Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
There are a number of magnetic effects that are active inside protons and neutrons that affect their decay. https://indico.cern.ch/event/277650/contributions/629993/attachments/505990/698572/chernodub.pdf Axial magnetic effect in QCD also see for better info http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf QCD in strong magnetic field A anisotropic magnetic field will generate instantons that destabilize protons and neutrons. Even a weak magnetic field produced by a SmCo7 magnet will generated a small nucleon decay response inside the nucleons due to quark deconfinement. The production of monopole magnetism via spin polarization is the key factor in both LENR and Mills. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Brian Ahern wrote: > What is the role of magnetism in: > > > LENR > > MILLS > > MANELAS > > > Are they connected? > > > -- > *From:* Arnaud Kodeck > *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. > > > > *From:* JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > > To clarify: > > > > Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization > potential (the catalytic “hole”) > > > > 1) Molybdenum .07 > > 2) Potassium .09 > > 3) Rubidium.09 > > > > BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further > from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. > > > > This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic > fit. > > > > AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd > onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. > > > > > --- > > > > … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has > found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. > > > > The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the > most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … > using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and > the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. > > > > http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/ > co-netic-sheet-and-foil > <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against > static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the > energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" > magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key > to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg > levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it > should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to > Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No > other metal is as close to the precise value. > > >
Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
What is the role of magnetism in: LENR MILLS MANELAS Are they connected? From: Arnaud Kodeck Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium.09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as close to the precise value.
Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
Spin seems to be a focal issue for alternative energy scenarios. The Manelas device operated with two input signals some how amplifying and producing excess energy accompanied by significant cooling of the strontium ferrite billet. The billet has a complicated field profile with multiple changes in polarity across the billet. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 1:02 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Axil— Nice find. When Maxwell his four differential equations, I doubt he realized the importance of the curl operator and how quantized spin would modify his theory of the continuity of EM phenomena. Maxwell had an inkling, however, given his concern about singularities. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9352edb8540f4f928b8e08d55d0b41e7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636517225286900802&sdata=eDeJyLyOgyjh85pOaiYNj042mZfyg6t4iRuKeG44q20%3D&reserved=0> for Windows 10 From: Axil Axil Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 6:58:13 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013802<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphysics.aps.org%2Fsynopsis-for%2F10.1103%2FPhysRevA.97.013802&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9352edb8540f4f928b8e08d55d0b41e7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636517225286900802&sdata=rbtMZ%2FSmPWkhk1m%2B7QzPZyVrLbKmB%2BZfC1qCyt443GY%3D&reserved=0> Twisted Cavity Is a One-Way Light Path The monopole (aka anisotropic) magnetic beam produced by spin polarization is the key to the LENR reaction. The spin can be produced by polaritons or atoms as in this experiment. Besides producing a monopole magnetic field, spin polarization also generates a change of state in time symmetry where light energy is forced to flow only in one direction. This one way flow of energy is what allows the soliton (AKA EVO) to accumulate gamma energy and down convert that energy into light and heat. For a post discussing time symmetry breaking see The process by which the proton decays in LENR<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lenr-forum.com%2Fforum%2Fthread%2F5201-the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr%2F%3FpostID%3D56995%23post56995&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9352edb8540f4f928b8e08d55d0b41e7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636517225286900802&sdata=2qYLTDCKQzgN1PY5W1ptlZ18KP0S%2BjZlCD7%2FKl2vMGE%3D&reserved=0> For a post discussing one way energy flow see The process by which the proton decays in LENR<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lenr-forum.com%2Fforum%2Fthread%2F5201-the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr%2F%3FpostID%3D57281%23post57281&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9352edb8540f4f928b8e08d55d0b41e7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636517225286900802&sdata=JOG1vc7ny28SBEtr%2FI73xofLR6PH24U8MilQlMuG1cg%3D&reserved=0> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:03 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Brian— I have been indicating that phonic spin energy in orbital atomic electronic structures are likely coupled via magnetic fields to nuclear spin states with appropriate EM resonant conditions. See about 50% of my comments on Vortex-l over the last 3 years. The coupling allows transfer of nuclear potential energy to phonic kinetic energy (lattice heat) consistent with a coherent system’s increase of entropy. It explains LENR given an absence of real particles with high linear momentum/kinetic energy. LENR is devoid of normal nuclear reactions involving two or three particle interactions.) It depends upon a coherent system of many particles including electrons and nucleons and maybe some virtual particles as well. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 3:13:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to learn more about thisnew concept. From: Arnaud Kodeck mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pa
RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
Axil— Nice find. When Maxwell his four differential equations, I doubt he realized the importance of the curl operator and how quantized spin would modify his theory of the continuity of EM phenomena. Maxwell had an inkling, however, given his concern about singularities. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Axil Axil Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 6:58:13 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013802 Twisted Cavity Is a One-Way Light Path The monopole (aka anisotropic) magnetic beam produced by spin polarization is the key to the LENR reaction. The spin can be produced by polaritons or atoms as in this experiment. Besides producing a monopole magnetic field, spin polarization also generates a change of state in time symmetry where light energy is forced to flow only in one direction. This one way flow of energy is what allows the soliton (AKA EVO) to accumulate gamma energy and down convert that energy into light and heat. For a post discussing time symmetry breaking see The process by which the proton decays in LENR<https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5201-the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr/?postID=56995#post56995> For a post discussing one way energy flow see The process by which the proton decays in LENR<https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5201-the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr/?postID=57281#post57281> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:03 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Brian— I have been indicating that phonic spin energy in orbital atomic electronic structures are likely coupled via magnetic fields to nuclear spin states with appropriate EM resonant conditions. See about 50% of my comments on Vortex-l over the last 3 years. The coupling allows transfer of nuclear potential energy to phonic kinetic energy (lattice heat) consistent with a coherent system’s increase of entropy. It explains LENR given an absence of real particles with high linear momentum/kinetic energy. LENR is devoid of normal nuclear reactions involving two or three particle interactions.) It depends upon a coherent system of many particles including electrons and nucleons and maybe some virtual particles as well. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 3:13:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to learn more about thisnew concept. From: Arnaud Kodeck mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>] Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium.09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1
Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013802 Twisted Cavity Is a One-Way Light Path The monopole (aka anisotropic) magnetic beam produced by spin polarization is the key to the LENR reaction. The spin can be produced by polaritons or atoms as in this experiment. Besides producing a monopole magnetic field, spin polarization also generates a change of state in time symmetry where light energy is forced to flow only in one direction. This one way flow of energy is what allows the soliton (AKA EVO) to accumulate gamma energy and down convert that energy into light and heat. For a post discussing time symmetry breaking see The process by which the proton decays in LENR <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5201-the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr/?postID=56995#post56995> For a post discussing one way energy flow see The process by which the proton decays in LENR <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5201-the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr/?postID=57281#post57281> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:03 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Brian— > > > > I have been indicating that phonic spin energy in orbital atomic > electronic structures are likely coupled via magnetic fields to nuclear > spin states with appropriate EM resonant conditions. See about 50% of my > comments on Vortex-l over the last 3 years. The coupling allows transfer > of nuclear potential energy to phonic kinetic energy (lattice heat) > consistent with a coherent system’s increase of entropy. > > > > It explains LENR given an absence of real particles with high linear > momentum/kinetic energy. LENR is devoid of normal nuclear reactions > involving two or three particle interactions.) It depends upon a coherent > system of many particles including electrons and nucleons and maybe some > virtual particles as well. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > -- > *From:* Brian Ahern > *Sent:* Sunday, January 14, 2018 3:13:22 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to > learn more about thisnew concept. > > > -------------- > *From:* Arnaud Kodeck > *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. > > > > *From:* JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > > To clarify: > > > > Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization > potential (the catalytic “hole”) > > > > 1) Molybdenum .07 > > 2) Potassium .09 > > 3) Rubidium.09 > > > > BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further > from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. > > > > This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic > fit. > > > > AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd > onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. > > > > > --- > > > > … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has > found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. > > > > The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the > most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … > using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and > the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. > > > > http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/ > co-netic-sheet-and-foil > <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against > static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the > energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" > magnetic material that sat
RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
Brian— I have been indicating that phonic spin energy in orbital atomic electronic structures are likely coupled via magnetic fields to nuclear spin states with appropriate EM resonant conditions. See about 50% of my comments on Vortex-l over the last 3 years. The coupling allows transfer of nuclear potential energy to phonic kinetic energy (lattice heat) consistent with a coherent system’s increase of entropy. It explains LENR given an absence of real particles with high linear momentum/kinetic energy. LENR is devoid of normal nuclear reactions involving two or three particle interactions.) It depends upon a coherent system of many particles including electrons and nucleons and maybe some virtual particles as well. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 3:13:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to learn more about thisnew concept. From: Arnaud Kodeck Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium.09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as close to the precise value.
Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to learn more about thisnew concept. From: Arnaud Kodeck Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium.09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as close to the precise value.
RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium.09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as close to the precise value.
RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR
To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium.09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as close to the precise value.
