Re: [Wiki-research-l] share research without paywalls or requests for personal information?
Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:06 PM, James Salsmanwrote: > However, I am not comfortable seeing research papers being shared on > this list in manners which ask the readers to disclose their personal > information: > > http://imgur.com/a/qtzRS > > Can we please have some baseline standards for sharing research > without any paywalls or requests for personal information? I agree in theory but your screenshot is for the abstract only. there is an option to make an account instead of doing the Google (or Facebook) login thing and once you've made the account and downloaded the PDF then it's still just an abstract, less than 1 full page. the full text is behind a different paywall and seems to require actual payment not just signing up for a free account: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0268580917722906 -Jeremy ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Re: [Wiki-research-l] Working with edit history dump
On Feb 24, 2015 1:44 PM, Behzad Tabibian btabib...@gmail.com wrote: I am new to working with Wikipedia dumps. I am trying to obtain full revision history of all the articles on Wikipedia. I downloaded enwiki-20140707-pages-meta-history1.xml-*.7z from https://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20140707/. However, by looking at the xml files revision history of individual articles do not match with revision history one may see from history page on Wikipedia website. It seems the dump contains significantly smaller number of revisions than what can be found on Wikipedia. This may be a decent place to ask (actually I don't read this list too much so just guessing) but probably more relevant at xmldatadump...@lists.wikimedia.org . FYI -Jeremy ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Re: [Wiki-research-l] Looking for reader's click log data for Wikipedia
On Dec 28, 2014 11:35 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: More importantly, the HTTPS protocol involves either sanitising or completely stripping referers, rendering those chains impossible to reconstruct. Could you elaborate? (we're talking about hops from one page to another within the same domain name?) More generally: what is the status of hadoop? could we potentially have 3rd-party users get access even if they can't do an NDA by writing their own mapreduce jobs to support their research? Depending on the job maybe it would need legal (LCA) review before releasing results or maybe some could be reviewed by others (approved by LCA). We could give researchers (all labs users?) access to a truly sanitized dataset with the right format for use when designing jobs. Or maybe not sanitized but filtered to requests for just a few users that volunteered to release their data for X days. -Jeremy ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Re: [Wiki-research-l] How to track all the diffs in real time?
On Dec 13, 2014 12:33 PM, Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org wrote: 1. It turns out that generating diffs is computationally complex, so generating them in real time is slow and lame. I'm working to generate all diffs historically using Hadoop and then have a live system listening to recent changes to keep the data up-to-date[2]. IIRC Mako does that in ~4 hours (maybe outdated and takes longer now) for all enwiki diffs for all time. (don't remember if this is namespace limited) But also using an extraordinary amount of RAM. i.e. hundreds of GB AIUI, there's no dynamic memory allocation. revisions are loaded into fixed-size buffers larger than the largest revision. https://github.com/makoshark/wikiq -Jeremy ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Re: [Wiki-research-l] [OpenAccess] Extracting PMIDs
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Jake Orlowitz jorlow...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know if it is possible to extract PubMed ID (PMID) or PMCIDs from Wiki references? Furthermore, could you dump those IDs out into a list for analysis? I think so. Can you tell us more about what they want? Using [[wikipedia:ebola virus disease]] as an example: ref name=Gatherer 2014{{cite journal | author = Gatherer D | title = The 2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa | journal = J. Gen. Virol. | volume = 95 | issue = Pt 8 | pages = 1619–1624 | year = 2014 | pmid = 24795448 | doi = 10.1099/vir.0.067199-0 }}/ref One of the params is pmid. -Jeremy ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l