date:20060305




Exactly. But in Wicket 1.1 it had markup. See my 
other reply to Johan why I need it.
 
Thanks, Jan

  "Igor Vaynberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
  message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...form 
  doesnt have its own markup, so how can it have a wicket:head tag associated 
  with it?-Igor
  On 3/5/06, jan_bar 
  < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  wrote:
  Hi 
Juergen,you got it wrong, the  is for Form, not 
Page, see me other post.Jan"Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote in 
messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
... in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and 
you aredone.JuergenOn 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> 
Hi, >> I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 
(snapshot 20060302).> It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My 
WebPage contains a MyForm.The> MyForm inherits from From and 
markup has  section. This section> is not 
shown in the final markup. This worked in previous version. I tried> 
to debug but I am lost, because I don't have deep knowledge of 
Wicket.> Where can I check why the  is ignored? 
>> Thanks, Jan>> This the inherited MyForm 
markup:>> > > >  > 
src="">> 
> > > 
>  
>> 
---> This SF.Net 
email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scriptinglanguage> 
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
webcast> and join the prime developer group breaking into this 
new codingterritory!> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 
> ___> 
Wicket-user mailing list> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net> 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>---This 
SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting 
languagethat extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the 
live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new 
coding territory!http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 
---This 
SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting 
languagethat extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the 
live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new 
coding territory!http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 
___Wicket-user 
mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Juergen Donnerstag

I assumed the example given by Jan was a Page (Page => derived from
Page.java) because of the html structure (body tag etc and no
wicket:extend, wicket:panel etc.). A standard normal Page does not
need . You can place your component in  and add()
them.

Panels , Borders  and extended pages
 may have a  for previewability as well, but
everything outside of ,  and
 is ignored, except  (and the  attribute).

Juergen

On 3/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > > On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David Leangen wrote:
> > >  >>  That's news to me. So when is  used?
> > >  >
> > >  > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the
> > >  of
> > >  > the output.
> > >
> > > But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any
> > > sense". Isn't a
> > > Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in
> that
> > > its  is automatically interpreted as  or
> something?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > in a normal page the  tag is redundant because you can put
> > > whatever you want into  element and you are done since you are in
> > > control of that portion of markup. but in a case where you are using
> > > markup inheritance +  is defined in the super page + the extending
> > > page wants to contribute something to head, i think  does
> > > make sense.
> >
> > Ok, so I want this clarified by Juergen then. I recall him saying
> > something about how in Wicket 1.2 you didn't need a  in
> > children pages because  would get used automatically.
>
>
>
> this may very well be the fact with the latest snapshots. juergen has been
> putting in a lot of time and cool stuff into header contributions.
>
>
> > > Well that's a catch-22 isn't it? If I don't know the answer,
> > > how can I
> > > document it in Wiki? And if I do, I wouldn't have asked the
> question.
> > > Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about
> > > updated the Wiki page.
> > >
> > >
> > > really? i didnt know this was the case. i can remember a lot of times
> > > when johan, i, and others answered your questions in ##wicket, and
> > > extensively explained things to you. how many wiki contributions have
> > > you made? hmm.
> > >
> > > i am not saying that we are trading our support for wiki contributions,
> > > but please dont talk bs.
> >
> > I made some Wiki contributions. My point wasn't whether I can
> > contribute to Wiki once I know an answer (clearly I can) but rather that
> > if I am the person asking a question it is illogical to expect me to
> > post an answer to Wiki before I know it myself.
>
>
>  i was just calling you on this:
>
> > Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about
> > updated the Wiki page.
>
> -Igor
>
>


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header




I will try to express myself better and I will add 
bug report if needed.
 
In Wicket 1.1 I had a ValidatedForm class that 
inherits from Form. That class does client form validation (uses fvalidate 
scripts). The ValidatedForm needs to add the scripts (and css) to the Page 
markup where the form is used. In Wicket I created ValidateForm.html with 
, put the scrripts there and use _javascript_Reference. With 
Wicket 1.2 (beta) it doesn't work. The reason is that Wicket doesn't read the 
associated markup for Form.
I think I can create new class out of 
WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup, add it as a member of my ValidatedForm 
and in onComponentTagBody() call renderAssociatedMarkup(). But there should be 
easier way.
 
I think, that the same problem applies to 
FormComponent subclasses. If I want to tweak the Button with some clever scripts 
but use it as Button in Java, I can't.
 
I hope I was clear enough, thanks, Jan

  "Johan Compagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
  message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...please 
  add a bug report, and describe or attach a test what you exactly 
  do.johan
  On 3/4/06, jan_bar 
  < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  wrote:
  Hi,I 
am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 
20060302).It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains 
a MyForm. TheMyForm inherits from From and markup has 
 section. This sectionis not shown in the final 
markup. This worked in previous version. I tried to debug but I am lost, 
because I don't have deep knowledge of Wicket.Where can I check why the 
 is ignored?Thanks, JanThis the inherited 
MyForm markup:  
---This 
SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language 
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
webcastand join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding 
territory!http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642___Wicket-user 
mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

form doesnt have its own markup, so how can it have a wicket:head tag associated with it?-IgorOn 3/5/06, jan_bar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi Juergen,you got it wrong, the  is for Form, not Page, see me other
post.Jan"Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you aredone.JuergenOn 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi,
>> I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302).> It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm.The> MyForm inherits from From and markup has  section. This
section> is not shown in the final markup. This worked in previous version. I tried> to debug but I am lost, because I don't have deep knowledge of Wicket.> Where can I check why the  is ignored?
>> Thanks, Jan>> This the inherited MyForm markup:>> > > > 
>

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Hi Juergen,

you got it wrong, the  is for Form, not Page, see me other
post.

Jan

"Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you are
done.

Juergen

On 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302).
> It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm.
The
> MyForm inherits from From and markup has  section. This
section
> is not shown in the final markup. This worked in previous version. I tried
> to debug but I am lost, because I don't have deep knowledge of Wicket.
> Where can I check why the  is ignored?
>
> Thanks, Jan
>
> This the inherited MyForm markup:
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:> On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
 David Leangen wrote:>  >>  That's news to me. So when is  used?>  >>  > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the
>  of>  > the output.>> But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any> sense". Isn't a> Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that
> its  is automatically interpreted as  or something? in a normal page the  tag is redundant because you can put> whatever you want into  element and you are done since you are in
> control of that portion of markup. but in a case where you are using> markup inheritance +  is defined in the super page + the extending> page wants to contribute something to head, i think  does
> make sense.Ok, so I want this clarified by Juergen then. I recall him sayingsomething about how in Wicket 1.2 you didn't need a  inchildren pages because  would get used automatically.
this may very well be the fact with the latest snapshots. juergen has been putting in a lot of time and cool stuff into header contributions. 
> Well that's a catch-22 isn't it? If I don't know the answer,> how can I> document it in Wiki? And if I do, I wouldn't have asked the question.> Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about
> updated the Wiki page.>>> really? i didnt know this was the case. i can remember a lot of times> when johan, i, and others answered your questions in ##wicket, and> extensively explained things to you. how many wiki contributions have
> you made? hmm.>> i am not saying that we are trading our support for wiki contributions,> but please dont talk bs.I made some Wiki contributions. My point wasn't whether I can
contribute to Wiki once I know an answer (clearly I can) but rather thatif I am the person asking a question it is illogical to expect me topost an answer to Wiki before I know it myself.
i was just calling you on this:> Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about> updated the Wiki page.-Igor

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:

David Leangen wrote:
 >>  That's news to me. So when is  used?
 >
 > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the
 of
 > the output.

But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any
sense". Isn't a
Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that
its  is automatically interpreted as  or something? 

in a normal page the  tag is redundant because you can put 
whatever you want into  element and you are done since you are in 
control of that portion of markup. but in a case where you are using 
markup inheritance +  is defined in the super page + the extending 
page wants to contribute something to head, i think  does 
make sense.

	Ok, so I want this clarified by Juergen then. I recall him saying 
something about how in Wicket 1.2 you didn't need a  in 
children pages because  would get used automatically.

Well that's a catch-22 isn't it? If I don't know the answer,
how can I
document it in Wiki? And if I do, I wouldn't have asked the question.
Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about
updated the Wiki page.

really? i didnt know this was the case. i can remember a lot of times 
when johan, i, and others answered your questions in ##wicket, and 
extensively explained things to you. how many wiki contributions have 
you made? hmm.

i am not saying that we are trading our support for wiki contributions, 
but please dont talk bs.

	I made some Wiki contributions. My point wasn't whether I can 
contribute to Wiki once I know an answer (clearly I can) but rather that 
if I am the person asking a question it is illogical to expect me to 
post an answer to Wiki before I know it myself.

Gili

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Leangen wrote:>>  That's news to me. So when is  used?>> In borders and components when you want to contribute to the  of> the output.
But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't aPage a component too? So is Page different from other components in thatits  is automatically interpreted as  or something?
in a normal page the  tag is redundant because you can put whatever you want into  element and you are done since you are in control of that portion of markup. but in a case where you are using markup inheritance +  is defined in the super page + the extending page wants to contribute something to head, i think  does make sense.
>>> You might want to>> update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem.
>>> The whole purpose of the wiki is so that anybody can contribute. The> developers are busy enough that they don't need somebody telling them to> update the wiki.>> Why not just add something yourself?
Well that's a catch-22 isn't it? If I don't know the answer, how can Idocument it in Wiki? And if I do, I wouldn't have asked the question.Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about
updated the Wiki page.really? i didnt know this was the case. i can remember a lot of times when johan, i, and others answered your questions in ##wicket, and extensively explained things to you. how many wiki contributions have you made? hmm.
i am not saying that we are trading our support for wiki contributions, but please dont talk bs.-Igor

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header



	In http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Markup_inheritance it 
reads:


" does not make sense in page markup (but does in inherited 
page markup)"


I plan on changing this to:

" is not necessary in Page markup. Wicket interprets  
as  automatically."


Any objections?

Gili

David Leangen wrote:

On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 23:09 -0500, Gili wrote:

David Leangen wrote:
	That's news to me. So when is  used? 

In borders and components when you want to contribute to the  of
the output.
	But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a 
Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that 
its  is automatically interpreted as  or something?


I meant to say "panel" above, and not "component".

Somebody else can probably answer better than I can, but my
understanding is that a Page "naturally" contains a header. The header
of a Page is always contributed, so it would be redundant to use the
 tag.

Borders and panels, on the other hand, do not necessarily contribute.
The header is there in many cases just for previewing. If you actually
want part of the header to be contributed, you need to explicitly tell
Wicket this. The way this is done is by using the  tag.


HTH




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



--
http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread David Leangen

On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 23:09 -0500, Gili wrote:
> 
> David Leangen wrote:
> >>That's news to me. So when is  used? 
> > 
> > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the  of
> > the output.
> 
>   But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a 
> Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that 
> its  is automatically interpreted as  or something?

I meant to say "panel" above, and not "component".

Somebody else can probably answer better than I can, but my
understanding is that a Page "naturally" contains a header. The header
of a Page is always contributed, so it would be redundant to use the
 tag.

Borders and panels, on the other hand, do not necessarily contribute.
The header is there in many cases just for previewing. If you actually
want part of the header to be contributed, you need to explicitly tell
Wicket this. The way this is done is by using the  tag.

HTH

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header




David Leangen wrote:
	That's news to me. So when is  used? 


In borders and components when you want to contribute to the  of
the output.


	But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a 
Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that 
its  is automatically interpreted as  or something?




You might want to 
update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem.



The whole purpose of the wiki is so that anybody can contribute. The
developers are busy enough that they don't need somebody telling them to
update the wiki.

Why not just add something yourself?


	Well that's a catch-22 isn't it? If I don't know the answer, how can I 
document it in Wiki? And if I do, I wouldn't have asked the question. 
Once I get the answer fully figured out I'll see what I can do about 
updated the Wiki page.


Gili


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread David Leangen


>   That's news to me. So when is  used? 

In borders and components when you want to contribute to the  of
the output.


> You might want to 
> update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem.


The whole purpose of the wiki is so that anybody can contribute. The
developers are busy enough that they don't need somebody telling them to
update the wiki.

Why not just add something yourself?


Just my 2 yen...





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] PageLink called request two times

2006-03-05 Thread R.A


Sorry, when import sources, this problem is same.
doGet is called two times.
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/PageLink-called-request-two-times-t1205926.html#a3256582
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] PageLink called request two times

2006-03-05 Thread R.A


Hi Johan,

It's felt that PageLink not relate to this problem.
For a fact doGet was called two times.
I deleted wicket-1.2-20060227-0200.jar from WEB-INF/lib and imported Wicket
sources(wicket-1.2-20060227-0200\src\java\wicket) for debug.
So doGet and onBeginRequest is called just one time.
Relate to the order which wicket-1.2-20060227-0200.jar is loaded?

Thank you.
R.A


--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/PageLink-called-request-two-times-t1205926.html#a3256132
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Porting to 1.2 -- using getSession().invalidate()

2006-03-05 Thread Johan Compagner

You can't do a redirect then.If you want to show a final page you have to show that page without a redirectIf you do a redirect then the session is expired so we can't show the page anymoreBecause of 2 things, 1 in
1.2 we cleanup a invalidated session much betterRedirect buffers are now cleared. and in 1.2 we don't generate a session anymoreif there is none when a redirect response comes in.In the past we did do that. And tomcat reuses the session id so that it looked like
it worked. But only because tomcat reuses the session id.This all doesn't work anymore and it only worked in certain circumstances.Now don't do a redirect but directly render the final page to the browser.
johanOn 3/5/06, Robert McClay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In 1.1, given a runtime exception of type "SecurityException", I'dforward to a special error page that then callsgetSession().invalidate() to log the user out. The special error pagewould render and then the session would be invalidated, causing
additional clicks to forward to the login page. In 1.2 my page nolonger renders -- it jumps straight to the Page Expired page if I callgetSession().invalidate(). I'm using the default render strategy. Isthere a preferred way to implement this type of behavior in
1.2? I wantto invalidate the session so that the user can't repeatedly requestresources that throw SecurityExceptions, but I'd like a page to berendered prior to the session being invalidated.Thanks.
---This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting languagethat extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] markup/java location

there has been a thread on this recently. please search the mailing list. there is also a wiki entry i believe.the gist involved is creating your own implemenation of IResouceStreamLocator and registering that with resource settings.
-IgorOn 3/5/06, Nili Adoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Can you please explain how can I place markup and Java files indifferent directories ?ThanksNili---This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcastand join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Porting to 1.2 -- using getSession().invalidate()

2006-03-05 Thread Robert McClay

In 1.1, given a runtime exception of type "SecurityException", I'd 
forward to a special error page that then calls 
getSession().invalidate() to log the user out. The special error page 
would render and then the session would be invalidated, causing 
additional clicks to forward to the login page. In 1.2 my page no 
longer renders -- it jumps straight to the Page Expired page if I call 
getSession().invalidate(). I'm using the default render strategy. Is 
there a preferred way to implement this type of behavior in 1.2? I want 
to invalidate the session so that the user can't repeatedly request 
resources that throw SecurityExceptions, but I'd like a page to be 
rendered prior to the session being invalidated.


Thanks.




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] markup/java location

2006-03-05 Thread Nili Adoram


Hi,
Can you please explain how can I place markup and Java files in 
different directories ?

Thanks
Nili


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Just a side note, the wicket:header should be wicket:head, the code is
correct, the message title and text has typo.

Jan

"jan_bar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302).
> It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm.
The
> MyForm inherits from From and markup has  section. This
section
> is not shown in the final markup. This worked in previous version. I tried
> to debug but I am lost, because I don't have deep knowledge of Wicket.
> Where can I check why the  is ignored?
>
> Thanks, Jan
>
> This the inherited MyForm markup:
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

The  is ignored because the MyForm markup is in read by Wicket.
So how can I add markup to Form?

Jan

"jan_bar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302).
> It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm.
The
> MyForm inherits from From and markup has  section. This
section
> is not shown in the final markup. This worked in previous version. I tried
> to debug but I am lost, because I don't have deep knowledge of Wicket.
> Where can I check why the  is ignored?
>
> Thanks, Jan
>
> This the inherited MyForm markup:
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] PageMaps and iFrames

2006-03-05 Thread Thomas J du Plessis

Hi allI have an iFrame that contains a BookmarkablePage, like this:while furnace.BasketPage is (of course) a class that extends WebPage.
My problem is that the page within the iFrame gets refreshed regularly, and appears not to refresh i.e. the controls are not updated.  It behaves almost like a page that is cached in the local browser.  I think that this is because of the fact that the page sits in a PageMap.
If that's true, then a possible solution would be to remove the page from the PageMap.  How is this done?  There is of course the session.remove() (Wicket 1.1), but when should that be called? Every time the page is generated? Is there a way to ensure that the page doesn't use a PageMap at all?  
Your help will be appreciated.Regards,Thomas

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header