[Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-19 Thread Evert Meulie

Hi all!

For anyone who is interested I have created a VServer forum on my site: 
 http://vserver.meulie.net/



Regards,
Evert

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


[Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Steven Truong
Hi all.  As you might have seen, I am totally a newbie here.  I would like to say something here though.

I for once found it rather confusing to find the infor needed to get
going with vservers.  Without the help of many others here I could
not get much done.

However, I really welcome the idea of a Vserver forum because the
benefits of sticky topics and distinct categories.   
Sticky topics would just pop right out of the pages when a user access
a category.   I also like the search features of all the
forums that I have visited because I just simply do a search and all
the related answers would come.  

Btw, not everybody knows how to use IRC and is on IRC.  Not
everybody would like to receive tons of emails everyday.  
Forum is just more user friendly and more accessible to newbies like
me. And not everybody lives in the same time zone with me.

Please don't feel offended by my comments because the mailing list is
great and the responses are plenty but would it be good if we could
spare those experts from answering the same questions again and
again?  Would it be better that newbies could use the forums to
learn as much as possible before he would voice his questions?
Would it be better if newbies could search the forums to find the
answers quick while the experts are sound sleeping in other countries?

I think a forum is just a win-win move for Vserver community as a whole.

Best regards,
Steven.
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-19 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Evert Meulie wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> For anyone who is interested I have created a VServer forum on my site: 
>  http://vserver.meulie.net/

thanks!

I changed the entry to 'Unofficial' and asked to
contact me at IRC, don't know when I will be there
actually but ML is even better ...

the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?

basically I've tried to make the ML the one and
only 'other' forum (besides the IRC channel), and
I'm not convinced that we really need one besides
that ... but I leave that to the community ...

sidenote: when I tried your forum, it was dog-slow
(which is something we could very likely improve
if there is a demand for such a kind of forum)

please let me know the reasoning behind the forum
(e.g. rationale, advantages over ML, etc ...)

don't get me wrong, I'm not vetoing this right now
I'm just trying to figure the details ...

TIA,
Herbert

> Regards,
>   Evert
> 
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Evert

Hi!

Well, my main reasoning was that there is no VServer Forum yet... There 
is a mailing list, but with mailing lists it's much more difficult to 
reply nicely to postings when you don't have the original message 
anymore. The forum does not have this problem. Here all messages & 
postings can be replied to indefinitely.


But I agree with you, and we leave it up to the community whether a 
VServer forum will be endorsed.


Regards,
   Evert

Herbert Poetzl wrote:


On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Evert Meulie wrote:
 


Hi all!

For anyone who is interested I have created a VServer forum on my site: 
http://vserver.meulie.net/
   



thanks!

I changed the entry to 'Unofficial' and asked to
contact me at IRC, don't know when I will be there
actually but ML is even better ...

the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?

basically I've tried to make the ML the one and
only 'other' forum (besides the IRC channel), and
I'm not convinced that we really need one besides
that ... but I leave that to the community ...

sidenote: when I tried your forum, it was dog-slow
(which is something we could very likely improve
if there is a demand for such a kind of forum)

please let me know the reasoning behind the forum
(e.g. rationale, advantages over ML, etc ...)

don't get me wrong, I'm not vetoing this right now
I'm just trying to figure the details ...

TIA,
Herbert

 


Regards,
Evert

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
   



___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Tor Rune Skoglund
Evert wrote:
> Well, my main reasoning was that there is no VServer Forum yet... There
> is a mailing list, but with mailing lists it's much more difficult to
> reply nicely to postings when you don't have the original message
> anymore. The forum does not have this problem. Here all messages &
> postings can be replied to indefinitely.
> 
> But I agree with you, and we leave it up to the community whether a
> VServer forum will be endorsed.

A _well-organized_, active forum would be nice. IMHO, one of the main
problems
(_the_ main problem?) with linux-vserver is the lack of good
documentation and support.

No offense... I mean, Herbert is doing a great job, but for
the average user, searching messages from old mailing list
postings, IRC logs and poorly styled/"incomplete" web pages (the flower
page being one example) is not the way to have it in the long run.

Tor Rune Skoglund
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Dariush Pietrzak,,,
> postings, IRC logs and poorly styled/"incomplete" web pages (the flower
> page being one example) is not the way to have it in the long run.
 flower page rocks.
Everyone and their brother creating their own forum is not the answer, there
already is a vserver wiki, if you want to work on documentation - go update
wiki.

-- 
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
 Total Existance Failure
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Tor Rune Skoglund

Dariush Pietrzak,,, wrote:


postings, IRC logs and poorly styled/"incomplete" web pages (the flower
page being one example) is not the way to have it in the long run.
   


flower page rocks.
 



Well, thats a matter of opinion... For the "average user" I would think 
the view would be

different... :)


Everyone and their brother creating their own forum is not the answer, there
already is a vserver wiki, if you want to work on documentation - go update
wiki.

 

Problem with the wiki is that there is no forum there. If one could 
incorporate some kind
of forum there, it would be nice --- like e.g. the forum.gentoo.org, 
which I find extremely valueable.


And btw, not _anyone_ has the required knowledge about vserver to write 
good documentation
on the wiki anyway. Nothing is worse than wrong and outdated 
documentation...


Tor Rune Skoglund
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Dariush Pietrzak,,,
> Well, thats a matter of opinion... For the "average user" I would think 
> the view would be different... :)
 I have never seen this mythical "average user" you keep on talking about.
I always thought that I'm him, but you seem to be implying that he's got
different views then me.

> >already is a vserver wiki, if you want to work on documentation - go update
> >wiki.
> Problem with the wiki is that there is no forum there. If one could 
> incorporate some kind
 AFAIK most wikis has 'discusion' panels for every page

>> And btw, not _anyone_ has the required knowledge about vserver to write 
> good documentation  on the wiki anyway. Nothing is worse than wrong and 
> outdated 
> documentation...
 well, fragmented and non-accessible documentation is worse.

-- 
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
 Total Existance Failure
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Daniel Hokka Zakrisson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
| And btw, not _anyone_ has the required knowledge about vserver to write
| good documentation
| on the wiki anyway. Nothing is worse than wrong and outdated
| documentation...

Which is one of the many problems with forums. A wiki can be changed by
anyone who spots the mistakes, while a forum requires whoever wrote it
or an admin to do it...

- --
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
GPG id: 06723412
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDV1zUYTbdogZyNBIRAua8AJ4kapCL1vBOf2xfbNXCIqyVcQ406QCfdHFS
+UygsODKddKr4NHAa/8WkhU=
=co/q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Tor Rune Skoglund
Dariush Pietrzak,,, wrote:
>>Well, thats a matter of opinion... For the "average user" I would think 
>>the view would be different... :)
> 
>  I have never seen this mythical "average user" you keep on talking about.
> I always thought that I'm him, but you seem to be implying that he's got
> different views then me.

I bet I'm more average than you - and to me, the flower page, is not
particarly nice... :) Well, that's just my opinion thought.
To my best memory I cannot remember any product I have used some
much time on to get up and running correctly the latest years.
Better documentation and an active forum surely would have
helped _me_ a lot anyway.

>>Problem with the wiki is that there is no forum there. If one could 
>>incorporate some kind
> 
>  AFAIK most wikis has 'discusion' panels for every page

Then it's sad it isn't installed on linux-vserver's wiki...(?)

>>>And btw, not _anyone_ has the required knowledge about vserver to write 
>>
>>good documentation  on the wiki anyway. Nothing is worse than wrong and 
>>outdated 
>>documentation...
> 
>  well, fragmented and non-accessible documentation is worse.

linux-vserver has it all! :-)

Just a final word from me; I would like to say that I am
_very_ impressed with Herbert's and Enrico's and all those I
cannot name and their work and support efforts on the mailing
list, wiki and IRC, and linux-vserver generally.
But if Linux-vserver is going to be big hit
someone with the right knowledge has to write consistent
and updated project documentation.

Tor Rune Skoglund
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:30:11AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?

Mailing lists are a lot better than web forums (IMHO).  I've dropped
out of more than one community when they transferred to web forums
from mailing lists (although some people might not think that's a bad
thing ;-))

I don't answer many questions here (2 or 3 in the past few months only)
so my opinion isn't too important!

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Chuck
On Thursday 20 October 2005 06:59 am, Stephen Harris wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:30:11AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?
> 
> Mailing lists are a lot better than web forums (IMHO).  I've dropped
> out of more than one community when they transferred to web forums
> from mailing lists (although some people might not think that's a bad
> thing ;-))
> 
> I don't answer many questions here (2 or 3 in the past few months only)
> so my opinion isn't too important!
> 

I have found both to be very helpful. Mailing lists are excellent but for me I 
find it difficult to wait through a search of tens of thousands of msgs for 
some content I am looking for. There is an extreme convenience in mailing 
lists in that, one.. they come into your home therefore seem more personal... 
two you can maintain your own 'database' of sorts to search at your liesure 
however it does get to be difficult when manipulating,say, 25,000 msgs. :)
The linux-vserver project has, I believe, one of the most responsive mailing 
lists I have seen, and the irc is excellent for solving problems in 
real-time.

I use the gentoo forum as an example. It is large, very active, and I have yet 
to do a search that did not result in a fast return on my search criteria. 
New content not covered was responded to quickly by many, some quite helpful 
and others not so much... just have to use judgement. 

To me forums seem less 'personal' in that I have to 'go' somewhere to get my 
answers and for that effort it still is not in real time as irc would be. I 
think the primary beauty of forums is topic organization and speed and ease 
of searches. However, in this case, a forum is just one more place to pay 
attention to. I personally think the mailing list and irc are sufficient for 
any discussion.

both have their strong and weak points... what would be nice instead of an 
interactive forum, but a bit difficult to implement, would be to create some 
kind of parsing program to parse the entire mailing list archives into a 
database, then present the database data in 'forum' form for easy searching 
and reading. I believe this would answer a need for a 'forum style' facility, 
and would make finding answers *considerably* easier for everyone. I don't 
know of a topic that has not been resolved somewhere in the mailing list 
archives. Resolutions done on irc, if not covered in the mailiing list could 
be submitted to the database for inclusion, and by running this update 
program a few times a day looking for new data, the 'forum' facility would be 
updated almost in real time.


I also believe in people having the freedom to create a forum if they wish, 
but it would be a personal thing run as many personal gentoo forums are and 
not officially sanctioned.. I think the developers have enough to do keeping 
up with mailing list and irc and I would never expect them to add more to 
their list to watch... what we need to do as users is to assist them by 
developing this huge wealth of data already existing in the mailing list 
archives and in irc logs into some kind of organized, easy to use, one-stop  
information facility like this forum-database idea.



> -- 
> 
> rgds
> Stephen
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> 

-- 

Chuck

"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath
or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose 
for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. "
The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book


___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:

> I have found both to be very helpful. Mailing lists are excellent but for me 
> I 
> find it difficult to wait through a search of tens of thousands of msgs for 
> some content I am looking for. There is an extreme convenience in mailing 

That's what a web engine is there for. The archives are world-visible.

> lists in that, one.. they come into your home therefore seem more personal... 

They are also serialized, and do not require polling. Whenever I have to
use a broken medium (such as e.g. Sveasoft, which is the only way they
support their product), I find myself I have to enable email notification on
responses to individual topics. Instead of having the answer delivered,
I have to invoke a browser instance, and manually cut and paste the link
(no, clicking doesn't work, because I read my mail from many places).

Also, unlike web search engines, the forums' uniformly suck mossy rocks,
both in speed and accuracy.

> two you can maintain your own 'database' of sorts to search at your liesure 
> however it does get to be difficult when manipulating,say, 25,000 msgs. :)

I don't find it difficult to manipulate well in excess of 100 k messages.
The database is of primary value in case the original effort goes away,
or data is destroyed by a disk crash with no backup (happens regularly).

-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:

> I use the gentoo forum as an example. It is large, very active, and I have 
> yet 

*giggle* I offer tivocommunity and dealdatabase web forums as a counter
example; most questions are responded to with "do a search" and two
thirds of the search results are posts telling people to do a search!

> both have their strong and weak points... what would be nice instead of an 
> interactive forum, but a bit difficult to implement, would be to create some 
> kind of parsing program to parse the entire mailing list archives into a 
> database, then present the database data in 'forum' form for easy searching 

Most mailing list software has a web interface for the archives of the list,
and some provide a searchable interface.  Hmm, we have an archive at

  http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/

and


  http://archives.linux-vserver.org/

I don't see a "search" option there, but I guess we could always make
google index the pages and then have a google search option :-)

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Daniel Hokka Zakrisson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Evert Meulie wrote:
| Not entirely true... Anyone can reply to a posting that contains a
| mistake...   8-)

But the wrong information is still there. People like taking shortcuts,
and reading replies seems like the long way around, since you already
have your solution/explaination/whatever you were looking for.

- --
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
GPG id: 06723412
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDV5uTYTbdogZyNBIRAtw4AJ9fdr/CmvJFfDFDHx9k5ETdaHnWSACeMS2B
clSLpfeNqHbL5oSiHLQlAtQ=
=Nr8q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread Gregor Schreier

Stephen Harris wrote:


On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:

...

and


 http://archives.linux-vserver.org/

I don't see a "search" option there, but I guess we could always make
google index the pages and then have a google search option :-)

 


hi there,

it's already done by google :-)

try this link:

http://www.google.com/search?as_q=limit&num=10&hs=CNv&hl=en&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Flist.linux-vserver.org%2Farchive%2Fvserver%2F

so we have our searchfunction
happy search und finding :-)

--
best regards
gregor
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


RE: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread smagnuson
I like the maillist because it does not require anything from me (going to a 
website and looking for updates, etc).  Guess that makes me really lazy :)  I 
don't get time to visit all the sites I should each day, but when that new 
email notification icon is sitting therewell you know the rest.

I do believe a web forum would open up vserver to more users (user friendly), 
modern looking, etc

Perhaps something like the following is a option.  The best of both worlds one 
could say I have never used it.

http://www.mail2forum.com/

later
sig


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Herbert
Poetzl
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 12:30 AM
To: Evert Meulie
Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] VServer forum


On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Evert Meulie wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> For anyone who is interested I have created a VServer forum on my site: 
>  http://vserver.meulie.net/

thanks!

I changed the entry to 'Unofficial' and asked to
contact me at IRC, don't know when I will be there
actually but ML is even better ...

the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?

basically I've tried to make the ML the one and
only 'other' forum (besides the IRC channel), and
I'm not convinced that we really need one besides
that ... but I leave that to the community ...

sidenote: when I tried your forum, it was dog-slow
(which is something we could very likely improve
if there is a demand for such a kind of forum)

please let me know the reasoning behind the forum
(e.g. rationale, advantages over ML, etc ...)

don't get me wrong, I'm not vetoing this right now
I'm just trying to figure the details ...

TIA,
Herbert

> Regards,
>   Evert
> 
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


RE: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-20 Thread smagnuson
I also noticed that if vserver wanted to go one step further

xoops + newbb + CM2F addon 
(http://dev.xoops.org/modules/xfmod/project/?xoopscm2f)
postnuke + PNphpBB + CM2F addon (http://mods.postnuke.com/Article2569.html)

I'm sure mambo and other may have this functionality as well

sig

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Magnuson,
Sig
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:36 AM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: RE: [Vserver] VServer forum


I like the maillist because it does not require anything from me (going to a 
website and looking for updates, etc).  Guess that makes me really lazy :)  I 
don't get time to visit all the sites I should each day, but when that new 
email notification icon is sitting therewell you know the rest.

I do believe a web forum would open up vserver to more users (user friendly), 
modern looking, etc

Perhaps something like the following is a option.  The best of both worlds one 
could say I have never used it.

http://www.mail2forum.com/

later
sig


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Herbert
Poetzl
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 12:30 AM
To: Evert Meulie
Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] VServer forum


On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Evert Meulie wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> For anyone who is interested I have created a VServer forum on my site: 
>  http://vserver.meulie.net/

thanks!

I changed the entry to 'Unofficial' and asked to
contact me at IRC, don't know when I will be there
actually but ML is even better ...

the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?

basically I've tried to make the ML the one and
only 'other' forum (besides the IRC channel), and
I'm not convinced that we really need one besides
that ... but I leave that to the community ...

sidenote: when I tried your forum, it was dog-slow
(which is something we could very likely improve
if there is a demand for such a kind of forum)

please let me know the reasoning behind the forum
(e.g. rationale, advantages over ML, etc ...)

don't get me wrong, I'm not vetoing this right now
I'm just trying to figure the details ...

TIA,
Herbert

> Regards,
>   Evert
> 
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] VServer forum

2005-10-21 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:31:02PM +0200, Gregor Schreier wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
> >...
> >
> >and
> >
> > http://archives.linux-vserver.org/
> >
> >I don't see a "search" option there, but I guess we could always make
> >google index the pages and then have a google search option :-)
> >
> hi there,
> 
> it's already done by google :-)
> 
> try this link:
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?as_q=limit&num=10&hs=CNv&hl=en&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Flist.linux-vserver.org%2Farchive%2Fvserver%2F
> 
> so we have our searchfunction
> happy search und finding :-)

well, I added this one a few weeks ago (linked from
the wiki page):

 http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/search/

best,
Herbert

> --
> best regards
> gregor
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver