Re: [Wiki-research-l] Results from 2018 global Wikimedia survey are published!

2018-09-15 Thread Pine W
Hi Edward, I'm surprised that this thread only appears in my email under
Research-l, but I can see in the WMF mail archives that you sent the email
to other lists also. I wonder if that happened because you used bcc. Maybe
there is a bug in Gmail. On the topic of diversity research, thanks for the
link to the team reports. I'll put those on my list of things that would be
good to browse.

Regarding the topic of harassment that the person with the email
"80hnhtv4agou" raised, I think that it's good to ask what more could and
should be done. My view is that WMF shouldn't be directly intervening in
community activities, but WMF support for community self-governance is
welcome with actions such as developing better moderation tools and
providing financial support to affiliates and community members who want to
develop evidence-based training modules. Sydney Poore is on the
Anti-Harrassment Tools team and I'm pinging her here to invite her to add
any comments that she has.

Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )


On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 5:45 PM Edward Galvez  wrote:

> Thanks for your note Pine. I believe I have already shared this on
> Wikimedia-l; I haven't shared to Announce, so I can do that.
>
> "Diversity" is multifaceted. I think that some areas offer some hope (e.g.
> program organizers & affiliate organizers have higher proportion of women
> and geographic representation), others I am not uncertain whether we put a
> lot of attention (Education & Age), and in others we are seeing little
> progress (gender on the projects). And perhaps some aren't even on our
> radar. I think many teams are still working to understand what are the
> problems and possible levers that can help us to bring change to these
> measures.  Some of those teams include Contributors/Audiences team,
> Anti-Harassment Tools, Trust & Safety and Community Resources. Each of
> these teams bringing their own strengths and angles to the problem. I
> invite you to read the team reports
> <
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Insights/2018_Report/Team_Reports
> >
> .
>
> The research team is also working on finding a way to capture demographic
> data as well this year. While we gather this data through CE Insights it is
> not the most optimal way to measure demographic data. There was also the
> recent email by Erik Zachte about language diversity (Email subject:
> "Wikipedias, participation per language") Always to good to start to
> measure what you want to change.
>
> I also invite you (and perhaps everyone on this list) to reflect on: what
> numbers are most concerning for you related to diversity? What could you do
> to improve diversity on the projects? And decide how you would like to take
> action.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Edward
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:53 PM Pine W  wrote:
>
> > Hi Edward,
> >
> > Thanks for this publication. This research is likely to be of interest to
> > the WikimediaAnnounce-l (and by extension, Wikimedia-l) and Wikitech-l
> > subscribers, so I suggest that you cross-post this publication to those
> > lists.
> >
> > After reading this report, I have a question which may be challenging to
> > answer: what should we do to improve our diversity? Many of us, inside
> and
> > outside of WMF, have wanted to see progress on diversity metrics for
> years,
> > and I get the impression that while significant attention and resources
> are
> > being given to diversity, our progress has been disappointing. Perhaps
> > that's a subject that can be discussed further during the video
> > presentation, but I'd also be interested in hearing your comments here on
> > Research-l.
> >
> > Have a good weekend,
> >
> > Pine
> > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07 PM Edward Galvez 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm excited to share that our annual survey about Wikimedia communities
> > is
> > > now published!
> > >
> > > This survey included 170 questions and reaches over 4,000 community
> > > members across
> > > four audiences: Contributors, Affiliate organizers, Program Organizers,
> > and
> > > Volunteer Developers. This survey helps us hear from the experience of
> > > Wikimedians from across the movement so that teams are able to use
> > > community feedback in their planning and their work. This survey also
> > helps
> > > us learn about long term changes in communities, such as community
> health
> > > or demographics.
> > >
> > > The report is available on meta:
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Insights/2018_Report
> > >
> > > For this survey, we worked with 11 teams to develop the questions. Once
> > the
> > > results were analyzed, we spent time with each team to help them
> > understand
> > > their results. Most teams have already identified how they will use the
> > > results to help improve their work to support you.
> > >
> > > The report could be useful for your work in the Wikimedi

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Results from 2018 global Wikimedia survey are published!

2018-09-15 Thread Edward Galvez
>
>  others I am not uncertain whether we put a lot of attention (Education &
> Age),
>

Oops - meant to say "I am not certain.."
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


Re: [Wiki-research-l] Results from 2018 global Wikimedia survey are published!

2018-09-15 Thread Edward Galvez
Thanks for your note Pine. I believe I have already shared this on
Wikimedia-l; I haven't shared to Announce, so I can do that.

"Diversity" is multifaceted. I think that some areas offer some hope (e.g.
program organizers & affiliate organizers have higher proportion of women
and geographic representation), others I am not uncertain whether we put a
lot of attention (Education & Age), and in others we are seeing little
progress (gender on the projects). And perhaps some aren't even on our
radar. I think many teams are still working to understand what are the
problems and possible levers that can help us to bring change to these
measures.  Some of those teams include Contributors/Audiences team,
Anti-Harassment Tools, Trust & Safety and Community Resources. Each of
these teams bringing their own strengths and angles to the problem. I
invite you to read the team reports

.

The research team is also working on finding a way to capture demographic
data as well this year. While we gather this data through CE Insights it is
not the most optimal way to measure demographic data. There was also the
recent email by Erik Zachte about language diversity (Email subject:
"Wikipedias, participation per language") Always to good to start to
measure what you want to change.

I also invite you (and perhaps everyone on this list) to reflect on: what
numbers are most concerning for you related to diversity? What could you do
to improve diversity on the projects? And decide how you would like to take
action.

Hope this helps!
Edward


On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:53 PM Pine W  wrote:

> Hi Edward,
>
> Thanks for this publication. This research is likely to be of interest to
> the WikimediaAnnounce-l (and by extension, Wikimedia-l) and Wikitech-l
> subscribers, so I suggest that you cross-post this publication to those
> lists.
>
> After reading this report, I have a question which may be challenging to
> answer: what should we do to improve our diversity? Many of us, inside and
> outside of WMF, have wanted to see progress on diversity metrics for years,
> and I get the impression that while significant attention and resources are
> being given to diversity, our progress has been disappointing. Perhaps
> that's a subject that can be discussed further during the video
> presentation, but I'd also be interested in hearing your comments here on
> Research-l.
>
> Have a good weekend,
>
> Pine
> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07 PM Edward Galvez 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm excited to share that our annual survey about Wikimedia communities
> is
> > now published!
> >
> > This survey included 170 questions and reaches over 4,000 community
> > members across
> > four audiences: Contributors, Affiliate organizers, Program Organizers,
> and
> > Volunteer Developers. This survey helps us hear from the experience of
> > Wikimedians from across the movement so that teams are able to use
> > community feedback in their planning and their work. This survey also
> helps
> > us learn about long term changes in communities, such as community health
> > or demographics.
> >
> > The report is available on meta:
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Insights/2018_Report
> >
> > For this survey, we worked with 11 teams to develop the questions. Once
> the
> > results were analyzed, we spent time with each team to help them
> understand
> > their results. Most teams have already identified how they will use the
> > results to help improve their work to support you.
> >
> > The report could be useful for your work in the Wikimedia movement as
> well!
> > What are you learning from the data? Take some time to read the report
> and
> > share your feedback on the talk pages. We have also published a blog that
> > you can read.[1]
> >
> > We are hosting a livestream presentation[2] on September 20 at 1600 UTC.
> > Hope to see you there!
> >
> > Feel free to email me directly with any questions.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Edward
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/2018/09/13/what-we-learned-surveying-4000-community-members/
> > [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGQtWFP9Cjc
> >
> >
> > --
> > Edward Galvez
> > Evaluation Strategist, Surveys
> > Learning & Evaluation
> > Community Engagement
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> >
> > --
> > Edward Galvez
> > Evaluation Strategist, Surveys
> > Learning & Evaluation
> > Community Engagement
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > ___
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >
> ___
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>


-- 
Edward Galvez
Evaluation Strategist, S