Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
thank you, dear Ron, but I am only sometimes correct Peter On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Ron Kita wrote: > Greetings Vortex, > > In Dr Peter Gluck s post citing LENR, Peter is correct as usual. > > I should mention that in the book: A Machine Called Indomibable- The > History of the MRI: > > that the he original term was: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and people were > concerned about the word: Nuclear. > > So NMR Imaging became MRI ..and the people felt better getting MRI Scans > versus NMR Scans. > > Ah..we live in a world of unscientific Nervous Nellies. > > Respectfully, > Ron Kita, Chiralex > Doylstown PA > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" would work better. T
Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
Terry, the ways of bureaucracy are tortuous, I have met seen lots of quantum reactors.They were mainly "perpetuum stabile" ypu know the antonu=ym of Perpettuum mobile. Peter On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" > would work better. > > T > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" > would work better. > > T > >
Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
singularity is frightening peter On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > >> As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" >> would work better. >> >> T >> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
Peter, I do not believe at this time there is any chance of collapse of a significant amount of matter from one of these things. Unless you give birth to an enormously large gremlin to begin with, they like to reach thermal equilibrium with their surroundings extremely quickly. There is however alot of energy claimed to be generated in the Papp Engine and much more available from what I see. 1500 Hp (1.1 MW) in a 360 cc engine limited to 2500 cycles/min using 8, 40 kV spark plugs is alot of energy from a rev limited engine. Imagine if you rev it to 8000 RPM... This is a relatively clean source of energy as long as you have the gremlins (collapsed matter) available nearby to suck the energy from the radiation as it leaves. A coil is a good idea also to remove charged particles created from gremlin belching. My understanding is that they emit charged particles. IF DGT wants to create a heater/power generation device I believe they should drop the nanopowder and look at the Papp Engine. If they stick with Nanopowder they should focus on transmutations, which is primarily what they are getting since that is what they are feeding their gremlins. On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > singularity is frightening > peter > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >> I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: >> >>> As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" >>> would work better. >>> >>> T >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
Peter, ChemEng, frightening it is. In the sense that 'logic' is abandoned. The 'singularity' is synonymous to annihilation of 'logic'. So beware what you think for! Have been fighting the 'singularity' in all sorts of contexts for years. It is sort of a joker. For the same (hopefully logic) reason I reject the big bang, which is a singularity hiding behind the Heisenberg radius. A lot of practical folks here are annoyed by this -my- way of thinking, which seems philosophical, which it is -strictu sensu- not. It is just trying to think affairs to their end. Guenter Von: Peter Gluck An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 20:50 Dienstag, 14.August 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK singularity is frightening peter On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... > > >On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > >As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" >>would work better. >> >>T >> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
