Re: [Vserver] Error compiling util-vserver 0.29.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes: > I get the following error when I try to compile util-vserver 0.29.2, > this is using linux-2.4.24 on debian woody. Can you try version 0.29.3 which is available at http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/pre/ > lib/vserver-internal.h: In function vserver': > lib/vserver-internal.h:99: error: __NR_vserver' undeclared (first use > in this function) Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Support with chroot problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Eggert) writes: >> I observerd the same on SuSE9.0. Therefore, i just used the binaries >> built in a Suse8.2 environment hoping that this works as well. So far >> it does. >> But of course i am interested in a 'clean' solution, i.e. the >> vserver-utils compiled with gcc 3.3.1 on SuSE9.0. > > I recently mailed a patch for reducecap to Enrico, which are > supposed to make it work as intended. AFAIS, this is unrelated to the chcontext capabilities: reducecap is nowhere used in the toolchain but a standalone utility only. Both tools are using different code for capability parsing and only the reducecap's one is faulty. The chroot issues are caused by a bug in the compiler; disabling of optimizations or upgrading to recent gcc will solve them (I am completely unfamiliar with SuSE and do not know if they are having newer packages or if their QA is aware of this problem). > http://7eggert.dyndns.org/~7eggert/vserver/ Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Undeliverable: Re: Your document
Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Your document Sent:Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:28:22 +0100 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:28:36 +0100 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=se;a= ;p=sebank;l=SMRI005A0403032328GDC3T3HX MSEXCH:IMS:Sebank:Sebank Hub1:SMRI005A 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient --- Begin Message --- Your file is attached. [Filename: your_document.pif, Content-Type: application/octet-stream] The attachment file in the message has been removed by the virus protection eManager. --- End Message ---
Re: [Vserver] Support with chroot problem
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [util-vserver and suse/gcc 3.3.1] > I observerd the same on SuSE9.0. Therefore, i just used the binaries > built in a Suse8.2 environment hoping that this > works as well. So far it does. > But of course i am interested in a 'clean' solution, i.e. > the vserver-utils compiled with gcc 3.3.1 on SuSE9.0. I recently mailed a patch for reducecap to Enrico, which are supposed to make it work as intended. (Looking at the code, I wonder how it could ever have work before, and it didn't change fron .26 to .29). (I didn't look colosely at the other tools, though.) Just in case it helps, I put it to http://7eggert.dyndns.org/~7eggert/vserver/ Since I don't know automake, I'm not sure how to change the depencencies. Therefore I created a separate Makefile (same link). Just compile the unpatched sources, apply the patch, put the Makefile into src/ and run 'make reducecap' again. (Or better, tell me from which file Makefile.in is generated. I hope it _is_ generated ...) -- The programmer's National Anthem is '' Friß, Spammer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] VServer, heartbeat and drbd
Dear All, I am new on the list, so please excuse my naive question. I went through the how-tos and the archives of the list, but was enable to find the answer to my question. It is between heartbeat and vserver so I hope not to be completely off-topic. Supposing I run 2 boxes BA and BB each has its very own IP + 1 ip for the vserver. When BA goes down, BB take over. DRBD mount the /vservers partition on BB as primary, then a script from linux-ha start the vserver on BB. Do I am wrong or thanks to the vserver approach I don't need to setup an ip takeover? Or formulated another way: heartbeat is only used to start the vserver on BB if BA goes down, drbd taking care of the synchro of the data. If anybody of you have experience with VServer, heartbeat and drbd I would be happy to have your feedback. Off-topic: If you are using drbd, how are you managing the synchro when the master BA comes online again? You will get a little howto if I succeed setting up all that. Best regards, loic -- loïc d'Anterroches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CAPEC, Department of Chemical Engineering Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark tel: (+45)4525 2911 fax: (+45)4593 2906 ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Support with chroot problem
Hi,
it seems to be the optimization. Compiled with -O0 all works fine, without the tests #
11, 201 and 202 of testme.sh fail.
I'll try the latest beta now.
Schlomo
--
Schlomo Schapiro
Senior Consultant
Solution Center Novell/Linux
mikado AG
Bülowstraße 66
10783 Berlin-Schöneberg
Tel.: (030) 21790-0
Mobil: (0177) 3279060
Fax: (030) 21790-200/ -201
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-02 22:55:47 >>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Schlomo Schapiro") writes:
> I played around a little more and found out that it seem to be the
> util-vserver package that is guilty.
>
> I compiled it on an older machine (gcc 2.95.3) and it worked well. The
> version compiled with gcc 3.3.1 on SuSE9.0 doesn't work correctly.
Can you try to build it without optimizations (CFLAGS='-O0' ./configure)?
Else, can you add a
| printf("%08x\n", remove_cap);
to vc_new_s_context_compat() in lib/syscall-compat.hc and see what
happens (expected would be )?
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Support with chroot problem
> > I played around a little more and found out that it seem to be the > util-vserver package that is guilty. > > I compiled it on an older machine (gcc 2.95.3) and it worked well. The > version compiled with gcc 3.3.1 on SuSE9.0 doesn't work correctly. > > Did anyone else observer such a problem ? Or does everybody else use gcc > 3.3.1 or SuSE9.0 without problems ? > Hi! I observerd the same on SuSE9.0. Therefore, i just used the binaries built in a Suse8.2 environment hoping that this works as well. So far it does. But of course i am interested in a 'clean' solution, i.e. the vserver-utils compiled with gcc 3.3.1 on SuSE9.0. Best wishes Jürgen - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
