Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transfer On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:22 AM William Beaty wrote: > On Sat, 8 Aug 2020, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > I agree its not clear what I meant.. I was intending to note that the > form > > of the energy being transmitted was avoided in the presentation. > > HA! They can't say "megawatts of RADIATION. It's jsut microwaves, > broadcast at exactly the same frequency as your kitchen soup-nuker box." > The natives would come after them with pitchforks (torches only needed if > at night.) > > But it's OK! Since its non-ionizing radiation! And, it's not on land, and > only sent above water. So it cooks migratory waterfowl. And cooks > pleasure boats who aren't aware of what that long mysterious row of > floating "danger buoys" actually means. > > ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) > William J. Beaty https://electricatechnology.com > beat...@gmail.comCTO, Inventor, Research Engineer > bi...@amasci.com > 206-762-3818 vm5459 Wilkinson Rd, Langley, WA 98260-8700 >
RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: I agree its not clear what I meant.. I was intending to note that the form of the energy being transmitted was avoided in the presentation. HA! They can't say "megawatts of RADIATION. It's jsut microwaves, broadcast at exactly the same frequency as your kitchen soup-nuker box." The natives would come after them with pitchforks (torches only needed if at night.) But it's OK! Since its non-ionizing radiation! And, it's not on land, and only sent above water. So it cooks migratory waterfowl. And cooks pleasure boats who aren't aware of what that long mysterious row of floating "danger buoys" actually means. ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) William J. Beaty https://electricatechnology.com beat...@gmail.comCTO, Inventor, Research Engineer bi...@amasci.com 206-762-3818 vm5459 Wilkinson Rd, Langley, WA 98260-8700
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
Safe - Emrod uses beams in the ISM (Industrial, Scientific, and Medical) band with frequencies commonly used in WiFi, Bluetooth, and RfID. - Point-to-Point transmission means that power is beamed directly between two points. There is no radiation around the beam, as there is with high voltage wire transmission. - Low power laser safety curtain ensures that the transmission beam immediately shuts down before any transient object (such as a bird or helicopter) can reach the main beam ensuring it never touches anything except clean air. - Reduces electrocution risk associated with wires https://emrod.energy/wireless-power/ >
RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
Rpbin— I agree its not clear what I meant.. I was intending to note that the form of the energy being transmitted was avoided in the presentation. For example, was it EM radiation that carried the energy, a neutrino beam of kinetic energy or what? Bob From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 2:33 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:26:41 +: Hi Bob, [snip] >Note how carefully the item avoids any mention of how the energy occurs for >fear of immediate necessity for classification. What do you mean by "occurs"? They talk about using renewable energy as the source, and transmission in the radio spectrum (2.5 GHz? - a guess on my part). > >Bob Cook
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:26:41 +: Hi Bob, [snip] >Note how carefully the item avoids any mention of how the energy occurs for >fear of immediate necessity for classification. What do you mean by "occurs"? They talk about using renewable energy as the source, and transmission in the radio spectrum (2.5 GHz? - a guess on my part). > >Bob Cook
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:30:50 +: Hi Bob, [snip] >On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with >new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a >device to collect neutrino energy would be useful as a solar neutrino >collector like sunlight. As I have pointed out before on vortex, neutrino harvesting is impractical. The power density available is at most 80 W/m^2, while normal sunlight is about 1000 W/m^2 (at best, at the surface). To compound the problem, it is difficult (being generous) to extract neutrino energy, while there are plenty of relatively cheap methods available for capturing energy from sunlight.
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission--are neutrinos involved?
BoB. Randall Mills postulated an oscillating universe already 30 years ago based on space time expansion due to photon emission. This allowed him to predict that the universe in fact does expand! He also gave the very exact reason why this happens!! So I do not think that any of these astronomers are famous except for their ignorance of exact physics! Of course this prediction (current expansion) can only be made if you forget the faulty Einstein general relativity and switch to a more general space metric. As we know the universe is not dominated by gravity. A black hole is a magnetically bound mass as already Einstein 1933 did prove that based on gravity you cannot get a black hole. But as said : Most today's physicists are trained ignorants! J.W. On 07.08.2020 19:23, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: A recent which addresses angular momentum is the universe abd and extra dimensions is as follows: *Read the article* <https://quantamagazine.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0d6ddf7dc1a0b7297c8e06618=7ac7d42765=1c22739553> Bob Cook *From: *bobcook39...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> *Sent: *Friday, August 7, 2020 8:33 AM *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission--are neutrinos involved? I have often wondered about neutrino physics. Neutrinos carry a quanta of angular momentum and some energy whether in motion or apparently still with respect to an observer—a neutrino detector for example.. However the physics of the interaction is not defined very well. Empirical models do exist to allow prediction of Interactions with matter. The characteristic of neutrinos not to not display any EM quality is somewhat mysterious. (They are thought to be primary particles that stand alone in nature., present a small rest mass and thus be attracted in a gravitational field. At times I consider neutrinos to be like a dimension of space or merely a circulating space volume quanta with a fixed circulating (time quanta). And at a Planck length scale. My comments suggest the need for some work on a physical model that that is validated by experimental observations! Bob Cook *From: *bobcook39...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> *Sent: *Friday, August 7, 2020 7:30 AM *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission Robin== As you note a protective curtain makes directed energy beams impractical—birds would suffer as would moat any electronic equipment and/or energy absorbing medium that got into the beam. On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a device to collect neutrino energy would be useful as a solar neutrino collector like sunlight. Bob Cook Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 *From: *Robin <mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 5, 2020 12:42 PM *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip] -- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr. 22 8910 Affoltern am Albis +41 44 760 14 18 +41 79 246 36 06
RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
Directed EM energy beams have been around since the 60’s at least. To my knowledge gamma, x-ray and normal light all have been used in high energy medium and low energy transmission. The technology associated with the medium and high energy spectrum has been weaponized and is classified in most places. I am surprised about NZ. Note how carefully the item avoids any mention of how the energy occurs for fear of immediate necessity for classification. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 11:24 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission I read it but it seemed flakey. This could be closer to scam than to reality. No one really knows the loss-rate of wireless for high power uses or the dangers involved. There is not much reason to suspect that there is a breakthrough here nor that this makes either scientific or economic sense, other than the mention of Tesla, but since they apparently are not using Tesla as a reference - where is their data? On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 11:13:24 AM PDT, Michael Foster wrote: I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. Tesla is nowhere mentioned? This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% electric car fleet. Wireless power transmission, if really workable, would solve this problem. Autos themselves could be set up to receive the power transmission, thereby eliminating the requirement for such large batteries. On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 02:50:34 AM UTC, MJ mailto:feli...@gmail.com>> wrote: https://emrod.energy/press-release-nz-start-up-launches-world-first-long-range-wireless-power-transmission/
RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission--are neutrinos involved?
A recent which addresses angular momentum is the universe abd and extra dimensions is as follows: Read the article<https://quantamagazine.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0d6ddf7dc1a0b7297c8e06618=7ac7d42765=1c22739553> Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 8:33 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission--are neutrinos involved? I have often wondered about neutrino physics. Neutrinos carry a quanta of angular momentum and some energy whether in motion or apparently still with respect to an observer—a neutrino detector for example.. However the physics of the interaction is not defined very well. Empirical models do exist to allow prediction of Interactions with matter. The characteristic of neutrinos not to not display any EM quality is somewhat mysterious. (They are thought to be primary particles that stand alone in nature., present a small rest mass and thus be attracted in a gravitational field. At times I consider neutrinos to be like a dimension of space or merely a circulating space volume quanta with a fixed circulating (time quanta). And at a Planck length scale. My comments suggest the need for some work on a physical model that that is validated by experimental observations! Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 7:30 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission Robin== As you note a protective curtain makes directed energy beams impractical—birds would suffer as would moat any electronic equipment and/or energy absorbing medium that got into the beam. On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a device to collect neutrino energy would be useful as a solar neutrino collector like sunlight. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 12:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. >Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who >like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The >problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the >current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last >time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric >cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. >Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air >conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% >electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip]
RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission--are neutrinos involved?
I have often wondered about neutrino physics. Neutrinos carry a quanta of angular momentum and some energy whether in motion or apparently still with respect to an observer—a neutrino detector for example.. However the physics of the interaction is not defined very well. Empirical models do exist to allow prediction of Interactions with matter. The characteristic of neutrinos not to not display any EM quality is somewhat mysterious. (They are thought to be primary particles that stand alone in nature., present a small rest mass and thus be attracted in a gravitational field. At times I consider neutrinos to be like a dimension of space or merely a circulating space volume quanta with a fixed circulating (time quanta). And at a Planck length scale. My comments suggest the need for some work on a physical model that that is validated by experimental observations! Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 7:30 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission Robin== As you note a protective curtain makes directed energy beams impractical—birds would suffer as would moat any electronic equipment and/or energy absorbing medium that got into the beam. On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a device to collect neutrino energy would be useful as a solar neutrino collector like sunlight. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 12:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. >Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who >like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The >problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the >current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last >time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric >cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. >Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air >conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% >electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip]
RE: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
Robin== As you note a protective curtain makes directed energy beams impractical—birds would suffer as would moat any electronic equipment and/or energy absorbing medium that got into the beam. On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a device to collect neutrino energy would be useful as a solar neutrino collector like sunlight. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 12:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. >Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who >like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The >problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the >current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last >time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric >cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. >Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air >conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% >electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip]
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:28 PM Michael Foster wrote: ... > Similar methods have been proposed to send power to earth from orbiting solar cell arrays, and probably just as impractical. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/9/x-37b-space-planes-microwave-power-beam-experiment-is-a-way-bigger-deal-than-it-seems
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
I see what you mean. I was unaware of their focused beam method. OTOH, Tesla did invent radio as we know it , but no one seems to know that.. I'm not a slavish Tesla fan, but the history is reasonably clear. This system wouldn't solve the power distribution problem either, since the lack of enough copper happens at the lower voltage distribution level. Similar methods have been proposed to send power to earth from orbiting solar cell arrays, and probably just as impractical. Visions of birds and small aircraft being vaporized if they accidentally cross the beam come to mind. On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 07:42:44 PM UTC, Robin wrote: In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. >Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who >like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The >problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the >current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last >time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric >cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. >Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air >conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% >electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip]
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. >Tesla is nowhere mentioned? There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common. Tesla used the Earth as a capacitor so that everyone was "in" the capacitor, and attached to one of the plates. This company is using conventional wireless, but in a tight beam. > >This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who >like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The >problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the >current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last >time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric >cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. >Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air >conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% >electric car fleet. I doubt mobile applications of this technology would be possible, if there were that many targets that had to be followed with a tight beam. Besides, the beam is dangerous. Worse than sitting in a microwave oven. That's why they talk about remote areas, and a laser curtain to detect intrusion into the beam. It wouldn't be suitable for use within an urban environment. It could however be used to transport power from a remote power plant to the top of a tall construction on the outskirts of a city, although it would be difficult to keep light aircraft from crossing the beam I should imagine. [snip]
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:13 PM Michael Foster wrote: > I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that > Mr. Tesla is nowhere mentioned? > Hell yes! I bet they can't even spell Wardencliff! Don't need copper if everyone roofed their house with solar shingles! Cheers!
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
I read it but it seemed flakey. This could be closer to scam than to reality. No one really knows the loss-rate of wireless for high power uses or the dangers involved. There is not much reason to suspect that there is a breakthrough here nor that this makes either scientific or economic sense, other than the mention of Tesla, but since they apparently are not using Tesla as a reference - where is their data? On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 11:13:24 AM PDT, Michael Foster wrote: I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. Tesla is nowhere mentioned? This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% electric car fleet. Wireless power transmission, if really workable, would solve this problem. Autos themselves could be set up to receive the power transmission, thereby eliminating the requirement for such large batteries. On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 02:50:34 AM UTC, MJ wrote: https://emrod.energy/press-release-nz-start-up-launches-world-first-long-range-wireless-power-transmission/
Re: [Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr. Tesla is nowhere mentioned? This is important. No doubt everyone other than auto mechanics and people who like the hear the vroom-vroom would like to switch to electric cars. The problem is there doesn't seem to be enough copper wire to carry all the current required to charge all the batteries in all the electric cars. Last time I did some rough figuring, it seemed as if the maximum number of electric cars would be about 10% of all vehicles before the power grid was over taxed. Look at what happens when there are brown-outs on hot days. Those air conditioners don't draw anywhere near the current required to charge a 100% electric car fleet. Wireless power transmission, if really workable, would solve this problem. Autos themselves could be set up to receive the power transmission, thereby eliminating the requirement for such large batteries. On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 02:50:34 AM UTC, MJ wrote: https://emrod.energy/press-release-nz-start-up-launches-world-first-long-range-wireless-power-transmission/
[Vo]:[EE] Wireless power transmission
https://emrod.energy/press-release-nz-start-up-launches-world-first-long-range-wireless-power-transmission/
