RE: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[JonesBeene]

Neutron activation

The interesting question is this – can  dense hydrogen substitute for the 
neutron?

 i.e. “the virtual neutron”



From: Robin

In reply to  JonesBeene's message:

>Silver is very easily activated. That is one of its uses in industry.

What sort of activation are you referring to here?

[snip]

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Robin]

In reply to  JonesBeene's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:29:50 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Silver is very easily activated. That is one of its uses in industry.

What sort of activation are you referring to here?

[snip]

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

Silver in a D*-D* environment easily ( as we measured) mutates up to 
113Cd. But the activity is low!


But if - with H*-H* - it stays at 109Cd it's not so nice.

J.W.



On 20.12.2020 15:29, JonesBeene wrote:


Although the top tier claims of Mills’ IP portfolio are old and have 
now expired, he still must present a technology to investors which is 
ostensibly non-nuclear.


**

*It is very likely that the silver he was using became activated over 
time – despite all efforts to avoid that situation.*


**

*Silver is very easily activated. That is one of its uses in industry.*

**

*From: *Robin 

In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's

>I personally do not understand why we (Mills) only wants to

>produce H*-H* when in cold fusion this step is the most complicated 
one...


Mills wants nothing to do with CF. I suspect because it has a bad 
reputation according to the mainstream.



--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06

RE: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[JonesBeene]

Although the top tier claims of Mills’ IP portfolio are old and have now 
expired, he still must present a technology to investors which is ostensibly 
non-nuclear.

It is very likely that the silver he was using became activated over time – 
despite all efforts to avoid that situation.

Silver is very easily activated. That is one of its uses in industry.

From: Robin

In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's 
>I personally do not understand why we (Mills) only wants to 
>produce H*-H* when in cold fusion this step is the most complicated one...

Mills wants nothing to do with CF. I suspect because it has a bad reputation 
according to the mainstream.

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Robin]

In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 01:43:28 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>I personally do not understand why we (Mills) only wants to 
>produce H*-H* when in cold fusion this step is the most complicated one...

Mills wants nothing to do with CF. I suspect because it has a bad reputation 
according to the mainstream.

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

Robin,

This - self sustain mode - has nothing to do with even or odd numbers in 
the periodic table...


It depends all on the magnetic gamma states you can activate during 
fusion. That's why I said: Either you understand the physics of fusion 
or not.


We - since one year - have a clean picture of the "cold fusion 
mechanism". I personally do not understand why we (Mills) only wants to 
produce H*-H* when in cold fusion this step is the most complicated one...


Just three weeks ago I improved Mills electron proton fine structure 
formula (1420Mhz signal) by applying the proper SO(4) coupling constant. 
Now it's exact for 9 digits! So there is new(SO(4)) physics and improved 
old one (GUT-CP).


J.W.

On 20.12.2020 00:32, Robin wrote:

In reply to  Robin's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:14:27 +1100:
Hi,

When I pointed out the problem with Silver, I actually suggested Lanthanum 
instead, which has a melting point close to
that of Silver, but a much higher boiling point.



--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Robin]

In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:28:15 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Not using silver means  a self sustain mode is no longer possible...
>
>It's all about understanding physics or just believing to understand 
>physics...
>
>J.W.
Gallium is also an odd numbered element.

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Robin]

In reply to  Robin's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:14:27 +1100:
Hi,

When I pointed out the problem with Silver, I actually suggested Lanthanum 
instead, which has a melting point close to
that of Silver, but a much higher boiling point.

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

Not using silver means  a self sustain mode is no longer possible...

It's all about understanding physics or just believing to understand 
physics...


J.W.


On 19.12.2020 20:08, Robin wrote:

In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:37:29 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]

As for the near future, we can ask - is it coincidental that Mills has shifted 
gears and now does not promote silver as a catalyst? Nor does he ever mention 
the bomb. Is that in response to high level directives?

[snip]
AFAIK, his reason for not working much with Silver nowadays, is because I 
pointed out to him that the boiling point of
Silver was so much lower than the 3000C temperature that he was aiming for that 
Silver vapor would not condense to a
liquid again inside his reactor.
He then switched to Gallium which has a much higher boiling point.



--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Robin]

In reply to  Robin's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:08:05 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]

Upon checking I see that I was wrong. The boiling point of Gallium is not much 
higher, however the melting point is much
lower, which extends the temperature range between melting and boiling.

>In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:37:29 + (UTC):
>Hi Jones,
>[snip]
>>As for the near future, we can ask - is it coincidental that Mills has 
>>shifted gears and now does not promote silver as a catalyst? Nor does he ever 
>>mention the bomb. Is that in response to high level directives?
>[snip]
>AFAIK, his reason for not working much with Silver nowadays, is because I 
>pointed out to him that the boiling point of
>Silver was so much lower than the 3000C temperature that he was aiming for 
>that Silver vapor would not condense to a
>liquid again inside his reactor.
>He then switched to Gallium which has a much higher boiling point.

Re: [Vo]:BLP really "bombs out" this time

[Robin]

In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:37:29 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>As for the near future, we can ask - is it coincidental that Mills has shifted 
>gears and now does not promote silver as a catalyst? Nor does he ever mention 
>the bomb. Is that in response to high level directives?
[snip]
AFAIK, his reason for not working much with Silver nowadays, is because I 
pointed out to him that the boiling point of
Silver was so much lower than the 3000C temperature that he was aiming for that 
Silver vapor would not condense to a
liquid again inside his reactor.
He then switched to Gallium which has a much higher boiling point.