Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
We aim for 2.0 actually. Both the authors (Martijn and me) are core
developers, so we hope to keep up with the changes.

Eelco


On 4/21/06, Vincent Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, if I'm not mistaken, the book will be based on 1.2, correct?
>
> On 4/21/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > we are going to release 1.2 pretty soon, I suppose somewhere in the next two
> > weeks, preferrable before 1st of may.
> >
> >  Wicket 1.2 has many improvements over 1.1 and will be our major release. I
> > don't know how long a release cycle for the netbeans module will be, but you
> > might want to wait for the 1.2 final release.
> >
> >  Martijn
> >
> >
> > On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to
> > use the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what the
> > difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything seems to be
> > ok now.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Johan Compagner wrote:
> > >
> > > migrating to 1.1? from where 1.0?
> > > For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
> > extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
> > > > Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > public CommentForm(final String id) {
> > > > // Construct form with no validation listener
> > > > -->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
> > > > null);
> > > >
> > > > // Add text entry widget
> > > > add(new TextArea("text"));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?
> > > >
> > > > Gj
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> > easier
> > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > >
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Wicket 1.2 is coming! Write Ajax applications without touching JavaScript!
> > -- http://wicketframework.org
>
>
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Geert, if it is a project you can share, we could help you I think.
It's probably not a zillion lines project anyway, right? Can you
contact me ofline if you are interested in that?

Eelco

On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  Well, I'm a bit fearful of doing that. I'm building all samples against 1.1
> and integrating them into NetBeans at that level. After JavaOne, I'll come
> back to this and upgrade them to 1.2.
>
>  -- Gj
>
>
>  Vincent Jenks wrote:
>
>  I'd almost say that you might want to consider just using 1.2 since it
> is now in RC mode and will be production-grade soon? Correct me if
> I'm wrong, but 1.1.1 will be obsolete soon.
>
> I'm using 1.2RC2 on a project that will go into productin in less than
> a month and so far I'm very happy w/ it. I just upgraded from 1.1.1
> and so far, it's solid.
>
> On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to use
> the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what the
> difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything seems to be
> ok now.
>
>  Gj
>
>
>  Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> migrating to 1.1? from where 1.0?
>  For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
> extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)
>
>  johan
>
>
>
> On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
> Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):
>
>
>  public CommentForm(final String id) {
>  // Construct form with no validation listener
> --> super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
> null);
>
>  // Add text entry widget
>  add(new TextArea("text"));
>  }
>
>
> Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?
>
> Gj
>
>
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
>
>  easier
>
>
>  Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>
>
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
>
>  ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Vincent Jenks
And, if I'm not mistaken, the book will be based on 1.2, correct?

On 4/21/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we are going to release 1.2 pretty soon, I suppose somewhere in the next two
> weeks, preferrable before 1st of may.
>
>  Wicket 1.2 has many improvements over 1.1 and will be our major release. I
> don't know how long a release cycle for the netbeans module will be, but you
> might want to wait for the 1.2 final release.
>
>  Martijn
>
>
> On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to
> use the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what the
> difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything seems to be
> ok now.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >
> >
> > Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > migrating to 1.1? from where 1.0?
> > For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
> extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
> > > Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):
> > >
> > >
> > > public CommentForm(final String id) {
> > > // Construct form with no validation listener
> > > -->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
> > > null);
> > >
> > > // Add text entry widget
> > > add(new TextArea("text"));
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?
> > >
> > > Gj
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Wicket 1.2 is coming! Write Ajax applications without touching JavaScript!
> -- http://wicketframework.org


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
we are going to release 1.2 pretty soon, I suppose somewhere in the next two weeks, preferrable before 1st of may.

Wicket 1.2 has many improvements over 1.1 and will be our major
release. I don't know how long a release cycle for the netbeans module
will be, but you might want to wait for the 1.2 final release.

Martijn
On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



  
  



Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to
use the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what
the difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything
seems to be ok now.

Gj


Johan Compagner wrote:
migrating
to 1.1? from where 1.0?
For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)
  
johan
  
  
  On 4/21/06, 
Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
  

I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):


public CommentForm(final String id) {
// Construct form with no validation listener

-->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
null);

// Add text entry widget
add(new TextArea("text"));
}


Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?


Gj


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  




-- Wicket 1.2 is coming! Write Ajax applications without touching _javascript_!-- http://wicketframework.org


Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Gustavo Santucho

> I'm using 1.2RC2 on a project that will go into productin in less than
> a month and so far I'm very happy w/ it.

Same here.

-
Gustavo.


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Geertjan Wielenga






Well, I'm a bit fearful of doing that. I'm building all samples against
1.1 and integrating them into NetBeans at that level. After JavaOne,
I'll come back to this and upgrade them to 1.2.

-- Gj

Vincent Jenks wrote:

  I'd almost say that you might want to consider just using 1.2 since it
is now in RC mode and will be production-grade soon?  Correct me if
I'm wrong, but 1.1.1 will be obsolete soon.

I'm using 1.2RC2 on a project that will go into productin in less than
a month and so far I'm very happy w/ it.  I just upgraded from 1.1.1
and so far, it's solid.

On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
  
 Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to use
the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what the
difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything seems to be
ok now.

 Gj


 Johan Compagner wrote:

migrating to 1.1? from where 1.0?
 For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)

 johan



On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


  
I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):


public CommentForm(final String id) {
// Construct form with no validation listener
-->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
null);

// Add text entry widget
add(new TextArea("text"));
}


Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?

Gj


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
  

easier


  Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo

  

http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642


  ___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

  



  
  

---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  





Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Vincent Jenks
I'd almost say that you might want to consider just using 1.2 since it
is now in RC mode and will be production-grade soon?  Correct me if
I'm wrong, but 1.1.1 will be obsolete soon.

I'm using 1.2RC2 on a project that will go into productin in less than
a month and so far I'm very happy w/ it.  I just upgraded from 1.1.1
and so far, it's solid.

On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to use
> the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what the
> difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything seems to be
> ok now.
>
>  Gj
>
>
>  Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> migrating to 1.1? from where 1.0?
>  For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
> extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)
>
>  johan
>
>
>
> On 4/21/06, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
> > Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):
> >
> >
> > public CommentForm(final String id) {
> > // Construct form with no validation listener
> > -->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
> > null);
> >
> > // Add text entry widget
> > add(new TextArea("text"));
> > }
> >
> >
> > Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Geertjan Wielenga





Yes, I had 1.0.3 samples and now, for the NetBeans support, I'd like to
use the latest stable major version, which is 1.1. So I don't know what
the difference was exactly, but I got the 1.1 samples and everything
seems to be ok now.

Gj


Johan Compagner wrote:
migrating
to 1.1? from where 1.0?
For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or
extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)
  
johan
  
  
  On 4/21/06, 
Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
  

I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest
Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):


public CommentForm(final String id) {
// Construct form with no validation listener

-->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),
null);

// Add text entry widget
add(new TextArea("text"));
}


Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?


Gj


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  





Re: [Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Johan Compagner
migrating to 1.1? from where 1.0?For every release we have a 1-1 relation shipt with our examples or extentions (and most wicket-stuff things also)johanOn 4/21/06, 
Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in GuestBook (the arrow point to the problematic line):public CommentForm(final String id) {// Construct form with no validation listener
 -->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()),null);// Add text entry widgetadd(new TextArea("text"));}Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?
Gj---Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] migrating to 1.1

2006-04-21 Thread Geertjan Wielenga



I migrated to Wicket 1.1 and found a problem with this method in Guest 
Book (the arrow point to the problematic line):



   public CommentForm(final String id) {
   // Construct form with no validation listener
-->   super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new Comment()), 
null);
  
   // Add text entry widget

   add(new TextArea("text"));
   }


Does 1.1 come with updated samples? Or can I change the above somehow?

Gj


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user