Re: [Vo]: after, ISCMNS, ICCF article at Wikipedia up for deletion.
"no reliable sources" of course if you dismiss all sources as unreliable just because they mention the ICCF. * http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion * http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/08/04/the-state-of-the-cold-fusion-market/2/ * the ICCF is mentioned in the Nuclear Energy Encyclopedia published by Wiley. * http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.11/coldfusion_pr.html * http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/call-for-interdisciplinary-studies-in-cold-fusion/article1165494.ece On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > after ISCMNS, it is ICCF which is tagged for deletion > > I've made an article... > > > http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1638-ICCF-Wikipedia-article-called-for-deletion&p=5173#post5173 > > more details will be welcome... > > its starts to be ridiculous, and stinky. > > > 2013/4/19 Alan Fletcher > >> > From: "Jed Rothwell" >> > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:08:35 AM >> >> > Someone informed me that the ISCMNS article at Wikipedia is up for >> > deletion: >> > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Society_for_Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science >> > >> > I did not know there is an article on this. I consider this good >> > news. Wikipedia is a travesty. The less there is about cold fusion >> > in Wikipedia, the better. >> > >> > I wish I could persuade them to delete the articles on Cold Fusion >> > and Eugene Mallove. >> > >> > - Jed >> >> Result was delete. 3 voted for delete, 2 for merging three separate >> pages (ISCMNS,JSCMNS and a grant page), 1 comment >> I bet they tackle JSCMNS next. >> >> >
[Vo]: after, ISCMNS, ICCF article at Wikipedia up for deletion.
I had a go at correcting the Wikipedia article on Rossi's E-Cat and got topic banned for my trouble. Look at the "talk page" about three quarters down (Parallel) When I started, half the intro was a very negative piece lifted from a blog as a reliable source. The existing editors like AndyTheGrumo wouldn't even accept that there had been an independent test by Elforsk. In essence they are convinced that LENR is junk science and won't allow anything to appear that might be interpreted as supporting it. Mentioning any supporting evidence is discounted by calling it "debate". I hadn't realized just how bad Wikipedia was until I had this first hand experience.
[Vo]: after, ISCMNS, ICCF article at Wikipedia up for deletion.
after ISCMNS, it is ICCF which is tagged for deletion I've made an article... http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1638-ICCF-Wikipedia-article-called-for-deletion&p=5173#post5173 more details will be welcome... its starts to be ridiculous, and stinky. 2013/4/19 Alan Fletcher > > From: "Jed Rothwell" > > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:08:35 AM > > > Someone informed me that the ISCMNS article at Wikipedia is up for > > deletion: > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Society_for_Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science > > > > I did not know there is an article on this. I consider this good > > news. Wikipedia is a travesty. The less there is about cold fusion > > in Wikipedia, the better. > > > > I wish I could persuade them to delete the articles on Cold Fusion > > and Eugene Mallove. > > > > - Jed > > Result was delete. 3 voted for delete, 2 for merging three separate pages > (ISCMNS,JSCMNS and a grant page), 1 comment > I bet they tackle JSCMNS next. > >
