Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?
Hello, I've been following the discussions here, and this one caught my eye. Does this mean that Wicket is ill suited for example for creating dynamic forms that are built dynamically at runtime after reading some page definition file from xml or some other data store. I havent looked into Wicket deeply, I just skimmed the surface, but I'm currently thinking about converting a Struts solution that builds forms based on form metadata stored in xml files. In my case, almost all jsp's have the same layout, and only differ in the form fields shown. On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested in creating a complex form in Java code without needing to manually configure any html for that form. In Swing for example, when you create a text field, it automatically has a default representation/view. Not a good comparison though, as Swing doesn't generate markup. Like with Swing you have to know where/ how your components need to be positioned using layout managers, with Wicket you need to tell where in the markup the components are located. It doesn't have to be a big problem though. As you start out, just keep your markup super simple, and later revisit to do more advanced layout etc. If you think a little bit ahead, and use CSS extensively, you typically don't very often have to change the hierarchy and you should get by just tweaking the templates and CSS. If you want a default look/ layout, you can use panels. You can provide custom markup for overriding classes later if you wish. It basically would be really sweet to be able to create forms, form elements, form layouts directly in Java code - and then later be able to tweak or tailor layout, css, etc. (perhaps via fragments?) As a Swing developer, I tend to develop every aspect of UIs in code. I've been using Wicket for just a couple of days. Where should I be looking? How do I approach this? strategies, Fragments, WebComponents? markup inheritance? ... It sounds like Echo is more your style of coding. See http://www.nextapp.com/ Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?
Hello, I've been following the discussions here, and this one caught my eye. Does this mean that Wicket is ill suited for example for creating dynamic forms that are built dynamically at runtime after reading some page definition file from xml or some other data store. I havent looked into Wicket deeply, I just skimmed the surface, but I'm currently thinking about converting a Struts solution that builds forms based on form metadata stored in xml files. In my case, almost all jsp's have the same layout, and only differ in the form fields shown. On the contrairy, Wicket is very well suited for that. Panels is the magic word. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag
I meant, when I don't use the wicket:fragment-tags (like in the example at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages ). Tom Igor Vaynberg schrieb: fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the wicket:fragment tags -igor On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content between the opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally replacing the tag, too? Tom - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag
Why not just use a panel instead? Martijn On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant, when I don't use the wicket:fragment-tags (like in the example at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages ). Tom Igor Vaynberg schrieb: fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the wicket:fragment tags -igor On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content between the opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally replacing the tag, too? Tom - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] localized resource property file - fallback to default?
Thanks Jurgen Eelco, I understand you would not want this as default behaviour I suppose I can figure it out. Cheers, Wilko Eelco Hillenius wrote: I see what you mean, and understand this use case may be good for some occasions. There is a big danger however, of Wicket 'silently' failing (depending on your settings not throwing an exception or displaying a place holder with a warning) when it cannot locate messages. It would be too easy to overlook messages that aren't localized. I think Wicket's defaults are good. And like Juergen said, if you feel you need another algorithm, you can implement this yourself by doing an extra bit of work. Shouldn't be too difficult. Eelco On 4/8/07, Wilko Hische [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do understand this, but that is not really my question. Let's assume all my keys are in an application scoped property file MyApplication.properties, where MyApplication.java extends the WebApplication. Let this file contain a large amount of keys. Now some customer of ours comes along and insists on the use of specific terminology for a few of the keys. I think the Wicket approach would be to create a variant of MyApplication.properties, MyApplication_customer.properties? But then I have to copy *all* keys, not only the few that will have another translation. Because if I don't provide the other keys as well Wicket will follow the tree upwards to WebApplication.properties, and of course will not find them. In other words, defaults are looked for on a higher level, not sideways as well. But maybe there is another way to tackle this case? Because now I would be stuck with maintaining files that are almost identical. Wilko Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Wicket does not only fall back to the default. It iterates over a long list of property filenames which are created from the component tree, locale, style and variation. Juergen On 4/8/07, Wilko Hische [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Erik, Wicket does fall back to the default *file* but what about the case where you have one (or more) large properties file(s) for your default language and you want to create a variation in which you want to change just a few words for instance to make them more domain specific? In that case I would like a way to override just those few domain specific terms, ie an additional .properties file for that variation containing only the deviating terms instead of a copy of the original with just a few changes. Is there a wicket way to implement that? Regards, Wilko Erik van Oosten wrote: It already does work like that. http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/i18n-and-resource-bundles.html Regards, Erik. dukejansen wrote: Right now, if I have a localized property file (e.g. Welcome_de.properties), it seems I must have all resource keys defined in it. I would prefer to have the localizer be smart enough to fallback to the default properties file (e.g. Welcome.properties) if a property is not present in the localized property file. This would make it possible to add properties to the system and not have to translate them all immediately - let it fall back to the default language until someone gets around to translating it. Does Wicket have this easily configurable, or do I need to roll my own resource resolvers or other classes for this purpose? -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/localized-resource-property-file---fallback-to-default--tf3493032.html#a9891947 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
Re: [Wicket-user] having a (newbie) Ajax problem
Thanks for the quick response i'll try that. I can't seem to find it in the
FAQ though.
On 4/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you cannot update a listview with ajax, i think its in the faq. wrap it in
a webmarkupcontainer and update that instead.
-igor
On 4/8/07, Robbert Vergeten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm new to wicket and currently trying out some things to learn
wicket and to do proof-of-concepts with ajax functionality.
Because for what I want for my actual application i'm going to need a
lot of Ajax.
I'm having a problem with an ajax update of a list through ajax. The
concept is a simple variation of the databinder.net example.
Its like a guestbook/chat example with a form for input and a list for
the output. With both the ajax and the normal submit
the server sends and receives the proper data only with the ajax the
list is not properly updated because it works with id's.
And all items in my list have the same id and therefore only the first
gets updated so to speak.
(IE and FF give quite different (both wrong) results.)
I'm quite stuck on this so my question is how should i properly pack the
output list into a single object with custom behavior
that can handle its own update as a single component. Like a table
instead of a list of rows.
Any hints or links on where to start are most welcome.
my current code:
list = new PropertyListView(list, new HibernateListModel(
ChatLine.class, new ICriteriaBuilder(){
public void build(Criteria criteria){
criteria.addOrder (Order.desc (id));
criteria.setMaxResults(10);
}})){
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
Label textLine = new Label(text);
Label userName = new Label(username);
item.add(userName);
item.add(textLine);
}};
list.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(list);
form = new DataForm(chatform, ChatLine.class){
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
super.onSubmit();
clearPersistentObject();
}};
form.add (new TextField(text));
form.add(new TextField(username));
form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton(ajaxsubmit, form){
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form f) {
target.addComponent(list);
}});
add(form);
wicket:extend
div style=margin-top:20px; position:absolute;
table class=chatline
tr wicket:id=list id=list
td wicket:id=username class=user/td
td: /td
td wicket:id=text class=text/td
/tr
/table
/div
div style=margin-top:700px; position:absolute;
form wicket:id=chatform
table
tr
tdUsername:/td
tdChat Message:/td
/tr
tr
tdinput type=text wicket:id=username //td
tdinput type=text wicket:id=text/ size=80/td
/tr
/table
div style=margin-left:100px; position:absolute;
input type=submit wicket:id=ajaxsubmit value=send
input type=submit value=send
/div
/form
/div
/wicket:extend
Thanks in advance,
Robbert
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] having a (newbie) Ajax problem
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-repaint-a-listview-via-ajax.html
And Igor was correct, just not the general faq :-P
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/listview.html#ListView-FAQ
On 4/9/07, Robbert Vergeten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick response i'll try that. I can't seem to find it in the
FAQ though.
On 4/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you cannot update a listview with ajax, i think its in the faq. wrap it in
a webmarkupcontainer and update that instead.
-igor
On 4/8/07, Robbert Vergeten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm new to wicket and currently trying out some things to learn
wicket and to do proof-of-concepts with ajax functionality.
Because for what I want for my actual application i'm going to need a
lot of Ajax.
I'm having a problem with an ajax update of a list through ajax. The
concept is a simple variation of the databinder.net example.
Its like a guestbook/chat example with a form for input and a list for
the output. With both the ajax and the normal submit
the server sends and receives the proper data only with the ajax the
list is not properly updated because it works with id's.
And all items in my list have the same id and therefore only the first
gets updated so to speak.
(IE and FF give quite different (both wrong) results.)
I'm quite stuck on this so my question is how should i properly pack the
output list into a single object with custom behavior
that can handle its own update as a single component. Like a table
instead of a list of rows.
Any hints or links on where to start are most welcome.
my current code:
list = new PropertyListView(list, new
HibernateListModel(ChatLine.class, new ICriteriaBuilder(){
public void build(Criteria criteria){
criteria.addOrder (Order.desc (id));
criteria.setMaxResults(10);
}})){
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
Label textLine = new Label(text);
Label userName = new Label(username);
item.add(userName);
item.add(textLine);
}};
list.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(list);
form = new DataForm(chatform, ChatLine.class){
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
super.onSubmit();
clearPersistentObject();
}};
form.add (new TextField(text));
form.add(new TextField(username));
form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton(ajaxsubmit, form){
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form f) {
target.addComponent(list);
}});
add(form);
wicket:extend
div style=margin-top:20px; position:absolute;
table class=chatline
tr wicket:id=list id=list
td wicket:id=username class=user/td
td: /td
td wicket:id=text class=text/td
/tr
/table
/div
div style=margin-top:700px; position:absolute;
form wicket:id=chatform
table
tr
tdUsername:/td
tdChat Message:/td
/tr
tr
tdinput type=text wicket:id=username //td
tdinput type=text wicket:id=text/ size=80/td
/tr
/table
div style=margin-left:100px; position:absolute;
input type=submit wicket:id=ajaxsubmit value=send
input type=submit value=send
/div
/form
/div
/wicket:extend
Thanks in advance,
Robbert
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Learn Wicket at
Re: [Wicket-user] No Page found for component after selecting TreeNode
Thanks for the quick replay. After some digging, I found that I forgot to check that TreeItem is also a WebMarkupContainer which is rebuilt. A wrong way to re-implement my requirement in the Tree component let me think it worked on the Tree component in wicket-extension, which is obvious not after some serious thought. Seems like I asked a dumb question, hah Isaac Matej Knopp wrote: When tree node is selected the appropriate part of tree is rebuilt, which also involves recreating the components. So the component on which you're calling getPage() is no longer in hierarchy, thus the page returned is null. -Matej On 4/8/07, Isaac Weng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Similar to ILinkCallback of Tree in wicket-extension, I created a callback link which allows me to select a tree node in my custom Link component. After the link is clicked, the callback is executed and the node is selected. However, after selectNode() runs, getPage() in the Link component results in No Page found for component. Following is a brief sample code: - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Actually I just did this at work but I used fragments rather than panels. We just need a simpler datatype-html widget look up so I just went with fragments so that I don't need to build a bunch of java class and html files. The fragments are named according to the type they represent so I can simply say : Fragment f = new Fragment(item, typeName); f.add(new TextField(...)); etc. There are, of course, some if checks to determine which component to add to f but this makes it pretty easy to add new widgets. Now if we ever need to start adding some very complex components I might move over to using panels. But for our simple form builder, the fragments work just fine. Eelco Hillenius wrote: Hello, I've been following the discussions here, and this one caught my eye. Does this mean that Wicket is ill suited for example for creating dynamic forms that are built dynamically at runtime after reading some page definition file from xml or some other data store. I havent looked into Wicket deeply, I just skimmed the surface, but I'm currently thinking about converting a Struts solution that builds forms based on form metadata stored in xml files. In my case, almost all jsp's have the same layout, and only differ in the form fields shown. On the contrairy, Wicket is very well suited for that. Panels is the magic word. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - -- Justin Lee http://www.antwerkz.com AIM : evan chooly Skype : evanchooly -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFGGiTLJnQfEGuJ90MRA+GxAKCqEmm3J1/k2O4xGD4x+7Q/Tw6PaQCdHyyh 5RWxlT4OYskq9NivC3mpa5Y= =5LJx -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] having a (newbie) Ajax problem
great link thank you.
can't believe I missed that...
On 4/9/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-repaint-a-listview-via-ajax.html
And Igor was correct, just not the general faq :-P
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/listview.html#ListView-FAQ
On 4/9/07, Robbert Vergeten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick response i'll try that. I can't seem to find it in
the
FAQ though.
On 4/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you cannot update a listview with ajax, i think its in the faq. wrap
it in
a webmarkupcontainer and update that instead.
-igor
On 4/8/07, Robbert Vergeten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm new to wicket and currently trying out some things to learn
wicket and to do proof-of-concepts with ajax functionality.
Because for what I want for my actual application i'm going to need
a
lot of Ajax.
I'm having a problem with an ajax update of a list through ajax. The
concept is a simple variation of the databinder.net example.
Its like a guestbook/chat example with a form for input and a list
for
the output. With both the ajax and the normal submit
the server sends and receives the proper data only with the ajax the
list is not properly updated because it works with id's.
And all items in my list have the same id and therefore only the
first
gets updated so to speak.
(IE and FF give quite different (both wrong) results.)
I'm quite stuck on this so my question is how should i properly pack
the
output list into a single object with custom behavior
that can handle its own update as a single component. Like a table
instead of a list of rows.
Any hints or links on where to start are most welcome.
my current code:
list = new PropertyListView(list, new
HibernateListModel(ChatLine.class, new ICriteriaBuilder(){
public void build(Criteria criteria){
criteria.addOrder (Order.desc (id));
criteria.setMaxResults(10);
}})){
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
Label textLine = new Label(text);
Label userName = new Label(username);
item.add(userName);
item.add(textLine);
}};
list.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(list);
form = new DataForm(chatform, ChatLine.class){
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
super.onSubmit();
clearPersistentObject();
}};
form.add (new TextField(text));
form.add(new TextField(username));
form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton(ajaxsubmit, form){
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form f) {
target.addComponent(list);
}});
add(form);
wicket:extend
div style=margin-top:20px; position:absolute;
table class=chatline
tr wicket:id=list id=list
td wicket:id=username class=user/td
td: /td
td wicket:id=text class=text/td
/tr
/table
/div
div style=margin-top:700px; position:absolute;
form wicket:id=chatform
table
tr
tdUsername:/td
tdChat Message:/td
/tr
tr
tdinput type=text wicket:id=username //td
tdinput type=text wicket:id=text/ size=80/td
/tr
/table
div style=margin-left:100px; position:absolute;
input type=submit wicket:id=ajaxsubmit value=send
input type=submit value=send
/div
/form
/div
/wicket:extend
Thanks in advance,
Robbert
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
[Wicket-user] Wicket gui building
Hi, I'm just getting started with wicket and I like. (I have a strong Swing background :-)) . Bat it looks to me that I sort of have to design each gui, i.e. I have to write markup files. In some cases I would like to be able to generate a form based on a database table. And I wouldn't like to adapt my code when the table structure changes. But it seems to me I always have to supply a html file were each component is mapped to. Is there a way to generate the html on the fly ? It is not immediatly clear to me. kind regards, Pieter - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] XSD / Validation
ali-13 wrote: I link your xsd to external resources of IDEA and add wicket:id to custom html tags/attributes, and now it know wicket'tags , but after validate following xhtml file : Sorry, but it's just a workaround for IDEA inspection, it's not a real schema for wicket. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XSD---Validation-tf3488923.html#a9901301 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] TopToolbar in datatable dispeared when ajax modal window closed
hi
i used a defaultdatatable to show the data list , and add some ajax link in it
to open some modal window to show detail.
the toptoolbar will dispeared when these modal window closed, it's only happen
in firefox, work well in IE 6.
so ,is there any one can help me ? the below is my code.
ps. the crypted url and customed error page cannot work in the current 2.0
snapshot when i used modal window.
it' seem that the current 2.0 is very not stable for some ajax behavior. no
body care it again?
table.addTopToolbar(new IToolbarFactory() {
public AbstractToolbar newToolbar(WebMarkupContainer parent,
String id, DataTable dataTable) {
FilterToolbar tt = new FilterToolbar(parent, id, instance, dataProvider);
tt.setOutputMarkupId(true);
return tt;
}
});
table.setOutputMarkupId(true);
setWindowClosedCallback(new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() {
public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
target.addComponent(table);
}
});
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] TopToolbar in datatable dispeared when ajax modal window closed
Yes, this is a known issue with refreshing dataview with toolbars
using ajax. The problem is that toolbars use non-invalid markup which
works fine with regular requests, but doesn't work using ajax.
-Matej
On 4/9/07, tooy li(Gmail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i used a defaultdatatable to show the data list , and add some ajax link in
it to open some modal window to show detail.
the toptoolbar will dispeared when these modal window closed, it's only
happen in firefox, work well in IE 6.
so ,is there any one can help me ? the below is my code.
ps. the crypted url and customed error page cannot work in the current 2.0
snapshot when i used modal window.
it' seem that the current 2.0 is very not stable for some ajax behavior. no
body care it again?
table.addTopToolbar(new IToolbarFactory() {
public AbstractToolbar newToolbar(WebMarkupContainer parent,
String id, DataTable dataTable) {
FilterToolbar tt = new FilterToolbar(parent, id, instance, dataProvider);
tt.setOutputMarkupId(true);
return tt;
}
});
table.setOutputMarkupId(true);
setWindowClosedCallback(new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() {
public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
target.addComponent(table);
}
});
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?
search the list and wiki for bean panels. there is also a bean panel project in wicket-stuff although i dont know how usable it is. -igor On 4/8/07, Philip Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested in creating a complex form in Java code without needing to manually configure any html for that form. In Swing for example, when you create a text field, it automatically has a default representation/view. If I decide I'd like to change the view, I set a new UI object. It basically would be really sweet to be able to create forms, form elements, form layouts directly in Java code - and then later be able to tweak or tailor layout, css, etc. (perhaps via fragments?) As a Swing developer, I tend to develop every aspect of UIs in code. I've been using Wicket for just a couple of days. Where should I be looking? How do I approach this? strategies, Fragments, WebComponents? markup inheritance? ... Thanks, Phil - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket gui building
Check out how panels, fragments and borders work. That will let you
break things up in smaller pieces and defer the decission of which
actual markup will be used.
if (x) {
add(new TextFieldPanel(editor);
} else {
add(new ListEditor(editor);
}
...
form
...
span wicket:id=editor /
...
/form
etc.
Just play with it a bit, I'm sure you'll get it :) Also, check out
dynamic components like Tree and Wizard etc and see how they use
panels internally.
Eelco
On 4/9/07, Pieter Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm just getting started with wicket and I like. (I have a strong
Swing background :-)) .
Bat it looks to me that I sort of have to design each gui, i.e. I
have to write markup files.
In some cases I would like to be able to generate a form based on a
database table. And I wouldn't like to adapt my code when the table
structure changes.
But it seems to me I always have to supply a html file were each
component is mapped to. Is there a way to generate the html on the
fly ? It is not immediatly clear to me.
kind regards,
Pieter
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Internationalization and DropDownChoice
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007, Toscano wrote:
The getCountries() method outputs the list of countries depending on the
language stored in session.
But if I create the DropDownChoice as you said:
countries = new DropDownChoice(country,
new Model() {
public List getObject()
{
return getCountries();}
}, new ChoiceRenderer (countryName, countryID));
I have a RunTimeException: java.lang.NullPointerException: List of choices
is null - Was the supplied 'Choices' model empty?
As far as I remember, at least in 2.0 DropDownChoice takes
in two models: a list of the choices, and the initial
choice. (By the way, this is an excellent example of where
generics make the constructor more explicit).
So double-check that you are supplying the choices
correctly, and not in fact invoking a constructor that only
determines the default choice.
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?
I'm just going to echo what Eelco originally said: HTML is quite good for defining forms. I'm glad people have found ways to generate them from XML or whatever (and for some purposes I'm sure that's best), but I would encourage new users to keep an open mind about plain HTML templates for forms (and everything else). It's not always easy to accept coming from other Java frameworks where things are so different, but I hate to see people building heavy-duty (and ultimately inflexible) form generators just to avoid coding up ten different forms in HTML. A really swell idea from Galligan's Groovy demo was generating basic form markup for components and dumping it to stdout. Ideally, this would go into the component missing from markup error screen. Then you could copy, paste, and add whatever extra markup you want. The demo is here if anyone missed it: http://bigheadco.blogspot.com/2007/03/party-on-patio.html Nathan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
Hi, I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine when the required javascript files are contributed using wicket:head But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page - and both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has duplicate script type=text/javascript entries. Is there some way to avoid this? Thanks, Peter. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
use IHeaderContributor, contributions through that are filtered. i dont think we currently parse what exactly is in wicket:head, we just blob it in. it might be nice to parse it, i dont know, but it is a lot of work. you can add an rfe if you want, but it will not get a high priority imho -igor On 4/9/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine when the required javascript files are contributed using wicket:head But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page - and both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has duplicate script type=text/javascript entries. Is there some way to avoid this? Thanks, Peter. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at cenia.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
66.35.250.206 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 451-Could not complete sender verify callout
451-Could not complete sender verify callout for
451-wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net.
451-The mail server(s) for the domain may be temporarily unreachable, or
451-they may be permanently unreachable from this server. In the latter case,
451-you need to change the address or create an MX record for its domain
451-if it is supposed to be generally accessible from the Internet.
451 Talk to your mail administrator for details.
Giving up on 66.35.250.206.
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Received: (qmail 6465 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 18:07:55 +0200
Received: from r2j243.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.0.78?) (62.245.73.243)
by iregistr.cz with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 18:07:55 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:07:24 +0200
From: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Custom component with css style
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
hello,
I have custom component FoldingBorder extends Border with associated css
style e.g. in package com.example.components. If I want to use style
within the package (FoldingBorder.css) I do following:
public class FoldingBorder extends Border implements Serializable {
public FoldingBorder (String id, String title) {
//...omited
add(HeaderContributor.forCss(FoldingBorder.class, FoldingBorder.css));
//...omited
}
}
On rendered page I have this:
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css
href=/webapp/resources/com.example.components.FoldingBorder/FoldingBorder.css/link
...and it surprisingly doesn't work;-) I'm little confused how to work
with resources... What's the best practice to use resources within some
component (styles, images, etc.)?
thanks for help,
marek
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
Thanks Igor I'll use IHeaderContributor for now. On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use IHeaderContributor, contributions through that are filtered. i dont think we currently parse what exactly is in wicket:head, we just blob it in. it might be nice to parse it, i dont know, but it is a lot of work. you can add an rfe if you want, but it will not get a high priority imho -igor On 4/9/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine when the required javascript files are contributed using wicket:head But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page - and both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has duplicate script type=text/javascript entries. Is there some way to avoid this? Thanks, Peter. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header contributor? Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same for a static script johan On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use IHeaderContributor, contributions through that are filtered. i dont think we currently parse what exactly is in wicket:head, we just blob it in. it might be nice to parse it, i dont know, but it is a lot of work. you can add an rfe if you want, but it will not get a high priority imho -igor On 4/9/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine when the required javascript files are contributed using wicket:head But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page - and both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has duplicate script type=text/javascript entries. Is there some way to avoid this? Thanks, Peter. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header contributor? Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same for a static script I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
we are talking about two different panel classes contributing the same link, that means we need to break the head down into individual tags and process them that way. this isnt the case where we filter contributions from two instances of the same panel class. -igor On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header contributor? Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same for a static script I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
We already do parse content of head, but only to filter hader contribution contributed by ajax (in javascript). -Matej On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we are talking about two different panel classes contributing the same link, that means we need to break the head down into individual tags and process them that way. this isnt the case where we filter contributions from two instances of the same panel class. -igor On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header contributor? Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same for a static script I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag
This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data). I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended). Martijn On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant, when I don't use the wicket:fragment-tags (like in the example at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages ). Tom Igor Vaynberg schrieb: fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the wicket:fragment tags -igor On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content between the opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally replacing the tag, too? Tom - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag
yes +1, just revert to version 3 -igor On 4/9/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data). I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended). Martijn On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant, when I don't use the wicket:fragment-tags (like in the example at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages ). Tom Igor Vaynberg schrieb: fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the wicket:fragment tags -igor On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content between the opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally replacing the tag, too? Tom - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Help Me Improve Wicket Quickstart
Well, isn't that just what mvn jetty:run gives you? :-) talking about quickstart and mvn jetty:run: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-455 Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
there is a FormComponentPanel that can embed other form components, and act
as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.
-igor
On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
synthetic invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
example:
class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm(String id) {
DateComponent.add(this, birthDate);
}
}
select wicket:id=birthDate.day/
span wicket:id=birthDate.day.feedback/span
select wicket:id=birthDate.month/
span wicket:id=birthDate.month.feedback/span
select wicket:id=birthDate.year/
span wicket:id=birthDate.year.feedback/span
span wicket:id=birthDate/span !-- dummy component --
span wicket:id=birthDate.feedback/span
There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
(notice that they are not the same as form errors).
2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
convolved?
Best regards,
Carlos
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
there is a FormComponentPanel that can embed other form components, and act
Great! Btw, is there something more like a border or fragment, to
inline the markup?
as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.
Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound
before their containers?
Cheers,
Carlos
-igor
On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
synthetic invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
example:
class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm(String id) {
DateComponent.add(this, birthDate);
}
}
select wicket:id=birthDate.day/
span wicket:id=birthDate.day.feedback/span
select wicket:id=birthDate.month/
span wicket:id=birthDate.month.feedback/span
select wicket:id=birthDate.year/
span wicket:id= birthDate.year.feedback/span
span wicket:id=birthDate/span !-- dummy component --
span wicket:id=birthDate.feedback/span
There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
(notice that they are not the same as form errors).
2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
convolved?
Best regards,
Carlos
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms. Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound before their containers? Look at wicket.examples.forminput.Multiply and wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.(Date)TimeField for examples. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
When nested form is submitted, the form components in surrounding
models are given the user input, but they are not processed. So the
input is persisted during request, but not validated and processed.
The inner (nested) form, that is submitted is both validated and if
validation succeeds, the models are updated.
-Matej
On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a FormComponentPanel that can embed other form components, and act
Great! Btw, is there something more like a border or fragment, to
inline the markup?
as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.
Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound
before their containers?
Cheers,
Carlos
-igor
On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
synthetic invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
example:
class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm(String id) {
DateComponent.add(this, birthDate);
}
}
select wicket:id=birthDate.day/
span wicket:id=birthDate.day.feedback/span
select wicket:id=birthDate.month/
span wicket:id=birthDate.month.feedback/span
select wicket:id=birthDate.year/
span wicket:id= birthDate.year.feedback/span
span wicket:id=birthDate/span !-- dummy component --
span wicket:id=birthDate.feedback/span
There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
(notice that they are not the same as form errors).
2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
convolved?
Best regards,
Carlos
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
Hi Eelco, I've looked at the examples. There are a couple of things that still troubles me: 1) How can I use a compound property model without naming the nested form components with their full path (ie. 'birthDate.year' instead of simply 'year'). 2) If I add a validator to the form component panel (for panel level validation), can I assume that the nested component models will be already bound when the validator is triggered, or at least that getConvertedInput() will work on them? Thank you. Cheers, Carlos On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms. Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound before their containers? Look at wicket.examples.forminput.Multiply and wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.(Date)TimeField for examples. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
1) How can I use a compound property model without naming the nested form components with their full path (ie. 'birthDate.year' instead of simply 'year'). 2) If I add a validator to the form component panel (for panel level validation), can I assume that the nested component models will be already bound when the validator is triggered, or at least that getConvertedInput() will work on them? As you're looking at the date-time components, the answer to both questions is that clients of those components should consider it implementation details. Like FormComponentPanel says, it doesn't typically get any input itself. The nested components really are for recording intermediate input, which is applied to the model of the panel when updateModel is called, and as you can see, the internal state is synchronized in onAttach. I believe you should design such compound components like black boxes, which from a user's perspective behave like normal form components (they work on one model, and you only have to know it's public API). Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How can I use a compound property model without naming the nested
form components with their full path (ie. 'birthDate.year' instead of
simply 'year').
use the model luke
what is below is some pseudocode, it is not the best way to do this, but it
will give you an idea.
leave the formcomponentpanel's model null. immediately under it add a
webmarkupcontainer with the following model
class indentingmodel extends Model implements icomponentinheritedmodel {
iwrapmodel wraponinheritance(Component c) {
return new PropertyModel(FormComponentPanel.this.getModel(),
FormComponentPanel.this.getId()+.+c.getId());
}
}
add all the children to this webmarkupcontainer instead of directly to the
panel. what this model does is any children created without a model will
inherit a model that looks up the property that is prefixed with the
formcomponentpanel's id.
-igor
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
maybe have FormComponentFeedbackBorders for the individual
components and then a global feedback panel to catch the general
ones (install a filter to ignore reporters that have feedback borders)
Carlos Pita-4 wrote:
Hi all,
suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
synthetic invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
example:
class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm(String id) {
DateComponent.add(this, birthDate);
}
}
select wicket:id=birthDate.day/
select wicket:id=birthDate.month/
select wicket:id=birthDate.year/
!-- dummy component --
There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
(notice that they are not the same as form errors).
2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
convolved?
Best regards,
Carlos
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Form-macro-component-tf3549549.html#a9911009
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
Well, here is what I've done based on your suggestions. Please review
this and tell me if it can be improved, if you are so kind:
1) An inherited model that looks into the passed model. If it's not
null it returns a propertymodel for the component id a la
CompoundPropertyModel. If it's null it returns a propertymodel for the
parent's model with the full path of the component. So inside my panel
I can add form components as add(new TextField(month,
Integer.class)) independently of the model passed (null or a real
date)
private class MyModel extends Model implements IComponentInheritedModel {
public IWrapModel wrapOnInheritance(Component component) {
final IModel wrappedModel;
if (model == null) {
IModel parentModel = DatePanel.this.getParent().getModel();
String path = DatePanel.this.getParent().getId() + .
+ component.getId();
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(parentModel, path);
} else {
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(model, component.getId());
}
return new AbstractWrapModel() {
public IModel getWrappedModel() { return wrappedModel;
}
};
}
}
2) To have control on when children are really validated and their
models updated:
public boolean processChildren() { return false; }
3) A DatePanel validator that first validate its fields (so they are
converted too) and finally do global validation (validateDate()). Note
that individual validators can do global validation do, depending on
whether the validation was ajax-triggered or not, so validateDate()
will occur depending on the value of the validateDate flag (true for
ajax-validation, false for individual validators during submit
validation). Notice that validateOnNullValue() must return true or
this validator won't be invoked.
add(new AbstractValidator() {
protected void onValidate(IValidatable validatable) {
validateDate = false;
yearField.validate();
monthField.validate();
dayField.validate();
validateDate = true;
if (!(yearField.hasErrorMessage() ||
monthField.hasErrorMessage() || dayField.hasErrorMessage())) {
validateDate();
}
}
public boolean validateOnNullValue() { return true; }
});
4) updateModel. Just delegate to fields.
public void updateModel() {
dayField.updateModel();
monthField.updateModel();
yearField.updateModel();
}
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Carlos
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component
looks good without actually running the code :)
-igor
On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, here is what I've done based on your suggestions. Please review
this and tell me if it can be improved, if you are so kind:
1) An inherited model that looks into the passed model. If it's not
null it returns a propertymodel for the component id a la
CompoundPropertyModel. If it's null it returns a propertymodel for the
parent's model with the full path of the component. So inside my panel
I can add form components as add(new TextField(month,
Integer.class)) independently of the model passed (null or a real
date)
private class MyModel extends Model implements IComponentInheritedModel {
public IWrapModel wrapOnInheritance(Component component) {
final IModel wrappedModel;
if (model == null) {
IModel parentModel = DatePanel.this.getParent
().getModel();
String path = DatePanel.this.getParent().getId() + .
+ component.getId();
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(parentModel, path);
} else {
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(model, component.getId
());
}
return new AbstractWrapModel() {
public IModel getWrappedModel() { return wrappedModel;
}
};
}
}
2) To have control on when children are really validated and their
models updated:
public boolean processChildren() { return false; }
3) A DatePanel validator that first validate its fields (so they are
converted too) and finally do global validation (validateDate()). Note
that individual validators can do global validation do, depending on
whether the validation was ajax-triggered or not, so validateDate()
will occur depending on the value of the validateDate flag (true for
ajax-validation, false for individual validators during submit
validation). Notice that validateOnNullValue() must return true or
this validator won't be invoked.
add(new AbstractValidator() {
protected void onValidate(IValidatable validatable) {
validateDate = false;
yearField.validate();
monthField.validate();
dayField.validate();
validateDate = true;
if (!(yearField.hasErrorMessage() ||
monthField.hasErrorMessage() || dayField.hasErrorMessage())) {
validateDate();
}
}
public boolean validateOnNullValue() { return true; }
});
4) updateModel. Just delegate to fields.
public void updateModel() {
dayField.updateModel();
monthField.updateModel();
yearField.updateModel();
}
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Carlos
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page
created JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-456 And when I use HeaderContributor (instead of wicket:head in the markup) it works fine as expected. Thanks, Peter. On 4/9/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We already do parse content of head, but only to filter hader contribution contributed by ajax (in javascript). -Matej On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we are talking about two different panel classes contributing the same link, that means we need to break the head down into individual tags and process them that way. this isnt the case where we filter contributions from two instances of the same panel class. -igor On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header contributor? Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same for a static script I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue. Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag
OK, do so. Tom On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:14:36 +0200, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data). I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended). Martijn On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant, when I don't use the wicket:fragment-tags (like in the example at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages ). Tom Igor Vaynberg schrieb: fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the wicket:fragment tags -igor On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content between the opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally replacing the tag, too? Tom - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Submit failure
Hi , What is the right way to identify that a submit was failed ( e.g. there is no connection to the server ) ? Best regards Mandeleil Roman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Submit-failure-tf3551190.html#a9914206 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
