Re: [Wiki-research-l] Does anyone have access to this research..?

2015-04-09 Thread Shani
Excellent. Thanks, Daniel! :)

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Mietchen 
daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Try

 http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/24741/1/AIBAR_EDULEARN2013preprint_WIKI4HE.pdf
 .

 d.


 On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Shani shani.e...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello fellow wiki-researchers,
 
  I've started working on a research for a seminar paper (which will
 probably
  evolve to an M.A. dissertation) on Wikipedia in Higher Education as part
 of
  my MA in Technology in Learning program at the School of Education,
  Tel-Aviv University. The research will focus on a elective course on
  Wikipedia for Med students, which I've developed and run at TAU.
 
  I was wondering if any of you have access to this research --
 
  Aibar, E., Lerga, M., Lladós, J., Meseguer, A.,  Minguillón, J. (2014).
  Wikipedia in Higher Education: an Empirical Study RUSC VOL. 11 No 2
 Special
  Issue| Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and University of New England|
  Barcelona.
 
  Other than an abstract, I wasn't able to find it online (nor is it
 available
  through the university library) and I would really appreciate a copy
 (word,
  PDF, whatever you can get your hands on).
 
  Any help getting this article would be much appreciated, as well as any
  directions to other relevant existing researches on the topic.
 
  Cheers,
  Shani.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 116, Issue 16

2015-04-09 Thread Oliver Keyes
Hey Ed,

As said, I'm looking specifically at that content which has made its
way into Wikidata. Thanks, though :)

On 9 April 2015 at 03:42, Ed H. Chi c...@acm.org wrote:
 Oliver,

 Here is one paper on mapping topic coverage in Wikipedia from 2009:

 Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., and Suh, B. 2009. What's in Wikipedia?: Mapping
 Topics and Conflict using Socially Annotated Category Structure. In
 Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in
 Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA, April 04 - 09, 2009). CHI '09. ACM, New
 York, NY, 1509-1512.
 ACM Link (24% acceptance rate)

 --Ed (on my tablet)

 On Apr 8, 2015 05:01, wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:

 Send Wiki-research-l mailing list submissions to
 wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 wiki-research-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Wiki-research-l digest...


 Today's Topics:

1. Re: Gender-specific page titles (Flöck)
2. Re: Research on Wikidata's content coverage (Flöck)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 11:09:00 +
 From: Flöck, Fabian fabian.flo...@gesis.org
 To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
 wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Gender-specific page titles
 Message-ID: 7ecba035-f388-4f89-9b65-a7c1c956a...@gesis.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Interesting, thanks Mark!

 - Fabian

 On 07.04.2015, at 16:38, Mark J.Nelson
 m...@anadrome.orgmailto:m...@anadrome.org wrote:


 Flöck, Fabian fabian.flo...@gesis.orgmailto:fabian.flo...@gesis.org
 writes:

 Does anyone know about a study that looks at how often for example
 articles about a profession use the male instead of the female form as
 the name (female form doesn't exist or is just a redirect)?

 It would probably not be a so much of an issue for English, but rather
 Spanish, German, Russian etc. Concrete example:
 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor exists in German, but
 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professorin is just a redirect.

 One thing to be careful of in such a study (though I would also like to
 see it!) is tha the politics and preferences in this area vary widely
 across languages, and sometimes within a language, so a purely
 data-driven study has to be careful about its assumptions and
 generalizations.

 Below a long-ish discussion of Greek that you may skip if not interested
 (it ended up longer-winded than I had expected):

 For example in Greek it is very profession-specific whether the trend is
 towards using a slashed form of both genders, or towards convergence on
 a single form that applies to both genders (sometimes with atypical
 morphology). Sometimes it depends on the specific word form and
 historical usage. In fields that historically had both men and women,
 both forms are very well established and tend to persist, e.g. a male
 teacher is a δάσκαλος and a female one is a δασκάλα. But in fields that
 were typically so male-dominated that only the masculine version has
 been in common use, there's disagreement over whether it's more
 progressive to revive a feminine form, or to generalize the masculine
 form to cover both genders. For example a female president would
 universally be called by the historically masculine form πρόεδρος,
 but with a feminine article (i.e. πρόεδρος can now be either a masculine
 or feminine noun, depending on context, even though it's morphologically
 irregular as a feminine noun). There is in Byzantine Greek a feminine
 analog, προέδρισσα (referring to a different position), but it isn't
 used today outside humorous contexts (roughly where you might use
 Presidentess in English). The same applies for a number of other more
 common professions, but for some it's more disputed which form should be
 used (for President there isn't any usage variance).

 In short it's complex, so I hope any data set is careful about what it's
 counting as data, and why. :)

 -Mark

 --
 Mark J. Nelson
 Anadrome Research
 http://www.anadrome.org

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l




 Cheers,
 Fabian

 --
 Fabian Flöck
 Research Associate
 Computational Social Science department @GESIS
 Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany
 Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208
 fabian.flo...@gesis.orgmailto:fabian.flo...@gesis.org

 www.gesis.org
 www.facebook.com/gesis.org





 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 

[Wiki-research-l] IdeaLab Grant Call for Feedback and Participants

2015-04-09 Thread Jason Radford
Hi Everyone,

I wanted to share two projects currently under consideration for IdeaLab
funding and which may be of direct interest to the Wiki research
community.  Note, one purpose of the consciousness-raising repository is to
create a collection of stories for use by researchers studying marginalized
identities on Wikipedia.  If you are interested or know someone who is
interested, let me know. If you have feedback for these projects, please
submit them to their discussion pages.

Thanks!


*Consciousness-Raising Repository Call for Working Group Participants*

*Purpose*: We're recruiting a group of diverse Wikipedians to help put
together a repository of stories from users experiencing marginalization on
Wikipedia. The purpose of the repository is to serve as a database of
knowledge about the forms marginalization can take for researchers studying
marginalized identities and as an outlet for users experiencing
marginalization.

*Requirements*: Experience working with marginalization and marginalized
groups.  Interest in the Wiki-community.  Willing to attend an hour-long
biweekly meeting.

*For more information*:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/A_Consciousness_Raising_Repository




*Wiki Controversy Monitoring Engine Call for Developers*

*Purpose*: The controversy monitoring engine maintains a real-time rating
of the controversiality of Wikipedia articles by listening to the live
stream of edits from Wikipedia.  We need someone who is interested in
building the web interface and interactive visualizations around these
controversies to enable administrators to monitor, investigate, and, if
need be, intervene to deescalate controversies.  The goal is to create a
site like stats.wikimedia.org.

*Requirements*: Knowledge of web development, web-based visualization,
and\or data analysis using Wikipedia's API or WikiData.

*For More Information*: see
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Controversy_Monitoring_Engine



-- 
Jason Radford
Doctoral Student, Sociology, University of Chicago
Visiting Researcher, Lazer Lab, Northeastern University
*Connect*: LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/jsradford, Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/jsradford, University of Chicago
http://home.uchicago.edu/%7Ejsradford/
*Play Games for Science at Volunteer Science
http://www.volunteerscience.com*
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


Re: [Wiki-research-l] Does anyone have access to this research..?

2015-04-09 Thread Daniel Mietchen
Try
http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/24741/1/AIBAR_EDULEARN2013preprint_WIKI4HE.pdf
.

d.


On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Shani shani.e...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello fellow wiki-researchers,

 I've started working on a research for a seminar paper (which will probably
 evolve to an M.A. dissertation) on Wikipedia in Higher Education as part of
 my MA in Technology in Learning program at the School of Education,
 Tel-Aviv University. The research will focus on a elective course on
 Wikipedia for Med students, which I've developed and run at TAU.

 I was wondering if any of you have access to this research --

 Aibar, E., Lerga, M., Lladós, J., Meseguer, A.,  Minguillón, J. (2014).
 Wikipedia in Higher Education: an Empirical Study RUSC VOL. 11 No 2 Special
 Issue| Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and University of New England|
 Barcelona.

 Other than an abstract, I wasn't able to find it online (nor is it available
 through the university library) and I would really appreciate a copy (word,
 PDF, whatever you can get your hands on).

 Any help getting this article would be much appreciated, as well as any
 directions to other relevant existing researches on the topic.

 Cheers,
 Shani.






 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 116, Issue 16

2015-04-09 Thread Ed H. Chi
Oliver,

Here is one paper on mapping topic coverage in Wikipedia from 2009:

Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., and Suh, B. 2009. What's in Wikipedia?: Mapping
Topics and Conflict using Socially Annotated Category Structure
http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~echi/papers/2009-CHI2009/p1509.pdf. In
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA, April 04 - 09, 2009). CHI '09. ACM, New
York, NY, 1509-1512.
ACM Link http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518930 (24% acceptance rate)

--Ed (on my tablet)
On Apr 8, 2015 05:01, wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:

 Send Wiki-research-l mailing list submissions to
 wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 wiki-research-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Wiki-research-l digest...


 Today's Topics:

1. Re: Gender-specific page titles (Flöck)
2. Re: Research on Wikidata's content coverage (Flöck)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 11:09:00 +
 From: Flöck, Fabian fabian.flo...@gesis.org
 To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
 wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Gender-specific page titles
 Message-ID: 7ecba035-f388-4f89-9b65-a7c1c956a...@gesis.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Interesting, thanks Mark!

 - Fabian

 On 07.04.2015, at 16:38, Mark J.Nelson m...@anadrome.orgmailto:
 m...@anadrome.org wrote:


 Flöck, Fabian fabian.flo...@gesis.orgmailto:fabian.flo...@gesis.org
 writes:

 Does anyone know about a study that looks at how often for example
 articles about a profession use the male instead of the female form as
 the name (female form doesn't exist or is just a redirect)?

 It would probably not be a so much of an issue for English, but rather
 Spanish, German, Russian etc. Concrete example:
 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor exists in German, but
 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professorin is just a redirect.

 One thing to be careful of in such a study (though I would also like to
 see it!) is tha the politics and preferences in this area vary widely
 across languages, and sometimes within a language, so a purely
 data-driven study has to be careful about its assumptions and
 generalizations.

 Below a long-ish discussion of Greek that you may skip if not interested
 (it ended up longer-winded than I had expected):

 For example in Greek it is very profession-specific whether the trend is
 towards using a slashed form of both genders, or towards convergence on
 a single form that applies to both genders (sometimes with atypical
 morphology). Sometimes it depends on the specific word form and
 historical usage. In fields that historically had both men and women,
 both forms are very well established and tend to persist, e.g. a male
 teacher is a δάσκαλος and a female one is a δασκάλα. But in fields that
 were typically so male-dominated that only the masculine version has
 been in common use, there's disagreement over whether it's more
 progressive to revive a feminine form, or to generalize the masculine
 form to cover both genders. For example a female president would
 universally be called by the historically masculine form πρόεδρος,
 but with a feminine article (i.e. πρόεδρος can now be either a masculine
 or feminine noun, depending on context, even though it's morphologically
 irregular as a feminine noun). There is in Byzantine Greek a feminine
 analog, προέδρισσα (referring to a different position), but it isn't
 used today outside humorous contexts (roughly where you might use
 Presidentess in English). The same applies for a number of other more
 common professions, but for some it's more disputed which form should be
 used (for President there isn't any usage variance).

 In short it's complex, so I hope any data set is careful about what it's
 counting as data, and why. :)

 -Mark

 --
 Mark J. Nelson
 Anadrome Research
 http://www.anadrome.org

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l




 Cheers,
 Fabian

 --
 Fabian Flöck
 Research Associate
 Computational Social Science department @GESIS
 Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany
 Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208
 fabian.flo...@gesis.orgmailto:fabian.flo...@gesis.org

 www.gesis.org
 www.facebook.com/gesis.org





 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 

[Wiki-research-l] Does anyone have access to this research..?

2015-04-09 Thread Shani
Hello fellow wiki-researchers,

I've started working on a research for a seminar paper (which will probably
evolve to an M.A. dissertation) on Wikipedia in Higher Education as part of
my MA in Technology in Learning program at the School of Education,
Tel-Aviv University. The research will focus on a elective course on
Wikipedia for Med students, which I've developed and run at TAU.

*I was wondering if any of you have access to this research -- *

Aibar, E., Lerga, M., Lladós, J., Meseguer, A.,  Minguillón, J. (2014).
Wikipedia in Higher Education: an Empirical Study RUSC VOL. 11 No 2 Special
Issue| Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and University of New England|
Barcelona.

Other than an abstract, I wasn't able to find it online (nor is it
available through the university library) and I would really appreciate a
copy (word, PDF, whatever you can get your hands on).

Any help getting this article would be much appreciated, as well as any
directions to other relevant existing researches on the topic.

Cheers,
Shani.
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l