Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Ramsey Gurley]

Rather than modify the old WOAdaptor, an alternative option is to write a 
WOAdaptor. ERWOAdaptor is already there, and it's based on netty. Personally, I 
consider that a better way forward, but right now, it is also limited in file 
size because it uses the chunked decoder.  

I believe it could be updated to support large file sizes, but 1) I haven't had 
the time to try and 2) I haven't had the problem :-)  I was more interested in 
making websockets work when I was working on it last year.  I recently updated 
the websocket implementation to support the latest spec. I didn't have any luck 
finding a large file upload example while I was doing it, so it's still limited 
to 100Mb uploads.

Ramsey

On Jun 19, 2012, at 2:30 AM, Johann Werner wrote:

> Apparently no one has tried to modify/override the involved classes yet so I 
> made some additions to Wonder by reimplementing the smallest possible number 
> of classes to support upload streams > 2.1GB. These are
> 
> WOHttpIO
> WOMultipartIterator
> WONoCopyPushbackInputStream
> 
> leaving NSRange as it is as that class is used in many places and changing 
> the API from int to long would involve many dependent fixes. For those 
> wanting to try out these changes and help in testing/modifying the code get 
> the corresponding wonder branch [1]. I attached an Eclipse project that can 
> be used to test the upload. Just pick a big file or create one with
> 
> dd if=/dev/zero of=big_file.bin bs=1g count=3
> 
> (this will create a 3GB file 'big_file.bin')
> 
> Some observations I made:
> 
> - using DirectConnect everything works as expected
> - Firefox cannot correctly upload files > 2.1GB [2] as the variable used for 
> the content-length header is an int (doh!), the header length is added to the 
> file length so the file cannot be exactly (2^32 - 1)
> - passing through Apache the upload stream is interrupted sometimes -> 
> timeout/problem within mod_WebObjects?
> 
> 
> Please share your thoughts
> 
> jw
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/darkv/wonder/tree/big_files_upload
> [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215450
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Am 14.06.2012 um 18:55 schrieb Helmut Tschemernjak:
> 
>> 
>> Downloading large files works fine, for uploads there are several bugs in 
>> the WO code. I reported it via the Apple bug reporter some time ago. Problem 
>> ID: 10765546
>> 
>> There is no workaround, here is some input in case somebody from Apple is 
>> looking into it:
>> 
>> The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
>> content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. This 
>> will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many instances 
>> in the code that make use of an integer for the content length of a request:
>> WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
>> WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
>> Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such a 
>> limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).
>> 
>> PS: looking forward to see many of you at WOWODC 2012 in Montreal
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Helmut Tschemernjak
>> 
>> 
>> On 13.06.12 09:45, Johann Werner wrote:
>>> Just hitting the same problem for uploading files > 5GB. Does anyone has 
>>> already done some work relating to that problem?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 05.03.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Q:
>>> 
 On 05/03/2012, at 9:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
 
> Hey Alan,
> 
> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
> 
>> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm 
>> curious where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that 
>> obligated Apple to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe 
>> you have for a law suit?  I'm just curious.
> Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)
> 
> Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
> supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
> damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple 
> would be happy to supply a full refund ;-)
> 
> More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
> promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. 
> The reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus 
> the initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its 
> funding of tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put 
> into WO by Apple that people could continue to build their business apps 
> with. And, there was some initial promise of better community involvement 
> in the evolution of WO when the Apple maven repo was made available 
> (which showed some future versions in the works). It didn't last long 
> though which was a shame at the time, especially for us maven users. Hmm 
> so, perhaps it was the community's unwillingness to emb

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Helmut Tschemernjak]

Downloading large files works fine, for uploads there are several bugs 
in the WO code. I reported it via the Apple bug reporter some time ago. 
Problem ID: 10765546


There is no workaround, here is some input in case somebody from Apple 
is looking into it:


The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. 
This will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many 
instances in the code that make use of an integer for the content length 
of a request:

WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such 
a limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).


PS: looking forward to see many of you at WOWODC 2012 in Montreal

Regards

Helmut Tschemernjak


On 13.06.12 09:45, Johann Werner wrote:

Just hitting the same problem for uploading files > 5GB. Does anyone has 
already done some work relating to that problem?


Am 05.03.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Q:


On 05/03/2012, at 9:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:


Hey Alan,

On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:


Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm curious 
where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that obligated Apple 
to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you have for a law 
suit?  I'm just curious.

Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)

Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple would be 
happy to supply a full refund ;-)

More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. The 
reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus the 
initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its funding of 
tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put into WO by Apple 
that people could continue to build their business apps with. And, there was 
some initial promise of better community involvement in the evolution of WO 
when the Apple maven repo was made available (which showed some future versions 
in the works). It didn't last long though which was a shame at the time, 
especially for us maven users. Hmm so, perhaps it was the community's 
unwillingness to embrace maven that canned it moving forward :-)

What are you trying to say? Maven killed WebObjects? Why am I not surprised. :)


cheers,
Lachlan Deck



  ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/helmut%40helios.de

This email sent to hel...@helios.de


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Amedeo Mantica]

If i recall I uploaded stuff about 10gb. I'll test today again

Sent from my iPhone

On 13/giu/2012, at 09:45, Johann Werner  wrote:

> Just hitting the same problem for uploading files > 5GB. Does anyone has 
> already done some work relating to that problem?
> 
> 
> Am 05.03.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Q:
> 
>> 
>> On 05/03/2012, at 9:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>> 
>>> Hey Alan,
>>> 
>>> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
>>> 
 Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm 
 curious where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that 
 obligated Apple to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe 
 you have for a law suit?  I'm just curious.
>>> 
>>> Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)
>>> 
>>> Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
>>> supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
>>> damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple 
>>> would be happy to supply a full refund ;-)
>>> 
>>> More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
>>> promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. 
>>> The reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus 
>>> the initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its 
>>> funding of tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put into 
>>> WO by Apple that people could continue to build their business apps with. 
>>> And, there was some initial promise of better community involvement in the 
>>> evolution of WO when the Apple maven repo was made available (which showed 
>>> some future versions in the works). It didn't last long though which was a 
>>> shame at the time, especially for us maven users. Hmm so, perhaps it was 
>>> the community's unwillingness to embrace maven that canned it moving 
>>> forward :-)
>> 
>> What are you trying to say? Maven killed WebObjects? Why am I not surprised. 
>> :)
>> 
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Lachlan Deck
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/amedeomantica%40me.com
> 
> This email sent to amedeomant...@me.com
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Johann Werner]

Just hitting the same problem for uploading files > 5GB. Does anyone has 
already done some work relating to that problem?


Am 05.03.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Q:

> 
> On 05/03/2012, at 9:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> 
>> Hey Alan,
>> 
>> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
>> 
>>> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm 
>>> curious where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that 
>>> obligated Apple to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you 
>>> have for a law suit?  I'm just curious.
>> 
>> Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)
>> 
>> Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
>> supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
>> damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple would 
>> be happy to supply a full refund ;-)
>> 
>> More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
>> promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. 
>> The reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus the 
>> initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its funding 
>> of tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put into WO by 
>> Apple that people could continue to build their business apps with. And, 
>> there was some initial promise of better community involvement in the 
>> evolution of WO when the Apple maven repo was made available (which showed 
>> some future versions in the works). It didn't last long though which was a 
>> shame at the time, especially for us maven users. Hmm so, perhaps it was the 
>> community's unwillingness to embrace maven that canned it moving forward :-)
> 
> What are you trying to say? Maven killed WebObjects? Why am I not surprised. 
> :)
> 
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Lachlan Deck



 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Q]

On 05/03/2012, at 9:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:

> Hey Alan,
> 
> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
> 
>> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm 
>> curious where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that 
>> obligated Apple to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you 
>> have for a law suit?  I'm just curious.
> 
> Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)
> 
> Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
> supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
> damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple would 
> be happy to supply a full refund ;-)
> 
> More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
> promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. The 
> reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus the 
> initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its funding 
> of tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put into WO by 
> Apple that people could continue to build their business apps with. And, 
> there was some initial promise of better community involvement in the 
> evolution of WO when the Apple maven repo was made available (which showed 
> some future versions in the works). It didn't last long though which was a 
> shame at the time, especially for us maven users. Hmm so, perhaps it was the 
> community's unwillingness to embrace maven that canned it moving forward :-)

What are you trying to say? Maven killed WebObjects? Why am I not surprised. :)

> 
> cheers,
> Lachlan Deck
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/qdolan%40gmail.com
> 
> This email sent to qdo...@gmail.com



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Pascal Robert]

Le 2012-03-04 à 18:40, Lachlan Deck a écrit :

> Hey Alan,
> 
> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
> 
>> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm 
>> curious where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that 
>> obligated Apple to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you 
>> have for a law suit?  I'm just curious.
> 
> Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)
> 
> Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
> supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
> damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple would 
> be happy to supply a full refund ;-)
> 
> More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
> promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. The 
> reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus the 
> initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its funding 
> of tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put into WO by 
> Apple that people could continue to build their business apps with. And, 
> there was some initial promise of better community involvement in the 
> evolution of WO when the Apple maven repo was made available (which showed 
> some future versions in the works). It didn't last long though which was a 
> shame at the time, especially for us maven users. Hmm so, perhaps it was the 
> community's unwillingness to embrace maven that canned it moving forward :-)

Sure, seeing WO 5.5 at WWDC 2008 and on ADC made us think that it would 
continue, but in May 2009, something changed at Apple, and we don't know what 
and why.

But anyway, that was almost 3 years. 3 years of trying to show to Apple that we 
have a community, we had surveys, wocommunity.org, etc. In fact, I think the 
surveys might have been negative instead of positive.

In November, I went to a job interview, and the guy was asking what WebObject 
is, and when I told him that the community is 800 people outside Apple, he 
almost laughed at me…


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Lachlan Deck]

Hey Alan,

On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:

> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm curious 
> where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that obligated Apple 
> to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you have for a law 
> suit?  I'm just curious.

Yes it's a somewhat comical notion :-)

Just to make your point/question clearer for people: the said product was 
supplied for free for the last few releases. So if people were to sue for 
damages, it would need to be a very strong case indeed! I'm sure Apple would be 
happy to supply a full refund ;-)

More seriously, I think the sentiment is coming from promises (or assumed 
promises) that were made when, for example, the Xcode tools were dropped. The 
reasoning given was to concentrate on enhancing the frameworks. Thus the 
initial impression given to the community by Apple (bolstered by its funding of 
tools like WOLips) was that a renewed energy was being put into WO by Apple 
that people could continue to build their business apps with. And, there was 
some initial promise of better community involvement in the evolution of WO 
when the Apple maven repo was made available (which showed some future versions 
in the works). It didn't last long though which was a shame at the time, 
especially for us maven users. Hmm so, perhaps it was the community's 
unwillingness to embrace maven that canned it moving forward :-)

cheers,
Lachlan Deck


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Alan Ward]

Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm curious 
where you are coming from here?  Did you have a contract that obligated Apple 
to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you have for a law 
suit?  I'm just curious.

Alan

On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:

> Apple is a North American company. So wouldn't a class action suit make 
> sense? We all have a lot riding on WebObjects and Apple has terminated us in 
> 2009 without any proper notice period and reasoning. I am sure we could get 
> over a 1000 participants.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> On 04/Mar/12 7:16 AM, Matteo Centro wrote:
>> It is certainly a good point... Don't know if it makes sense in real life 
>> but, count me in!
>> 
>> Matteo
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 04/mar/2012, at 11:54, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:
>> 
>>> I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to 
>>> be supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple 
>>> shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners, 
>>> bringing up an motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an extra 
>>> announced shareholders meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the attendees 
>>> (and mandates) votes have the power to decide on this issue.
>>> 
>>> The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the 
>>> amount total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives 
>>> cannot vote because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim Cramer 
>>> with CNBC will help to mobilize additional shareholders because it is a 
>>> great story.
>>> 
>>> I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me, 
>>> friends, many others) and therefore it is our company.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Helmut
>>> ___
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mcentro%40altera.it
>>> 
>>> This email sent to mcen...@altera.it
>>  ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com
>> 
>> This email sent to webobjects_li...@webappz.com
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Kind Regards,
> 
> Dennis Gaastra,
> WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
> (+1) 604.921.1333
> www.webappz.com&  www.scheduleDS.com&  www.1tracker.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender 
> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If 
> verification is required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, 
> Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, 
> www.webappz.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/award%40apple.com
> 
> This email sent to aw...@apple.com


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists]

Apple ran out of money and can't afford to release it; they would just 
have to dump WebObjects on us. :-)


On 04/Mar/12 2:11 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:

Well, I wish you luck. I'm not going to fight with Apple Legal for years, I 
prefer actually moving the community forward and stopping looking at the past.


Apple is a North American company. So wouldn't a class action suit make sense? 
We all have a lot riding on WebObjects and Apple has terminated us in 2009 
without any proper notice period and reasoning. I am sure we could get over a 
1000 participants.

Dennis

On 04/Mar/12 7:16 AM, Matteo Centro wrote:

It is certainly a good point... Don't know if it makes sense in real life but, 
count me in!

Matteo

Sent from my iPhone

On 04/mar/2012, at 11:54, Helmut Tschemernjak   wrote:


I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to be 
supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple shareholders 
we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners, bringing up an 
motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an extra announced shareholders 
meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the attendees (and mandates) votes have 
the power to decide on this issue.

The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the amount 
total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives cannot vote 
because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim Cramer with CNBC will 
help to mobilize additional shareholders because it is a great story.

I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me, friends, 
many others) and therefore it is our company.

Regards

Helmut
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mcentro%40altera.it

This email sent to mcen...@altera.it

  ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com

This email sent to webobjects_li...@webappz.com



--
With Kind Regards,

Dennis Gaastra,
WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
(+1) 604.921.1333
www.webappz.com&   www.scheduleDS.com&   www.1tracker.com





This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 
Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca

This email sent to prob...@macti.ca





--
With Kind Regards,

Dennis Gaastra,
WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
(+1) 604.921.1333
www.webappz.com&  www.scheduleDS.com&  www.1tracker.com





This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 
Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.co

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Pascal Robert]

Well, I wish you luck. I'm not going to fight with Apple Legal for years, I 
prefer actually moving the community forward and stopping looking at the past.

> Apple is a North American company. So wouldn't a class action suit make 
> sense? We all have a lot riding on WebObjects and Apple has terminated us in 
> 2009 without any proper notice period and reasoning. I am sure we could get 
> over a 1000 participants.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> On 04/Mar/12 7:16 AM, Matteo Centro wrote:
>> It is certainly a good point... Don't know if it makes sense in real life 
>> but, count me in!
>> 
>> Matteo
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 04/mar/2012, at 11:54, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:
>> 
>>> I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to 
>>> be supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple 
>>> shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners, 
>>> bringing up an motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an extra 
>>> announced shareholders meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the attendees 
>>> (and mandates) votes have the power to decide on this issue.
>>> 
>>> The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the 
>>> amount total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives 
>>> cannot vote because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim Cramer 
>>> with CNBC will help to mobilize additional shareholders because it is a 
>>> great story.
>>> 
>>> I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me, 
>>> friends, many others) and therefore it is our company.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Helmut
>>> ___
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mcentro%40altera.it
>>> 
>>> This email sent to mcen...@altera.it
>>  ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com
>> 
>> This email sent to webobjects_li...@webappz.com
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Kind Regards,
> 
> Dennis Gaastra,
> WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
> (+1) 604.921.1333
> www.webappz.com&  www.scheduleDS.com&  www.1tracker.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender 
> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If 
> verification is required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, 
> Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, 
> www.webappz.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
> 
> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists]

Apple is a North American company. So wouldn't a class action suit make 
sense? We all have a lot riding on WebObjects and Apple has terminated 
us in 2009 without any proper notice period and reasoning. I am sure we 
could get over a 1000 participants.


Dennis

On 04/Mar/12 7:16 AM, Matteo Centro wrote:

It is certainly a good point... Don't know if it makes sense in real life but, 
count me in!

Matteo

Sent from my iPhone

On 04/mar/2012, at 11:54, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:


I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to be 
supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple shareholders 
we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners, bringing up an 
motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an extra announced shareholders 
meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the attendees (and mandates) votes have 
the power to decide on this issue.

The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the amount 
total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives cannot vote 
because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim Cramer with CNBC will 
help to mobilize additional shareholders because it is a great story.

I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me, friends, 
many others) and therefore it is our company.

Regards

Helmut
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mcentro%40altera.it

This email sent to mcen...@altera.it

  ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com

This email sent to webobjects_li...@webappz.com




--
With Kind Regards,

Dennis Gaastra,
WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
(+1) 604.921.1333
www.webappz.com&  www.scheduleDS.com&  www.1tracker.com





This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 
Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Matteo Centro]

It is certainly a good point... Don't know if it makes sense in real life but, 
count me in!

Matteo

Sent from my iPhone

On 04/mar/2012, at 11:54, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:

> 
> I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to be 
> supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple 
> shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners, 
> bringing up an motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an extra announced 
> shareholders meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the attendees (and 
> mandates) votes have the power to decide on this issue.
> 
> The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the amount 
> total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives cannot vote 
> because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim Cramer with CNBC 
> will help to mobilize additional shareholders because it is a great story.
> 
> I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me, friends, 
> many others) and therefore it is our company.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Helmut
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mcentro%40altera.it
> 
> This email sent to mcen...@altera.it

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Amy Worrall]

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:
>
> I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to
> be supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple
> shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners,
> bringing up an motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an extra
> announced shareholders meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the attendees
> (and mandates) votes have the power to decide on this issue.
>
> The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the amount
> total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives cannot vote
> because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim Cramer with CNBC
> will help to mobilize additional shareholders because it is a great story.
>
> I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me,
> friends, many others) and therefore it is our company.
>
> Regards
>
> Helmut
>

Well, if you can make it happen…

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Helmut Tschemernjak]

I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important 
to be supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple 
shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock 
owners, bringing up an motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an 
extra announced shareholders meeting. Once this meeting gets setup, the 
attendees (and mandates) votes have the power to decide on this issue.


The trick is that the amount a attending votes will count and not the 
amount total votes/shares available. Also Apple employes and relatives 
cannot vote because there is a conflict of interest. I sure that Jim 
Cramer with CNBC will help to mobilize additional shareholders because 
it is a great story.


I personally know, we are the owners of Apple (my wife, company, me, 
friends, many others) and therefore it is our company.


Regards

Helmut
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[ISHIMOTO Ken]

But I am happy to be 1 of 800 Worldwide.

^^

On 2012/03/04, at 9:39, Pascal Robert wrote:

> As every decisions Apple makes, we will never know why. But I guess that they 
> don't see why they should support a group of ~ 800 developers… We have more 
> .Net developers in Montreal than the total count of WO developers (excluding 
> WO devs inside Apple) world wide!
> 
>> Hi List,
>> 
>> Why has Apple decided to abandon us? What can  we do to get Apple releasing 
>> WebObjects like it used to?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Dennis.
>> 
>> On 03/Mar/12 4:29 PM, John Huss wrote:
>>> As Mike said above it is already fixed in Apple's version of WO.  But 
>>> you're never going to see that version.  So if you want a fix you have to 
>>> roll your own.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:
 
 we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. I 
 reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel it is 
 not hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. See my 
 report below.
 
 Regards
 
 Helmut Tschemernjak
 
 ---
 Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
 Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)
 
 Summary:
 Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
 The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
 content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. This 
 will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many 
 instances in the code that make use of an integer for the content length 
 of a request:
 WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
 WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
 Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such a 
 limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com
 
 This email sent to johnth...@gmail.com
 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (
>>> Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
>>> )
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> 
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This email sent to 
>>> webobjects_li...@webappz.com
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> With Kind Regards,
>> 
>> Dennis Gaastra, 
>> WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
>> (+1) 604.921.1333
>> 
>> www.webappz.com & www.scheduleDS.com & www.1tracker.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
>> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
>> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
>> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender 
>> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
>> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If 
>> verification is required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ 
>> Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, 
>> www.webappz.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
>> 
>> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ken%40ksroom.com
> 
> This email sent to k...@ksroom.com



 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Pascal Robert]

As every decisions Apple makes, we will never know why. But I guess that they 
don't see why they should support a group of ~ 800 developers… We have more 
.Net developers in Montreal than the total count of WO developers (excluding WO 
devs inside Apple) world wide!

> Hi List,
> 
> Why has Apple decided to abandon us? What can  we do to get Apple releasing 
> WebObjects like it used to?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dennis.
> 
> On 03/Mar/12 4:29 PM, John Huss wrote:
>> As Mike said above it is already fixed in Apple's version of WO.  But you're 
>> never going to see that version.  So if you want a fix you have to roll your 
>> own.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:
>> >
>> > we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. I 
>> > reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel it is 
>> > not hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. See my 
>> > report below.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Helmut Tschemernjak
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
>> > Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)
>> >
>> > Summary:
>> > Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
>> > The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
>> > content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. This 
>> > will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many 
>> > instances in the code that make use of an integer for the content length 
>> > of a request:
>> > WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
>> > WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
>> > Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such a 
>> > limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).
>> > ___
>> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> > Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com
>> >
>> > This email sent to johnth...@gmail.com
>> > 
>> 
>>  ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (
>> Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
>> )
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> 
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com
>> 
>> 
>> This email sent to 
>> webobjects_li...@webappz.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Kind Regards,
> 
> Dennis Gaastra, 
> WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
> (+1) 604.921.1333
> 
> www.webappz.com & www.scheduleDS.com & www.1tracker.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender 
> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If 
> verification is required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, 
> Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, 
> www.webappz.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
> 
> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Jean Pierre Malrieu]

We need to change Project Wonder licencing to forbid Apple using it ;-)

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 4 mars 2012 à 03:15, Chuck Hill  a écrit :

> But that would require Apple to release a new version of WO.  Only the 
> psychotically delusional among us are still expecting that.  We have two 
> practical choices: fix it ourselves in Wonder or live with it.
> 
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> On 2012-03-03, at 2:49 PM, Helmut Tschemernjak wrote:
> 
>> 
>> we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. I 
>> reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel it is not 
>> hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. See my report 
>> below.
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Helmut Tschemernjak
>> 
>> ---
>> Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
>> Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)
>> 
>> Summary:
>> Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
>> The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
>> content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. This 
>> will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many instances 
>> in the code that make use of an integer for the content length of a request:
>> WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
>> WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
>> Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such a 
>> limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
>> 
>> This email sent to ch...@global-village.net
> 
> -- 
> Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
> 
> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall 
> knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
> http://www.global-village.net/gvc/practical_webobjects
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jp.malrieu%40free.fr
> 
> This email sent to jp.malr...@free.fr

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Chuck Hill]

But that would require Apple to release a new version of WO.  Only the 
psychotically delusional among us are still expecting that.  We have two 
practical choices: fix it ourselves in Wonder or live with it.


Chuck


On 2012-03-03, at 2:49 PM, Helmut Tschemernjak wrote:

> 
> we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. I 
> reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel it is not 
> hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. See my report 
> below.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Helmut Tschemernjak
> 
> ---
> Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
> Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)
> 
> Summary:
> Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
> The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
> content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. This 
> will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many instances 
> in the code that make use of an integer for the content length of a request:
> WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
> WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
> Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such a 
> limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
> 
> This email sent to ch...@global-village.net

-- 
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall 
knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/gvc/practical_webobjects










smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists]

Hi List,

Why has Apple decided to abandon us? What can  we do to get Apple 
releasing WebObjects like it used to?


Thanks,

Dennis.

On 03/Mar/12 4:29 PM, John Huss wrote:
As Mike said above it is already fixed in Apple's version of WO.  But 
you're never going to see that version.  So if you want a fix you have 
to roll your own.


John

On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Helmut Tschemernjak > wrote:

>
> we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. 
I reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel 
it is not hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. 
See my report below.

>
> Regards
>
> Helmut Tschemernjak
>
> ---
> Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
> Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)
>
> Summary:
> Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
> The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse 
the content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer 
class. This will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there 
are many instances in the code that make use of an integer for the 
content length of a request:

> WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
> WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
> Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show 
such a limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).

> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com 
)

> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> 
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com

>
> This email sent to johnth...@gmail.com 
>


  ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com

This email sent to webobjects_li...@webappz.com



--
With Kind Regards,

Dennis Gaastra,
WEBAPPZ®  Systems, Inc.
(+1) 604.921.1333
www.webappz.com&  www.scheduleDS.com&  www.1tracker.com





This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 
Marine Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[John Huss]

As Mike said above it is already fixed in Apple's version of WO.  But
you're never going to see that version.  So if you want a fix you have to
roll your own.

John

On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Helmut Tschemernjak  wrote:
>
> we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. I
reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel it is
not hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. See my
report below.
>
> Regards
>
> Helmut Tschemernjak
>
> ---
> Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
> Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)
>
> Summary:
> Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
> The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the
content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. This
will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many instances
in the code that make use of an integer for the content length of a request:
> WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
> WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
> Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such a
limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com
>
> This email sent to johnth...@gmail.com
>
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Helmut Tschemernjak]

we investigated in the past into the > 2.1GB form upload limitation. I 
reported this via the Apple Bug Reporter earlier this year. I feel it is 
not hard to fix, hopefully Apple spends a day or two to fix it. See my 
report below.


Regards

Helmut Tschemernjak

---
Bug Reporter Problem ID: 10765546
Subject: WebObjects 5.4.3 large request (> 2.1GB)

Summary:
Requests larger than 2.1GB (uploading large files) fail.
The class com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHttpIO tries to parse the 
content-length header with the method parseInt of the Integer class. 
This will fail for all files larger than 2.1GB. Further there are many 
instances in the code that make use of an integer for the content length 
of a request:

WOInputStreamData: public WOInputStreamData(InputStream, int)
WORequest: public int _contentLengthHeader()
Also classes not directly involved in the request handling do show such 
a limitation (e.g. public NSRange(int, int)).

___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Lachlan Deck]

> Le 2012-03-01 à 05:52, "Lachlan Deck"  a écrit :
> 
>> On 01/03/2012, at 4:59 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> 
>>> Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 changed 
>>> the response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't fix wohttpio and 
>>> worequest to make them parse content length as long.
>> 
>> Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to slip 5.4.3.1 
>> (or whatever it got up it internally) under the door somewhere (?)
>> :)
> 
> Asking that on a public mailing list hosted by Apple is not a great idea :-)

A moment of attempted humour or 'tongue in cheek', but, of course, you're right 
:)


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Dan Beatty]

Greetings Pascal and company,
I agree.  I had been working pro-bono on this for the ERAttachment version,
but I can switch over to the at large WOHTTP-IO case.   I can do it as a
civil servant, since I am what they call "industrially funded."  Basically,
as a long as I have a CRADA in place (as described in
http://www.chinalaketechnologies.org/collaboration.html) then basically,
that company contracts my organization (the U.S. Naval Air Warfare Center
Weapons Division at China Lake) to peform the labor.   This could be quite
useful now and in the future.

V/R,

-- 
Daniel Beatty
Information Assurance Officer (IAO), Energetics Research Division
Code 474300D
1 Administration Circle M/S 1109
China Lake, CA 93555
daniel.bea...@navy.mil
(LandLine) (760)939-7097
(iPhone) (806)438-6620





On 3/1/12 7:36 AM, "Pascal Robert"  wrote:

> Since this is, to my view, a bug affecting all of the community, wocommunity
> should paid for the workŠ if someone is willing to work on it. WOHttpIO is a
> final class...

> No workaround that I know of. It will require someone to
> write a patch in Wonder to overcome this limitation.
> 
> On Feb 29, 2012, at
> 11:52 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3
> and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB file:
>> 
>>
>  Unable to parse content-length
> header: '2255571732'.
>> 
>> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else
> encountering it. Is there a workaround?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gordon
>> 
>> Gordon
> Belray
>> Information Technology Services 
>> University of Toronto
> Libraries
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not
> post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev
> mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update
> your Subscription:
>>
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
>
> > 
>> This email sent to kelleh...@gmail.com
> 
>
> ___
> Do not post admin requests
> to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list
> (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your
> Subscription:
> 
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca> 
>
> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca



> ___
Do not post admin requests to
> the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
> (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your
> Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/daniel.be
> atty%40navy.mil

This email sent to daniel.bea...@navy.mil


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Ramsey Gurley]

Perhaps this is fixable in ERWOAdaptor without need to fix WOHttpIO or 
WORequest.  ERWOAdaptor is currently limited to 100Mb.  I'll look at that 
possibility when I go back to update the WebSockets implementation, but I'm 
sorta busy at the moment. :-)

Ramsey

On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:

> Another viewpoint might be that only a few rare apps need > 2GB upload size, 
> so like everything else in Wonder, the person who needs a new feature should 
> implement it (themselves or via contractor) and then do a pull request 
> perhaps? I don't need this, and I don't know if I will ever need it, but the 
> day I need it in one of my apps is the day I would work on implementing it.
> 
> BTW, if the community was going to fund projects, it might be a good idea to 
> pick the github Issues with the most votes. I don't think github issues has 
> voting like JIRA had, so people can just add a '+1' comment on the Issue 
> discussion maybe.
> 
> Anyway, that was just a few thoughts to add to the discussion
> 
> Cheers, Kieran
> 
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> 
>> Since this is, to my view, a bug affecting all of the community, wocommunity 
>> should paid for the work… if someone is willing to work on it. WOHttpIO is a 
>> final class...
>> 
>>> No workaround that I know of. It will require someone to write a patch in 
>>> Wonder to overcome this limitation.
>>> 
>>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:
>>> 
 Hi,
 
 I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB 
 file:
 
  Unable to parse 
 content-length header: '2255571732'.
 
 Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there 
 a workaround?
 
 Thanks,
 Gordon
 
 Gordon Belray
 Information Technology Services 
 University of Toronto Libraries
 
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
 
 This email sent to kelleh...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
>>> 
>>> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca
>> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com
> 
> This email sent to rgur...@smarthealth.com


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Paul Yu]

Gordon 

Given that 85% of all IT projects fail (not on time and over budget, and many 
never deliver software), what you have accomplished should be commended by the 
University regardless of the software architecture.  Having said that, the fact 
that you were successful and the app is being used by many customers, you are 
actually a threat to the people that didn't produce with other "mo + better" 
technologies.

2GB is a BIG file does not matter the platform.  In the past, not many people 
would even think about uploading a file that size.  So, now you should ask how 
important this requirement is for the university and find a solution.  Could be 
to come up with a bit of money to pay a wocommunity member to solve it. 

-- 
Paul Yu
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)


On Thursday, March 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Gordon Belray wrote:

> 
> > 
> > > > > > Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 
> > > > > > changed the response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't 
> > > > > > fix wohttpio and worequest to make them parse content length as 
> > > > > > long.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to 
> > > > > slip 5.4.3.1 (or whatever it got up it internally) under the door 
> > > > > somewhere (?)
> > > > > :)
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Asking that on a public mailing list hosted by Apple is not a 
> > > > great idea :-)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Don't worry ... The public and private answer is the same :)
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > And the answer will probably be: "the community should fix it in 
> > Wonder" :-)
> > 
> 
> 
> This would be great but I fear outside my scope. I've developed a wo 
> app to manage video/audio content at the university and the uptake has 
> been great. It's hard enough justifying WebObjects here, and issues 
> such as this, if it cannot be resolved, raise more eyebrows.
> 
> Gordon
> 
> 
> > ___
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com 
> > (mailto:Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com))
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/gordon.belray%40utoronto.ca
> > 
> > This email sent to gordon.bel...@utoronto.ca 
> > (mailto:gordon.bel...@utoronto.ca)
> 
> Gordon Belray
> Systems and Interface Designer
> Information Technology Services
> University of Toronto Libraries
> gordon.bel...@utoronto.ca (mailto:gordon.bel...@utoronto.ca)
> 416-946-8617 w
> 416-427-7007 m
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com 
> (mailto:Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com))
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/pyu%40mac.com
> 
> This email sent to p...@mac.com (mailto:p...@mac.com) 

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Kieran Kelleher]

Another viewpoint might be that only a few rare apps need > 2GB upload size, so 
like everything else in Wonder, the person who needs a new feature should 
implement it (themselves or via contractor) and then do a pull request perhaps? 
I don't need this, and I don't know if I will ever need it, but the day I need 
it in one of my apps is the day I would work on implementing it.

BTW, if the community was going to fund projects, it might be a good idea to 
pick the github Issues with the most votes. I don't think github issues has 
voting like JIRA had, so people can just add a '+1' comment on the Issue 
discussion maybe.

Anyway, that was just a few thoughts to add to the discussion

Cheers, Kieran

On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:

> Since this is, to my view, a bug affecting all of the community, wocommunity 
> should paid for the work… if someone is willing to work on it. WOHttpIO is a 
> final class...
> 
>> No workaround that I know of. It will require someone to write a patch in 
>> Wonder to overcome this limitation.
>> 
>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB 
>>> file:
>>> 
>>>  Unable to parse content-length 
>>> header: '2255571732'.
>>> 
>>> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there a 
>>> workaround?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gordon
>>> 
>>> Gordon Belray
>>> Information Technology Services 
>>> University of Toronto Libraries
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
>>> 
>>> This email sent to kelleh...@gmail.com
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
>> 
>> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca
> 


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Gordon Belray]

Since this is, to my view, a bug affecting all of the community,  
wocommunity should paid for the work… if someone is willing to work  
on it. WOHttpIO is a final class...


does the community have a budget for this? I recall membership fee but  
I don't see anything on wocommunity.org about a paid membership.


Gordon




___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Gordon Belray]

Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3  
changed the response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't  
fix wohttpio and worequest to make them parse content length as  
long.


Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to  
slip 5.4.3.1 (or whatever it got up it internally) under the door  
somewhere (?)

:)


Asking that on a public mailing list hosted by Apple is not a  
great idea :-)

Don't worry ... The public and private answer is the same :)


And the answer will probably be: "the community should fix it in  
Wonder" :-)


This would be great but I fear outside my scope. I've developed a wo  
app to manage video/audio content at the university and the uptake has  
been great. It's hard enough justifying WebObjects here, and issues  
such as this, if it cannot be resolved, raise more eyebrows.


Gordon



___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/gordon.belray%40utoronto.ca

This email sent to gordon.bel...@utoronto.ca


Gordon Belray
Systems and Interface Designer
Information Technology Services
University of Toronto Libraries
gordon.bel...@utoronto.ca
416-946-8617 w
416-427-7007 m




___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Ramsey Gurley]

And then re-patch it into a separate framework like WORequestExtension or 
something :-P

On Mar 1, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:

> No workaround that I know of. It will require someone to write a patch in 
> Wonder to overcome this limitation.
> 
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB 
>> file:
>> 
>>  Unable to parse content-length 
>> header: '2255571732'.
>> 
>> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there a 
>> workaround?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gordon
>> 
>> Gordon Belray
>> Information Technology Services 
>> University of Toronto Libraries
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
>> 
>> This email sent to kelleh...@gmail.com
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ramseygurley%40gmail.com
> 
> This email sent to ramseygur...@gmail.com

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Pascal Robert]

Since this is, to my view, a bug affecting all of the community, wocommunity 
should paid for the work… if someone is willing to work on it. WOHttpIO is a 
final class...

> No workaround that I know of. It will require someone to write a patch in 
> Wonder to overcome this limitation.
> 
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB 
>> file:
>> 
>>  Unable to parse content-length 
>> header: '2255571732'.
>> 
>> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there a 
>> workaround?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gordon
>> 
>> Gordon Belray
>> Information Technology Services 
>> University of Toronto Libraries
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
>> 
>> This email sent to kelleh...@gmail.com
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
> 
> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Kieran Kelleher]

No workaround that I know of. It will require someone to write a patch in 
Wonder to overcome this limitation.

On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB file:
> 
>  Unable to parse content-length 
> header: '2255571732'.
> 
> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there a 
> workaround?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gordon
> 
> Gordon Belray
> Information Technology Services 
> University of Toronto Libraries
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
> 
> This email sent to kelleh...@gmail.com

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Pascal Robert]

Le 2012-03-01 à 06:47, Mike Schrag a écrit :

 Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 changed 
 the response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't fix wohttpio and 
 worequest to make them parse content length as long.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to slip 5.4.3.1 
>>> (or whatever it got up it internally) under the door somewhere (?)
>>> :)
>> 
>> Asking that on a public mailing list hosted by Apple is not a great idea :-)
> Don't worry ... The public and private answer is the same :)

And the answer will probably be: "the community should fix it in Wonder" :-)
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Mike Schrag]

>>> Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 changed 
>>> the response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't fix wohttpio and 
>>> worequest to make them parse content length as long.
>> 
>> Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to slip 5.4.3.1 
>> (or whatever it got up it internally) under the door somewhere (?)
>> :)
> 
> Asking that on a public mailing list hosted by Apple is not a great idea :-)
Don't worry ... The public and private answer is the same :)

ms
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[probert]

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 2012-03-01 à 05:52, "Lachlan Deck"  a écrit :

> On 01/03/2012, at 4:59 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> 
>> Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 changed the 
>> response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't fix wohttpio and 
>> worequest to make them parse content length as long.
> 
> Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to slip 5.4.3.1 
> (or whatever it got up it internally) under the door somewhere (?)
> :)

Asking that on a public mailing list hosted by Apple is not a great idea :-)

> cheers,
> Lachlan Deck
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
> 
> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Lachlan Deck]

On 01/03/2012, at 4:59 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

> Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 changed the 
> response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't fix wohttpio and worequest 
> to make them parse content length as long.

Perhaps, assuming you're still on the inside, you'd be able to slip 5.4.3.1 (or 
whatever it got up it internally) under the door somewhere (?)
:)

cheers,
Lachlan Deck




 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Mike Schrag]

Yeah this wasn't fully fixed until later ... I think maybe 5.4.3 changed the 
response streaming api's to take longs, but didn't fix wohttpio and worequest 
to make them parse content length as long.

ms

On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

> i THOUGHT that longs were punched all the way through in 5.4.3, but it 
> certainly appears that was done after 5.4.3 based on this exception .
> 
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB 
>> file:
>> 
>>  Unable to parse content-length 
>> header: '2255571732'.
>> 
>> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there a 
>> workaround?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gordon
>> 
>> Gordon Belray
>> Information Technology Services 
>> University of Toronto Libraries
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com
>> 
>> This email sent to msch...@pobox.com
> 

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: 5.4 uploading large files

[Mike Schrag]

i THOUGHT that longs were punched all the way through in 5.4.3, but it 
certainly appears that was done after 5.4.3 based on this exception .

On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Gordon Belray wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1 GB file:
> 
>  Unable to parse content-length 
> header: '2255571732'.
> 
> Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is there a 
> workaround?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gordon
> 
> Gordon Belray
> Information Technology Services 
> University of Toronto Libraries
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com
> 
> This email sent to msch...@pobox.com

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

5.4 uploading large files

[Gordon Belray]

Hi,

I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1  
GB file:


 Unable to parse content- 
length header: '2255571732'.


Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is  
there a workaround?


Thanks,
Gordon

Gordon Belray
Information Technology Services
University of Toronto Libraries


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

5.4 uploading large files

[Gordon Belray]

Hi,

I'm running WebObjects 5.4.3 and am seeing this error uploading a 2.1  
GB file:


 Unable to parse content- 
length header: '2255571732'.


Mike suggested it was fixed in 5.4, anyone else encountering it. Is  
there a workaround?


Thanks,
Gordon

Gordon Belray
Information Technology Services
University of Toronto Libraries





 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com