Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread James Bowery
Tell that to the MFMP


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> People will not attempt to understand LENR until it is heating the water
> for their baths.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, James Bowery  wrote:
>
>> What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?
>>
>> Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy
>> Grain of cold fusion research from day one.  I find it stretches credulity
>> to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003:
>>
>> *Has anyone replicated this effect yet? *
>>
>> Yes, it's been replicated now by three or four different labs
>>
>>
>> Replication didn't spread like wildfire.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>> It seem like  no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities
>>> and it usually revolves around making money.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>>>
 That was a 2003 interview.

 If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science
 fair in the world by now.


 On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

>  http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
>
>
>
> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up
> to 30 with it.
>
>
>
> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of
> palladium which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
>
>
>
> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is
> amazingly very low powered yet can produce a high COP.
>
>
>
>
>


>>>
>>
>


Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread Axil Axil
People will not attempt to understand LENR until it is heating the water
for their baths.


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, James Bowery  wrote:

> What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?
>
> Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy
> Grain of cold fusion research from day one.  I find it stretches credulity
> to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003:
>
> *Has anyone replicated this effect yet? *
>
> Yes, it's been replicated now by three or four different labs
>
>
> Replication didn't spread like wildfire.
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> It seem like  no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and
>> it usually revolves around making money.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery  wrote:
>>
>>> That was a 2003 interview.
>>>
>>> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science
>>> fair in the world by now.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>>
  http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml



 Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up
 to 30 with it.



 He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
 which has been roughened through deuterium loading.



 Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is
 amazingly very low powered yet can produce a high COP.





>>>
>>>
>>
>


Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread James Bowery
What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?

Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy
Grain of cold fusion research from day one.  I find it stretches credulity
to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003:

*Has anyone replicated this effect yet? *

Yes, it's been replicated now by three or four different labs


Replication didn't spread like wildfire.

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> It seem like  no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and
> it usually revolves around making money.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery  wrote:
>
>> That was a 2003 interview.
>>
>> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science
>> fair in the world by now.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>>  http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up
>>> to 30 with it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
>>> which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is
>>> amazingly very low powered yet can produce a high COP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread Daniel Rocha
I mean, your 1st post

2014-04-18 20:50 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha :
> Axil, this is a good path.
>
> 2014-04-18 20:48 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil :
>> It seem like  no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and it
>> usually revolves around making money.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery  wrote:
>>>
>>> That was a 2003 interview.
>>>
>>> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
>>> in the world by now.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

 http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml



 Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up to
 30 with it.



 He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
 which has been roughened through deuterium loading.



 Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is amazingly
 very low powered yet can produce a high COP.




>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com



-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com



Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread Daniel Rocha
Axil, this is a good path.

2014-04-18 20:48 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil :
> It seem like  no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and it
> usually revolves around making money.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery  wrote:
>>
>> That was a 2003 interview.
>>
>> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
>> in the world by now.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>>
>>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up to
>>> 30 with it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
>>> which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is amazingly
>>> very low powered yet can produce a high COP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com



Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread Axil Axil
It seem like  no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and
it usually revolves around making money.


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery  wrote:

> That was a 2003 interview.
>
> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
> in the world by now.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>>  http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up to
>> 30 with it.
>>
>>
>>
>> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
>> which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is amazingly
>> very low powered yet can produce a high COP.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Re: [Vo]:LENR through Nanoplasmonics

2014-04-18 Thread James Bowery
That was a 2003 interview.

If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
in the world by now.


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
>
>
>
> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up to
> 30 with it.
>
>
>
> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
> which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
>
>
>
> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is amazingly
> very low powered yet can produce a high COP.
>
>
>
>
>