[Wien] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2012-02-29 Thread Ram Kumar Thapa via LinkedIn
LinkedIn





Ram Kumar Thapa requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
  

--

Saeid,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- Ram Kumar

Accept invitation from Ram Kumar Thapa
http://www.linkedin.com/e/hkdd2o-gz7rawrp-6j/77q4aLF8a-dbNmmcGlp90DOvAVARfBOcUAZW3ymqWXObQhS/blk/I180058726_130/6lColZJrmZznQNdhjRQnOpBtn9QfmhBt71BoSd1p65Lr6lOfP0PclYSczsUdj0Me359bP8Vm5hRqlhJbPsPdj0QcPwMcjoLrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/?hs=falsetok=2YpON6QvP-mR81

View invitation from Ram Kumar Thapa
http://www.linkedin.com/e/hkdd2o-gz7rawrp-6j/77q4aLF8a-dbNmmcGlp90DOvAVARfBOcUAZW3ymqWXObQhS/blk/I180058726_130/c3cNnPoOdPwRc30UckALqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/?hs=falsetok=37T9iz-3L-mR81

--

Why might connecting with Ram Kumar Thapa be a good idea?

Ram Kumar Thapa's connections could be useful to you:

After accepting Ram Kumar Thapa's invitation, check Ram Kumar Thapa's 
connections to see who else you may know and who you might want an introduction 
to. Building these connections can create opportunities in the future.
 
-- 
(c) 2012, LinkedIn Corporation
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/6b0aac74/attachment.htm


[Wien] Some confirmation regarding SO calculation

2012-02-29 Thread Vinayak Mishra
Dear WIEN 2K users and Dr Blaha,

I am a regular WIEN2K user. Off late I have started doing spin orbit (SO)
calculation of an element. And I want some small confirmation here.

 For this I have done the normal SR calculation. After this, in order to
include SO effect I invoke the command initso_lapw and generate the
case.inso file by agreeing for default settings for ecverything except when
it asks to Add  RLO for NONE, ALL,  CHOOSE elements ? (N/a/c) and for
this I select a. This is how I created inso file. And at the same time I
observed that in the case.in1 file emax has changed from default 2.5 to 5.
This is the default setting for initso_lapw. Now in order to run SO
calculation I invoke the command run_lapw -so -ec 0.1. And this is how
I did the calculation at one particular value of emax. Now I am not very
clear that if I have to include large spin orbit effect (more than 5 Ry,
for which maximum recommended value is 10 Ry), should I change the emax in
case.in1 file only or in case.inso file also as I guess emax in case.inso
file is for printing purpose only.If not so then what is its purpose.

I am really sorry for bothering but  I just want to confirm this before
going ahead.

Thank you very much in advance for your attention and time.

V. Mishra
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/b196a87d/attachment.htm


[Wien] Some confirmation regarding SO calculation

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Blaha
You cannot expect unique answers. All this may depend on the system AND on 
the properties
you are interesting.

Adding RLO:  There is a good reason why N (NO) is the default for initso.
RLOs are mainly usefull for elements with semicore p-states ( do you have 
them ??)
 and for TOTAL ENERGIES.

EMAX in case.in1: This is similar as above: For a bandstructure or DOS emax=5 
will be
sufficient in most cases. For E-tot (volume optimization, or comparison of 
two structures)
it may not be enough.

Emax in case.inso is only for printint (or DOS).

In the end it is always the same:TEST it yourself for your specific system 
and propertiy.

Am 29.02.2012 13:23, schrieb Vinayak Mishra:
 Dear WIEN 2K users and Dr Blaha,

 I am a regular WIEN2K user. Off late I have started doing spin orbit (SO) 
 calculation of an element. And I want some small confirmation here.

   For this I have done the normal SR calculation. After this, in order to 
 include SO effect I invoke the command initso_lapw and generate the case.inso 
 file by agreeing for
 default settings for ecverything except when it asks to Add  RLO for NONE, 
 ALL,  CHOOSE elements ? (N/a/c) and for this I select a. This is how I 
 created inso file. And at the
 same time I observed that in the case.in1 file emax has changed from default 
 2.5 to 5. This is the default setting for initso_lapw. Now in order to run SO 
 calculation I invoke the
 command run_lapw -so -ec 0.1. And this is how I did the calculation at 
 one particular value of emax. Now I am not very clear that if I have to 
 include large spin orbit effect
 (more than 5 Ry, for which maximum recommended value is 10 Ry), should I 
 change the emax in case.in1 file only or in case.inso file also as I guess 
 emax in case.inso file is for
 printing purpose only.If not so then what is its purpose.

 I am really sorry for bothering but  I just want to confirm this before going 
 ahead.

 Thank you very much in advance for your attention and time.

 V. Mishra




 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- 

   P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--


[Wien] problem in making case.vectorup_1

2012-02-29 Thread Saba k
Dear all,
 I use Wien2k 10.0,

 Mkl 10.2.5.035

 Ifort  11.1

on OS suse11.3, cpu : Intel quad 64 bit, I don't use mpi

I study a fcc bulk,

It is a complex system and also spin polarized then I have lapw1c up

and lapw1c dn

I use the command  runsp_lapw -it -in1new 3 -cc 0.1 -p

I compiled my Wien2k and I can run the case without parallel great

but the problem happens when I have parallel run

it crashes at lapw2 because it can not find case.energyup_1

I checked to see what is going

I checked before the run testpara_lapw :   ok

then

I saw it makes following files


 case.klist_1  dnlapw1_1.def  uplapw1_1.def

case.klist_2  dnlapw1_2.def  uplapw1_2.def

case.klist_3  dnlapw1_3.def  uplapw1_3.def

case.klist_4  dnlapw1_4.def  uplapw1_4.def

but instead of making

case.vectorup_1, case.vectorup_2, case.vectorup_3, case.vectorup_4; the
same  for dn

it only makes case.vectorup  case.vectordn, later only case.energyup 
case.energydn

then, at the moment of lapw2 it looks for case.energyup_1 and it can not
find it , so it crashes

As vector files are scratch files, what do you think about my problem and
how I can solve it?

Thanks in advance


 Saba Khosh

ps as I do not have a memory shared then during compile I said this option
no
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/d1698586/attachment.htm


[Wien] problem in making case.vectorup_1

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Blaha
Did you make a.machines file ?

Please read the UG.

Am 29.02.2012 14:13, schrieb Saba k:

 Dear all,
   I use Wien2k 10.0,

   Mkl 10.2.5.035

   Ifort 11.1

 on OS suse11.3, cpu : Intel quad 64 bit, I don't use mpi

 I study a fcc bulk,

 It is a complex system and also spin polarized then I have lapw1c up

 and lapw1c dn

 I use the command  runsp_lapw -it -in1new 3 -cc 0.1 -p

 I compiled my Wien2k and I can run the case without parallel great

 but the problem happens when I have parallel run

 it crashes at lapw2 because it can not find case.energyup_1

 I checked to see what is going

 I checked before the run testpara_lapw :   ok

 then

 I saw it makes following files


 case.klist_1dnlapw1_1.defuplapw1_1.def

 case.klist_2dnlapw1_2.defuplapw1_2.def

 case.klist_3dnlapw1_3.defuplapw1_3.def

 case.klist_4dnlapw1_4.defuplapw1_4.def

 but instead of making

 case.vectorup_1, case.vectorup_2, case.vectorup_3, case.vectorup_4; the same  
 for dn

 it only makes case.vectorup  case.vectordn, later only case.energyup  
 case.energydn

 then, at the moment of lapw2 it looks for case.energyup_1 and it can not find 
 it , so it crashes

 As vector files are scratch files, what do you think about my problem and how 
 I can solve it?

 Thanks in advance


 Saba Khosh

 ps as I do not have a memory shared then during compile I said this option no





 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- 

   P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--


[Wien] problem in making case.vectorup_1

2012-02-29 Thread Samaneh J
Thank you for the answer,
 for sure I made the machine file according to the UG.
this is my .machines
granularity:1
1:localhost
1:localhost
1:localhost
1:localhost

then, as I mentioned testpara_lapw worked properly
still you think it is the problem of machine files?
if yes I would real the userguide again and thanks for
your attention.


On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atwrote:

 Did you make a.machines file ?

 Please read the UG.

 Am 29.02.2012 14:13, schrieb Saba k:


 Dear all,
  I use Wien2k 10.0,

  Mkl 10.2.5.035

  Ifort 11.1

 on OS suse11.3, cpu : Intel quad 64 bit, I don't use mpi

 I study a fcc bulk,

 It is a complex system and also spin polarized then I have lapw1c up

 and lapw1c dn

 I use the command  runsp_lapw -it -in1new 3 -cc 0.1 -p

 I compiled my Wien2k and I can run the case without parallel great

 but the problem happens when I have parallel run

 it crashes at lapw2 because it can not find case.energyup_1

 I checked to see what is going

 I checked before the run testpara_lapw :   ok

 then

 I saw it makes following files


 case.klist_1dnlapw1_1.**defuplapw1_1.def

 case.klist_2dnlapw1_2.**defuplapw1_2.def

 case.klist_3dnlapw1_3.**defuplapw1_3.def

 case.klist_4dnlapw1_4.**defuplapw1_4.def

 but instead of making

 case.vectorup_1, case.vectorup_2, case.vectorup_3, case.vectorup_4; the
 same  for dn

 it only makes case.vectorup  case.vectordn, later only case.energyup 
 case.energydn

 then, at the moment of lapw2 it looks for case.energyup_1 and it can not
 find it , so it crashes

 As vector files are scratch files, what do you think about my problem and
 how I can solve it?

 Thanks in advance


 Saba Khosh

 ps as I do not have a memory shared then during compile I said this
 option no





 __**_
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.**at Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.**ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wienhttp://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


 --

  P.Blaha
 --**--**
 --
 Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
 Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
 Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/**
 theochem/ http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
 --**--**
 --
 __**_
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.**at Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.**ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wienhttp://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/c6e98d54/attachment.htm


[Wien] Lapw1

2012-02-29 Thread ben amara imen
Hello!

i'm trying to determine the electronic structure of my compound, but when I
run the  SCF, i get the following error:

Error in LAPW1
 'SELECT' - no energy limits found for L=
1
 'SELECT' - E-bottom -200.0   E-top -200.0

knowing that  the file* in1* is the following:

 WFFIL  EF= 0.5   (WFFIL, WFPRI, ENFIL, SUPWF)
  7.00   104 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT
  0.305  0  (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global
APW/LAPW)
 10.30  0.000 CONT 0
 1   -6.87  0.001 STOP 0
 2   -1.09  0.002 CONT 0
 20.30  0.000 CONT 0
 00.30  0.000 CONT 0
  0.303  0  (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global
APW/LAPW)
 0   -1.02  0.002 CONT 0
 00.30  0.000 CONT 0
 10.30  0.000 CONT 0
K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4  -11.0   2.5   302   emin/emax/nband #red



What can i do ?? Can you help me please and  thanks in advance
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/6e044f83/attachment.htm


[Wien] Wien2k_11 ORB execution

2012-02-29 Thread César de la Fuente
Dear Prof. Blaha,

I've just re-started the calculations by using a different directory but with 
same in- and in*c-files !!!, and NOW the ORB-prog is working fine. ( of course 
without recompiling the soft as you suggested, but without doing any different 
configuration). To be honest, I don't understand what it was wrong But now, it 
works. Thanks for your support.

C?sar

N.B. I've noticed sometimes that I have to run the calculations twices when I 
start the runsp_lapw form w2web to get the right flags. Maybe it should be 
related with my previous problem, or it could be a local configuration problem 
of my system. I know how to avoid it.

-Mensaje original-
De: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [mailto:wien-bounces at 
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] En nombre de Peter Blaha
Enviado el: lunes, 27 de febrero de 2012 9:04
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: Re: [Wien] Wien2k_11 ORB execution

There is nothing to recompile if there is no error !
Bad compilation results in an error, but not in running a scf cycle without the 
orb program.

In runsp script one can read, that when   -orb is specified, it max jump over 
the orb step
when either case.inorb is not present,
  or case.dmatup/dn is not present or empty !!!
  or   -orbc is specified instead !


Am 27.02.2012 08:58, schrieb Cesar:
 Yes i have it.
 The most strange is that lapw1 includes the orb flag, as usual in orb 
 calculation, but the orb program is apparently not running.  I remark the 
 word apparently because the the scf Ends without any error.
 N.B. I ve done orb calculations in other systems and orb program runs always 
 after lapw0, and lapw1 has orb flag active during these calculations.
 I m thinking to recompile all again and see if it is fixed. If not fixed i 
 will submit you full report.
 Cesar

 El 24/02/2012, a las 20:46, Peter Blahapblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at  
 escribi?:
 Could it be that you do not have a case.inorb file Am 24.02.2012 
 17:07, schrieb Cesar:  Ok. Thank you.  Yes, I guess sometimes It is 
 difficult to send us a correct reply without sending you a full report.  
 First, I will repeat eece calculations without mixing orb and eece flags. I 
 did not see this information in the wien2k guide, so I was doing wrong the 
 eece calculation.  If i still having problems i will submit you a complet 
 report and include the calculation with orb flag only, where aparently orb 
 program is not executed after lapw0 (when you check the status of scf 
 process) but the scf convergence is obtained.  SincerelyCesar  
 El 24/02/2012, a las 15:41, Laurence MarksL-marks at 
 northwestern.edu   escribi?:  Can you please try and send your question 
 again, explaining a bit   more. I am not sure that anyone can currently 
 help as it is not clear   exactly what you are asking.  N.B., you 
 cannot run orb and eece at the same t
ime.  N.N.B., did you setup the input files for orb and eece? If you did 
not   then they won't run.  On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:09 AM, C?sar de la 
Fuentecesar at unizar.es   wrote:   To whom may concern,  I m using 
wien2k_11 and after selecting the orb option for a regular run_sp_lapw  I 
have never seen the execution of the orb program after lapw0 (as other 
times), but lapw1 is still having the flag -orb active. In fact, run_sp_lapw 
finish correctly without having any apparently error and without running orb 
program somehow. Is it normal?  I am comment you that because I m 
having a lapw0 error during first cycle when I activate the flags -eece and 
-orb together in run_sp_lapw from w2web, and I guess it is because the orb 
program  is not running during self consistent cycles.  Many thanks in 
advance for your comments.   Dr. C?sar de la Fuente 
___   Wien mailing list   Wien 
at ze
us.theochem.tuwien.ac.at  
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien--
Professor Laurence Marks   Department of Materials Science and Engineering   
Northwestern University   www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996   
Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what   nobody 
else has thought   Albert Szent-Gyorgi   
___   Wien mailing list   Wien at 
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at   
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien   
___Wien mailing listWien at 
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.athttp://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
--   -  Peter Blaha  Inst. 
Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna  Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria  Tel: 
+43-1-5880115671  Fax: +43-1-5880115698  email: pblaha at 
theochem.tuwien.ac.at  -  
___
  Wien mailing list  Wien at 
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at  

[Wien] problem in making case.vectorup_1

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Blaha
Can you do:

ssh localhost and get logged in without password ??

Am 29.02.2012 16:02, schrieb Samaneh J:
 Thank you for the answer,
   for sure I made the machine file according to the UG.
 this is my .machines
 granularity:1
 1:localhost
 1:localhost
 1:localhost
 1:localhost

 then, as I mentioned testpara_lapw worked properly
 still you think it is the problem of machine files?
 if yes I would real the userguide again and thanks for
 your attention.


 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Peter Blaha pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
 mailto:pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at wrote:

 Did you make a .machines file ?

 Please read the UG.

 Am 29.02.2012 14:13, schrieb Saba k:


 Dear all,
   I use Wien2k 10.0,

   Mkl 10.2.5.035

   Ifort 11.1

 on OS suse11.3, cpu : Intel quad 64 bit, I don't use mpi

 I study a fcc bulk,

 It is a complex system and also spin polarized then I have lapw1c up

 and lapw1c dn

 I use the command  runsp_lapw -it -in1new 3 -cc 0.1 -p

 I compiled my Wien2k and I can run the case without parallel great

 but the problem happens when I have parallel run

 it crashes at lapw2 because it can not find case.energyup_1

 I checked to see what is going

 I checked before the run testpara_lapw :   ok

 then

 I saw it makes following files


 case.klist_1dnlapw1_1.__defuplapw1_1.def

 case.klist_2dnlapw1_2.__defuplapw1_2.def

 case.klist_3dnlapw1_3.__defuplapw1_3.def

 case.klist_4dnlapw1_4.__defuplapw1_4.def

 but instead of making

 case.vectorup_1, case.vectorup_2, case.vectorup_3, case.vectorup_4; 
 the same  for dn

 it only makes case.vectorup  case.vectordn, later only case.energyup 
  case.energydn

 then, at the moment of lapw2 it looks for case.energyup_1 and it can 
 not find it , so it crashes

 As vector files are scratch files, what do you think about my problem 
 and how I can solve it?

 Thanks in advance


 Saba Khosh

 ps as I do not have a memory shared then during compile I said this 
 option no





 _
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.__at mailto:Wien at 
 zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.__ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien 
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


 --

   P.Blaha
 
 --__--__--
 Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
 Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 tel:%2B43-1-58801-165300 FAX: 
 +43-1-58801-165982 tel:%2B43-1-58801-165982
 Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at mailto:blaha at 
 theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/__theochem/ 
 http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
 
 --__--__--
 _
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.__at mailto:Wien at 
 zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.__ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien 
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien




 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- 

   P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--


[Wien] problem in making case.vectorup_1

2012-02-29 Thread Samaneh J

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/9c476536/attachment.htm


[Wien] Lapw1

2012-02-29 Thread Laurence Marks
In most cases this is because you did the initialization wrong,
probably bad RMT values. Please attach your case.struct file.

2012/2/29 ben amara imen imen.benamara5 at gmail.com:



 Hello!

 i'm trying to determine the electronic structure of my compound, but when I
 run the? SCF, i get the following error:

 Error in LAPW1
 ?'SELECT' - no energy limits found for L=
 1
 ?'SELECT' - E-bottom -200.0?? E-top -200.0

 knowing that? the file in1 is the following:

 ?WFFIL? EF= 0.5?? (WFFIL, WFPRI, ENFIL, SUPWF)
 ? 7.00?? 10??? 4 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT
 ? 0.30??? 5? 0? (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global
 APW/LAPW)
 ?1??? 0.30? 0.000 CONT 0
 ?1?? -6.87? 0.001 STOP 0
 ?2?? -1.09? 0.002 CONT 0
 ?2??? 0.30? 0.000 CONT 0
 ?0??? 0.30? 0.000 CONT 0
 ? 0.30??? 3? 0? (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global
 APW/LAPW)
 ?0?? -1.02? 0.002 CONT 0
 ?0??? 0.30? 0.000 CONT 0
 ?1??? 0.30? 0.000 CONT 0
 K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4? -11.0?? 2.5?? 302?? emin/emax/nband #red



 What can i do ?? Can you help me please and? thanks in advance




 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien




-- 
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought
Albert Szent-Gyorgi


[Wien] The band structure of CuAlO2- SG 166

2012-02-29 Thread Osama Yassin
Dear Prof Blaha

With reference of your work in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 79, 165209 2009, about
the band structure as given in Fig 2 and copied below. May you please let
me know how do you select the k-point of its space group R-3m (No. 166)
which is not supported in Wien2k

[image: Inline image 1]

-- 
*Osama  *
*Prof Dr Osama Ali Yassin ** ** *
*Professor of Solid State Physics and ICTP regular associate*
*Department of Physics, Faculty of Science*
*Taibah University, A-Madinah Al-Munawarh, K. Saudi Arabia *
*
*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/0bb5ba0a/attachment.htm
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 22088 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120229/0bb5ba0a/attachment.png


[Wien] The band structure of CuAlO2- SG 166

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Blaha
xcrysden 

bilbao crystallographic server ...

eventually ctreate case.klist_band (just two directions) by hand.

Am 29.02.2012 20:52, schrieb Osama Yassin:
 Dear Prof Blaha

 With reference of your work in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 79, 165209 2009, about the 
 band structure as given in Fig 2 and copied below. May you please let me know 
 how do you
 select the k-point of its space group R-3m (No. 166) which is not supported 
 in Wien2k
 Inline image 1

 --
 *_Osama _*
 *Prof Dr Osama Ali Yassin *
 */Professor of Solid State Physics and ICTP regular associate/*
 */Department of Physics, Faculty of Science/*
 *Taibah University, A-Madinah Al-Munawarh, K. Saudi Arabia *
 *
 *



 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- 
-
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
-