[Wicket-user] How to pass the parameter without submit

[（株） いい生活 福原 信貴]

Hello.

How to pass the parameters other popup window (using bookmarkpagebleLink)
without submit.

I want to use a click of an image in substitution for a click of an submit 
button.



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

[Eelco Hillenius]

Good luck! Keep us informed, and of course I hope Wicket will be good for you :)

Eelco

On 1/17/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wish me luck.  Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the
> next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets & Wicket.  This
> will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website.  My
> apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions
> to which I will undoubtedly subject you all.
>
> As a first question in that direction, are there any known gotchas in
> using Wicket with JBoss?
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-2.0 - ajax page expired exceptions

[Ryan Sonnek]

Done!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-216


On 1/17/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


dont think so but feel free to open one

-igor


On 1/17/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> is there a JIRA issue that I can watch for when this will be fixed?
>
> On 1/17/07, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, this is a problem with 2.0 currently. Ajax requests increase
> > page
> > version. Johan promised to fix this soon :)
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > > a good start is to isolate this in a quickstart so we can all look
> > at
> > > it. if you want to do it yourself then just break in request cycle
> > and
> > > walk the steps, see why the page cannot be resolved.
> > >
> > > -igor
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/16/07, *Ryan Sonnek* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm running wicket-2.0 from a recent svn checkout and i'm seeing
> > a
> > > *lot* of page expired exceptions when using ajax behaviors.  I'm
> >
> > > wondering where I can start digging to see why this is
> > happening.
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance
> > to
> > > share your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and
> > earn cash
> > >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > 
 > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > 
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
> > cash
> > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
> > -
> >
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Alexandru Popescu]

On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have any past experience, just as you :). I think we should be
> able to rate proposals, but that particular page only gets generated
> for the top half.
>

Not sure what you mean by "the top half", as I get an empty page (just
the left side bar) :-).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.

> Martijn
>
> On 1/17/07, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, from your past experience: how long it takes
> > for finding out the status of ApacheCon submittions?
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > ./alex
> > --
> > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> >
> >
> > On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We'll see what the possibilities are. I am thinking of getting a video
> > > link through skype with some of the US core members that won't be able
> > > to attend, provided we have a good i-net connection.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
> > > > think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
> > > > some webcasts.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially 
> > > > this part :
> > > >  - what were the top 3 problems you had
> > > >   - what were the top 3 benefits you received
> > > > It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket 
> > > > area. :)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >  ZedroS
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > > your
> > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > ___
> > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Vote for Wicket at the 
> > > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > > http://wicketframework.org
> > >
> > > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> --
> Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-2.0 - ajax page expired exceptions

[Ryan Sonnek]

Thanks for the update.

is there a JIRA issue that I can watch for when this will be fixed?

On 1/17/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Yeah, this is a problem with 2.0 currently. Ajax requests increase page
version. Johan promised to fix this soon :)

-Matej

Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> a good start is to isolate this in a quickstart so we can all look at
> it. if you want to do it yourself then just break in request cycle and
> walk the steps, see why the page cannot be resolved.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 1/16/07, *Ryan Sonnek* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> I'm running wicket-2.0 from a recent svn checkout and i'm seeing a
> *lot* of page expired exceptions when using ajax behaviors.  I'm
> wondering where I can start digging to see why this is happening.
> Any ideas?
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> <
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV>
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
>
> 
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Eelco Hillenius]

See, what you need to do is combine forces. Find two more people and
you'll end up with the whole page ;)

Eelco

On 1/17/07, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't have any past experience, just as you :). I think we should be
> > able to rate proposals, but that particular page only gets generated
> > for the top half.
> >
>
> Not sure what you mean by "the top half", as I get an empty page (just
> the left side bar) :-).
>
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 1/17/07, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just out of curiosity, from your past experience: how long it takes
> > > for finding out the status of ApacheCon submittions?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > ./alex
> > > --
> > > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > We'll see what the possibilities are. I am thinking of getting a video
> > > > link through skype with some of the US core members that won't be able
> > > > to attend, provided we have a good i-net connection.
> > > >
> > > > Martijn
> > > >
> > > > On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
> > > > > think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
> > > > > some webcasts.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially 
> > > > > this part :
> > > > >  - what were the top 3 problems you had
> > > > >   - what were the top 3 benefits you received
> > > > > It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket 
> > > > > area. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >  ZedroS
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to 
> > > > > share your
> > > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Vote for Wicket at the 
> > > > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > > > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > > > http://wicketframework.org
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > > your
> > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > ___
> > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mail

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Alexandru Popescu]

On 1/18/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See, what you need to do is combine forces. Find two more people and
> you'll end up with the whole page ;)
>

Darn... I thought I could trick it just by using multiple browsers :-).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.

> Eelco
>
> On 1/17/07, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't have any past experience, just as you :). I think we should be
> > > able to rate proposals, but that particular page only gets generated
> > > for the top half.
> > >
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by "the top half", as I get an empty page (just
> > the left side bar) :-).
> >
> > ./alex
> > --
> > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On 1/17/07, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Just out of curiosity, from your past experience: how long it takes
> > > > for finding out the status of ApacheCon submittions?
> > > >
> > > > TIA,
> > > >
> > > > ./alex
> > > > --
> > > > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > We'll see what the possibilities are. I am thinking of getting a video
> > > > > link through skype with some of the US core members that won't be able
> > > > > to attend, provided we have a good i-net connection.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martijn
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
> > > > > > think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
> > > > > > some webcasts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially 
> > > > > > this part :
> > > > > >  - what were the top 3 problems you had
> > > > > >   - what were the top 3 benefits you received
> > > > > > It's most interesting and important for people outside of the 
> > > > > > wicket area. :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >  ZedroS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to 
> > > > > > share your
> > > > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn 
> > > > > > cash
> > > > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > > > ___
> > > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Vote for Wicket at the 
> > > > > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > > > > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > > > > http://wicketframework.org
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to 
> > > > > share your
> > > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > > your
> > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > ___
> > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Vote for Wicket at the 
> > > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > > http://wicketframework.org
> > >
> > > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> > ---

[Wicket-user] creating a mountBookmarkablePage with PageMap

[Kadir Sener GUMUS]

Hi,
i want to mount a bookmarkablePage with custom pagemap parameter in
Application.init() but as a normal result i am experiencing with no session
error. Because PageMap.forName("") requires a session.
so can i ask you what the method "*mountBookmarkablePage(String path,
PageMap pageMap, Class bookmarkablePageClass)"* is for? where do i have to
define that? i couldnt find any usage description for the method.
Thanks.

Kadir
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Impossible to customize multi-part POST-s from Form-s in Wicket due to "final" methods

[Eelco Hillenius]

This was what I meant with: 'It can, though not very obvious. Look at
wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.form.upload.UploadWebRequest'.
Guess I wasn't clear enough. But as I also stated in that answer, I
would be fine with making that method protected non-final if no urgent
objection arise in this thread.

Eelco

On 1/17/07, beboris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, I guess you suggest we do it on the application level by overriding
> newWebRequest() method inside the whole WebApplication, so it returns our
> custom WebRequest subclass globally, as follows:
>
> protected WebRequest newWebRequest(HttpServletRequest servletRequest) {
> return new CustomWebRequest(servletRequest);
> }
>
> Then our CustomWebRequest class would in turn override
> newMultipartWebRequest() method and do custom processing globally, as
> opposed to working on the specific Form level which we could achieve should
> our CustomForm's handleMultiPart() method be overridable. Is that correct?
>
> If yes - do you see it as a workaround for a "simple" case or a generic
> solution for anyone who needs custom behavior of multi-part HTTP POST-s from
> forms?
>
> -boris
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > you can already substitute your own implementation of IMultipartWebRequest
> > globally. the ajax-upload-progressbar does it
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 1/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > IMHO, linking FileUploadField-s (which we need to browse for the
> >> correct
> >> > input file in the browser) with the specific (FileUpload, File)
> >> > implementation of the results of the multi-part HTTP POST streams
> >> (created
> >> > when the form is submitted) is too strong (and limiting) for a
> >> "generic"
> >> > [and the only available!] contract for multi-part HTTP POST streams in
> >> a
> >> > generic-purpose web framework like wicket. So, I'd suggest either
> >> leaving
> >> > things the way they are (FileUploadField-s will return null for
> >> FileUpload
> >> > when File upload is not used) or eliminating those FileUpload-related
> >> > methods (let the user get this info from (IMultipartWebRequest)request
> >> > instead), or creating an extra layer of objects (StreamUploadField-s,
> >> which
> >> > would be a super-class for FileUploadField-s without FileUpload-related
> >> > contract obligations). In the latter case, you'd give users those
> >> needed
> >> > generic components that "look and feel" (and smell :) ) like files on
> >> the
> >> > client side, but are free for interpretation on the server side. Still,
> >> > today's FileUploadField-s would be there as subclasses (in all their
> >> > full-contract "glory") for backward compatibility...
> >>
> >> In general this sounds good to me. It would be a great help to us if
> >> someone (you) could provide us with a patch to make this concrete.
> >> Without a patch, I'm afraid this would be on the bottom of our current
> >> priority list (though we can do the change in Form anyway).
> >>
> >> Eelco
> >>
> >> -
> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> >> your
> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >> ___
> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Impossible-to-customize-multi-part-POST-s-from-Form-s-in-Wicket-due-to-%22final%22-methods-tf3025509.html#a8420808
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Ta

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-2.0 - ajax page expired exceptions

[Matej Knopp]

Yeah, this is a problem with 2.0 currently. Ajax requests increase page 
version. Johan promised to fix this soon :)

-Matej

Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> a good start is to isolate this in a quickstart so we can all look at 
> it. if you want to do it yourself then just break in request cycle and 
> walk the steps, see why the page cannot be resolved.
> 
> -igor
> 
> 
> On 1/16/07, *Ryan Sonnek* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
> 
> I'm running wicket-2.0 from a recent svn checkout and i'm seeing a
> *lot* of page expired exceptions when using ajax behaviors.  I'm
> wondering where I can start digging to see why this is happening. 
> Any ideas?
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-2.0 - ajax page expired exceptions

[Igor Vaynberg]

dont think so but feel free to open one

-igor


On 1/17/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks for the update.

is there a JIRA issue that I can watch for when this will be fixed?

On 1/17/07, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, this is a problem with 2.0 currently. Ajax requests increase page
> version. Johan promised to fix this soon :)
>
> -Matej
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > a good start is to isolate this in a quickstart so we can all look at
> > it. if you want to do it yourself then just break in request cycle and
>
> > walk the steps, see why the page cannot be resolved.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 1/16/07, *Ryan Sonnek* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > I'm running wicket-2.0 from a recent svn checkout and i'm seeing a
> > *lot* of page expired exceptions when using ajax behaviors.  I'm
> > wondering where I can start digging to see why this is happening.
> > Any ideas?
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
> cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > 
 >
> >
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > 
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
> -
>
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] creating a mountBookmarkablePage with PageMap

[Igor Vaynberg]

lol, yes
i think someone got a bit overzealous with typesafety. please create a jira
issue for it and we will change PageMap pageMap to String pageMapName

-igor


On 1/17/07, Kadir Sener GUMUS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,
i want to mount a bookmarkablePage with custom pagemap parameter in
Application.init() but as a normal result i am experiencing with no
session error. Because PageMap.forName("") requires a session.
so can i ask you what the method "*mountBookmarkablePage(String path,
PageMap pageMap, Class bookmarkablePageClass)"* is for? where do i have to
define that? i couldnt find any usage description for the method.
Thanks.

Kadir

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Martijn Dashorst]

I don't have any past experience, just as you :). I think we should be
able to rate proposals, but that particular page only gets generated
for the top half.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, from your past experience: how long it takes
> for finding out the status of ApacheCon submittions?
>
> TIA,
>
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
>
> On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We'll see what the possibilities are. I am thinking of getting a video
> > link through skype with some of the US core members that won't be able
> > to attend, provided we have a good i-net connection.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
> > > think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
> > > some webcasts.
> > >
> > > BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially this 
> > > part :
> > >  - what were the top 3 problems you had
> > >   - what were the top 3 benefits you received
> > > It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket 
> > > area. :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >  ZedroS
> > >
> > > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > > your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Impossible to customize multi-part POST-s from Form-s in Wicket due to "final" methods

[Igor Vaynberg]

i dont know if it is a "workaround", it is just how the api is designed
currently.

what i am interested in is if doing this will solve your problem?

i also think we should make handlemultipart protected with a javadoc warning
that overrides may break fileuploadfields

-igor


On 1/17/07, beboris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



So, I guess you suggest we do it on the application level by overriding
newWebRequest() method inside the whole WebApplication, so it returns our
custom WebRequest subclass globally, as follows:

protected WebRequest newWebRequest(HttpServletRequest servletRequest) {
return new CustomWebRequest(servletRequest);
}

Then our CustomWebRequest class would in turn override
newMultipartWebRequest() method and do custom processing globally, as
opposed to working on the specific Form level which we could achieve
should
our CustomForm's handleMultiPart() method be overridable. Is that correct?

If yes - do you see it as a workaround for a "simple" case or a generic
solution for anyone who needs custom behavior of multi-part HTTP POST-s
from
forms?

-boris


igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> you can already substitute your own implementation of
IMultipartWebRequest
> globally. the ajax-upload-progressbar does it
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 1/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > IMHO, linking FileUploadField-s (which we need to browse for the
>> correct
>> > input file in the browser) with the specific (FileUpload, File)
>> > implementation of the results of the multi-part HTTP POST streams
>> (created
>> > when the form is submitted) is too strong (and limiting) for a
>> "generic"
>> > [and the only available!] contract for multi-part HTTP POST streams
in
>> a
>> > generic-purpose web framework like wicket. So, I'd suggest either
>> leaving
>> > things the way they are (FileUploadField-s will return null for
>> FileUpload
>> > when File upload is not used) or eliminating those FileUpload-related
>> > methods (let the user get this info from
(IMultipartWebRequest)request
>> > instead), or creating an extra layer of objects (StreamUploadField-s,
>> which
>> > would be a super-class for FileUploadField-s without
FileUpload-related
>> > contract obligations). In the latter case, you'd give users those
>> needed
>> > generic components that "look and feel" (and smell :) ) like files on
>> the
>> > client side, but are free for interpretation on the server side.
Still,
>> > today's FileUploadField-s would be there as subclasses (in all their
>> > full-contract "glory") for backward compatibility...
>>
>> In general this sounds good to me. It would be a great help to us if
>> someone (you) could provide us with a patch to make this concrete.
>> Without a patch, I'm afraid this would be on the bottom of our current
>> priority list (though we can do the change in Form anyway).
>>
>> Eelco
>>
>>
-
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>> your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> ___
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Impossible-to-customize-multi-part-POST-s-from-Form-s-in-Wicket-due-to-%22final%22-methods-tf3025509.html#a8420808
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Alexandru Popescu]

Just out of curiosity, from your past experience: how long it takes
for finding out the status of ApacheCon submittions?

TIA,

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.


On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll see what the possibilities are. I am thinking of getting a video
> link through skype with some of the US core members that won't be able
> to attend, provided we have a good i-net connection.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
> > think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
> > some webcasts.
> >
> > BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially this 
> > part :
> >  - what were the top 3 problems you had
> >   - what were the top 3 benefits you received
> > It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket area. 
> > :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  ZedroS
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> --
> Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Impossible to customize multi-part POST-s from Form-s in Wicket due to "final" methods

[beboris]

So, I guess you suggest we do it on the application level by overriding
newWebRequest() method inside the whole WebApplication, so it returns our
custom WebRequest subclass globally, as follows:

protected WebRequest newWebRequest(HttpServletRequest servletRequest) {
return new CustomWebRequest(servletRequest);
}

Then our CustomWebRequest class would in turn override
newMultipartWebRequest() method and do custom processing globally, as
opposed to working on the specific Form level which we could achieve should
our CustomForm's handleMultiPart() method be overridable. Is that correct?

If yes - do you see it as a workaround for a "simple" case or a generic
solution for anyone who needs custom behavior of multi-part HTTP POST-s from
forms? 

-boris


igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> you can already substitute your own implementation of IMultipartWebRequest
> globally. the ajax-upload-progressbar does it
> 
> -igor
> 
> 
> On 1/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > IMHO, linking FileUploadField-s (which we need to browse for the
>> correct
>> > input file in the browser) with the specific (FileUpload, File)
>> > implementation of the results of the multi-part HTTP POST streams
>> (created
>> > when the form is submitted) is too strong (and limiting) for a
>> "generic"
>> > [and the only available!] contract for multi-part HTTP POST streams in
>> a
>> > generic-purpose web framework like wicket. So, I'd suggest either
>> leaving
>> > things the way they are (FileUploadField-s will return null for
>> FileUpload
>> > when File upload is not used) or eliminating those FileUpload-related
>> > methods (let the user get this info from (IMultipartWebRequest)request
>> > instead), or creating an extra layer of objects (StreamUploadField-s,
>> which
>> > would be a super-class for FileUploadField-s without FileUpload-related
>> > contract obligations). In the latter case, you'd give users those
>> needed
>> > generic components that "look and feel" (and smell :) ) like files on
>> the
>> > client side, but are free for interpretation on the server side. Still,
>> > today's FileUploadField-s would be there as subclasses (in all their
>> > full-contract "glory") for backward compatibility...
>>
>> In general this sounds good to me. It would be a great help to us if
>> someone (you) could provide us with a patch to make this concrete.
>> Without a patch, I'm afraid this would be on the bottom of our current
>> priority list (though we can do the change in Form anyway).
>>
>> Eelco
>>
>> -
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>> your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> ___
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Impossible-to-customize-multi-part-POST-s-from-Form-s-in-Wicket-due-to-%22final%22-methods-tf3025509.html#a8420808
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Martijn Dashorst]

We'll see what the possibilities are. I am thinking of getting a video
link through skype with some of the US core members that won't be able
to attend, provided we have a good i-net connection.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
> think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
> some webcasts.
>
> BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially this part 
> :
>  - what were the top 3 problems you had
>   - what were the top 3 benefits you received
> It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket area. :)
>
> Cheers,
>  ZedroS
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

[Igor Vaynberg]

not that we know of. its just a servlet/filter.

-igor

On 1/17/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Wish me luck.  Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the
next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets & Wicket.  This
will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website.  My
apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions
to which I will undoubtedly subject you all.

As a first question in that direction, are there any known gotchas in
using Wicket with JBoss?

Cheers,
Scott

__
From:
Sent:   Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:46 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject:UI Framework selection

C, I would like you to lead up the UI Framework prototyping project,
which is a prerequisite for BSC.  I would like you to work with Scott
Swank and J, who have also put in a lot of effort in research and
prototyping.

We have a couple weeks to dedicate to this, and a number of developers
to work on prototypes.  Our goal is to select the framework for BSC
and establish initial guidelines and directions for use.  Our
candidates are JSF Facelets and Wicket.  Wicket is the underdog, but I
want us to give it due consideration, as I like the approach.  I would
like to divide the group into two teams.  Primary criteria will be
ease (speed/complexity) of use, reuse and maintenance.  Consider
mainly the sorts of UI tasks necessary for BSC, but also consider
concierge style AJAX.   It would be best to come up with a single
"obstacle course" to run each framework through.

Primarily the team will be those that worked on hotels, with the
addition of K, and others optional, depending on need.

Please schedule a meeting tomorrow with me, Swank, R, J, B for us to
finalize our plan.

Thanks,
SM

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How to do a table with cell specific background image and image ?

[Igor Vaynberg]

On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks again Igor !

You're most helpful.

However, as a newbe I am, I still don't get it to work (but I try
before posting again, I promise!).

In fact, the issue now is with the path associated with my images.

Indeed, for the cell image, I used :
Image test = new Image("image1", new Model("test.png"));
then, currently, I do a item.add(test);

However, in my WebMarkupContainer, when I do tag.put("background",
"test2.png"); } it gives in the html : 
even if this image is in fact in my package next to the html page.



image does some stuff behind scenes to build the url for you, you can do the
same

String test2pngurl=RequestCycle.get().urlFor(new
ResourceReference(pageclass, "test2.png"))

should get you url to test2.png in the same package as page class



At the end of the day, I've found that my image from new
Image("image1", new Model("test.png")); is written as test_en.png in
the html file. But I don't need to localise it neither, so I wonder
what is the best way...



image is one of those bastardized classes that tries to do too much... i
wouldnt mind if we split it into a bunch of subclasses

for now just do the same thing as bove - use resourcereference instead of
the string
new Image("foo", new ResourceReference(pageclass, "test.png"));

A last question :

I don't use a DataView but a RepeatingView. In the end, if it works
properly, I would like to have some ajax behavior linked to the
images' hover (to render some information on the image displayed on
the right corner of the page). Is a DataView better suited for such an
use? I don't know exactly, yet, when to use XXView or XXData... I read
the Javadoc but I wasn't enlightened.



there is a page on the wiki that details the hierarchy and usecases for the
repeaters [1]


[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Tables+and+Grids

-igor



Thanks in advance again !

ZedroS

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Marc-Andre Houle]

I agree with that, maybe make a webcast (or even a podcast for me to listen
during the job on my ipod!) of some of the talk (I'm interested in the talk
about future 2, 2.1, 3) and reel life problem.

That would be really nice to have and would make us think we are not that
far away...

Marc

On 1/17/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi

For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
some webcasts.

BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially this
part :
- what were the top 3 problems you had
  - what were the top 3 benefits you received
It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket area.
:)

Cheers,
ZedroS

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

[Scott Swank]

Wish me luck.  Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the
next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets & Wicket.  This
will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website.  My
apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions
to which I will undoubtedly subject you all.

As a first question in that direction, are there any known gotchas in
using Wicket with JBoss?

Cheers,
Scott

__
From:
Sent:   Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:46 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject:UI Framework selection

C, I would like you to lead up the UI Framework prototyping project,
which is a prerequisite for BSC.  I would like you to work with Scott
Swank and J, who have also put in a lot of effort in research and
prototyping.

We have a couple weeks to dedicate to this, and a number of developers
to work on prototypes.  Our goal is to select the framework for BSC
and establish initial guidelines and directions for use.  Our
candidates are JSF Facelets and Wicket.  Wicket is the underdog, but I
want us to give it due consideration, as I like the approach.  I would
like to divide the group into two teams.  Primary criteria will be
ease (speed/complexity) of use, reuse and maintenance.  Consider
mainly the sorts of UI tasks necessary for BSC, but also consider
concierge style AJAX.   It would be best to come up with a single
"obstacle course" to run each framework through.

Primarily the team will be those that worked on hotels, with the
addition of K, and others optional, depending on need.

Please schedule a meeting tomorrow with me, Swank, R, J, B for us to
finalize our plan.

Thanks,
SM

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[ZedroS Schwart]

Hi

For the ones not lucky enough to be able to attend this apachecon, I
think you would be excellent to have the slides of the demo or even
some webcasts.

BTW, I really appreciate Martijn suggestions of content, especially this part :
 - what were the top 3 problems you had
  - what were the top 3 benefits you received
It's most interesting and important for people outside of the wicket area. :)

Cheers,
 ZedroS

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How to do a table with cell specific background image and image ?

[ZedroS Schwart]

Thanks again Igor !

You're most helpful.

However, as a newbe I am, I still don't get it to work (but I try
before posting again, I promise!).

In fact, the issue now is with the path associated with my images.

Indeed, for the cell image, I used :
Image test = new Image("image1", new Model("test.png"));
then, currently, I do a item.add(test);

However, in my WebMarkupContainer, when I do tag.put("background",
"test2.png"); } it gives in the html : 
even if this image is in fact in my package next to the html page.

At the end of the day, I've found that my image from new
Image("image1", new Model("test.png")); is written as test_en.png in
the html file. But I don't need to localise it neither, so I wonder
what is the best way...

A last question :
I don't use a DataView but a RepeatingView. In the end, if it works
properly, I would like to have some ajax behavior linked to the
images' hover (to render some information on the image displayed on
the right corner of the page). Is a DataView better suited for such an
use? I don't know exactly, yet, when to use XXView or XXData... I read
the Javadoc but I wasn't enlightened.

Thanks in advance again !
ZedroS

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Impossible to customize multi-part POST-s from Form-s in Wicket due to "final" methods

[Igor Vaynberg]

you can already substitute your own implementation of IMultipartWebRequest
globally. the ajax-upload-progressbar does it

-igor


On 1/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> IMHO, linking FileUploadField-s (which we need to browse for the correct
> input file in the browser) with the specific (FileUpload, File)
> implementation of the results of the multi-part HTTP POST streams
(created
> when the form is submitted) is too strong (and limiting) for a "generic"
> [and the only available!] contract for multi-part HTTP POST streams in a
> generic-purpose web framework like wicket. So, I'd suggest either
leaving
> things the way they are (FileUploadField-s will return null for
FileUpload
> when File upload is not used) or eliminating those FileUpload-related
> methods (let the user get this info from (IMultipartWebRequest)request
> instead), or creating an extra layer of objects (StreamUploadField-s,
which
> would be a super-class for FileUploadField-s without FileUpload-related
> contract obligations). In the latter case, you'd give users those needed
> generic components that "look and feel" (and smell :) ) like files on
the
> client side, but are free for interpretation on the server side. Still,
> today's FileUploadField-s would be there as subclasses (in all their
> full-contract "glory") for backward compatibility...

In general this sounds good to me. It would be a great help to us if
someone (you) could provide us with a patch to make this concrete.
Without a patch, I'm afraid this would be on the bottom of our current
priority list (though we can do the change in Form anyway).

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Impossible to customize multi-part POST-s from Form-s in Wicket due to "final" methods

[Beboris]

I am glad you are open to making the handleMultiPart() method "protected". 
While we understand your concern about existing "contracts", the dangers of 
giving user ability to override and control multi-part stream handling may well 
be exaggerated - especially considering getRequest/setRequest methods are 
already available in the RequestCycle class. And, yes, if the user overrides 
handleMultiPart() method he will be on his own as far as the upload results are 
concerned.  Consider it the price of "freedom"... [See the note on 
FileUploadField-s later...]

Let me first tell you what we do today and how that will change once we have 
the "protected" handleMultiPart() method available to us. In our today's code 
we are forced to use files, but even today we don't rely on getting info on 
those files from the form fields. We use the following code in the onSubmit() 
method of our Form subclass to get to the results of the upload:

final Request request = getRequest();
if (request instanceof IMultipartWebRequest) {
   IMultipartWebRequest multiReq = (IMultipartWebRequest)request;
   Map fileItems = multiReq.getFiles();
   ...
}

As you see, we don't use FileUploadField "contracts" and live happily 
thereafter... (well, except we don't need those intermediary files to start 
with...:) ).

In case handleMultiPart() method is made protected all we need to do is create 
our own wrapper (similar to MultipartServletWebRequest used inside Form) like 
this:

class CustomForm extends Form {
   ...
   private final boolean handleMultiPart() {
  if (multiPart) {
 try {
final CustomMultipartServletWebRequest customMultipartWebRequest = 
new 
CustomMultipartServletWebRequest((HttpServletRequest)getRequest(),this.maxSize);
getRequestCycle().setRequest(customMultipartWebRequest);
 }
  ...
}

Then we'd handle streams "our way" inside that CustomMultipartServletWebRequest 
class...

class CustomMultipartServletWebRequest {
   ...
   CustomMultipartServletWebRequest( HttpServletRequest request, Bytes maxSize) 
{...}
   ...
}

An example of MultipartServletWebRequest class would be of help, but otherwise, 
it would be our class with our own logic. And it will be our responsibility to 
handle stream parts any way we see fit... That's the goal...

IMHO, linking FileUploadField-s (which we need to browse for the correct input 
file in the browser) with the specific (FileUpload, File) implementation of the 
results of the multi-part HTTP POST streams (created when the form is 
submitted) is too strong (and limiting) for a "generic" [and the only 
available!] contract for multi-part HTTP POST streams in a generic-purpose web 
framework like wicket. So, I'd suggest either leaving things the way they are 
(FileUploadField-s will return null for FileUpload when File upload is not 
used) or eliminating those FileUpload-related methods (let the user get this 
info from (IMultipartWebRequest)request instead), or creating an extra layer of 
objects (StreamUploadField-s, which would be a super-class for 
FileUploadField-s without FileUpload-related contract obligations). In the 
latter case, you'd give users those needed generic components that "look and 
feel" (and smell :) ) like files on the client side, but are free for 
interpretation on the server side. Still, today's FileUploadField-s would be 
there as subclasses (in all their full-contract "glory") for backward 
compatibility...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Impossible to customize multi-part POST-s from Form-s in Wicket due to "final" methods

[Eelco Hillenius]

> IMHO, linking FileUploadField-s (which we need to browse for the correct
> input file in the browser) with the specific (FileUpload, File)
> implementation of the results of the multi-part HTTP POST streams (created
> when the form is submitted) is too strong (and limiting) for a "generic"
> [and the only available!] contract for multi-part HTTP POST streams in a
> generic-purpose web framework like wicket. So, I'd suggest either leaving
> things the way they are (FileUploadField-s will return null for FileUpload
> when File upload is not used) or eliminating those FileUpload-related
> methods (let the user get this info from (IMultipartWebRequest)request
> instead), or creating an extra layer of objects (StreamUploadField-s, which
> would be a super-class for FileUploadField-s without FileUpload-related
> contract obligations). In the latter case, you'd give users those needed
> generic components that "look and feel" (and smell :) ) like files on the
> client side, but are free for interpretation on the server side. Still,
> today's FileUploadField-s would be there as subclasses (in all their
> full-contract "glory") for backward compatibility...

In general this sounds good to me. It would be a great help to us if
someone (you) could provide us with a patch to make this concrete.
Without a patch, I'm afraid this would be on the bottom of our current
priority list (though we can do the change in Form anyway).

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Making disappear a section

[Marc-Andre Houle]

yeah, I didn't think of it like that.

On 1/17/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


leaving the frame means leaving the html tags, and that means the
component might not be fully hidden as expected if, for example, it has a
css border

-igor


On 1/17/07, Marc-Andre Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just to know if I'm the only one who think it should be a good idea
> that, when outputmarkupId is true, the "frame" of the component is still
> there so it can be reprinted using ajax and without having the overhead of
> managing to add a new component and setting each one of them to the correct
> visibility.
>
> Maybe not all the type of component, but particularly container can be
> of that style. (Like setting invisible a fragment at startup and make it
> appear when you click something.
>
> Anyway, my 2 cents about that.
>
> Marc
>
>
> On 1/16/07, Marc-Andre Houle < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Just to let know a possible reader, do not override isVisible.  It is
> > what make me search a long time about this to find out that if you say in
> > isVisible something that you don't want, it will make your
> > fragment/panel/whateverContainer disapear like before.
> >
> > So, thats it, don't override isVisible if it is not necessary (Or like
> > me becaus eyou don't want to modify some existing lazy code...)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > On 1/16/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Martijn's example works only with JavaScript but needs no server
> > > roundtrip.
> > > Igor's and my version also works without JavaScript but does need to
> > > make a call to the server.
> > >
> > > My version is probably more useful when you need to switch more
> > > things
> > > in and out. Now I reread your question, this does not seem to be the
> > > case. So either of the Martijn and Igor solutions are appropriate.
> > >
> > > Erik.
> > >
> > >
> > > Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
> > > > Every one of you seem's to have a different answer, but I'm not
> > > sure
> > > > which one is the best...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik van Oosten
> > > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > >
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > > share your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
> > > cash
> > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom web form in Wicket

[Eelco Hillenius]

On 1/17/07, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are just refactoing the package name to
> wicket.contrib.markup.html.beanpanel
>
> What do you think is? Is there a naming convention for Wicket-stuff contribs
> ?

There are no hard rules. Most projects use wicket.contrib.x or
wicket.extensions.x (and some prefer to leave the whole markup.html.x
stuff out as well), but any naming works (though com etc might give
the wrong message).

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Making disappear a section

[Marc-Andre Houle]

Just to know if I'm the only one who think it should be a good idea that,
when outputmarkupId is true, the "frame" of the component is still there so
it can be reprinted using ajax and without having the overhead of managing
to add a new component and setting each one of them to the correct
visibility.

Maybe not all the type of component, but particularly container can be of
that style. (Like setting invisible a fragment at startup and make it appear
when you click something.

Anyway, my 2 cents about that.

Marc


On 1/16/07, Marc-Andre Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Just to let know a possible reader, do not override isVisible.  It is what
make me search a long time about this to find out that if you say in
isVisible something that you don't want, it will make your
fragment/panel/whateverContainer disapear like before.

So, thats it, don't override isVisible if it is not necessary (Or like me
becaus eyou don't want to modify some existing lazy code...)

Thanks

Marc

On 1/16/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martijn's example works only with JavaScript but needs no server
> roundtrip.
> Igor's and my version also works without JavaScript but does need to
> make a call to the server.
>
> My version is probably more useful when you need to switch more things
> in and out. Now I reread your question, this does not seem to be the
> case. So either of the Martijn and Igor solutions are appropriate.
>
> Erik.
>
>
> Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
> > Every one of you seem's to have a different answer, but I'm not sure
> > which one is the best...
>
> --
> Erik van Oosten
> http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>
>
> -
>
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Making disappear a section

[Igor Vaynberg]

leaving the frame means leaving the html tags, and that means the component
might not be fully hidden as expected if, for example, it has a css border

-igor


On 1/17/07, Marc-Andre Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Just to know if I'm the only one who think it should be a good idea that,
when outputmarkupId is true, the "frame" of the component is still there so
it can be reprinted using ajax and without having the overhead of managing
to add a new component and setting each one of them to the correct
visibility.

Maybe not all the type of component, but particularly container can be of
that style. (Like setting invisible a fragment at startup and make it appear
when you click something.

Anyway, my 2 cents about that.

Marc


On 1/16/07, Marc-Andre Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just to let know a possible reader, do not override isVisible.  It is
> what make me search a long time about this to find out that if you say in
> isVisible something that you don't want, it will make your
> fragment/panel/whateverContainer disapear like before.
>
> So, thats it, don't override isVisible if it is not necessary (Or like
> me becaus eyou don't want to modify some existing lazy code...)
>
> Thanks
>
> Marc
>
> On 1/16/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Martijn's example works only with JavaScript but needs no server
> > roundtrip.
> > Igor's and my version also works without JavaScript but does need to
> > make a call to the server.
> >
> > My version is probably more useful when you need to switch more things
> >
> > in and out. Now I reread your question, this does not seem to be the
> > case. So either of the Martijn and Igor solutions are appropriate.
> >
> > Erik.
> >
> >
> > Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
> > > Every one of you seem's to have a different answer, but I'm not sure
> >
> > > which one is the best...
> >
> > --
> > Erik van Oosten
> > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > -
> >
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Multiple sessions from one client

[Eelco Hillenius]

Well, it is possible though it might not be totally bullet proof. We
have a mechanism in place that tries to detect opening up a new window
or tab. When this is detected, a quick redirect is done to the same
page, but in a different page map (and sometimes, like with popup
links, this is more explicit).

If you want to store window/ tab relative session information, you
could store attributes using the current page map name as part of the
key.

Eelco


On 1/17/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short answer: NO.
>
> Long answer: mostly no, but it strongly depends on the browser.
>
> Solution: do not use the session (is against Wicket matra anyway) but
> maintain state in the Wicket components. Make sure that your components
> are versioned (defaults to on).
>
> Regards,
>  Erik.
>
>
> Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> > Is it possible to have multiple sessions from the same client?
> >
>
> --
> Erik van Oosten
> http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ContainerFeedbackMessageFilter

[Igor Vaynberg]

makes sense to me, go ahead

-igor


On 1/17/07, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,

ContainerFeedbackMessageFilter filters out messages for the container (for
instance Form). I don't know if this is intention or bug, for me this
seems
better:

public boolean accept(FeedbackMessage message)
{
if (message.getReporter() == null)
{
return false;
}
else if(container == message.getReporter())  //<=== missing?
{
return true;
}
else
{
return container.contains(message.getReporter(), true);
}
}

Should I fill bug report?

Jan




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] DataView modelChanged

[Igor Vaynberg]

you dont need to do anything. next request the dataprovider is polled again.
if the dataview really doesnt refresh make sure your dataprovider/orm layer
are not doing any caching.

-igor


On 1/17/07, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi again,

I have a simple DataView where one of the columns contains a Link which
onClick modifies the data.  What is the best way of telling the DataView
that the model has changed.  I've tried a few things, see the comments
in the code

Thanks for your help,
Tim

DataView dataView = new DataView("tasks",
new UserTaskDataProvider(user)) {

protected void populateItem(final Item item) {
final TaskInstance task = (TaskInstance)
item.getModelObject();

item.add(new Label("taskName",
task.getName()));

// add a link that, when clicked,
assigns the task back to
// the group
Link assignLink = new Link("assignLink")
{
@Override
public void onClick() {

ATMInstallsDao.getFromApplicationContext()

.assignTaskToGroup(task.getId(),

"InstallsTeam");

//-PLEASE
HELP WITH THIS BIT-



// tell wicket that
we've changed the model so it
// updates the page

//tried...

// modelChanged(); -
does nothing (the Link objects model??)
//
DataView.this.modelChanged(); - does not compile no DataView parent???
// This works but is not
really the most efficient!.

getRequestCycle().setResponsePage(new UserTasksPage(userName));





//

}
};
assignLink.add(new
Label("assignLinkLabel",
"assign to group"));
item.add(assignLink);


}
};


The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Static pages?

[Igor Vaynberg]

the basic way to do it is to hae a page with a label. call
setescapemodelstrings(false) on the label and add html into it.

but we also have freemarker integration in wicket-stuff

-igor


On 1/17/07, behlma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Hi there,
I'm quite new to Wicket and was wondering if there's a possibility to
create
some static pages in Wicket without having the need to create an Action.
What I eventually want are a couple of Freemarker templates without any
wicket:ids getting rendered and to be able to access them.


Thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Static-pages--tf3026287.html#a8407550
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] ContainerFeedbackMessageFilter

[jan_bar]

Hi,

ContainerFeedbackMessageFilter filters out messages for the container (for
instance Form). I don't know if this is intention or bug, for me this seems
better:

public boolean accept(FeedbackMessage message)
{
if (message.getReporter() == null)
{
return false;
}
else if(container == message.getReporter())  //<=== missing?
{
return true;
}
else
{
return container.contains(message.getReporter(), true);
}
}

Should I fill bug report?

Jan




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Multiple sessions from one client

[Johannes Fahrenkrug]

Thank you, Erik.
I'll read up on that topic and I guess a bit of refactoring will be in 
place then :)

- Johannes

Erik van Oosten wrote:
> Short answer: NO.
>
> Long answer: mostly no, but it strongly depends on the browser.
>
> Solution: do not use the session (is against Wicket matra anyway) but 
> maintain state in the Wicket components. Make sure that your components 
> are versioned (defaults to on).
>
> Regards,
>  Erik.
>
>
> Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
>   
>> Is it possible to have multiple sessions from the same client?
>>   
>> 
>
>   


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Multiple sessions from one client

[Erik van Oosten]

Short answer: NO.

Long answer: mostly no, but it strongly depends on the browser.

Solution: do not use the session (is against Wicket matra anyway) but 
maintain state in the Wicket components. Make sure that your components 
are versioned (defaults to on).

Regards,
 Erik.


Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Is it possible to have multiple sessions from the same client?
>   

-- 
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] DataView modelChanged

[Tim Squires]

Hi again,
 
I have a simple DataView where one of the columns contains a Link which
onClick modifies the data.  What is the best way of telling the DataView
that the model has changed.  I've tried a few things, see the comments
in the code
 
Thanks for your help,
Tim
 
DataView dataView = new DataView("tasks",
new UserTaskDataProvider(user)) {

protected void populateItem(final Item item) {
final TaskInstance task = (TaskInstance)
item.getModelObject();

item.add(new Label("taskName",
task.getName()));

// add a link that, when clicked,
assigns the task back to
// the group
Link assignLink = new Link("assignLink")
{
@Override
public void onClick() {

ATMInstallsDao.getFromApplicationContext()

.assignTaskToGroup(task.getId(),

"InstallsTeam");

//-PLEASE
HELP WITH THIS BIT-



// tell wicket that
we've changed the model so it
// updates the page

//tried...

// modelChanged(); -
does nothing (the Link objects model??)
//
DataView.this.modelChanged(); - does not compile no DataView parent???
// This works but is not
really the most efficient!.

getRequestCycle().setResponsePage(new UserTasksPage(userName));





//

}
};
assignLink.add(new
Label("assignLinkLabel",
"assign to group"));
item.add(assignLink);


}
};


The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Reloading Jars

[Johan Compagner]

and this should be fixed in 1.3 and 2.0

johan


On 1/17/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Don't deploy with DEVELOPMENT mode.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, suranjay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Our webapp running on Resin-pro 3.0.21 uses Wicket 1.2.4.
> Our server often gets saturated with open file connections.
> When checking this with lsof, we see that the Wicket.jar file is getting
> loaded many times. i.e. once per every hit to our webapp.
> This fills up the open file space on our RHEL server.
> Is there a way to make sure that the Wicket.jar file is loaded only
> once,when Resin starts?
> We tried putting the .jar file in resin's lib folder, but then when
starting
> resin, classdefNotFoundErrors are thrown for the Application class.
>
> Does anyone have an idea on what we can do to rectify this? Or what we
are
> doing wrong?
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank You!
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-Jars-tf3027009.html#a8409488
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


--
Vote for Wicket at the
http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-auth-roles 1.2.4 pom

[Tim Squires]

That's great.  Thanks Martijn. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martijn
Dashorst
Sent: 17 January 2007 12:47
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-auth-roles 1.2.4 pom

It is not possible to update a deployed pom on the ibiblio servers.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The pom for wicket-auth-roles
>
> http://wicket.sourceforge.net/maven2/wicket/wicket-auth-roles/1.2.4/wi
> ck
> et-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
>
> refers to the wicket 1.2 snapshot...
>
>   
> wicket-parent
> wicket
> 1.2-SNAPSHOT
>   
>
> Where as the pom for wicket-extensions goes to wicket 1.2.4...
>
>   
> wicket-parent
> wicket
> 1.2.4
> ../wicket-parent
>   
>
>
> Does anyone know who to contact to have the 
> wicket-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom updated, if this is the right thing to do?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> __
> __ The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only 
> for the individuals named above. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, 
> forwarding or other duplication of this communication is strictly 
> prohibited.
> The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual author 
> and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
> Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should 
> seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have 
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> __
> __
>
> --
> --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn

> cash 
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEV
> DEV ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


--
Vote for Wicket at the
http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com

LINK Information Security


The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-auth-roles 1.2.4 pom

[Martijn Dashorst]

I'll fix it with 1.2.5

On 1/17/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not possible to update a deployed pom on the ibiblio servers.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 1/17/07, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The pom for wicket-auth-roles
> >
> > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/maven2/wicket/wicket-auth-roles/1.2.4/wick
> > et-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
> >
> > refers to the wicket 1.2 snapshot...
> >
> >   
> > wicket-parent
> > wicket
> > 1.2-SNAPSHOT
> >   
> >
> > Where as the pom for wicket-extensions goes to wicket 1.2.4...
> >
> >   
> > wicket-parent
> > wicket
> > 1.2.4
> > ../wicket-parent
> >   
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know who to contact to have the wicket-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
> > updated, if this is the right thing to do?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> > 
> > The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> > the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
> > or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> > The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
> > author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
> > Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
> > seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
> > received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> > 
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> --
> Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-auth-roles 1.2.4 pom

[Martijn Dashorst]

It is not possible to update a deployed pom on the ibiblio servers.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The pom for wicket-auth-roles
>
> http://wicket.sourceforge.net/maven2/wicket/wicket-auth-roles/1.2.4/wick
> et-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
>
> refers to the wicket 1.2 snapshot...
>
>   
> wicket-parent
> wicket
> 1.2-SNAPSHOT
>   
>
> Where as the pom for wicket-extensions goes to wicket 1.2.4...
>
>   
> wicket-parent
> wicket
> 1.2.4
> ../wicket-parent
>   
>
>
> Does anyone know who to contact to have the wicket-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
> updated, if this is the right thing to do?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> 
> The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
> or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
> author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
> Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
> seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> 
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Reloading Jars

[Martijn Dashorst]

Don't deploy with DEVELOPMENT mode.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, suranjay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Our webapp running on Resin-pro 3.0.21 uses Wicket 1.2.4.
> Our server often gets saturated with open file connections.
> When checking this with lsof, we see that the Wicket.jar file is getting
> loaded many times. i.e. once per every hit to our webapp.
> This fills up the open file space on our RHEL server.
> Is there a way to make sure that the Wicket.jar file is loaded only
> once,when Resin starts?
> We tried putting the .jar file in resin's lib folder, but then when starting
> resin, classdefNotFoundErrors are thrown for the Application class.
>
> Does anyone have an idea on what we can do to rectify this? Or what we are
> doing wrong?
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank You!
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-Jars-tf3027009.html#a8409488
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] wicket-auth-roles 1.2.4 pom

[Tim Squires]

Hi,
 
The pom for wicket-auth-roles 
 
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/maven2/wicket/wicket-auth-roles/1.2.4/wick
et-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
 
refers to the wicket 1.2 snapshot...

  
wicket-parent
wicket
1.2-SNAPSHOT
  
 
Where as the pom for wicket-extensions goes to wicket 1.2.4...

  
wicket-parent
wicket
1.2.4
../wicket-parent
  
 

Does anyone know who to contact to have the wicket-auth-roles-1.2.4.pom
updated, if this is the right thing to do?

Thanks,
Tim


The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Reloading Jars

[suranjay]

Our webapp running on Resin-pro 3.0.21 uses Wicket 1.2.4.  
Our server often gets saturated with open file connections.
When checking this with lsof, we see that the Wicket.jar file is getting
loaded many times. i.e. once per every hit to our webapp.
This fills up the open file space on our RHEL server.
Is there a way to make sure that the Wicket.jar file is loaded only
once,when Resin starts?
We tried putting the .jar file in resin's lib folder, but then when starting
resin, classdefNotFoundErrors are thrown for the Application class.

Does anyone have an idea on what we can do to rectify this? Or what we are
doing wrong?
Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thank You!
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-Jars-tf3027009.html#a8409488
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Static pages?

[behlma]

Hi there,
I'm quite new to Wicket and was wondering if there's a possibility to create
some static pages in Wicket without having the need to create an Action.
What I eventually want are a couple of Freemarker templates without any
wicket:ids getting rendered and to be able to access them.


Thanks in advance!
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Static-pages--tf3026287.html#a8407550
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Conversion Error For Boolean/Checkbox

[Ayodeji Aladejebi]

waoh...behold the wonder of this day..thanks for that tip..works fine now

On 1/17/07, Arnout Engelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ayodeji Aladejebi schreef:
> Please when I used the SignInForm RemeberMe property, anytime a user
> checks it, i keep getting this error
>
> Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find
> resource: ConversionError for component:
> registerPanel:signInForm:rememberMeRow:rememberMe
> at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:262)
> at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:121)
> at
> wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.error(FormComponent.java:398)
> at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.convert
> (FormComponent.java:907)
>
> even though a boolean property exists properly mapped to the model.

I seem to remember having some problems when the checkbox had a 'value'
attribute in the HTML (i.e. "value='checkbox'"). Might be worth a look?


Arnout

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Multiple sessions from one client

[Johannes Fahrenkrug]

Hi,

I have a quick question: my online booking web application depends on 
sessions. When one user is at a certain step of the session process and 
opens a new tab/window in the same browser, the same session is used and 
no new session is created.

Is it possible to have multiple sessions from the same client?

- Johannes

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Conversion Error For Boolean/Checkbox

[Arnout Engelen]

Ayodeji Aladejebi schreef:
> Please when I used the SignInForm RemeberMe property, anytime a user 
> checks it, i keep getting this error
>
> Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find 
> resource: ConversionError for component: 
> registerPanel:signInForm:rememberMeRow:rememberMe
> at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:262)
> at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:121)
> at 
> wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.error(FormComponent.java:398)
> at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.convert 
> (FormComponent.java:907)
>
> even though a boolean property exists properly mapped to the model.

I seem to remember having some problems when the checkbox had a 'value' 
attribute in the HTML (i.e. "value='checkbox'"). Might be worth a look?


Arnout

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Martijn Dashorst]

We have yet to file a BoF session, until then please add yourself to
this wiki page:

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-at-apachecon-europe-2007.html

Martijn

On 1/17/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Martijn,
>
> I can present my application for the municipality of Amsterdam. Have to
> ask for permission first of course.
> How do I apply?
>
> Regards,
>  Erik.
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > Not sure, perhaps give each willing person a time slot to show off
> > their application, something like 10 minutes (depending on the number
> > of people that want to give it a go) with:
> >  - personal introduction (who are you, what company, what does the comp do)
> >  - purpose of application (market, what can you do with it, etc)
> >  - demo
> >  - why did you choose wicket (viral marketing, liked what you saw, got
> > recommended by a friend, other)
> >  - what other technologies did you use
> >  - what were the top 3 problems you had
> >  - what were the top 3 benefits you recieved
> >
> > It is a lot to cover in 10 minutes though. Basically anything that
> > shows off your application and gives us more insight into how Wicket
> > was used and where we can improve things.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
>
> --
> Erik van Oosten
> http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Conversion Error For Boolean/Checkbox

[Ayodeji Aladejebi]

Version: 1.2.4

On 1/17/07, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Please when I used the SignInForm RemeberMe property, anytime a user
checks it, i keep getting this error

Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find resource:
ConversionError for component:
registerPanel:signInForm:rememberMeRow:rememberMe
at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:262)
at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:121)
at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.error(FormComponent.java
:398)
at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.convert (
FormComponent.java:907)

even though a boolean property exists properly mapped to the model.

any help?
thanks



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom web form in Wicket

[Michael K]

Hi Paolo,

Thanks for your suggestion. I 'm about to download the package but I 'm not 
sure which package the beanpanel is belong to. Cause, I saw a list of 
categorized packages such as contrib-data, contrib-dojo etc in the download 
page. 


Thanks,
Michael


- Original Message 
From: Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3:52:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom web form in Wicket

We are just refactoing the package name to wicket.contrib.markup.html.beanpanel

What do you think is? Is there a naming convention for Wicket-stuff contribs ? 


Thanks, Paolo



On 1/16/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, ok. In that case, you should move the project from trunk to the 1.3 branch 
in the wicket-stuff project. Trunk is reserved for 2.0 projects. I regularly 
update those projects (like last weekend) when there are API breaks.


Eelco




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user







 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom web form in Wicket

[Paolo Di Tommaso]

We are just refactoing the package name to
wicket.contrib.markup.html.beanpanel

What do you think is? Is there a naming convention for Wicket-stuff contribs
?


Thanks, Paolo


On 1/16/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ah, ok. In that case, you should move the project from trunk to the 1.3branch 
in the wicket-stuff project. Trunk is reserved for
2.0 projects. I regularly update those projects (like last weekend) when
there are API breaks.

Eelco


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Erik van Oosten]

Hello Martijn,

I can present my application for the municipality of Amsterdam. Have to 
ask for permission first of course.
How do I apply?

Regards,
 Erik.


Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Not sure, perhaps give each willing person a time slot to show off
> their application, something like 10 minutes (depending on the number
> of people that want to give it a go) with:
>  - personal introduction (who are you, what company, what does the comp do)
>  - purpose of application (market, what can you do with it, etc)
>  - demo
>  - why did you choose wicket (viral marketing, liked what you saw, got
> recommended by a friend, other)
>  - what other technologies did you use
>  - what were the top 3 problems you had
>  - what were the top 3 benefits you recieved
>
> It is a lot to cover in 10 minutes though. Basically anything that
> shows off your application and gives us more insight into how Wicket
> was used and where we can improve things.
>
> Martijn
>   

-- 
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Conversion Error For Boolean/Checkbox

[Ayodeji Aladejebi]

Please when I used the SignInForm RemeberMe property, anytime a user checks
it, i keep getting this error

Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find resource:
ConversionError for component:
registerPanel:signInForm:rememberMeRow:rememberMe
   at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:262)
   at wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:121)
   at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.error(FormComponent.java
:398)
   at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.convert(FormComponent.java
:907)

even though a boolean property exists properly mapped to the model.

any help?
thanks
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] ApacheCon Europe 2007

[Martijn Dashorst]

Not sure, perhaps give each willing person a time slot to show off
their application, something like 10 minutes (depending on the number
of people that want to give it a go) with:
 - personal introduction (who are you, what company, what does the comp do)
 - purpose of application (market, what can you do with it, etc)
 - demo
 - why did you choose wicket (viral marketing, liked what you saw, got
recommended by a friend, other)
 - what other technologies did you use
 - what were the top 3 problems you had
 - what were the top 3 benefits you recieved

It is a lot to cover in 10 minutes though. Basically anything that
shows off your application and gives us more insight into how Wicket
was used and where we can improve things.

Martijn

On 1/17/07, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this message got lost under the appall for the ApacheCon website ;-)
> What kinds of real world applications did you have in mind? How are you
> planning to go about presenting them?
>
> - Johannes
>
> Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
>
> >Martijn,
> >
> >it would be great to meet up.
> >I have developed a complex online booking application for the travel
> >company I work for (with Ajax and all).
> >It went live last November and has been working great! I'd love to talk
> >about it at Apachecon (if I'll be able to attend, that is).
> >
> >I think a big thank you for this wonderful framework is in place: Thank
> >you guys for making my work so much easier and so much more fun!
> >
> >- Johannes
> >
> >Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>As you all probably know, the Apache conference Apache Con Europe 2007
> >>is getting closer (read more about it here: http://apachecon.com)
> >>
> >>We can try to organize a couple of get to gethers. I already submitted
> >>an Introduction to Wicket presentation (it still has to be accepted).
> >>We are also preparing an Introductory course (3 hours) for the monday.
> >>
> >>I want to propose to put in a birds of a feather for the Wicket
> >>community. Birds of a feather are typically held in the evening.
> >>
> >>I was wondering if you come, and what you would expect of such a get
> >>together. Ideas could be:
> >>- discuss 2.0/2.1/3.0 roadmap
> >>- get some real applications shown
> >>- discuss other projects, such as wicket stuff
> >>- discuss the future of the wicket 1.x branch
> >>- ask the core team
> >>
> >>Or more mundane things such as drinking beer. Any thoughts?
> >>
> >>Martijn
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >-
> >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >___
> >Wicket-user mailing list
> >Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user