Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
How do we make it stronger? Vibrate a Bose condensate. In my language, "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the Electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is Vibrated at a Dimensional Frequency of 1.094 megahertz meters". ***Frank, on another thread http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89493.html I proposed a 1dimensional BEC. I assumed that the BEC was vibrating. If your theory were condensed down to 1Dimensional physics, it could be mathematically and experimentally elegant. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:07 AM, wrote: > Thank you Fran. Theories such as Storm's theory of cracks and Widdom > Larson's theory are based on conventional thinking applied under an extreme > condition. These theories consider only the static Coulombic force and the > static strong nuclear force. Even mills with his exotic hydrions considers > only the static forces. As in the battle between Kann and Kirk; Kirk > defeated Kann by his three dimensional thinking. There is another force at > work in the nucleus. They cannot account for the lack of high energy > emissions. > > I am an electric engineer. The only thing I have ever done with the > static electric field is to rub a balloon on my head and stick to to the > wall. I have, however, worked extensively with the dynamic magnetic > component of the electrical field. This is second nature for an electrical > engineer. There is a dynamic magnetic component of the nuclear force. > Its called the spin orbit force. Like the electro-magnetic force; it is > not conserved and can increase without bound. It tends to flip nucleons > and induce a beta decay. How do we make it stronger? Vibrate a Bose > condensate. In my language, "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the > Electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is Vibrated at a Dimensional > Frequency of 1.094 megahertz meters". > > The motion constants are related to motion. Motion is carried by the > magnetic components of the static force fields. Why that speed? When the > velocity of nuclear cluster equals the velocity of sound in the nucleus and > impedance matched condition emerges. This is the condition of the quantum > jump. The quantum condition of the atom emerged from an analysis of this > speed. An extrapolation produced low level nuclear reactions. I believe > that is a big story and that it goes way beyond cold fusion. It has > produced the quantum condition as a subset of the Newtonian mechanics and > it shows how to classically control all of the natural forces. > > The solutions are simple and require only the simple harmonic motion of > advanced high school physics. > > Frank > > > Frank Znidarsic > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roarty, Francis X > To: vortex-l > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 12:17 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > Frank.. > > Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of > antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] > > > > I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the > back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the > claims of Eugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the > environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk > magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I > think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational > effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will > soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved...like > we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently > these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor > placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down > the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as > opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas > becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present > additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or > catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector > and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial > bias. Fran > > > > > > *From:* fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation > for LENR > > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion > > theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size a
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
I consider a magnetic field the consequence of a time changing electric field. The electromagnetic effects that we experience depend upon which observation frame we happen to occupy. This is demonstrated by considering how a charged particle appears to a stationary or moving observer at some distant point in 3 dimensional space. One sees nothing but an electric field, the other records a combination of magnetic and electric fields. Both are valid measurements. Dave -Original Message- From: MarkI-Zeropoint To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 7:17 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR "No one ever wrote an equation that conserves magnetic flux." In order to determine if something is conserved when it can be transformed into different forms, you HAVE to be able to MEASURE how much of EACH different form is present... It only APPEARS as if mag-flux is not conserved... The mag-field is the physical manifestation of a polarization of the vacuum (ZPF or Zero Point Field), and we have no way to measure the local amount of vacuum, so you can't tell whether its conserved or not. -mark On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:58 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: I don't know if anyone is now interested in this. Its old stuff. If you watch Walter Lewin at MIT Academic Earth he says often the the magnetic force is non-conservative. Energy and momentum are conserved in equations. No one ever wrote an equation that conserves magnetic flux. This just goes without saying. I, however, say it loudly in my published works. The only things that are not conserved are inertial mass and magnetic flux. They are related as magnetic fields carries the inertial mass of moving stuff. Electrical engineers employ soft iron to increase the magnetic force. Soft iron increase the flux produced by a coil by a factor of about 10,000. I found the soft iron equivalent for the other forces. Its a vibrating Bose condensate. Frank -Original Message- From: Chris Zell To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 3:30 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR What where did this emergent inductance come from? More magnetism that came from nothing. I was upset, this would make the test harder. Magnetism is not a conserved force. Somethings it springs out of nowhere. This is a general property of all of the magnetic force s. The above interests me but are there any specifics on this, especially published papers?
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
"No one ever wrote an equation that conserves magnetic flux." In order to determine if something is conserved when it can be transformed into different forms, you HAVE to be able to MEASURE how much of EACH different form is present... It only APPEARS as if mag-flux is not conserved... The mag-field is the physical manifestation of a polarization of the vacuum (ZPF or Zero Point Field), and we have no way to measure the local amount of vacuum, so you can't tell whether its conserved or not. -mark On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:58 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: I don't know if anyone is now interested in this. Its old stuff. If you watch Walter Lewin at MIT Academic Earth he says often the the magnetic force is non-conservative. Energy and momentum are conserved in equations. No one ever wrote an equation that conserves magnetic flux. This just goes without saying. I, however, say it loudly in my published works. The only things that are not conserved are inertial mass and magnetic flux. They are related as magnetic fields carries the inertial mass of moving stuff. Electrical engineers employ soft iron to increase the magnetic force. Soft iron increase the flux produced by a coil by a factor of about 10,000. I found the soft iron equivalent for the other forces. Its a vibrating Bose condensate. Frank -Original Message- From: Chris Zell To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 3:30 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR What where did this emergent inductance come from? More magnetism that came from nothing. I was upset, this would make the test harder. Magnetism is not a conserved force. Somethings it springs out of nowhere. This is a general property of all of the magnetic force s. The above interests me but are there any specifics on this, especially published papers?
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
I don't know if anyone is now interested in this. Its old stuff. If you watch Walter Lewin at MIT Academic Earth he says often the the magnetic force is non-conservative. Energy and momentum are conserved in equations. No one ever wrote an equation that conserves magnetic flux. This just goes without saying. I, however, say it loudly in my published works. The only things that are not conserved are inertial mass and magnetic flux. They are related as magnetic fields carries the inertial mass of moving stuff. Electrical engineers employ soft iron to increase the magnetic force. Soft iron increase the flux produced by a coil by a factor of about 10,000. I found the soft iron equivalent for the other forces. Its a vibrating Bose condensate. Frank -Original Message- From: Chris Zell To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 3:30 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR What where did this emergent inductance come from? More magnetism that came from nothing. I was upset, this would make the test harder. Magnetism is not a conserved force. Somethings it springs out of nowhere. This is a general property of all of the magnetic force s. The above interests me but are there any specifics on this, especially published papers?
RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
What where did this emergent inductance come from? More magnetism that came from nothing. I was upset, this would make the test harder. Magnetism is not a conserved force. Somethings it springs out of nowhere. This is a general property of all of the magnetic force s. The above interests me but are there any specifics on this, especially published papers?
Fwd: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
I have had a different experience than a nuclear engineer. When I was just out of high school I was building unlicensed radio transmitters. I had an old radio with a tuning eye. I had one transmitter that when I turned it all the radio's eye wrapped twice around. I got scared and gave it up. Who knows how much power I was putting out from that large tube. My did would be mad if I got arrested! Skip ahead a few years and there I was in college sitting in Richard Bender's electronics class. He was going over the air core transformer. I was interested. I had made these things for my radio transmitter. Richard said, The inductance = the inductance of the primary + the inductance of the secondary + a third mutual inductance. What where did this emergent inductance come from? More magnetism that came from nothing. I was upset, this would make the test harder. Magnetism is not a conserved force. Somethings it springs out of nowhere. This is a general property of all of the magnetic forces. Much later in life I realized that it was also a property of the nuclear magnetic spin orbit force. The mutual nuclear magnetic force can be, under the right conditions be 10 exp 39 power greater than the normal spin orbit force. The same property applies to the gravitomangetic force. I started picking up on this after speaking with David Noever. Nuclear physicists would say that the range of the spin orbit force is only that of the strong force. In an electrical conductor the static electrical forces balance. There is no static electrical force emerging from the conductor. Yet there it is, on its own, a strong magnetic field. The same applies to the spin orbit force. It range is an affect of the construction of the conductor. It this case its a proton conductor not an electron conductor. Frank
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
Thank you Fran. Theories such as Storm's theory of cracks and Widdom Larson's theory are based on conventional thinking applied under an extreme condition. These theories consider only the static Coulombic force and the static strong nuclear force. Even mills with his exotic hydrions considers only the static forces. As in the battle between Kann and Kirk; Kirk defeated Kann by his three dimensional thinking. There is another force at work in the nucleus. They cannot account for the lack of high energy emissions. I am an electric engineer. The only thing I have ever done with the static electric field is to rub a balloon on my head and stick to to the wall. I have, however, worked extensively with the dynamic magnetic component of the electrical field. This is second nature for an electrical engineer. There is a dynamic magnetic component of the nuclear force. Its called the spin orbit force. Like the electro-magnetic force; it is not conserved and can increase without bound. It tends to flip nucleons and induce a beta decay. How do we make it stronger? Vibrate a Bose condensate. In my language, "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the Electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is Vibrated at a Dimensional Frequency of 1.094 megahertz meters". The motion constants are related to motion. Motion is carried by the magnetic components of the static force fields. Why that speed? When the velocity of nuclear cluster equals the velocity of sound in the nucleus and impedance matched condition emerges. This is the condition of the quantum jump. The quantum condition of the atom emerged from an analysis of this speed. An extrapolation produced low level nuclear reactions. I believe that is a big story and that it goes way beyond cold fusion. It has produced the quantum condition as a subset of the Newtonian mechanics and it shows how to classically control all of the natural forces. The solutions are simple and require only the simple harmonic motion of advanced high school physics. Frank Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: Roarty, Francis X To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 12:17 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR Frank.. Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the claims ofEugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved…like we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial bias. Fran From: fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound in the nucleus. What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the electronic structure. Your get: The energy levels of all of the atoms. The intensity of spectral emission. The enegy and the frequency of the photon The S,P,D, and F orbits. A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. The deBroglie wave. extrapolate and get: The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: fznidarsic To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am Subject: Re: [
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
Terahertz stimulation is the photon frequency that produces the lowest resistive loss in plasmonic energy concentration using metal nanoparticles. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Frank.. > > Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of > antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] > > > > I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the > back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the > claims of Eugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the > environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk > magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I > think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational > effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will > soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved...like > we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently > these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor > placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down > the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as > opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas > becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present > additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or > catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector > and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial > bias. Fran > > > > > > > > *From:* fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation > for LENR > > > > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion > > theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity > 1,094,000 > > meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear > > Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. > > > > > > > > > > What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound > in the nucleus. > > > > > > What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the > electronic structure. > > > > Your get: > > > > The energy levels of all of the atoms. > > The intensity of spectral emission. > > The enegy and the frequency of the photon > > The S,P,D, and F orbits. > > A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. > > The deBroglie wave. > > > > extrapolate and get: > > > > The technology of antigravity > > and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. > > > > > > > > Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" > > > > > > > > Frank Znidarsic > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: fznidarsic > To: vortex-l > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > "a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" > > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the > Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity > 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of > the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. > > > > > > http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 > > > > Frank Znidarsic > > -Original Message- > From: Jones Beene > To: vortex-l > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am > Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > > > > > *From:* Ron Kita > > > > I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but > > I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell > > citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the > > LENR reaction: > > > > > http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > Thanks for posting this. It confirms what we have been talking about in > related threads about the connection between intense THz and the SPP as the > active modality. > > > > In the HotCat - it appears that Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of > how to get coherent radiation in this spectrum (where lasers are simply not > available) by using a monochromatic emitter of FIR (far infrared), and then > merely applying resistance heat to that emitter. Once the emitter comes up > to temperature, the energy needed to maintain it drops by a large factor - > thus providing control. That temperature is near the runaway temp- so added > control is needed. > > > > Maybe I am giving Rossi more credit than he is due. >
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
Frank.. Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the claims of Eugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved…like we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial bias. Fran From: fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound in the nucleus. What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the electronic structure. Your get: The energy levels of all of the atoms. The intensity of spectral emission. The enegy and the frequency of the photon The S,P,D, and F orbits. A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. The deBroglie wave. extrapolate and get: The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: fznidarsic mailto:fznidar...@aol.com>> To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR "a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: Jones Beene mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR From: Ron Kita I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the LENR reaction: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane Hi Ron, Thanks for posting this. It confirms what we have been talking about in related threads about the connection between intense THz and the SPP as the active modality. In the HotCat – it appears that Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of how to get coherent radiation in this spectrum (where lasers are simply not available) by using a monochromatic emitter of FIR (far infrared), and then merely applying resistance heat to that emitter. Once the emitter comes up to temperature, the energy needed to maintain it drops by a large factor – thus providing control. That temperature is near the runaway temp- so added control is needed. Maybe I am giving Rossi more credit than he is due.
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound in the nucleus. What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the electronic structure. Your get: The energy levels of all of the atoms. The intensity of spectral emission. The enegy and the frequency of the photon The S,P,D, and F orbits. A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. The deBroglie wave. extrapolate and get: The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: fznidarsic To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR "a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: Jones Beene To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR From:Ron Kita I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR postsbut I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed toinitate the LENR reaction: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane Hi Ron, Thanks for posting this.It confirms what we have been talking about in related threads about theconnection between intense THz and the SPP as the active modality. In the HotCat – it appearsthat Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of how to get coherent radiation inthis spectrum (where lasers are simply not available) by using a monochromaticemitter of FIR (far infrared), and then merely applying resistance heat to thatemitter. Once the emitter comes up to temperature, the energy needed to maintainit drops by a large factor – thus providing control. That temperature isnear the runaway temp- so added control is needed. Maybe I am giving Rossimore credit than he is due.
Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
"a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: Jones Beene To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR From:Ron Kita I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR postsbut I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed toinitate the LENR reaction: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane Hi Ron, Thanks for posting this.It confirms what we have been talking about in related threads about theconnection between intense THz and the SPP as the active modality. In the HotCat – it appearsthat Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of how to get coherent radiation inthis spectrum (where lasers are simply not available) by using a monochromaticemitter of FIR (far infrared), and then merely applying resistance heat to thatemitter. Once the emitter comes up to temperature, the energy needed to maintainit drops by a large factor – thus providing control. That temperature isnear the runaway temp- so added control is needed. Maybe I am giving Rossimore credit than he is due.
RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
From: Ron Kita I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the LENR reaction: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a -nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane Hi Ron, Thanks for posting this. It confirms what we have been talking about in related threads about the connection between intense THz and the SPP as the active modality. In the HotCat - it appears that Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of how to get coherent radiation in this spectrum (where lasers are simply not available) by using a monochromatic emitter of FIR (far infrared), and then merely applying resistance heat to that emitter. Once the emitter comes up to temperature, the energy needed to maintain it drops by a large factor - thus providing control. That temperature is near the runaway temp- so added control is needed. Maybe I am giving Rossi more credit than he is due.
[Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
Greetings Vortex-L, I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the LENR reaction: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane I am probably the last to know this. Respectfully, Ron Kita, Chiralex Doylestown PA 18901
