[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2015-05-26 Thread Dave S


On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 3:13:04 PM UTC-7, Ben Lawrence wrote:

 So, I am wondering how the web2py developers  feel about StackOverflow?

 My understanding is that web2py questions should be asked here at 
 web2py-users... is it because there is some commercial gain (advertising) 
 at SO? I don't mind using either... 



More likely it is, as Anthony hints at below, most of the power users are 
over here, and there's less monitoring of SO by those who know answers.  
Build up the core group a little larger, and splitting it's attention will 
be easier.

/dps

 



 On Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 9:39:38 AM UTC-7, Anthony wrote:

 Well, it's possible that at some point Google Groups will include QA 
 functionality, as alluded to at the end of this announcement: 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/googlegroups-announce/2ccywee6dE4/discussion
 .

 The idea for the new web2pyslices.com was that it would include QA 
 functionality as well, though not sure if/when to expect that.

 As already noted, one benefit of SO is that it increases the public 
 exposure of web2py. I try to monitor it and answer questions, but it's not 
 quite as easy to stay on top of posts -- even though I'm following the 
 web2py tag, it typically takes from several hours up to a full day before 
 I receive email alerts about new questions posted.

 Anthony

 On Thursday, October 6, 2011 11:39:56 AM UTC-4, monotasker wrote:

 I may be different than others, but SO is usually the first place I go 
 with questions. I asked my first couple of web2py questions on SO and then 
 was steered here. Massimo seems to point people here quite deliberately 
 when they post questions on SO, and the web2py site (as well as the book) 
 points people here as *the* place for support and discussion. So I suspect 
 that simply stating that SO is the preferred forum for how-to and 
 problem-solving questions would largely do the trick.

 I do see what you mean about possibly dissipating answers. I guess the 
 issue would be having to watch two forums instead of one. I wonder whether 
 that's why Massimo has emphasized this group as a one-stop-shop--so that 
 it's a more manageable workflow for him. As the community grows, though, I 
 wonder whether a shift will actually help to reduce the noise of repeated 
 answers.

 Yes, it's easy to filter questions here. But I find that I still often 
 have to read through scores of answers before realizing that my particular 
 question hasn't been answered yet.



-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
web2py-users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2015-05-26 Thread Ben Lawrence
So, I am wondering how the web2py developers  feel about StackOverflow?

My understanding is that web2py questions should be asked here at 
web2py-users... is it because there is some commercial gain (advertising) 
at SO? I don't mind using either... 


On Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 9:39:38 AM UTC-7, Anthony wrote:

 Well, it's possible that at some point Google Groups will include QA 
 functionality, as alluded to at the end of this announcement: 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/googlegroups-announce/2ccywee6dE4/discussion
 .

 The idea for the new web2pyslices.com was that it would include QA 
 functionality as well, though not sure if/when to expect that.

 As already noted, one benefit of SO is that it increases the public 
 exposure of web2py. I try to monitor it and answer questions, but it's not 
 quite as easy to stay on top of posts -- even though I'm following the 
 web2py tag, it typically takes from several hours up to a full day before 
 I receive email alerts about new questions posted.

 Anthony

 On Thursday, October 6, 2011 11:39:56 AM UTC-4, monotasker wrote:

 I may be different than others, but SO is usually the first place I go 
 with questions. I asked my first couple of web2py questions on SO and then 
 was steered here. Massimo seems to point people here quite deliberately 
 when they post questions on SO, and the web2py site (as well as the book) 
 points people here as *the* place for support and discussion. So I suspect 
 that simply stating that SO is the preferred forum for how-to and 
 problem-solving questions would largely do the trick.

 I do see what you mean about possibly dissipating answers. I guess the 
 issue would be having to watch two forums instead of one. I wonder whether 
 that's why Massimo has emphasized this group as a one-stop-shop--so that 
 it's a more manageable workflow for him. As the community grows, though, I 
 wonder whether a shift will actually help to reduce the noise of repeated 
 answers.

 Yes, it's easy to filter questions here. But I find that I still often 
 have to read through scores of answers before realizing that my particular 
 question hasn't been answered yet.



-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
web2py-users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2011-10-06 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
James M. sipajah...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is alot of activity on this newsgroup, which can
 make it challenging to find answers to previously asked questions...
 signal to noise mismatch.

Hmm...I'm total noob here and can easily select/filter threads that speaks
about the stuff which is above my head.

Otoh, I believe that extracting FAQ entries from the newsgroup would serve
better than another SO forum...considering that certain topics are already
answered.


Sincerely,
Gour


-- 
“In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are
all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu)

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2011-10-06 Thread pbreit
On one hand, that might be beneficial. On the other, it may dissipate and 
slow down answers. How do you really steer people there anyway?

[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2011-10-06 Thread monotasker
I may be different than others, but SO is usually the first place I go with 
questions. I asked my first couple of web2py questions on SO and then was 
steered here. Massimo seems to point people here quite deliberately when 
they post questions on SO, and the web2py site (as well as the book) points 
people here as *the* place for support and discussion. So I suspect that 
simply stating that SO is the preferred forum for how-to and problem-solving 
questions would largely do the trick.

I do see what you mean about possibly dissipating answers. I guess the issue 
would be having to watch two forums instead of one. I wonder whether that's 
why Massimo has emphasized this group as a one-stop-shop--so that it's a 
more manageable workflow for him. As the community grows, though, I wonder 
whether a shift will actually help to reduce the noise of repeated 
answers.

Yes, it's easy to filter questions here. But I find that I still often have 
to read through scores of answers before realizing that my particular 
question hasn't been answered yet.


[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2011-10-06 Thread Anthony
Well, it's possible that at some point Google Groups will include QA 
functionality, as alluded to at the end of this 
announcement: 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/googlegroups-announce/2ccywee6dE4/discussion.

The idea for the new web2pyslices.com was that it would include QA 
functionality as well, though not sure if/when to expect that.

As already noted, one benefit of SO is that it increases the public exposure 
of web2py. I try to monitor it and answer questions, but it's not quite as 
easy to stay on top of posts -- even though I'm following the web2py tag, 
it typically takes from several hours up to a full day before I receive 
email alerts about new questions posted.

Anthony

On Thursday, October 6, 2011 11:39:56 AM UTC-4, monotasker wrote:

 I may be different than others, but SO is usually the first place I go with 
 questions. I asked my first couple of web2py questions on SO and then was 
 steered here. Massimo seems to point people here quite deliberately when 
 they post questions on SO, and the web2py site (as well as the book) points 
 people here as *the* place for support and discussion. So I suspect that 
 simply stating that SO is the preferred forum for how-to and problem-solving 
 questions would largely do the trick.

 I do see what you mean about possibly dissipating answers. I guess the 
 issue would be having to watch two forums instead of one. I wonder whether 
 that's why Massimo has emphasized this group as a one-stop-shop--so that 
 it's a more manageable workflow for him. As the community grows, though, I 
 wonder whether a shift will actually help to reduce the noise of repeated 
 answers.

 Yes, it's easy to filter questions here. But I find that I still often have 
 to read through scores of answers before realizing that my particular 
 question hasn't been answered yet.



[web2py] Re: Would there be an advantage to having more discussion on Stackoverflow?

2011-10-05 Thread James M.

I believe the community would be better served by using Stackoverflow
for QA and using the newsgroups for non QA freeform discussions/
news. I think this would seperate and emphasize the highly reusable
information, QA, from the often transient/limited use information/
discussion.  There is alot of activity on this newsgroup, which can
make it challenging to find answers to previously asked questions...
signal to noise mismatch.

On Oct 5, 8:26 am, monotasker scotti...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've been using web2py for about six weeks now and am loving the supportive
 community. I notice that there's a strong push to focus that community
 discussion here on the Google group. I wonder if this has some
 disadvantages, though:

 a) It seems difficult sometimes to find previous discussions of the same
 issue. So I suspect people are answering the same question more than they
 need to sometimes. Here it seems like Stackoverflow helps to streamline the
 support process.

 b) The focus on the Google group means that the web2py name isn't popping up
 as often in mixed forums like Stackoverflow. I think that creates the
 impression that web2py has fewer users than it really does.

 So would there be some value in encouraging people to direct specific
 support questions to Stackoverflow and reserving the Google group for things
 like announcements, open-ended discussion, threads about resources and
 hosting, etc?

 Ian