Re: [Vo]:Yevgen Barsukov propose Parkhomov/MFMP reaction is chemistry
Controlling the internal temperature seems to be an important objective of the reactor development. Potentially an internal central tube with circulating cooling could better maintain an internal temperature. Say a thin Alumina tube with pressurized He as a coolant. The sealing may be a little more difficult but should be accomplished with a little development. Bob Cook sent from Windows Mail From: Peter Gluck Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 6:34 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Not a practical idea, just a forced solution, guys. What thermal efrfect could have the lithium from 100 mgr LiAlH4? and Al2O3 is a very stable compound, lithium corrosion is impossible. It is a Li Al lloy there when hyydrogen is out. Waste of time. Peter On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote: Alain, The excess heat generated by Parkhomov’s experiment (if real) is far above any chemical reaction. 3 Li + 2 Al2O3 - 3 LiO2 + 4 Al doesn’t produce much energy. The Li inside the reactor is very small 100 mg? But Li could corrode the wall of AL203 making it less strong to resist to the high pressure inside the reactor. It could be an explanation of the BANG of MFMP. It can’t rule out excess heat. Arnaud From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com [mailto:alain.coetm...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alain Sepeda Sent: mercredi 11 février 2015 14:48 To: Vortex List Subject: [Vo]:Yevgen Barsukov propose Parkhomov/MFMP reaction is chemistry Hi, about recent Ni+LiAlH4 experiments done by Parkhomov and MFMP on facebook group, Yevgen Barsukov propose that it is a chemical reaction: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/920127711351262 After decomposition of LiAlH4, pure lithium is left. Lithium is reacting with the walls of the tube made of Al2O3, being a stronger metal than aluminium it takes away its oxygen with release of heat. is it an interesting hypothesis to check ? I think we should also integrate in the reasoning the phase of LiAlH4 decomposition which is probably endothermic... What is the total sum ? maybe this mean the reactor swallow heat at the beginning, and restore more , or less, later... what is the quantity of heat expected compared to the one AG Parkhomov measured? -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
RE: [Vo]:Yevgen Barsukov propose Parkhomov/MFMP reaction is chemistry
Alain, The excess heat generated by Parkhomovs experiment (if real) is far above any chemical reaction. 3 Li + 2 Al2O3 - 3 LiO2 + 4 Al doesnt produce much energy. The Li inside the reactor is very small 100 mg? But Li could corrode the wall of AL203 making it less strong to resist to the high pressure inside the reactor. It could be an explanation of the BANG of MFMP. It cant rule out excess heat. Arnaud _ From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com [mailto:alain.coetm...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alain Sepeda Sent: mercredi 11 février 2015 14:48 To: Vortex List Subject: [Vo]:Yevgen Barsukov propose Parkhomov/MFMP reaction is chemistry Hi, about recent Ni+LiAlH4 experiments done by Parkhomov and MFMP on facebook group, Yevgen Barsukov propose that it is a chemical reaction: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/92012771135 1262 https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/920127711351 262 After decomposition of LiAlH4, pure lithium is left. Lithium is reacting with the walls of the tube made of Al2O3, being a stronger metal than aluminium it takes away its oxygen with release of heat. is it an interesting hypothesis to check ? I think we should also integrate in the reasoning the phase of LiAlH4 decomposition which is probably endothermic... What is the total sum ? maybe this mean the reactor swallow heat at the beginning, and restore more , or less, later... what is the quantity of heat expected compared to the one AG Parkhomov measured?
Re: [Vo]:Yevgen Barsukov propose Parkhomov/MFMP reaction is chemistry
Not a practical idea, just a forced solution, guys. What thermal efrfect could have the lithium from 100 mgr LiAlH4? and Al2O3 is a very stable compound, lithium corrosion is impossible. It is a Li Al lloy there when hyydrogen is out. Waste of time. Peter On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote: Alain, The excess heat generated by Parkhomov’s experiment (if real) is far above any chemical reaction. 3 Li + 2 Al2O3 - 3 LiO2 + 4 Al doesn’t produce much energy. The Li inside the reactor is very small 100 mg? But Li could corrode the wall of AL203 making it less strong to resist to the high pressure inside the reactor. It could be an explanation of the BANG of MFMP. It can’t rule out excess heat. Arnaud -- *From:* alain.coetm...@gmail.com [mailto:alain.coetm...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Alain Sepeda *Sent:* mercredi 11 février 2015 14:48 *To:* Vortex List *Subject:* [Vo]:Yevgen Barsukov propose Parkhomov/MFMP reaction is chemistry Hi, about recent Ni+LiAlH4 experiments done by Parkhomov and MFMP on facebook group, Yevgen Barsukov propose that it is a chemical reaction: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/920127711351262 After decomposition of LiAlH4, pure lithium is left. Lithium is reacting with the walls of the tube made of Al2O3, being a stronger metal than aluminium it takes away its oxygen with release of heat. is it an interesting hypothesis to check ? I think we should also integrate in the reasoning the phase of LiAlH4 decomposition which is probably endothermic... What is the total sum ? maybe this mean the reactor swallow heat at the beginning, and restore more , or less, later... what is the quantity of heat expected compared to the one AG Parkhomov measured? -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
