Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
Axil: Hasn't the existence of this attractive force been disproven? http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012arXiv1205.4922B On Novel attractive forces between ions in quantum plasmas -- failure of linearized quantum hydrodynamics Bonitz, M.; Pehlke, E.; Schoof, T. eprint arXiv:1205.4922 In a recent letter [P.K. Shukla and B. Eliasson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 165007 (2012)] the discovery of a new attractive force between protons in a hydrogen plasma was reported that would be responsible for the formation of molecules and of a proton lattice. Here we show, based on ab initio density functional theory calculations, that these predictions are wrong and caused by using linearized quantum hydrodynamics beyond the limits of its applicability. Keywords: Physics - Plasma Physics, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics -Kevmo --- On Wed, 9/12/12, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 11:10 AM This increase in conductivity is casued by the formation of cooper pairs of protons through the action of thr Shukla-Eliasson Attractive Force. See my last post - Friedel oscillations Cheers: Axil
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: In either case, we might have a peculiar state in which bulk material (e.g. Celani's wire) is intermittently (patchily) superconductive along the path of current flow. This might be observed as a sort of average, i.e. a decrease in resistance across the bulk material just as Celani is reporting. Abd noted a few months ago that there is often a marked decrease in resitivity in Pd/D experiments when anomalous heat is observed. The thread is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg67322.html Eric
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
Thanks, Lou. In Larsen's slide 8, he wonders: Just before 'going nuclear', does 'patch' become an evanescent HTSC? Now these fractal HTSC links you have provided discuss behaviors that occur on scales vastly larger than nanoscale, but smaller than bulk materials. In either case, we might have a peculiar state in which bulk material (e.g. Celani's wire) is intermittently (patchily) superconductive along the path of current flow. This might be observed as a sort of average, i.e. a decrease in resistance across the bulk material just as Celani is reporting. Or so I wonder. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:36 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html Fractals make better superconductors http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593 Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf X-rays control disorder in superconductor http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor Fractals boost superconductivity http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
The Shukla-Eliasson (SE) force is one of the main actors in cold fusion.
The other is charge screening which is the triggering process .
Also high electric charge concentration produces degenerate electrons.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.0914
Clustering of Ions at Atomic-Dimensions in Quantum Plasmas
IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we have carried out particle simulations to demonstrate
clustering of ions due to the newly found SE attractive force arising from
collective interactions between ensembles of degenerate electrons that
shield ions in HED quantum plasmas. Specially, the SE attractive force
leads to clustering/condensation or coagulation of ions in the absence of
an external conning potential for charged particles.
*This part is very important to cold fusion.*
We believe that the formation of ion clusters are going to play valuable
roles in the area of compressed plasmas with degenerate electrons [42, 47,
48] for ICF to succeed, and also in the emerging eld of nano-material
sciences (e.g. nanodiodes, metallic nanostructures for thin films [30],
nanowires, tabletop quantum free-electron- lasers [49{51] to be used as
tunable coherent radiation sources for practical applications), where
closely-packed ions will lend support to enhanced fusion probabilities
(with anomalous fusion crosssections) for controlled thermonuclear ICF, and
may also influence the electric properties (e.g. resistivity) of new
super-condensed plasma materials. Specially, we stress that the Cooper
pairing of ions at atomic dimensions shall provide possibility of novel
superconducting plasma based nanotechnology, since the electron transport
in nanostructures would be rapid due to shortened distances between ions in
the presence of the novel SE attractive force.
Cheers: Axil
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Jeff,
The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I
believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena.
It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity
seen in fractal materials - e.g.,
High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html
Fractals make better superconductors
http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593
Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf
X-rays control disorder in superconductor
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor
Fractals boost superconductivity
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
To answer my own question: yes, here
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item
(3)
of the numbered list.
Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical
resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is
an
interesting coincidence.
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative
temperature
coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed
wires
begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ...
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs)
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen
-- or at --
http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen#
- proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface
plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the
interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively
oscillating protons.
Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in -
Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser
pulses
http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf
- since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m
(p.293)
-- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
- proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. snip They are getting closer. Next they must dump the neutrons and define the velocity of the collective oscillation as one million meters per second. At that velocity the impedance of the nuclear and electronic sites is matched. Frank Znidarsic
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
For any here puzzled- Pointing out the obvious: If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which temperature rise is causing at the same time, you get non-monotonic resistivity vs temp. Ol' Bab On 9/12/2012 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html Fractals make better superconductors http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593 Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf X-rays control disorder in superconductor http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor Fractals boost superconductivity http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
This increase in conductivity is casued by the formation of cooper pairs of protons through the action of thr Shukla-Eliasson Attractive Force. See my last post - Friedel oscillations Cheers: Axil On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.comwrote: For any here puzzled- Pointing out the obvious: If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which temperature rise is causing at the same time, you get non-monotonic resistivity vs temp. Ol' Bab On 9/12/2012 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt http://www.nature.com/nature/**journal/v466/n7308/full/**466825a.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html Fractals make better superconductors http://www.nanotech-now.com/**news.cgi?story_id=39593http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593 Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors http://www.stealthskater.com/**Documents/Fractals_04.pdfhttp://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf X-rays control disorder in superconductor http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2011/aug/31/x-** rays-control-disorder-in-**superconductorhttp://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor Fractals boost superconductivity http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2010/aug/13/**fractals-boost-* *superconductivityhttp://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/**CelaniFcunimnallo.pdfhttp://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdfon page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/**lewisglarsenhttp://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/**slideshow/embed_code/14256059?** hostedIn=slidesharereferer=**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.** net%2Flewisglarsen#http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/**DombiLPB27_291.pdfhttp://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
Also if you go to the later slides in the presentation Lou originally posted, there is some mention of experimental evidence for something like non-monotonic resistivity - it may be described as wild swings (?) on the slide). I haven't searched the archive for the reference(s). Jeff On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: This increase in conductivity is casued by the formation of cooper pairs of protons through the action of thr Shukla-Eliasson Attractive Force. See my last post - Friedel oscillations Cheers: Axil On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.comwrote: For any here puzzled- Pointing out the obvious: If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which temperature rise is causing at the same time, you get non-monotonic resistivity vs temp. Ol' Bab On 9/12/2012 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt http://www.nature.com/nature/**journal/v466/n7308/full/**466825a.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html Fractals make better superconductors http://www.nanotech-now.com/**news.cgi?story_id=39593http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593 Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors http://www.stealthskater.com/**Documents/Fractals_04.pdfhttp://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf X-rays control disorder in superconductor http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2011/aug/31/x-** rays-control-disorder-in-**superconductorhttp://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor Fractals boost superconductivity http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2010/aug/13/**fractals-boost- **superconductivityhttp://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/**CelaniFcunimnallo.pdfhttp://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdfon page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/**lewisglarsenhttp://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/**slideshow/embed_code/14256059?** hostedIn=slidesharereferer=**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.** net%2Flewisglarsen#http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/**DombiLPB27_291.pdfhttp://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
David, I agree. If the resistance fluctuates under constant potential, transient superconductivity, or ballistic conduction may be occuring. If the resistance follows the same deterministic non-monotonic path each time the voltage is swept, then maybe something like Esaki-diode (differential) negative resistance is happening. -- LP David L Babcock wrote: For any here puzzled- Pointing out the obvious: If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which temperature rise is causing at the same time, you get non-monotonic resistivity vs temp. Ol' Bab On 9/12/2012 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html Fractals make better superconductors http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593 Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf X-rays control disorder in superconductor http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor Fractals boost superconductivity http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
[Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR
Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html Fractals make better superconductors http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593 Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf X-rays control disorder in superconductor http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor Fractals boost superconductivity http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting coincidence. Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively oscillating protons. Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser pulses http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m (p.293) -- Lou Pagnucco
