Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:53 +0200, Eelco Hillenius wrote: now we're going to build s.th. like a shop and i'm looking for A Thai site? hm? a thai site? what do you mean? cheers, martin Eelco - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 15:36 +0200, Johan Compagner wrote: and eelco only dreams thai now so.. ok, then sweet dreams, eelco :) On 5/1/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:53 +0200, Eelco Hillenius wrote: now we're going to build s.th. like a shop and i'm looking for A Thai site? hm? a thai site? what do you mean? Was a joke. You said 's.th' and .th is Thailand's extension. Eelco - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
hi igor,
thanx a lot for this clarification!
cheers,
martin
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 18:05 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
in reality this isnt how its supposed to work.
usually you would have something like this:
searchpage {
private criteria crit;
searchpage() {
add(new searchform(form, new PropertyModel(this, crit));
add(new resultsview(view, new PropertyModel(this, crit));
}
}
that way the form and the view are bound to the same criteria object.
the form modifies it, and the view renders according to it. you would
not call any setresponsepage in the form, the same insatance of the
page would be reused. that is the wicket way. however, if you must
have that nice bookmarkable url then you need to call
setresponsepage(class, pageparams) from the form. it is not as clean,
but it works.
-igor
On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:41 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
no, once the form is submitted the page is no longer
bookmarkable and
so it will lose any bookmarkable/mounted url.
if you want to keep it you can call
setresponsepage( page.class,
params) in onsubmit(), but in your case that is silly since
searchresultspage probably contains the submitted form
anyways?
well, i can do this (setResponsePage with params).
the SearchResultsPage indeed has a also an instance of the
form,
and the user can also initiate a search on the
SearchResultsPage.
so for each search the SearchForm.onSubmit creates a new
SearchResultsPage and (indirectly) a new SearchForm...
i just wonder if this this is the way how wicket should work,
or if
this stateless way is s.th. that is not really the target of
component based frameworks...
thanx cheers,
martin
-igor
On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi all,
i'm just starting with wicket and have a simple
search
form, that leads to a SearchResultsPage.
the SearchResultsPage is mounted as a bookmarkable
page (via
mountBookmarkablePage(/search,
SearchResultsPage.class);),
although the url that is shown then contains s.th.
like
?wicket:interface=:6:searchForm::IFormSubmitListener...
is it possible to have a nicer url for the submitted
form?
i'm using wicket 1.2.6 right now...
thanx in advance,
cheers,
martin
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2
express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to
get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___ Wicket-user
mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
hi igor,
i'm trying to implement your advice, but don't really know
how to do this.
what would the SearchForm then look like? does the form itself
use the model and how is the input field added to the form?
and how can the ResultsView access the value of the PropertyModel?
the model has a getObject(Component) accessor - does this mean that
the ResultsView would need pass the SearchPage into getObject?
thanx cheers,
martin
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 18:05 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
in reality this isnt how its supposed to work.
usually you would have something like this:
searchpage {
private criteria crit;
searchpage() {
add(new searchform(form, new PropertyModel(this, crit));
add(new resultsview(view, new PropertyModel(this, crit));
}
}
that way the form and the view are bound to the same criteria object.
the form modifies it, and the view renders according to it. you would
not call any setresponsepage in the form, the same insatance of the
page would be reused. that is the wicket way. however, if you must
have that nice bookmarkable url then you need to call
setresponsepage(class, pageparams) from the form. it is not as clean,
but it works.
-igor
On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:41 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
no, once the form is submitted the page is no longer
bookmarkable and
so it will lose any bookmarkable/mounted url.
if you want to keep it you can call
setresponsepage( page.class,
params) in onsubmit(), but in your case that is silly since
searchresultspage probably contains the submitted form
anyways?
well, i can do this (setResponsePage with params).
the SearchResultsPage indeed has a also an instance of the
form,
and the user can also initiate a search on the
SearchResultsPage.
so for each search the SearchForm.onSubmit creates a new
SearchResultsPage and (indirectly) a new SearchForm...
i just wonder if this this is the way how wicket should work,
or if
this stateless way is s.th. that is not really the target of
component based frameworks...
thanx cheers,
martin
-igor
On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi all,
i'm just starting with wicket and have a simple
search
form, that leads to a SearchResultsPage.
the SearchResultsPage is mounted as a bookmarkable
page (via
mountBookmarkablePage(/search,
SearchResultsPage.class);),
although the url that is shown then contains s.th.
like
?wicket:interface=:6:searchForm::IFormSubmitListener...
is it possible to have a nicer url for the submitted
form?
i'm using wicket 1.2.6 right now...
thanx in advance,
cheers,
martin
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2
express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to
get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___ Wicket-user
mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
hi igor,
i hope i got the idea now. i post my beans here, it would be nice
if could tell me if anything's not following the right path :)
// the start page, simply with the search form
public Index(final PageParameters parameters) {
LOG.debug( Creating new Index page with params + parameters );
add( new SearchForm( searchForm, new Model() ) );
}
// the search form
public SearchForm(String id, IModel model) {
super( id, model );
add( new TextField( query, model ) );
}
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
// set response page with page params for bookmarkable urls
final PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.add( query, (String) getModelObject() );
setResponsePage( SearchPage.class, params );
}
// the search page with form and results
private String _userInput;
public SearchPage(final PageParameters parameters) {
_userInput = parameters.getString( query );
add( new SearchForm( searchForm, new PropertyModel( this, userInput
) ) );
add( new SearchResultsView( productList, new PropertyModel( this,
userInput ), this ) );
}
public String getUserInput() {
return _userInput;
}
public void setUserInput( String userInput ) {
_userInput = userInput;
}
cheers,
martin
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:02 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i suggest you read here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket
+models
the idea is pretty simple:
the form submits its data into a bean, and the view renders according
to that bean. this is accomplished by having the form and the view's
models connected to the same bean via models.
-igor
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi igor,
i'm trying to implement your advice, but don't really know
how to do this.
what would the SearchForm then look like? does the form itself
use the model and how is the input field added to the form?
and how can the ResultsView access the value of the
PropertyModel?
the model has a getObject(Component) accessor - does this mean
that
the ResultsView would need pass the SearchPage into getObject?
thanx cheers,
martin
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 18:05 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
in reality this isnt how its supposed to work.
usually you would have something like this:
searchpage {
private criteria crit;
searchpage() {
add(new searchform(form, new PropertyModel(this,
crit));
add(new resultsview(view, new PropertyModel(this,
crit));
}
}
that way the form and the view are bound to the same
criteria object.
the form modifies it, and the view renders according to it.
you would
not call any setresponsepage in the form, the same insatance
of the
page would be reused. that is the wicket way. however, if
you must
have that nice bookmarkable url then you need to call
setresponsepage(class, pageparams) from the form. it is not
as clean,
but it works.
-igor
On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:41 -0700, Igor Vaynberg
wrote:
no, once the form is submitted the page is no
longer
bookmarkable and
so it will lose any bookmarkable/mounted url.
if you want to keep it you can call
setresponsepage( page.class,
params) in onsubmit(), but in your case that is
silly since
searchresultspage probably contains the submitted
form
anyways?
well, i can do this (setResponsePage with params).
the SearchResultsPage indeed has a also an instance
of the
form,
and the user can also initiate a search on the
SearchResultsPage.
so for each search the SearchForm.onSubmit creates a
new
SearchResultsPage and (indirectly) a new
SearchForm...
i just wonder if this this is the way how wicket
should work,
or if
this stateless way is s.th. that is not really the
target of
component based frameworks...
thanx cheers,
martin
-igor
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 23:55 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
hi igor,
i hope i got the idea now. i post my beans here,
aehem, sorry - forgot to include SearchResultsView:
public SearchResultsView(String id, PropertyModel model ) {
super( id, model );
final String query = (String) getModelObject();
final List? extends Product products =
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find( query );
setList( products );
}
@SuppressWarnings(serial)
@Override
protected void populateItem( ListItem listItem ) {
final Product product =
(Product)listItem.getModelObject();
listItem.add( new Label(id, product.getId() ) );
listItem.add( new Label( title, product.getTitle() ) );
listItem.add( new Label( description, product.getDescription() ) );
listItem.add(new Link(showDetailsLink){
public void onClick(){
PageParameters pp = new PageParameters();
pp.add(productId, product.getId());
setResponsePage(Index.class, pp);
}
});
}
cheers :)
martin
it would be nice
if could tell me if anything's not following the right path :)
// the start page, simply with the search form
public Index(final PageParameters parameters) {
LOG.debug( Creating new Index page with params + parameters );
add( new SearchForm( searchForm, new Model() ) );
}
// the search form
public SearchForm(String id, IModel model) {
super( id, model );
add( new TextField( query, model ) );
}
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
// set response page with page params for bookmarkable urls
final PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.add( query, (String) getModelObject() );
setResponsePage( SearchPage.class, params );
}
// the search page with form and results
private String _userInput;
public SearchPage(final PageParameters parameters) {
_userInput = parameters.getString( query );
add( new SearchForm( searchForm, new PropertyModel( this,
userInput ) ) );
add( new SearchResultsView( productList, new PropertyModel( this,
userInput ), this ) );
}
public String getUserInput() {
return _userInput;
}
public void setUserInput( String userInput ) {
_userInput = userInput;
}
cheers,
martin
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:02 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i suggest you read here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket
+models
the idea is pretty simple:
the form submits its data into a bean, and the view renders according
to that bean. this is accomplished by having the form and the view's
models connected to the same bean via models.
-igor
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi igor,
i'm trying to implement your advice, but don't really know
how to do this.
what would the SearchForm then look like? does the form itself
use the model and how is the input field added to the form?
and how can the ResultsView access the value of the
PropertyModel?
the model has a getObject(Component) accessor - does this mean
that
the ResultsView would need pass the SearchPage into getObject?
thanx cheers,
martin
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 18:05 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
in reality this isnt how its supposed to work.
usually you would have something like this:
searchpage {
private criteria crit;
searchpage() {
add(new searchform(form, new PropertyModel(this,
crit));
add(new resultsview(view, new PropertyModel(this,
crit));
}
}
that way the form and the view are bound to the same
criteria object.
the form modifies it, and the view renders according to it.
you would
not call any setresponsepage in the form, the same insatance
of the
page would be reused. that is the wicket way. however, if
you must
have that nice bookmarkable url then you need to call
setresponsepage(class, pageparams) from the form. it is not
as clean,
but it works.
-igor
On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:41 -0700, Igor Vaynberg
wrote:
no, once the form is submitted the page is no
longer
bookmarkable and
so
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:07 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 23:55 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
hi igor,
i hope i got the idea now. i post my beans here,
aehem, sorry - forgot to include SearchResultsView:
public SearchResultsView(String id, PropertyModel model )
{
super( id, model );
final String query = (String) getModelObject();
final List? extends Product products =
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find(
query );
setList( products );
the above isnt right because the list is refreshed only when the
searchresultsview is created - which only happens once.
hmm, but the SearchPage is created for each request, that shows a
LOG.debug( Creating new SearchPage with params + parameters );
that I added to the constructor of the SearchPage.
this should be caused by the onSubmit implementation of the SearchForm:
protected void onSubmit() {
// set response page with page params for bookmarkable urls
final PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.add( query, (String) getModelObject() );
setResponsePage( SearchPage.class, params );
}
which I implemented like this to have bookmarkable urls.
therefore the SearchResultsView is created for each request.
is this wrong in terms of lifecycle of wicket pages?
would there be another possibility to achieve bookmarkable
pages with a form submit?
cheers,
martin
instead
class resultsmodel extends abstractreadonlymodel {
private imodel query;
public resultsmodel(imodel query) { this.query=query; }
public object getobject() {
return
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find(
query.getobject () );
}
public void detach() { query.detach(); }
}
setmodel(new resultsmodel(model));
that way listview will get fresh results every page refresh
-igor
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___ Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:23 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
if you want to maintain the bookmarkable url then no. but this is
atypical of how wicket lifecycle usually works.
ok. do I have to take anything in acount if i use wicket in this
atypical way?
however, until now it feels very good to work with wicket, even
with this more action/mvc like (stateless) aproach... :)
the model i showed is better because if you reuse the
searchresultsview outside of this lifecycle you are creating it will
still work properly, but if you have no plans on reusing it then i
guess what you do will work too.
ok, i'll keep that in mind.
thanx a lot for your help,
cheers,
martin
-igor
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:07 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 23:55 +0200, Martin Grotzke
wrote:
hi igor,
i hope i got the idea now. i post my beans here,
aehem, sorry - forgot to include SearchResultsView:
public SearchResultsView(String id,
PropertyModel model )
{
super( id, model );
final String query = (String)
getModelObject();
final List? extends Product products =
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find(
query );
setList( products );
the above isnt right because the list is refreshed only when
the
searchresultsview is created - which only happens once.
hmm, but the SearchPage is created for each request, that
shows a
LOG.debug( Creating new SearchPage with params +
parameters );
that I added to the constructor of the SearchPage.
this should be caused by the onSubmit implementation of the
SearchForm:
protected void onSubmit() {
// set response page with page params for bookmarkable
urls
final PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.add( query, (String) getModelObject() );
setResponsePage( SearchPage.class, params );
}
which I implemented like this to have bookmarkable urls.
therefore the SearchResultsView is created for each request.
is this wrong in terms of lifecycle of wicket pages?
would there be another possibility to achieve bookmarkable
pages with a form submit?
cheers,
martin
instead
class resultsmodel extends abstractreadonlymodel {
private imodel query;
public resultsmodel(imodel query) { this.query=query; }
public object getobject() {
return
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find(
query.getobject () );
}
public void detach() { query.detach(); }
}
setmodel(new resultsmodel(model));
that way listview will get fresh results every page refresh
-igor
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___ Wicket-user
mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:42 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:23 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
if you want to maintain the bookmarkable url then no. but
this is
atypical of how wicket lifecycle usually works.
ok. do I have to take anything in acount if i use wicket in
this
atypical way?
noep, nothing special to watch out for.
cool :)
however, until now it feels very good to work with wicket,
even
with this more action/mvc like (stateless) aproach... :)
it feels even better once you use the normal lifecycle :)
jepp, i believe this :) i have written apps with wingS some times ago
and i loved it - but we could only use for cms-like apps, not for end
users...
now we're going to build s.th. like a shop and i'm looking for
frameworks that match our needs. probably spring-mvc or tapestry would
also be candidates, but what i've read about wicket sounded better :)
cheers,
martin
-igor
the model i showed is better because if you reuse the
searchresultsview outside of this lifecycle you are creating
it will
still work properly, but if you have no plans on reusing it
then i
guess what you do will work too.
ok, i'll keep that in mind.
thanx a lot for your help,
cheers,
martin
-igor
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:07 -0700, Igor Vaynberg
wrote:
On 4/30/07, Martin Grotzke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 23:55 +0200, Martin
Grotzke
wrote:
hi igor,
i hope i got the idea now. i post my
beans here,
aehem, sorry - forgot to include
SearchResultsView:
public SearchResultsView(String id,
PropertyModel model )
{
super( id, model );
final String query = (String)
getModelObject();
final List? extends Product
products =
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find(
query );
setList( products );
the above isnt right because the list is refreshed
only when
the
searchresultsview is created - which only happens
once.
hmm, but the SearchPage is created for each request,
that
shows a
LOG.debug ( Creating new SearchPage with params +
parameters );
that I added to the constructor of the SearchPage.
this should be caused by the onSubmit implementation
of the
SearchForm:
protected void onSubmit() {
// set response page with page params for
bookmarkable
urls
final PageParameters params = new
PageParameters();
params.add( query, (String)
getModelObject() );
setResponsePage( SearchPage.class, params );
}
which I implemented like this to have bookmarkable
urls.
therefore the SearchResultsView is created for each
request.
is this wrong in terms of lifecycle of wicket pages?
would there be another possibility to achieve
bookmarkable
pages with a form submit?
cheers,
martin
instead
class resultsmodel extends abstractreadonlymodel
{
private imodel query;
public resultsmodel(imodel query)
{ this.query=query; }
public object getobject() {
return
((StealthShopApplication)getApplication()).getSearchService().find(
query.getobject () );
}
public void detach() { query.detach(); }
}
setmodel(new resultsmodel(model));
that way listview will get fresh results
[Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
hi all, i'm just starting with wicket and have a simple search form, that leads to a SearchResultsPage. the SearchResultsPage is mounted as a bookmarkable page (via mountBookmarkablePage(/search, SearchResultsPage.class);), although the url that is shown then contains s.th. like ?wicket:interface=:6:searchForm::IFormSubmitListener... is it possible to have a nicer url for the submitted form? i'm using wicket 1.2.6 right now... thanx in advance, cheers, martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] nice url with submitted form
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:41 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote: no, once the form is submitted the page is no longer bookmarkable and so it will lose any bookmarkable/mounted url. if you want to keep it you can call setresponsepage(page.class, params) in onsubmit(), but in your case that is silly since searchresultspage probably contains the submitted form anyways? well, i can do this (setResponsePage with params). the SearchResultsPage indeed has a also an instance of the form, and the user can also initiate a search on the SearchResultsPage. so for each search the SearchForm.onSubmit creates a new SearchResultsPage and (indirectly) a new SearchForm... i just wonder if this this is the way how wicket should work, or if this stateless way is s.th. that is not really the target of component based frameworks... thanx cheers, martin -igor On 4/29/07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all, i'm just starting with wicket and have a simple search form, that leads to a SearchResultsPage. the SearchResultsPage is mounted as a bookmarkable page (via mountBookmarkablePage(/search, SearchResultsPage.class);), although the url that is shown then contains s.th. like ?wicket:interface=:6:searchForm::IFormSubmitListener... is it possible to have a nicer url for the submitted form? i'm using wicket 1.2.6 right now... thanx in advance, cheers, martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
