Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence


On 01/31/2011 08:34 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
 Steve Krivit came come out with his latest NET #36 issue. Rossi  Co. are
 discussed.
 http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/NET360.shtml


 Not sure if the following info has already been discussed here or not.

 See:
 http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/3626-energycatalyzer.shtml

 Near the end of the interview:

 PASSERINI. On the Journal of Nuclear Physics [blog], you've stated that a
 new company has been founded in Athens, Defkalion Energy, which will
 manufacture catalyzers. Could you tell us some more details?

 ROSSI. It's a European Newco, affiliated with the largest businesses in the
 sector. They will issue a press release soon to announce themselves to the
 public.

 ---

 Still, not much. But more than before. Googling on Newco brings up many
 possible corporate entities. Hard to tell if any of them are the one we're
 after...

Wrong approach.   It's not a specific company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NewCo

Wiki sez:  *NewCo* is a generic name used to refer to corporate
spin-offs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_spin-off and startups
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startup_company before they are assigned
a final name.

We now know for sure it's no company anyone's ever heard of because it
was established just for this purpose.

He wants to mass produce something, with shipments to start in a few
months, so he builds his own brand new company to manufacture it, rather
than having an established manufacturer do it.   Does that make any
sense at all?  It's certainly not how I'd do it.

OTOH if what he wanted were a shell company into which investors' money
could be poured, then this approach would make a lot of sense.  IMHO the
/only/ aspect to all this which doesn't have a bad smell is the calorimetry.



RE: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Jones Beene
From: Stephen A. 

 

*  Wiki sez:  NewCo is a generic name used to refer to corporate spin-offs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_spin-off  and startups
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startup_company  before they are assigned a
final name.

 

Curious, eh? . in the homonyminous reverberations g Nuko


 He wants to mass produce something, with shipments to start in a few
months, so he builds his own brand new company to manufacture it, rather
than having an established manufacturer do it. Does that make any sense at
all?  

 

 

Well, the assumption which you are making (without justification) is that
they (the Nuko-Newco) has not already arranged a partnership with a
manufacturer of similar products. That kind of pre-arrangement is extremely
easy to do in today's market where severe over-capacity and unemployment
exist (automobiles, for instance). All it takes is planning.

 

Greece is not known as a manufacturing powerhouse, but a quick check shows
that there are a number of companies making trucks and auto parts:
Theologou, Biamax, Sfakianakis, Saracakis, Namco, Neorion, ELBO,
Petropoulos, Malkotsis, Scavas, AK Hellas, Attica, DIM, AutoDiana, Balkania,
MAVA-Renault, MEBEA, Motoemil, Ros, SAM, and Styl Kar. Unemployment in
Greece is similar to here - reported to be ~11% but probably half again
higher.

 

It is a mistake to sell Rossi short on 'smarts' or pre-planning. 

 

He may not be 'from the future', but everything he does so far seems to be
well thought-out from the perspective of maximizing the value of his
personal wealth in the near term.

 

The problem is: many of us want to see 'altruism' of some kind in this
development, such as giving away trade secrets. That is not going to happen.

 

Jones

 

 

 

 





 

 



Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Greece is not known as a manufacturing powerhouse. . .

Nor their work ethics.  Ask the Germans.  ;-)

T



Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence


On 01/31/2011 09:44 AM, Jones Beene wrote:

 *From:* Stephen A.

  

 Ø  Wiki sez:  *NewCo* is a generic name used to refer to corporate
 spin-offs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_spin-off and
 startups http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startup_company before they
 are assigned a final name.

  

 Curious, eh? ... in the homonyminous reverberations g Nuko


  He wants to mass produce something, with shipments to start in a few
 months, so he builds his own brand new company to manufacture it,
 rather than having an established manufacturer do it. Does that make
 any sense at all? 

  

  

 Well, the assumption which you are making (without justification) is
 that they (the Nuko-Newco) has not already arranged a partnership with
 a manufacturer of similar products. That kind of pre-arrangement is
 extremely easy to do in today's market where severe over-capacity and
 unemployment exist (automobiles, for instance). All it takes is planning.


Sure.  In that case, Defkalion is just a shell company, taking money
from Leonardo (Rossi's company) on one end and sending it off to the
real manufacturer on the other end.  To minimize costs, we'd expect the
units to be drop shipped from the actual manufacturer to the end user,
with no actual contact with Defkalion.

And Defkalion looks very dispensable in this scenario.

OTOH it's easy to come up with more Enron-ish scenarios in which the
role of Defkalion would be much more central.

As I said, the /only/ thing that militates against such an
interpretation is the calorimetry.



Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Jed Rothwell

Jones Beene wrote:

That kind of pre-arrangement is extremely easy to do in today's market 
where severe over-capacity and unemployment exist (automobiles, for 
instance). All it takes is planning. Greece is not known as a 
manufacturing powerhouse, but a quick check shows that there are a 
number of companies making trucks and auto parts: Theologou, Biamax, 
Sfakianakis, Saracakis, Namco, Neorion, ELBO . . .




I believe the gadget is being manufactured in the U.S. (I don't recall 
where I heard that.)


There is plenty of overcapacity in the U.S. as well. Also, outsourcing 
of high-tech industrial production has become common in recent decades. 
I expect the Ni catalyst is made by some specialized firm. That takes a 
lot of know-how.


- Jed



RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Roarty, Francis X
My bet is the New company is mean to assemble the pieces where said pieces are 
farmed out far and wide... with even a red herring or two to keep copy cats at 
bay. His
Biggest concern is procuring and packaging the secret additive to avoid it's 
identification for as long as possible. Perhaps he intends to mix the nano 
powder alloy himself .
fran

From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

Jones Beene wrote:


That kind of pre-arrangement is extremely easy to do in today's market where 
severe over-capacity and unemployment exist (automobiles, for instance). All it 
takes is planning. Greece is not known as a manufacturing powerhouse, but a 
quick check shows that there are a number of companies making trucks and auto 
parts: Theologou, Biamax, Sfakianakis, Saracakis, Namco, Neorion, ELBO . . .

I believe the gadget is being manufactured in the U.S. (I don't recall where I 
heard that.)

There is plenty of overcapacity in the U.S. as well. Also, outsourcing of 
high-tech industrial production has become common in recent decades. I expect 
the Ni catalyst is made by some specialized firm. That takes a lot of know-how.

- Jed


Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Possibly more on DEFKALION's origins

2011-01-31 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence


On 01/31/2011 11:03 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:

 My bet is the New company is mean to assemble the pieces where said
 pieces are farmed out far and wide...


In which case you're back to assuming Rossi is setting up a brand new
assembly line and manufacturing facility.

If the new entity is doing anything more than just pasting shipping
labels on pre-boxed units, he's got a big job to do in establishing the
new company, and it's an unnecessary job, as that work could have been
farmed out.


 with even a red herring or two to keep copy cats at bay.


God, I hope not!  That's nuts!  Make a hard problem even harder just to
try to provide a little security by obfuscation, and buy perhaps an
extra week or two while the competition figures out the trick?


 His

 Biggest concern is procuring and packaging the secret additive to
 avoid it's identification for as long as possible. Perhaps he intends
 to mix the nano powder alloy himself .


And what's he going to do, post a guard in every customer's shop to be
sure nobody cracks open the case and analyzes the powder?  (Some of the
folks who will want to know how it works already have more guards than
Rossi could ever hire.)

If this works, there is no way under heaven he's going to prevent the
secret from getting out.  License agreements and NDAs won't mean s--t
when it comes to protecting the knowledge on something this big.  The
importance of this knowledge is on the same general order as the
knowledge of how to build a hydrogen bomb.  Even the U.S. government
couldn't protect /that/ knowledge, and they've got a lot more
counter-espionage capabilities than lone-worker Rossi.

He may be able to collect licensing fees for a good long while, but
there is absolutely no way he's going to keep the rest of the world in
the dark as to how these things work.


The biggest red flag is how casually this is being treated.