I posted and Jones Beene replied;
I attempted to start a thread several weeks ago. Two physicists claim
that they have developed a laser stimulation method which is isotope
specific.
Are you sure they are physicists?
Yes, my friend is talking to them. One is an astrophysicist, one is a
nuclear physicist, and the third is a metallurgical chemist. I told
my friend that you were interested in using their methods in energy
production and give him your email address.
I know it is supposed to come off as a spontaneous interview, but
there are a number of such obvious errors that no high school
physics student would make.
I thought they were doing good until they attempted to explain how
the charged metal atoms brought about DNA
They sound more like snake oil salesmen than physicists.
I understand why you would feel that way Jones, it depends on whether
or not The Water relieves the symptoms of degenerative illness. There
are various indices of aging, which it is our intention to reverse,
these indices are the ultimate proof of their claims.
That turned me off initially to the extent that, as my grandmother
used to say, if you can't say anything nice then don't say
anything... But you asked why, and you deserve an answer. These are
not scientists.
The particular frequency charges the atoms. When two
solutions of charged atoms are combined, the atoms combine. By
selecting the proper atoms, one should be able to produce what ever
element you want. I can think of one particular element, the
production of which would allow me to finance what ever research
tickled my fancy.
I can't express in words how ridiculous this sounds on its surface.
They claim to have synthesized specific isotopes of what ever
elements they want to produce. They are claiming the same thing that
your are, changing one element into another.
Coming from one (me) who is never shy about throwing out outlandish
ideas, and doesn't mind well-directed criticism, those two should
consider this assessment of their work to be especially damning...
unless, of course, it is just semantic problems. Some of the better
physicits are poor writers and even poorer speakers. Are there any
real experiments that they can show? These don't lie. Without some
basis in experiment, why waste our time?
If they hadn't claimed to be able to combine atoms, I wouldn't have
posted this.
I was hoping to get some of you to read the article and tell me what
you think of what they say. I'm wondering how quantum state, which I
assume corresponds to the charge on the electrons correlates with a
specific isotope.
Thomas, quantum mechanics is fairly complicated material and it
wouldn't do it justice to try to explain it in a quick post.
I realize that. What I'm trying to understand is this; is it your
opinion that the fusion of the two atoms is a result of aligning the
movement of the electrons critical to initiating the fusion? Do you
think that aligning the electrons is critical to overcoming the
coulomb barrier?
Given the 35% efficiency of conventional
electric generating plants, that's very good. I noted with interest
Any decent flux of charged particles will be poised to give very
high efficiency, because if you think about it, the moving charges
are just like electrical cuurent anyway, so all one needs to do is
to separate them.
Interesting way to look at it.
There's nothing like electrical production to give a no B S
indication of energy output.
On that not you are exactly correct!!
This undoubtedly is the future direction for LENR researchers who
want to avoid the calorimetry quicksand.
I had no idea that calorimetry was such a black art until I listened
to you people talk about it.
