Re: [Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive
By all means, Abd, I'm asking -- on list. Please show the list what you mean. Is this the kind of treatment one can expect from Vortex-L? I don't see anyone else getting such disrespect, not even Mary Yugo when she was directly operating against the list's rules. So, yes, please explain what you mean, in detail. Kevin O --- On Wed, 8/1/12, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive To: helloke...@sbcglobal.net, vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2012, 9:08 PM Mmmm looking at your posts, Kevin, I predict a site ban is coming. Not because of cold fusion, but because of your own lack of restraint. You really describe the problem in your comment here. Kevin, if you want to effectively represent cold fusion to the world, please grow up. If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you are welcome to ask, on or off-list. By the way, you are indeed dealing with pseudoskeptics. So? What else would you expect? At 03:52 PM 8/1/2012, helloke...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Hello Jed: Yes, that was me. I posted a lot of Cold Fusion articles over the last 3 years, starting from before Rossi arriving on the scene. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articleshttp://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles I put up with a lot of abuse from the skeptopath crowd, especially due to Rossi pulling his showmanship shenanigans. I was operating with my hands behind my back, because I would call the skeptopaths seagulls. It was an effective countermeasure to their constant derision. It was also an accurate representation of the scientific value of their 'contributions'. The admin moderator told me to stop calling them that. I gather I hurt their feelings. But the admin moderator continued to allow all kinds of stalking, disrupting, personal attacks and distortions from the anti-LENR crowd. Lately it's gotten worse. The moderator has started pulling threads entirely. Kevmo p.s. I missed a chance to meet KP Sinha when he was in town. He looked me up and called me. Unfortunately, that was the day that my car decided to go kablooey. Jed Rothwell Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:20:07 -0700 Hold it. This was the 2009 thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/postshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts Here is the recent one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/postshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/posts This is the Sinha ICCF-14 paper. What I mean by positive is, for example, where someone said this article is bunk someone else responded: This guy is a world class scientist with several articles published in peer reviewed journals, and it pulls only from classical physics. Explain how it is bunk. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive
Hello Jed: Yes, that was me. I posted a lot of Cold Fusion articles over the last 3 years, starting from before Rossi arriving on the scene. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles I put up with a lot of abuse from the skeptopath crowd, especially due to Rossi pulling his showmanship shenanigans. I was operating with my hands behind my back, because I would call the skeptopaths seagulls. It was an effective countermeasure to their constant derision. It was also an accurate representation of the scientific value of their 'contributions'. The admin moderator told me to stop calling them that. I gather I hurt their feelings. But the admin moderator continued to allow all kinds of stalking, disrupting, personal attacks and distortions from the anti-LENR crowd. Lately it's gotten worse. The moderator has started pulling threads entirely. Kevmo p.s. I missed a chance to meet KP Sinha when he was in town. He looked me up and called me. Unfortunately, that was the day that my car decided to go kablooey. Jed Rothwell Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:20:07 -0700 Hold it. This was the 2009 thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts Here is the recent one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/posts This is the Sinha ICCF-14 paper. What I mean by positive is, for example, where someone said this article is bunk someone else responded:This guy is a world class scientist with several articles published in peer reviewed journals, and it pulls only from classical physics. Explain how it is bunk.- Jed
Re: [Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive
Mmmm looking at your posts, Kevin, I predict a site ban is coming. Not because of cold fusion, but because of your own lack of restraint. You really describe the problem in your comment here. Kevin, if you want to effectively represent cold fusion to the world, please grow up. If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you are welcome to ask, on or off-list. By the way, you are indeed dealing with pseudoskeptics. So? What else would you expect? At 03:52 PM 8/1/2012, helloke...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Hello Jed: Yes, that was me. I posted a lot of Cold Fusion articles over the last 3 years, starting from before Rossi arriving on the scene. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articleshttp://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles I put up with a lot of abuse from the skeptopath crowd, especially due to Rossi pulling his showmanship shenanigans. I was operating with my hands behind my back, because I would call the skeptopaths seagulls. It was an effective countermeasure to their constant derision. It was also an accurate representation of the scientific value of their 'contributions'. The admin moderator told me to stop calling them that. I gather I hurt their feelings. But the admin moderator continued to allow all kinds of stalking, disrupting, personal attacks and distortions from the anti-LENR crowd. Lately it's gotten worse. The moderator has started pulling threads entirely. Kevmo p.s. I missed a chance to meet KP Sinha when he was in town. He looked me up and called me. Unfortunately, that was the day that my car decided to go kablooey. Jed Rothwell Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:20:07 -0700 Hold it. This was the 2009 thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/postshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts Here is the recent one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/postshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/posts This is the Sinha ICCF-14 paper. What I mean by positive is, for example, where someone said this article is bunk someone else responded: This guy is a world class scientist with several articles published in peer reviewed journals, and it pulls only from classical physics. Explain how it is bunk. - Jed
[Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive
The right-wing Free Republic blog occasionally covers cold fusion. A recent set of comments there seems to be more positive than previous ones. See: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive
Hold it. This was the 2009 thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts Here is the recent one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/posts This is the Sinha ICCF-14 paper. What I mean by positive is, for example, where someone said this article is bunk someone else responded: This guy is a world class scientist with several articles published in peer reviewed journals, and it pulls only from classical physics. Explain how it is bunk. - Jed
