FW: [Vo]:TIME-MOBIUS AEON replace 'TimeLineariltyAge'
Apology: The excessive 'caps' are a personal cross referencing device. I tend to think 'spherical to a centre-point.' Most human language (including mathmatic-script) is obiously mono-directional reflecting 'Time-linear' logic perforce. Spherical-to-centre logic is 'Gestalt-logic' and obviously(again) awkward to express in 'Time-linear' script. Usually my articles(at best) tend to 'spiral-to the-centre;' on a good day and the 'point begins to become blurred to the observer; who has (resonably lost patience) with the whole affair. Yea I know, what good is the quirkily-unique point of view of a 'savant' (even if valid) if nobody else can follow it.~;-) I get that. I IS fair for a 'formal' paper to conform to more 'Time-Linear' script conventions, but per my apologies, when I'm 'thinking out-loud' on the key-board, the whole affair tends to reflect my routine Time-Mobius/Spherical logic tendencies. My reply on 'Gravitons' follows. Disclaimer: GRAVITONs /or TACHYONs as 'particles' concept=fictional particle(s) 'not' virtually-fictional. REF: GRAVION-TACHYON Carrier-Wave: Posit: Our relatively 'low-energy-density' spectrum-range Universe is a Bubble within a 'hyper'/much higher energy density 'dark-energy space' medium with I have of late trying to shorten to AexoBlackSpace. AexoBlackSpace at its lowest energy density spectrum-plateau would correlate to the nexial-eye of a Black-Hole Singularity in 'our' space-time normal bubble-universe. Thus the idea that I am trying to express is that our bubble-universe arises (is inflated) via a common event in AexoBlackSpace's hyper-fractallating super-currents. The concept of the big-bang is that in the eye of a AexoBlackSpace fractal-toroid(supermaelstrom to us) that a low-pressure virtual 'pin-point' is created specifically at a speed-density below the Base-Ambient-Speed-Density plateau of AexoBlackSpace at the centre which graduates paroxismally into a egress-singularity which the 'Big-Bang' White-hole which subsequently 'inflates/creates' our Universe. . . yadda-yadda, nuff said here. I have been using the extended term for AexoBlackSpace(which is also Parallel-Adjacent DarkEnergy Space) as Gravion-Tachyon(speed) AexoCarrier-Wave which (theoretically to my model) 'carries' ALL other Wave lengths in the Omni-Spectrum-Contiguity. This Gravion-Tachyon(speed) Aexo-Carrier-Wave would be the 'definition' of the ubiquitously infinitely permeating Super-M-Brane 'connective-tissue' so to speak. I have extended the argument to 'define' GRAVITY as an Electro-Plasmic Phenomenon that is rooted and based in the existence of the Gravion Tachyon(speed) Aexo-Carrier-Wave. Admittedly I confusingly 'trade' the word descriptors 'back forth' within my work, mostly relative to my own personal thought emphasis at the instant that I write it. And for 'communication' this is also 'not' helpful I realise. Ciao-Jack- From: orionwo...@charter.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:TIME-MOBIUS AEON replace 'TimeLineariltyAge' Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:27:30 -0600 Jack sez: ... We have thusly entered the TIME-MOBIUS INVERSE EVOLUTIONARY PERIOD of the PHOENIX PLANETARY EPIC. . . hold on to your butts. . .WE are just beginning ONE HELL OF RIDE! ! ! -Jack Harbach O'Sullivan- ... I see that Terry has already mentioned the excessive caps issue. As for me: Does any of your literature have anything to do with claims that our solar system is about to pass through the galactic ecliptic? BTW, do you know what a graviton-tachyon-wave is? I sure don't. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks _ Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
Re: FW: [Vo]:TIME-MOBIUS AEON replace 'TimeLineariltyAge'
Hello Jack Thanks for toning down the CAPs prose. You seem to be aware of the fact that your writing has a tendency to barrage the reader with a lot of confusing terminology - some of that terminology, I confess, I've never hear of. One needs a Harbach-O'Sullivan glossary in order to understand all the yadda-yadda stuff. However, you are aware of your short comings and that makes points in my book. Nobody is perfect! Certainly not me. As Terry has previously commented, I too have a difficult time following the flow of your logic. I hasten to add, however, that my own intellectual predilections tend to gravitate towards mythic interpretations. To compensate, I often try to communicate with my fellow colleagues by following the rules of linear oriented techno-speak in order to stay grounded. I see a lot of personal interpretation of what reality is supposed to be made up of in your prose. My perception of what you're writing strikes me less as scientific theory or hypothesis in the making, and more as modern mythic interpretations of our perceptions of reality, where you use a rich word-salad of technical terminology to couch the mysterious underpinnings of Mother Nature. I hasten to add that writing in the style of modern mythic prose is NOT in itself a bad thing. Far from it. Problems only occur when mythic interpretation (which IMHO are just as valid a perception as scientific interpretations) get confused as being a scientific interpretation. IMHO, we need... our society needs both perceptions in order to evolve. They need each other. BTW, I'm a recovering dyslexic. I constantly battle against inflicting turgid prose amongst my potential readers. Some days... some posts are better than others. You have my sympathies. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
