Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower : Weinberg
At 02:19 PM 5/22/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: At 07:40 AM 5/22/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: And it is extremely ambitious to talk about 1KJ. 6 orders of magnitude of improvement within a few months. The Weinberg report : http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/WeinbergReport.pdf indicates that it's straight-forward electro-chemical engineering. I see that Rowan U has had quite a long association with BLP. eg Their Blacklight Rocket Engine http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/752Marchese.pdf Weinberg says it's not unheard of to get a 10^5 increase from first hit to production .. but BLP has been at it quite a while. Or is the main change that they're no longer aiming at heat, but direct electricity, and THAT is unoptimized? Also, Weinberg's calculation of reactions/area assume it's hydrinos -- so the reaction rate from some other mechanism could be quite different. So ... since these are mostly consultant reports (except the anonymous Fortune 500 company) .. how independent are they?
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower : Rowan U
At 01:20 PM 5/23/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: I see that Rowan U has had quite a long association with BLP. eg Their Blacklight Rocket Engine http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/752Marchese.pdf It's Ramanujachary who's from Rowan. http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/RamanujacharyCV.pdf http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/RamanujacharyReport.pdf
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower : Copeland / Fortune 500
Copeland : http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/CopelandReport.pdf spills the beans (Manual cut and paste ...) Some of those were validation cells under test by Sanmina-SCI scientists, another validation team. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2012/snapshots/10805.html Rank: 376 http://www.sanmina-sci.com/ (They've had previous partnerships in the solar area.)
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower : Sanmina-SCI
At 01:46 PM 5/23/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Copeland : http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/CopelandReport.pdf spills the beans Some of those were validation cells under test by Sanmina-SCI scientists, another validation team. http://www.sanmina-sci.com/ (They've had previous partnerships in the solar area.) http://www.sanmina-sci.com/sections/industries/clean-technology/index.php Sanmina-SCI is committed to serving companies leading the energy revolution in the solar, wind, fuel cell, battery systems and clean tech industries. Looks as if they should be able to figure out if it's fake pretty quickly.
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower : Sanmina-SCI
At 02:03 PM 5/23/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: http://www.sanmina-sci.com/sections/industries/clean-technology/index.php Sanmina-SCI is committed to serving companies leading the energy revolution in the solar, wind, fuel cell, battery systems and clean tech industries. http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/F500Study.pdf Lists VP of Engineering Defense and Aerospace Sanmina has a Defense and Aerospace Systems (DAS) Division http://www.sanmina-sci.com/sections/industries/defense-aerospace/
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Impressive, however small power, small energy, results some 5 months old- the phase of scale up, intensification, long term functionality has only started.. Science is great but engineering put's the generators on the market. Let's hope the best Peter On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:30 PM, P.J van Noorden pjvannoor...@caiway.nlwrote: See press release and validation reports from Blacklightpower: http://dev.blacklightpower.**com/press/052212-2/http://dev.blacklightpower.com/press/052212-2/ http://www.blacklightpower.**com/technology/validation-**reports/http://www.blacklightpower.com/technology/validation-reports/ Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Haynes 242 alloy: http://www.haynesintl.com/pdf/h3142.pdf T
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Indeed! So small, that it won't remove skepticism from skeptics. They will say it's an error in measurment. And it is extremely ambitious to talk about 1KJ. 6 orders of magnitude of improvement within a few months. 2012/5/22 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com Impressive, however small power, small energy, results some 5 months old- the phase of scale up, intensification, long term functionality has only started.. Science is great but engineering put's the generators on the market. Let's hope the best Peter On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:30 PM, P.J van Noorden pjvannoor...@caiway.nlwrote: See press release and validation reports from Blacklightpower: http://dev.blacklightpower.**com/press/052212-2/http://dev.blacklightpower.com/press/052212-2/ http://www.blacklightpower.**com/technology/validation-**reports/http://www.blacklightpower.com/technology/validation-reports/ Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Peter, I am somehow tired, as we probably all are, of all those annnouncements of 'breakthroughs' . Randall M. probably sees the 'scene' moving away from him and feels challened to announce his n'th breakthrough. Count me unimpressed. Albeit I consider the LENR phenomenon real, quite a lot of Quacks need a decent dose of psychotherapy, it seems. Sorry to say that. After poking into Mill's 2000+ pages theory of everything, I am impressed by his boldness, but not what he has to present. Von: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 16:12 Dienstag, 22.Mai 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower Impressive, however small power, small energy, results some 5 months old- the phase of scale up, intensification, long term functionality has only started.. Science is great but engineering put's the generators on the market. Let's hope the best Peter On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:30 PM, P.J van Noorden pjvannoor...@caiway.nl wrote: See press release and validation reports from Blacklightpower: http://dev.blacklightpower.com/press/052212-2/ http://www.blacklightpower.com/technology/validation-reports/ Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
I have seen a lot of water vapor, in my bathtub, in my sink, in fog, emitted from a boiler, at high pressure. There was never any excess energy. Yes, I know, Blacklight discovered the hydrino and they have all of them. Frank
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Von: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 16:40 Dienstag, 22.Mai 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower Indeed! So small, that it won't remove skepticism from skeptics. They will say it's an error in measurment. And it is extremely ambitious to talk about 1KJ. 6 orders of magnitude of improvement within a few months. ## I am just thinking of Zuckerbererg investing a meager 100million into Blacklight Power. Is it 'real' evidence to invest 'virtual' money into 'virtual' evidence? Count me confused. Guenther
RE: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
-Original Message- From: Terry Blanton Haynes 242 alloy: http://www.haynesintl.com/pdf/h3142.pdf Hmmm ... Good eye, Terry. It is probably not coincidental that this is one of the highest available alloys in molybdenum content. Moly is possibly the best fit catalyst in the periodic table, but the unalloyed metal is extremely prone to corrosion. Anyone who reads the BLP experiments with an eye towards best fit can see the 'usual suspects' in Column one and two of the Table. The criterion is to be as close as possible at 27.2 eV - using the confusing Mills rules of engagement, and eliminating 3-body reactions. Molybdenum ions are a good fit at 27.13 which is off by only .07 eV and this for the Mo(2+) ion; plus the miss with moly is on the low side. It seems possible, using the energy hole analogy, that you would want to err on the low side of 27.2 eV if you cannot hit it exactly - since the approaching hydrogen atom carries momentum. Jones attachment: winmail.dat
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Frank You have to bathe in Ni nano powder to dilate the space time which the vapor then diffuses into becoming hydrino or inverse Rydberg from our perspective - I would posit gas loading is actually based on temporal distortion where many more atoms can perform Lorentzian contraction to fit into an impossibly small space, radiating huge numbers of spontaneous emissions from our perspective which are also frequency skewed due to their Pythagorean relationship to our frame. Instead of accelerating the object to near C and causing time to slow [ether velocity vs object velocity] you instead use Casimir suppression to segregate the ether velocity into faster and slower pockets through which you selectively diffuse your hydrogen. Fran From: fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:51 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower I have seen a lot of water vapor, in my bathtub, in my sink, in fog, emitted from a boiler, at high pressure. There was never any excess energy. Yes, I know, Blacklight discovered the hydrino and they have all of them. Frank
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
At 07:40 AM 5/22/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: And it is extremely ambitious to talk about 1KJ. 6 orders of magnitude of improvement within a few months. The Weinberg report : http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/WeinbergReport.pdf indicates that it's straight-forward electro-chemical engineering. The PDF's secured, so I can't cut and paste . Page 2-3, and particularly Page 3 starting with A combination of increasing the surface area ...
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: The PDF's secured, so I can't cut and paste . Page 2-3, and particularly Page 3 starting with A combination of increasing the surface area ... Secured PDFs are annoying, aren't they? Here is the text you meant to quote: A combination of increasing the surface area of the supported catalyst and improving/optimizing the supported catalyst could increase the power output of a single CIHT cell by many orders of magnitude. In the former case, using the power density of about 3 mW/cm2 of the Mo-anode cell and a thickness of each cell of a stack of 30 microns, the projected power density is 1 kW/1. Furthermore, the 3 mW/cm2 based on the geometrical surface area of the Mo electrode can be increased by large factors by using textured materials with much larger surface areas than the geometrical surface areas. Moreover, an improvement of five orders of magnitude, which is not unprecedented in the heterogeneous catalysis literature between the first hit and the optimized catalyst . . .
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
Alan, If you have firefox you can render most PDFs in your browser without any extra reader. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pdfjs plain js + html5 You can do all the copying you need then ;-) mic 2012/5/22 Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com: At 07:40 AM 5/22/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: And it is extremely ambitious to talk about 1KJ. 6 orders of magnitude of improvement within a few months. The Weinberg report : http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/WeinbergReport.pdf indicates that it's straight-forward electro-chemical engineering. The PDF's secured, so I can't cut and paste . Page 2-3, and particularly Page 3 starting with A combination of increasing the surface area ...
Re: [Vo]:Press release Blacklightpower
You can always print, scan and OCR it with a cheap all-in-one printer. T
