Re: Getting Started With WO site

2007-06-19 Thread Andrus Adamchik


On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:50 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

Yeah it seemed like it would be nicer going in, but once the  
content was in there it has been less than useful ... The one big  
benefit of it is that it's not going away any time soon, which  
can't necessarily be said of any place that might host a confluence  
for us.


ObjectStyle.org has been up since 2001 and has no plans to shut down  
any time soon. It even outlived some of our hosting providers and  
survided 4 major infrastructure migrations. Although I wouldn't bet  
on us outliving the Wikipedia, so taking full XML backups is a good  
idea :-)


Cheers,
Andrus

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Send an HTTP-Request and process the responding xml data

2007-06-19 Thread William Gier

Hello list,
can anybody give me a hint on how to send an http request to a server 
and process the xml response data with WO.


Regards,
William

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Send an HTTP-Request and process the responding xml data

2007-06-19 Thread Paul Lynch


On 19 Jun 2007, at 10:27, William Gier wrote:

can anybody give me a hint on how to send an http request to a  
server and process the xml response data with WO.


At the crudest level, just use WOHTTPConnection.  If the XML you are  
processing is XMLRPC or SOAP, then take a look at WOWebServiceClient,  
or use the Apache XMLRPC Java package.


That should be enough to get started; let us know if you need any  
more information.


Paul

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Getting Started With WO site

2007-06-19 Thread Mike Schrag
I have the procedure (and the xml file) dump of the wikibook, if  
someone wants to write an xslt to convert it into whatever the import  
format is for confluence ...


ms

On Jun 19, 2007, at 5:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:



On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:50 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

Yeah it seemed like it would be nicer going in, but once the  
content was in there it has been less than useful ... The one big  
benefit of it is that it's not going away any time soon, which  
can't necessarily be said of any place that might host a  
confluence for us.


ObjectStyle.org has been up since 2001 and has no plans to shut  
down any time soon. It even outlived some of our hosting providers  
and survided 4 major infrastructure migrations. Although I wouldn't  
bet on us outliving the Wikipedia, so taking full XML backups is a  
good idea :-)


Cheers,
Andrus

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag% 
40mdimension.com


This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firefox VS Safari

2007-06-19 Thread Asa Hardcastle
I've experienced the exact opposite.  However, Firefox has Firebug -  
how does anyone live without it?


Two questions:
- Are you testing over HTTPS?
- Have you tried Safari 3 beta?

asa


On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Anthony Arthur wrote:

Normally I test/debug using Safari, suffering glacier-ly slow  
response times.  Then I tried Firefox -- wow -- what a difference.   
Why does Safari respond so much more slowly than FF?  Anyone  
else ever notice this and care to offer a reason?


--Brian

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Getting Started With WO site

2007-06-19 Thread Michael Warner
I would like to volunteer to provide support for authors  --  editing  
of content, not so much from the point of view of the correctness of  
the content, but from the point of view
of clear written communication -- what should be added, deleted, re- 
arranged, elaborated -- that sort of thing.   I can do this for  
contributions before they are posted
or afterwards.   I had quite of bit of experience with that sort of  
thing in a previous life and in a different technical arena.   Since  
I am not a WO expert,   I can sometimes  see things in the

writing that experts do not.

Mike Warner



On Jun 18, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

I am not sure that putting it in the WOCommunity site is the best  
idea.  I will propose that a top level split is of longer term  
value.  spaces in a Confluence website are somewhat isolated from  
each other, but it is still easy to make links between topics in  
each.  Rather than have the stuff from the WikiBook jammed into  
WOCOM, would it not be more useful to provide something along the  
lines of:


WOLips - for all things directly related to WOLips and Eclipse usage
WOCOOM - for community related things, news, plans, associations, etc.
Wonder -  for all things directly related to Project Wonder
WebObjects - for documentation on WebObjects
WOTutorials - maybe part of WebObjects, maybe  a separate space

I think that having a top level differentiation like that will make  
it easier to locate the information that you want and easier to  
decide where to place new material.


Chuck


On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Q wrote:



++1 here. I really dislike trying to use the wiki book, I would  
much prefer to see content marshalled into the WOCommunity wiki,  
rather than into the wiki book.


If the WOCOM wiki was the official centre of these efforts I would  
be much more included to spend time on it.


On 19/06/2007, at 8:45 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:


I also am less than thrilled with the WikiBook:

- the process of adding images is painful
- I am not sure if anything else can be added
- searching just the WO content is either not possible or not clear
- the markup is limited
- no one has control over the backups etc.

I have used Confluence quite a bit and find that to be much  
better for documenting technical material.


Chuck

On Jun 14, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:

Agreed.  How do we (and I guess by we I mean everybody on this  
list) come to an agreement on the one place that should be the  
definitive posting grounds?  Honestly, I sometimes find  
navigating the wiki book less than ideal, but it's kind of a  
minor irritation that I can live with if it solves the problem  
of a central repository, and there's so much there already that  
it seems like the most logical place to me.  Whatever it is, it  
should be publicly editable, I think, and it has to be  
searchable and individual articles must be linkable.  Is anybody  
in disagreement that the wiki book is the best place ongoing to  
post information?  If so, can we start an effort to shuttle  
information posted elsewhere into the wiki book if it is  
missing?  If not, what are alternative suggestions for the  
central repository of information?


Thanks,
Mark

On Jun 14, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Dana Kashubeck wrote:


On 6/14/07 11:57 AM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
My understanding is that the webobjects wiki book (http:// 
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects) is trying to  
become the central point of documentation for WebObjects that  
people post to.  There's already a ton of info there, but we  
all know it could use a ton more.  At WOWODC, when the experts  
panel was asked what could be done to help with project  
wonder, this is what they came back with immediately:  We need  
people writing documentation, and this is the place to put  
it.  Even if it's bad, there are so many people watching it  
that bad info will get edited out quickly.
I think there's a danger in having TOO many informational  
sites.  If everybody decides to wing it because they get on a  
high at a developer's conference regarding being able to  
document stuff to widen the movement, I think we will end up  
with dozens of blogs, half finished tutorials, etc.  There's a  
reason there isn't much documentation on Wonder and  
WebObjects:  writing good documentation is HARD and time  
consuming, and not a very glamorous task.  So if you have 10  
spare hours to write a decent article on a very specific  
issue, I think everybody would be better served if that went  
to the wikibook.  That way, everybody can always point to one  
resource as definitive.
I don't mean to be preachy about it or rain on anybody's  
parade that is putting up yet another site about WebObjects.   
What I just wrote might sound snappy or mean, but I don't mean  
it that way.  I'm just trying to advocate a central repository  
for everything so people don't have to go here and there to  
get various pieces of the overall puzzle.  

Re: Firefox VS Safari

2007-06-19 Thread Jerry W. Walker

Hi, Anthony,

Typically, when Safari is returning pages incredibly slowly for me,  
it's usually been due to host name confusion. I don't know why this  
would affect Safari and not Firefox, but I've experienced the problem.


For more information, you might review this thread from 4/2006:

http://www.mail-archive.com/webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com/ 
msg03511.html


Regards,
Jerry

On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Anthony Arthur wrote:

Normally I test/debug using Safari, suffering glacier-ly slow  
response times.  Then I tried Firefox -- wow -- what a difference.   
Why does Safari respond so much more slowly than FF?  Anyone  
else ever notice this and care to offer a reason?


--Brian
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jerrywwalker% 
40gmail.com


This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
__ Jerry W. Walker,
   WebObjects Developer/Instructor for High Performance Industrial  
Strength Internet Enabled Systems


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
203 278-4085office



___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [Eclipse/WOLips] EOGenerator not generating files

2007-06-19 Thread Henrique Prange

Hi Cheong Hee,

This is a known bug of WOLips. See [1] and [2] for details. There are 
patches for these issues, but it seems they still have not been applied.


[1]http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/browse/WOL-361
[2]http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/browse/WOL-362

Cheers,

Henrique

Cheong Hee (Datasonic) wrote:

Testing on the tutorial posted by Janine a while ago ...
 
At the install EOGenerator 1.7 section (c), i supposed this is a minor 
to change:
 
Go to Eclipse - Preferences - WOLips - EOGenerator meant

Go to Window - Preferences - WOLips - EOGenerator
 
The issue I am running into is the eogenerator seemed unable to generate 
the class files from Eclipse/WOLips.  I am right-clicked 
LicensePlate.eogen and then WOLips Tools- EO Generate.  No package is 
generated in src directory.
 
The extract of the .eogen file looks as such:
C:\CheongHee\UserAreaEclipse\Developer\Applications\eogenerator\eogenerator.exe 
-destination src -java -javaTemplate JavaSourceEOF52.eotemplate -model 
C:LicensePlate.eomodeld -packagedirs -subclassDestination src 
-subclassJavaTemplate JavaSubclassSourceEOF5.eotemplate -templatedir 
../../../../UserAreaEclipse/Developer/Applications/eogenerator/Templates 
-verbose
 
Note that there is a -model C:LicensePlate.eomodeld.  Is this supposed 
to be -model LicensePlate.eomodeld ?
 
Running on the command line, with slight modiification on -model 
LicensePlate.eomodeld, it did work.
 
Cheers
 
Cheong Hee
 
 
 





 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/hprange%40gmail.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--

\o/ Henrique Prange, Moleque de Idéias Educação e Tecnologia Ltda
 |  Phone: 55-21-2710-0178 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ http://www.moleque.com.br
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


double/triple click (was: Re: [ANN] Tying my hands...)

2007-06-19 Thread Marc Guenther

Hi Pierre,

interesting project you have there. Does it have a name?

On 14. Jun. 2007, at 1:56, Pierre Bernard wrote:
For Java I use Eclipse.  Wish they had decent (Mac like) text  
editing: double-click, tripple click, bindings, ...


For double/triple click see here:
http://www.biffy-berlin.de/marc/doubleTripleClick_patch_322.zip

That is for Eclipse 3.2.2, but there are patches for other versions too.

What do you mean by bindings?

Marc

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Getting Started With WO site

2007-06-19 Thread Chuck Hill


On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:22 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

I can create a Confluence Wonder space if requested on  
ObjectStyle.org.


Thank you Andrus, that is very generous of you.


Just let me know who wants to be the main admin for that space and  
if there is a consensus among potential volunteer authors that the  
docs should be maintained there.


I think I will leave that to someone else, I have too many things on  
the go at the moment.



Chuck



On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:30 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
The ObjectStyle wiki is not my site so I can't comment on what can  
or should be done.  Right now they host a space/site for WOLips  
and one  for the WO-Community.  The stuff from the wiki book does  
not seem like it should go in either place.


It would be cool if Wonder had its own space.

Just ruminating.

Chuck






--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their  
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific  
problems.

http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects





___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


WSDL via Direct Action?

2007-06-19 Thread seevion
I'm having trouble with the types schema of my WSDL.  In the WIKI for 
WebServices Francis Labrie recommends sharing the WSDL through Direct 
Action.  Can somebody explain how to do this please?  Is anyone aware 
of another work-around?


--Mat

AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: JS libraries used with WO

2007-06-19 Thread Jesse Tayler

HA! thanks, chuck! yea, I've noticed that secret google site--

the question is, what people on the list doing a lot of AJAX type  
work lately? what sorts of things are you doing with it?


I was sort of thinking discussion...

jess


On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:

There is this very cool technology that you probably have not heard  
of.  It is a pretty deep secret right now.  The code name is  
Google.  Here is a quick example:


http://www.google.com/search?q=WebObjects+Ajax


Wow!


Chuck




On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Jesse Tayler wrote:



What sorts of JS libraries are people using for interface  
engineering, and what sorts of things are you doing with them?


Is anyone using this one:

http://script.aculo.us/

Anyone doing a lot of AJAX type work?

jess


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: JS libraries used with WO

2007-06-19 Thread Asa Hardcastle

Hi Jess,

We've been using lots of prototype, excellent for ajax and is the  
basis for script.aculo.us.   Scriptaculous/Prototype are the basis  
for the Project Wonder ajax framework, which is a great way to get  
started doing ajax with wo.


Prototype:
http://www.prototypejs.org/

Wonder:
http://wonder.sourceforge.net/

some Ajax framework docs, but download the Ajax Examples with project  
wonder.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Project_WONDER/ 
Frameworks/Ajax


It should be noted that starting to use ajax with your apps (if you  
are going to account for and deal with all of the possible error  
states) has a high development time cost, especially as your codebase  
grows.


These days we are doing an ever increasing amount of ajax work.  We  
use a mixture of prototype, project wonder, and our own JS (which we  
will probably be deprecating since prototype does an excellent  
job).The apps that we're using it in range from forms with  
related pulldowns/form fields that change fairly often, in place page  
replacement and editing, and basically any time we want to avoid a  
page refresh.  We've found that once you've ajaxified one portion of  
your app, it isn't long before everything is ajax.



later,

asa



On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote:



What sorts of JS libraries are people using for interface  
engineering, and what sorts of things are you doing with them?


Is anyone using this one:

http://script.aculo.us/

Anyone doing a lot of AJAX type work?

jess


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/a.talk% 
40zenn.net


This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]