Re: [Wikimediauk-l] GDPR?
Incidentally if the charity would like some informal advice on its GDPR obligations (offlist) I am happy to assist. Best Harry On Wed, May 23, 2018, 02:48 Michael Peelwrote: > I haven’t spotted any emails from WMUK about this yet, are they coming > soon or is everything already OK here? > > Thanks, > Mike > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Digitising old 8mm home movies
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Gordon Jolywrote: > Alternatively buy a scanner? > > http://www.amazon.co.uk/Reflecta-Super-8-film-scanner/dp/B00I48MAR6/ > > :-) > Free UK delivery. Bargain! Harry ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
[Wikimediauk-l] Technology projects / volunteer strategy consultation
[apologies for x-post -- replies to wikimediauk-l please] Hi all Ahead of the volunteer strategy day, my Technology Committee colleagues and I have spent a little time thinking about the volunteer strategy consultation [1]. Charles is going to speak a little on the subject at the Volunteer Gathering [2] so I won't pre-empt the entirety of the discussion there, but rather I wanted to share a couple of personal points that might be helpful in prompting other thoughts that people can take with them on the day (sadly I can't myself attend). The first is that under the model proposed, it will be vital for working groups to really take ownership of project proposals. Over the last two years, IMHO TechComm (I can't profess to speak for other committees) has been pretty good at saying 'Yes', but hasn't been so good at actively supporting those proposals which it likes. By which I mean, it's been good at providing (constructive) challenge, but a project based system has overheads, and working groups will be vital in helping meet those overheads (e.g. by actively filling out and developing project plans). This will require a genuine (if not extensive) time commitment of a form that I think will be quite unfamiliar to many wiki volunteers. The second is that the model for project plans will also be an interesting question to get right. On the one hand, it will be important to be able to be able to compare projects in detail -- there has even been a suggestion that projects should essentially bid into multiple flexible resource pools, which will require quite precise assessment of needs. On the other, we do not wish to put casual volunteers off, or to simply collapse under the weight of paperwork. I have attempt to put up a quick sketch of a hypothetical project plan at [3] so there's a tangible proof of concept out there -- but equally people more knowledgeable than I will be familiar with what other chapters/IEG/FDC ask for. Incidentally, the plan is hosted on Launchpad, a microsite TechComm has been looking at developing to capture former and future projects -- this may be of more general interest. Just food for thought :) Many thanks Harry (User:Jarry1250) [1] https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteer_strategy_consultation_2015 [2] https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteer_Strategy_Gathering/July_2015 [3] https://launchpad.wikimedia.org.uk/translatesvg/ -- Harry Burt ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimeet survey
On 2 Jun 2015 23:52, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote: The big advantages of cafes and pubs is that people can come and go, can order food and drink if they wish, and don't look odd if the numbers are small or large. Well put! The only cafe I know in Oxford is Greens which is next to the Bird and Baby in St Giles, is nice, if pricey, but has accessibility issues. I think in the specific case of Oxford (and probably more generally) I am pretty confident it would be possible to find a nice café (although not all will have wheelchair access). Off the top of my head, the Turl Street Kitchen is nice (if a bit trendy) and GD's (St Aldates) would give the meetup a different vibe. Participants would be under a bit more pressure to order *something* (Wetherspoons being very lax about this) but in those two cases I've never had trouble. Possibly university, community, religious or GLAM space might be used especially if an additional event was involved, but we would be very lucky to get such a venue on a recurring basis. Certainly in Oxford it is generally pretty easy for a student to book a room at her/his own college, and many are without cost, although they tend to be more lecture theatres in setup than cafés! Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Changes to timings of membership approvals
Hello everyone, I am copying here from a post I've just made on the Engine room https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Engine_room#Changes_to_timings_of_membership_approvals : At the meeting of the Board of Trustees on 7th March a decision was made in lieu of a permanent Chief Executive appointment that the full board of trustees would return to considering and approving applications for memberships i.e. these will not be done under the scheme of delegation by a staff member until a permanent appointment is made and following induction. In practical terms this means new members (whether a former lapsed member applying or a brand new member) will apply for membership as before, but it will not be approved and therefore active until the date of the next meeting of the board of Trustees. The language on our sign up page now reads: *New member:* *Your application to become a member of Wikimedia U.K. is now pending approval. If you are applying following a previous membership expiring then you will need to be re-approved. Following a decision made by Trustees on 7th March 2015 memberships will be approved by the full board of Trustees pending the recruitment of a permanent Chief Executive. The dates of board meetings for the year are 20th June, 25th July (AGM), 12th September, 12th December. New memberships, including those of former members who have lapsed and are re-applying will not be approved until these dates. If you wish you application to be approved today, for example, in order to apply for a micro-grant, please contact members...@wikimedia.org.uk members...@wikimedia.org.uk with your request and reasons.* Please do continue to encourage supporters and event attendees to consider applying for membership, only make them aware that there will be a wait for approval unless there is an urgent need to consider sooner based on project support (Grant application/Equipment loan) If you have questions or concerns you can reply in the Engine room, email members...@wikimedia.org.uk or reply here. *Katherine Bavage * *Fundraising Manager * *Wikimedia UK* +44 20 7065 0752 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Importing event calendar
I created a version at http://tools.wmflabs.org/wmukevents some time ago (it works for me). I can't remember why we didn't update the links though. Harry On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Tristan Hill tris...@saticed.me.uk wrote: Hi, Unfortunately I use google calendar. I'm trying to add the events calendar from https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Events to mine. When adding webcal:// h2vx.com/ics/wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Events I get Could not fetch the URL because robots.txt prevents us from crawling the URL. Anyone else have this working? Thanks Tristan ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Unsuccessful candidates in UK elections
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: I have just created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unsuccessful_candidates_in_United_Kingdom_elections Please help to populate, and eventually subdivide, it. Andy Mabbett Are you intending this to contain anyone who has every lost an election in the UK? Or just those who stood but *never* won? Harry ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Hillsborough page
Some more today on the BBC (and probably others): http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27203371 It's currently on the BBC homepage with the description The charity that represents Wikipedia in the UK has condemned edits made from government computers after more insults and vandalism emerged. Looks like a good write up (factually accurate) with some choice quotes from Stevie. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Just for some context, it's been reported in the Liverpool Echo - http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/hillsborough-wikipedia-insults-added-government-7029881and the Telegraph - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/10786380/Insulting-revisions-to-Wikipedia-entry-on-Hillsborough-made-from-Government-computers.html- so please be aware it's a live story for now. If you happen to receive any enquiries, please do feel free to send them my way. Thanks and regards, Stevie On 24 April 2014 21:14, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Just to alert anyone a journalist has been in touch regarding some reported vandalism to the article about the Hillsborough Disaster = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillsborough_disaster We have explained how it is the community of editors who look after the content and that we have faith in the sound judgement of the community -- *Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 tweet @jonatreesdavies Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- Stevie Benton Head of External Relations Wikimedia UK+44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBenton Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: Armenian wiki video
What a fabulous video Jon! Can haz one for the UK? Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Damokos Bence damokos.be...@wikimedia.huwrote: Thanks for sharing this, Jon. Best regards, Bence On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Damn! Not enough coffee yet Here it is Here is the link of the video made with high-school students. On 13 April 2014 07:59, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote: If you are going to repost emails to this list, please ensure you include the relevant content. Thanks, Fae On 13 April 2014 07:17, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Lovely video from Armenia From: Lilit Tarkhanyan lilit.tarkhan...@wikimedia.am Best regards Lilit Tarkhanyan Wikimedia Armenia Board Member Wikipedia Education Program Leader -- Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 tweet @jonatreesdavies Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 tweet @jonatreesdavies Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- Damokos Bence Wikimédia Magyarország http://wikimedia.hu ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Trademark Agreement between Wikimedia UK and Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Is there a digital version available? The scan quality is... not ideal. Harry On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Andy Mabbett pigsotw...@gmail.com wrote: What implications does this have for QRpedia? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk On Apr 8, 2014 4:35 PM, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Hello everyone, I'm very happy to report that there is now a Trademark Agreement in place between Wikimedia UK and Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Thank you to the Trademarks team at the WMF for their work in making this happen. Thanks also to Jon Davies and Michael Maggs for their input, and to Mike Peel for highlighting the need. You can see the agreement at https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/File:WMUK_and_WMF_trademark_agreement.pdf If you have any questions about this please do let me know. Thanks and regards, Stevie -- Stevie Benton Head of External Relations Wikimedia UK+44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBenton Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Rights in church bell ringing
Amateur orchestras, in particular (unless there are professional church bell ringers?). Harry On 19 Mar 2014 14:50, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: I'm clearly no expert on copyright but I wonder if the rights issue would be the same as an orchestra. Would you need to get approval from each musician in an orchestra to use a recording of their performance? Stevie On 19 March 2014 14:43, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: I've raised a question on Commons, about performers; ruiights in reoding of church bells: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Church_bells I'm no expert, but AIUI, the UK style of bell ringing is different from that elsewhere in the world. I hope our ability to upload recordings of church bells will not be encumbered by the need to get clearance from each bell ringer. Can anyone comment, with any authority, on such matters? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- Stevie Benton Head of External Relations Wikimedia UK+44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBenton Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
[Wikimediauk-l] Calling all British-based bloggers and blog readers
Hi all, Further to previous, I am proud to announce that we UK Wikimedians now have a 'Wikimedia in the UK' themed blog planet (aggregator), live at [1]. One small issue: at the moment, we don't have many blogs aggregated on it. So if you're British based, blog in any of the UK's many languages, and have a blog category/tag (or the whole blog) dedicated to your Wikimedia or Open Content activities, I'd love to hear from you. It's a great way to make sure what you write gets the biggest possible audience :) Everyone else, why not bookmark the page or consolidate your existing RSS subscriptions into one easy Planet subscription? Best, Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) Wikimedia UK Tech Committee p.s. someone at the office should probably have admin rights in addition to just me! [1] https://planet.wikimedia.org.uk/ ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Idea: blog planet for UK Wikimedians
Hi all, One thing that Wikimedia UK's technology committee (which I am on) has discussed a couple of times is the idea of a blog planet [1] (aggregator) for use by UK Wikimedians. Regular Wikimedians will know that there's already an English-language planet at http://en.planet.wikimedia.org , automatically collating blog posts from around the web that are both about Wikimedia (or similar projects, eg. FOSS in general). The idea with a UK planet would be the collation of blog posts from (British?) Wikimedians' blogs, with a strong focus on activities in/around/involving the UK. The hypothesised criteria for inclusion would limit posts to those in English, Scots, both forms of Gaelic, Welsh, and the many other languages of the UK. I envisage that, at its best, it could be a great place to follow as diverse set of events as wikimeetups, chapter activity, GLAM initiatives--not to mention everything else that is (and has been) going on. These are things that are already being blogged about, but many of these blog posts (I venture) are on individuals' own (under-read) blogs. By collating blog posts, they are easier to find and hence each blog post reaches a much wider audience. Blog planets are not difficult to setup, and would not particularly resource intensive; it's just a question of whether people would appreciate such a thing. Any thoughts? Harry -- Harry Burt User:Jarry1250 [1] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_%28software%29 . In practice one would use a newer fork, as the WMF-hosted planet does. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Call for volunteers - Open Government Partnership summit
Hi Stevie, Likewise, I could make the Friday (if one can volunteer for single days at a time). Harry On Oct 10, 2013 1:51 PM, Edward Hands edwar...@gmail.com wrote: Stevie and Katherine Looks like WMUK needs our help at short notice here, so dig deep people! I'd be happy to help out on one of those days, preferably just the afternoon. No preference as to day. best wishes Edward Hands Edwardx on WP etc Hello everyone, I hope you're well. Wikimedia UK has been offered a stand at the Open Government Partnership summit on 31 October and 1 November. This is excellent news as we will be able to spread the word about the Wikimedia mission to many opinion formers and policy makers. I wonder if there are any volunteers who would be interested in helping to staff the stand on 31 October and 1 November. I know this is short notice - but this was only confirmed with us about ten minutes ago. The thing is, I need to pass on the details of those attending from our side TODAY. So I need to hear from you by about 3.30pm at the very latest. Thanks and regards, Stevie -- Stevie Benton Communications Organiser Wikimedia UK+44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBenton Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing listwikimediauk-l@wikimedia.orghttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] 'Illustrating Wikipedia brochure' - your thoughts?
Hi Stevie, It looks very good. For my money, You can upload your photographs of public domain works, such as old buildings, statues, and art. (page 3) is a little ambiguous (the old applies to all three, but this is not 100% clear) though I cannot think of anything better. The only other thing I would question is the use of the term public domain without a clear nod to the fact that the copyright sense of the term is not the same as the general usage. In particular, perhaps the reference to the public domain on page 3 could be qualified with the word copyright to avoid confusion. On page 11 and the glossary, one could do the same, or tweak the sentence there to read In copyright terms, a work is said to be in the public domain if is not covered by anyone’s copyright. I've seen this confusion a lot myself, so i think it would be worth it, but others may disagree. Remember the back page still needs a URL! :) In general, I think it's great though. Harry -- Harry Burt ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Student societies 2013 campaign
Thank you. Which part of the trademark policy covers this? My own reading was from == Things You Can Do, a Summary ==, which does not give any examples related to third parties such as student societies (only second parties, the chapters themselves). Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Hello everyone, We've looked in to this a bit more deeply, and as long as the student society is associated (or affiliated) with Wikimedia UK and isn't selling any products then there's no need to seek permission to use the marks. The Trademark Policy at http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Trademark_policy is the key document here and is quite clear on this, thankfully. We're on good terms with the WMF, so if there are any trademark issues that the WMF contacts a student group about, try and let us know, and we can get in touch with the WMF during work hours and smooth over any difficulties. I hope this is useful, Stevie On 6 August 2013 10:58, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote: On 6 August 2013 10:34, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Thanks Charles. When the CUWS was established was there a need for you to discuss trademarking with the WMF? If so, how did you approach this? Are there any apposite lessons you might be able to share? Anything that was done would have been by Deryck Chan. Charles ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- Stevie Benton Communications Organiser Wikimedia UK +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBenton Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Student societies 2013 campaign
I emailed the WMF's trademark people just to confirm that naming a society the [NAME] Wiki[mp]edia Society did not require approval. Their response was that it may: a hurdle, if not a large one. Usefully, then, WMUK could seek some clarification in this area, just to keep the burden on volunteers down. Just a thought. Harry On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Toni Sant toni.s...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote: As many subscriber to this mailing list will already know, Wikimedia UK is keen to support student societieshttps://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Student_societiestowards a better understanding and improvement of Wikipedia and its sister projects. We are currently looking for a volunteer to help me develop a strategic plan we've drafted for reaching out to university student unions across the UK. This work relates to WMUK's developing efforts to support Student Societies focused on editing Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects; it essentially involves an intensive period of concentrated effort to reach out to potential new student societies. Details available at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Student_societies_2013_campaign_volunteer Many thanks, Toni --- Dr Toni Sant - Education Organiser, Wikimedia UK toni.s...@wikimedia.org.uk +44 (0)7885 980 536 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Nice piece from another country.
Seems well-informed. Is there any intention to ask for Wikipedian to be changed to Wikipedian-in-Residence in the prose if not the headline? I always thought the latter had quite a nice ring to it myself. Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-22264118 -- *Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 tweet @jonatreesdavies Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: Funding Opportunity: Google launch the Global Impact Challenge
Incidentally, it's worth noting that Google Translate is already crowdsourced to an extent. IMHO the idea of translation hints embedded into Wikipedia articles is a better one. I'm not sure it's going to be possible to construct a pitch for as complex a project as that within a short amount of time however; it may even require a new web standard. Harry -- Harry Burt / User:Jarry1250 ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Anyone interested in Lua and PIzza one day?
Great idea IMHO. Plus, it could also be a useful starting point for creating a second not-quite-annual UK-based hackathon. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote: Should we have a Lua love-in for UK geeks sometime led by someone who understands this? Could be a jolly day? Jon -- *Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 tweet @jonatreesdavies Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Photograph cropping day!
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.ukwrote: Very nice! I will have a play, but it looks like that's more oriented towards reorienting than cropping... Yes; well, it seems to only want to crop black borders from around the edges. But in any case, reorientation alone is going to save volunteers a lot of time; and there are good GUIs for batch cropping IIRC once you've taken out the need for reorientation. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Photograph cropping day!
Has anyone tried using unpaper [1] on a sample of images? I could do -- all you really need is a Unix-based OS and some command-line savvy - but I'm a little tied up just at the moment. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) [1] http://unpaper.berlios.de/ ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] FYI: BBC Your paintings artist list
People working with YourPaintings might also find the {{Artwork}} generator at [1] of use. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) [1] https://toolserver.org/~jarry/yourpaintings/ On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.ukwrote: On 3 January 2013 10:37, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: we've had microformat markup in our infoobxes since 2007 - I'm going to raise an Rfc to have all infoboxes renamed infoobox... OpenCorprates, OpenDomesday: Correction: OpenDomesday doesn't link back to us; I've just requested that it do so. [[Info(o)box play]] links to Theatricalia, another linked data site with reciprocal links too. To facilitate further discussion and development, I have just created, and am populating, [[Category:External link templates to linked data sites with reciprocal links]]: That's very slow updating, sadly. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Verifying membership applications - Suggestions and comments
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote: On 20 November 2012 10:37, Katherine Bavage katherine.bav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Morning - All members are voting members...unless I've missed something? I think Harry might have been distinguishing between members that do vote and members that don't, rather than members than *can* vote. Just like insurance companies only check your details when you try to make a claim, we could just check when people try to vote. Indeed, although I'm not sure exactly what percentage of members choose to vote, and hence the scale of the efficiency. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Verifying membership applications - Suggestions and comments
Aren't there really two points here: (i) Should we enforce more checks on prospective members? (ii) Should we enforce more checks on members before we let them vote at AGMs, whether in person or by proxy? I think the legal question is a good one. Are charities required to do neither/either/both? Legal issues aside, surely (ii) but not (i) is the easiest by quite a margin. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Katherine Bavage katherine.bav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Hi All, At the board meeting on Saturday a valid point was made that currently the verification process for membership applications doesn't really prove a barrier to fraudulent or duplicate applications. I'd like to look at ways of improving this, so as we aim to expand our membership numbers we're also making sure fairness is enshrined in a checking process that means people can only have one vote. If people pay their membership fee with Paypal, this isn't so much of a problem, as having a verified paypal account has already required this person to link their identity to their postal address - but we want to be as open as possible and so there will be people who give us 'a form and a fiver'. What checking processes do we think would be acceptable without being invasive/onerous? At a basic level, we should be confirming that the applicant is the named person at the address given. Please flag up concerns, suggestions for services or resources we can use, and so on. It may be that we can't completely eliminate the risk of fraudulent applications, but we can make it more difficult and provide a measure or reassurance that no individual has more power than any other by being able to vote twice etc . Thanks! -- *Katherine Bavage * *Fundraising Manager * *Wikimedia UK* +44 20 7065 0949 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Verifying membership applications - Suggestions and comments
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Katherine Bavage katherine.bav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Hey Harry, I'm not sure if ii) *is* easier. Compare the work of verifying members before every AGM and EGM or merely at the point of joining. We don't really have formal check on membership at the moment - no applicant is asked to prove their residency at their address of that they have provided their real name. It depends, I suppose, on what kind of check you have in mind. I was imagining show us proof of identity (with a large burden on the information supplier) rather than a cheap automated check. By cheap I also mean monetarily: it's probably not a good use of WMUK money verifying the addresses of non-voting members if WMUK is not legally obliged to. Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Mobile uk.wikimedia.org still failing
The assignment feature is rarely used on Wikimedia's bugzilla installation per se, in fairness. But yes, no developer seems to have taken a keen interest in it yet. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: Thank you. That was closed as a duplicate of https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38799 which was raised in July this year, and yet is still unassigned. On 23 October 2012 23:21, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: I've raised this on bugzilla at: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41334 Please add any clarifying comments there that you think would be useful. Thanks, Mike On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:46, Damokos Bence damokos.be...@wikimedia.hu wrote: I think this issue affects all *.wikimedia.org addresses (at least the ones of chapters hosted by the WMF); a workaround is to change the user-agent setting in your mobile browser, if possible. Best regards, Bence On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: I'm still having problems too. Stevie On Oct 23, 2012 7:09 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: It appears that this is still an issue. On 5 October 2012 12:57, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Have just chased this up with the WMF. Thanks for reminding me Andy! On 5 October 2012 12:49, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: It's difficult to promote events like: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass when mobile visits to that URL are redirected to: http://uk.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass and errors are returned for all http://uk.m.wikimedia.org pages. I know this has been raised on this mailing list previously, but there's still no sign of a fix. The impact of this problem can be understood by considering that yesterday it was reported that 40% of Wikipedia's growth is mobile, versus 4% desktop. Can this serious bug be (re-)escalated as a matter of urgency, please? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- Damokos Bence ügyvezető alelnök, Wikimédia Magyarország http://wikimedia.hu ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Geonotices.
Hi Gorgo, What does http://geoiplookup.wikimedia.org report for you? The database is usually pretty accurate. Harry -- Harry Burt On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote: On 15/10/12 13:28, Craig Franklin wrote: Geonotices are only as good as the database underneath. If the IP database doesn't think you're in London, no amount of tinkering with skins will fix that. Cheers, Craig Franklin I see. So in what sense is this a good communications tool? Can I enter an IP address range into the database? I am sure thousands of BT Infinity customers would thank me. Gordo __**_ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Geonotices.
(Location-wise, I mean. No need to publish your IP if you don't want to.) Harry On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Harry Burt harryab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gorgo, What does http://geoiplookup.wikimedia.org report for you? The database is usually pretty accurate. Harry -- Harry Burt On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.comwrote: On 15/10/12 13:28, Craig Franklin wrote: Geonotices are only as good as the database underneath. If the IP database doesn't think you're in London, no amount of tinkering with skins will fix that. Cheers, Craig Franklin I see. So in what sense is this a good communications tool? Can I enter an IP address range into the database? I am sure thousands of BT Infinity customers would thank me. Gordo __**_ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Falklands
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: The list of monuments at http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Monumentos_de_la_Provincia_de_Tierra_del_Fuego,_Ant%C3%A1rtida_e_Islas_del_Atl%C3%A1ntico_Sur - includes Port Darwin, Fox Bay, Goose Green, Stanley, Pebble Island, and a few more. I think it's been imported straight from the Argentine national registry, which of course assumes that the Falklands are Argentine. IMHO the best way to depoliticise the issue would be to either to create a specific Falklands list/template or to ensure the same monuments are also on a British list to allow islanders the choice. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] New Laptops for events
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: They all come with Windows 7 installed, but it'd be nice if a volunteer with experience in open-source software came in and got them to dual-boot with a suitable version of Linux. Any volunteers? Well, without wanting to start a complete firestorm, dualbooting Ubuntu 12.04 (LTS) via Wubi is really very easy indeed for 95% of setups [1]. Depending on your internet package, you might want to use the Download Ubuntu link in the bottom left, burn it to CD, insert CD, then run Wubi to avoid downloading Ubuntu three times over. I did the same only last week, no problems whatsoever. -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Oxford Wikimedians
Hey all, I can't believe I haven't asked this before, but are any lurkers on this list either (a) members of the University of Oxford (b) offer-holders from the University of Oxford? Or does anyone know any Wikimedians who fit either of those descriptions but aren't on this list? (Feel free to message me offlist in either case.) It might also be useful in future to know if there are any active Wikimedians currently studying at Oxford Brookes. Thanks, Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Oxford Wikimedians
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Any chance of Oxford meetups or a group? My particular train of though at the moment surrounded the establishment (re-establishment, IIRC) of a student society suitable for Wikimedians in Oxford. So yes :) On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: PS: Does this mean we might be having Oxford vs Cambridge editing contests in the future? If all goes well, yes. The establishment of a society would also help ensure participation in inter-collegiate competitions. Regards, Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] What is in a name?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:45 AM, HJ Mitchell hjmitch...@ymail.com wrote: despite it not having the same 'brand' recognition as the movement's flagship project. SOFIXIT :P No seriously, that's probably the answer, longterm. -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] One technical question
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Still trying to sort this one out... On open office I cannot get the template to use Arial as a default font. Can anyone help? I've never used OpenOffice before, but I presume Google's suggestion to do the following doesn't work? Press F11 to open the Styles and Formatting window. Click the Paragraph Styles icon. Right-click on Default and choose Modify. On the Font tab, set the required typeface and size. Click OK to save, then save the template. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Role accounts
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote: snip http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_contact_role_accounts does say it is a copyright matter; but the page linked to doesn't seem to spell that out. Perhaps it should. Charles As I understand it, there used to be a general concern that the only way the GFDL could be held to be compatible with pseudonymity was if there was a 1-to-1 mapping between pseudonyms and human beings. I'm not sure that was ever actually looked into, since it seems to me that many-to-many would be just as good, as long as you realised and confirmed you were asking to be attributed with a vague identifier (like 99% of humanity does when it picks a name someone else already has or had). In any case, role accounts are in all practical terms regarded merely an accountability issue these days. Which is probably why no page goes into detail on the copyright matter. Harry -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Copyright of pictures from 1870
Incidentally, since I don't think anyone mentioned it, it's my understanding that you can't get UK publication rights if you first published it in the U.S., only U.S. publication rights. [1] So that is the best thing to look into regarding publication rights. I think the assumption of copyright lapse is a good one. Admittedly, the whole thing makes my head hurt! -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) [1] http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/2967/regulation/17/made 4) A work qualifies for publication right protection only if—(a)first publication is in the European Economic Area... On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Deryck Chan deryckc...@wikimedia.hkwrote: Any update to this? Deryck 2012/2/9 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk On 9 February 2012 17:49, Deryck Chan deryckc...@wikimedia.hk wrote: I am recently engaged in a conversation with [[User:Kimberlyblaker]], who uploaded a fair amount of old, 19th century pictures onto Commons, including the album of places in Cambridge (see below) which is of particular interest to me. What stumbled me was the copyright status of these images - are they in the public domain? If they aren't, is it due to publication right, and is Kimberly Blaker ( co.) the rightful copyright holder of them? If they were previously unpublished - which looks likely, if this is a personal photo album of commissioned photographs - then yes, it sounds plausible. I'll do a little more research on this this evening and let you know :-) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Openness - copyright policy
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Policy Please read, contemplate, discuss and amend! Chris I do wonder if there's a conflation here of publication and licensing. For example, it is not clear to me whether publishing personal information under a restrictive licence is less bad than publishing it under an open one. That is to say, I'm not sure that restrictive copyright is the right tool to use in each of the examples. Wouldn't it be better simply to not disclose the private information in the first place? Regards, -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Openness - copyright policy
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote: I've raised similar points on the talk page. Would you mind adding your comments there? I think that's probably the better venue for this discussion. Of course. Had the discussion page not been a redlink at the time, I probably would have put my comments there the first time round. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A few requests!
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Good afternoon everyone! I have a couple of things that I'm begging your assistance with: I hope you folks can help. 1. [...] 2. We've had a couple of contacts from local political parties trying to get pages about candidates in the upcoming London Assembly elections. At present, we only really have stubs on a few of the candidates. We told them politely that it's not something we can help with - WP is written by volunteers - although we did of course offer to teach their volunteers how to edit (and edit ethically and openly) if necessary. Perhaps this is something to keep an eye on when you're patrolling articles, or looking for a new DYK? It's worth noting that traditionally PPCs have had difficulty sustaining articles, whereas incumbent MPs are all notable. I suspect the same may be true of L.A. elections. As the motto goes, sources first, article second. Although I personally don't mind helping with some of these (being a politics student). Regards, Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Microgrant application submitted
Hey all. I just submitted a microgrant application [1]. I'm not sure how I'm suppose to publicise that fact though, so I thought I'd post here. Apologies if I would have been better off posting elsewhere; I don't know how many people actively monitor the category itself. Thanks, Harry (User:Jarry1250) [1] https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Microgrants/Oxford_Law_Competition ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Thanks-Gift-Aid page
Hey all. Perhaps it would be worth some clarifying the Thanks-Gift-Aid page to the extent that (with the exception of email address) all fields are necessary for the purpose of claiming GiftAid, and/or that the information provided will only be used for that purpose and then destroyed (or whatever the reality of the matter is). Just a thought, Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] The new British standard for copyright infringement...
That might actually be licensed, though. -- Harry On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote: I wonder if http://www.popartuk.com/**photography/london/red-bus-on-** westminster-bridge-ph0408-**poster.asphttp://www.popartuk.com/photography/london/red-bus-on-westminster-bridge-ph0408-poster.aspwould have been considered enough to make the idea non-novel. On 25/01/2012 22:23, geni wrote: On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manskemagnusmanske@**googlemail.commagnusman...@googlemail.com wrote: ...photos that somehow look similar: http://www.**amateurphotographer.co.uk/**news/photographers_face_** copyright_threat_after_shock_**ruling__news_311191.htmlhttp://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html The servers are safe (well, relatively speaking) in the U.S., but should people in the UK be concerned when uploading images? Magnus Nothing new here. Its always been understood that in theory if you see a photo and take another photo that is similar enough to it to be considered a derivative work that that is a copyright violation. However in most cases it would be extremely hard to prove and people don't care enough to try. __**_ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] The new British standard for copyright infringement...
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:24 PM, James Forrester ja...@jdforrester.orgwrote: On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote: ...photos that somehow look similar: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html It is worth having a glance at the images themselves: http://www.swanturton.com/multimedia/docs/Temple%20Island%20v%20New%20English%20photographs.pdf I can understand why Amateur Photographer magazine are worried, but the language they use in the article makes the two images sound far more different than they actually were IMHO. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
Okay, so http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/27728 is now available, the product of the earlier conversations on this list and onwiki. Thoughts on linking to it in a completely voluntary manner from the blackout notice? Time is of the essence, rather. -- Harry On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote: On 17/01/2012 22:58, Alison M. Wheeler wrote: - Original Message - From: Gordon Jolygordon.j...@pobox.com So who owns the Internet? Who has ultimate authority over DNS? A very good question indeed ;-P And the answer, of course, is it depends on who you are talking to. Even though it shouldn't. And the people in one country disagree with the rest of the world. AlisonW Alison, It was two questions! :-) Gordo -- Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com http://www.joly.org.uk/ Don't Leave Space To The Professionals! ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
Or numerous other methods to avoid the blackout. I believe the same FA is going to run for 48 hours. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Alison M. Wheeler wikime...@alisonwheeler.com wrote: From: Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com I am told that if you disable JavaScript you can see the light. Indeed. And what is more, the main page doesn't lead with the SOPA news (but does include a featured article, which I feel quite sad for as few will see it), likewise the [[Portal:Current events]] completely omits the days big event. Given that mobile users, non-scripting browsers, etc. can see these pages it seems somehow wrong that there is nothing on them. AlisonW ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
What is the official UK call to action here? Emailing the embassy? Or could you create a Number10-esque petition? Or did I miss something else entirely? -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote: Nicely put. Luckily we are all singing from the same song sheet. Are you coming in? A bit hectic here. Quoting Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk: All, Just a followup email to let you know that the English Wikipedia community have decided on an action for the English Wikipedia with regard to the SOPA and PROTECT acts. The English Wikipedia will be blacked out, worldwide, from 5am GMT on 18 January. The blackout will last for roughly 24 hours. There's a timer counting down at http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/event?lid=0 http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/event?lid=0h=0sts=22114080sln=5-6a=showe uid=2a1130f2-81f4-e3c4-7d37-0a1c1001632d h=0sts=22114080sln=5-6a=showeuid=2a1130f2-81f4-e3c4-7d37-0a1c1001632d. If you get any UK press interest, forward them to Jon and me in the office on 020 7065 0990, or to pr...@wikimedia.org.uk. We have a few volunteers with press experience who will be helping out, too (many thanks to them, they know who they are!) Bear in mind that tomorrow will be extremely busy in the WMF and WMUK offices, even though Wikipedia itself will be down. The key points to remember are: . It's the community who decided to do this - not a decree from Jimmy or the WMF, and not Wikimedia UK. We all support the decision of the community, however - we're all in this together . These acts are something that will hurt the freedom of information globally, even though they're (on the surface) US laws. This may well affect every .com, .org or .net site worldwide . Non-English Wikipedias may (or may) be blacking out, depending on the views of their individual communities If you have any major problems over the course of the next 48 hours, or a press query, please get in touch. And if you're looking for something to do, Commons isn't being blacked out, and I imagine that there is a fair categorisation backlog. All the best, Richard Symonds Office Development Manager Wikimedia UK -- Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Our Registered Charity No. is 1144513. The Registered Office is 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. Wikimedia UK is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). It is an independent non-profit organization with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk -- Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. 07976 935 986 tweet @jonatreesdavies Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited. Wiki UK Ltd is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513 Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. Wikimedia UK is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). It is an independent non-profit organization with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:31 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_of_State_for_Trade ? Visa, Mastercard, PayPal - all US companies. SOPA can switch British businesses off like a light. - d. That might be a bit much to ask for. On the other hand, I don't know how many petition signatures we could get in a day for: Her Majesty's Government should voice its disapproval of any proposed American legislation that would limit the ability of British citizens to speak freely on the internet. Say, or something similar. Just a thought. Harry (Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
I note that there is a petition with 280 signatures available at: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/26143 It seems to be fairly strongly (but not badly IMHO) worded, so therefore worthy of our support if we can get geolocation going. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: AFAIK, there hasn't been time to put in proper geolocation notices, and the WMF are still asleep (it's 4 or 5am there). However, I believe the best place to forward any comments would be the Foreign Office. That said, I think there's a petition being set up, however... ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
Cool. Then I suggest someone with access to that list put it up [1]. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) [1] https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/new On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:18 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 January 2012 13:16, Harry Burt harryab...@gmail.com wrote: As of time of writing, the U.S. Congress is currently considering the issue of whether to tighten internet policing laws with regard to digital rights enforcement. Whilst the overall goal of these pieces of proposed legislation (mostly notably those known as SOPA and PIPA) is not necessarily disagreeable, the suggested mechanisms for rights enforcement risk damaging the quality, quantity and free character of speech on the internet. Given the global nature of the internet, we, the undersigned, feel that the British Government should consider the possible impact of these measures on British citizens, and are confident that upon doing so it would see the overt and immediate need to speak out on our behalf in this matter. My stab at things. Thoughts? Does it need more explanation? Or is brevity key? FT2 wrote a good one on the comcom list ... - d. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
Just to say that I asked on IRC and there is no technical issue with having a UK-only petition appeal appear on the page, if we can get a petition up and potentially get as much consensus for it as we can in the meantime. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Alison M. Wheeler wikime...@alisonwheeler.com wrote: One thing to make clear when talking to anyone about this is that whilst SOPA/PIPA are proposals in the USA, they are *explicitly* targeted to foreign websites. And though the DNS aspect may have been delayed at present it is still in there and will be re-introduced at a later stage. This permits them to block DNS resolution for .COM .NET .ORG and some other TLDs, no matter that the owner of the website/webservice concerned may be in the UK (aka not in the USA), and the servers may be in the UK and the users may be in the UK *and even if geo-IP is used to ensure that only non-USA people can access the site/service then SOPA/PIPA would *still* permit that site to be blocked / taken offline. Also, given that even .UK .IT .NO and all the rest of the ccTLDs refer back to the dozen of so root DNS servers, they too could be poisened under the draft bill as it exists. So make no bones about it, these proposals *will* affect just about every country in the world if they go through. AlisonW ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Hi all, Personal opinion: The best place to discuss UK-specific text, including for the proposed petition, would be on-wiki at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Proposed_Messages since it would probably have to be a community-driven action rather than a WMUK/WMF one, as with the other non-technical aspects of the blackout (but feel free to disagree with that. ;-) ). Thanks, Mike Thanks Mike. I have created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action/UK_petitionas a rough first draft, based on some wording from FT2, which I hope he won't mind me using. Note that that page refers to the official blurb *of the petition*, not the wording that goes on the blackout page itself. All comments welcome :) -- Harry (User;Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] SOPA/PROTECT Blackout
Okay, so, in any case, I think we're too late on this now. I have submitted a wording in line with FT2's, but there's no guarantee that it will be processed and made available to sign in anything like the timescales we need. It's a shame, but then, all that was at stake was a parliamentary debate and a little publicity anyhow. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote: On 17 January 2012 12:51, Harry Burt harryab...@gmail.com wrote: I note that there is a petition with 280 signatures available at: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/26143 It seems to be fairly strongly (but not badly IMHO) worded, so therefore worthy of our support if we can get geolocation going. I'd rather we wrote out own petition. We should focus on the freedom aspects and the workability of the acts, not things like job losses (which I'm not even sure are true). ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Laptop recommendations?
It might (I haven't scrutinised the exact criteria) also qualify for funding from Google as part of their Google Summer of Code (GSoC) project [1]. GSoC is targetted at university students who want to program during their summer holidays and typically provides stipends of ~$5000 to support this. Even if it doesn't, it still might be advantageous to run it alongside GSoC anyway (but open to students and non-students and privately funded) simply because GSoC generates a rare interest among potential developers to take on large-ish for relatively small sums of money. Just a thought, Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:49 AM, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote: If I'm correct in assuming that the UK chapter has some spare cash at the moment then making AWB and other proven, popular, useful but single OS tools available on more operating systems would be a very useful investment. Community development, quality improvement and uncontentious. WSC On 15 January 2012 07:09, Doug Weller dougwel...@gmail.com wrote: Acer makes a decent product at around £300 as I recall which of course included VAT. Dell makes a decent product starting at £239 excluding VAT. Windows 7 works fine and people are familiar with it. As Harry says, We should focus on getting something that WORKS. It doesn't need expert administration to avoid becoming a toxic waste dump I've got enough friends and family using it who are no where near experts to know that. There's very good and free security software available. So go for dual boot to satisfy those who dislike WIndows or any software needs. And I'd hide IE. But please let users have the option of a familiar interface. Doug ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Editor retention
Does anyone know how the idea that we might limit article creation to autoconfirmed users whilst directing non-autoconfirmed users to a special holding area (AfC or similar) evolved once the Foundation refused to endorse it as stated? -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote: [snip] How can we promote this change effectively? ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Monmouthpedia
Seconded - that's fantastic news! Also, I might as well put it on record that I am more than happy to help with any bot programming that might be of use during these sort of initiatives. (I was reminded by the idea of scoring, having spent this morning updating the WikiCup bot to a 2012 specification, but you name, I'd be happy to contribute.) -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:45 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 December 2011 11:32, Roger Bamkin victuall...@gmail.com wrote: We have the Archaeological Society signed up. They tell me that we can have the lot - they are convinced that CC by SA beats (c) 2011.. HUGE WIN! What was the process of convincing them? That's definitely one to duplicate! - d. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner
Obviously getting way off topic, but if you want a detailed analysis of the motivations and surprising findings of these games, they are the four classics of game theory: the dictator game, the ultimatum game, the public (goods) game, and the trust game. The researchers know what they're doing here, the question really is whether we want to support fairly random pieces of research in this obvious a manner. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote: On 12 December 2011 21:52, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote: It is, but the type of Wikimedians who would go in for this are likely to be more familiar with game theory than the average bear. Yes, I'm curious what they actually want to learn. I'm guessing its something to do with alturism, but I'm not sure it will work. It seems obvious to me that the optimal strategy is to completely screw over your associates (it's not the optimal group strategy, but you can't control what the group does), so that's what I did (the researchers then screwed me over by randomly choosing the game with the least win as the one I actually got - they said it was random, but they never said they had equal probabilties!). I'm obviously an alturistic person (I wouldn't volunteer here otherwise), but my alturism doesn't extend to giving random people on the internet that I don't know and that don't know me money that I have no idea what they'll do with. It's just not a realistic scenario. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Membership renewal / Brighton hackathon
Hey all, it's vaguely that time of year again when I feel like I ought to be coughing up membership dues. Will a reminder be sent out at the correct time automatically or is there some other process I should be following? (I've been a member for two years; it didn't remind me last year but I heard talk of getting it to in the near future.) Apologies for asking such a stupid question. Also, as far as I know we're looking a little under-numbers for the Brighton Hackathon next weekend so I guess I should drop that into this email in the name of publicity. Regards, Harry (User:Jarry1250) p.s. rather confusingly http://donate.wikimedia.org.uk has a different favicon from the usual domain, incidentally. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimedia UKs microgrants scheme
Incidentally, I believe this was fixed by The Land [1]. -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=454578016oldid=454347327 On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew West andrewcw...@gmail.com wrote: Just seen a watchlist notice advertising Wikimedia UKs microgrants scheme -- perhaps someone can fix the double quote that is used instead of an apostrophe. Andrew [[User:BabelStone]] ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A little wiki hacking
Sorry to ask such a tangential question, but what is WMUK's position on non-English wikis that might be suitable for a Scottish audience (e.g. Scots)? Will it seek to actively promote interest in them? -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Brian McNeil brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org wrote: I've created [[Wikimedia in Scotland]] on the WM UK wiki, and would really appreciate if someone could create a specific Common.css page for it. Required is [[MediaWiki:Common.css/Wikimedia in Scotland]] with the following content: #p-logo a { background-image: url('http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2d/Wikimedia_in_Scotland-4.5%22.png/150px-Wikimedia_in_Scotland-4.5%22.png') !important; } Once a hard refresh is done, this should then cause the Wikimedia in Scotland graphic I've created to be displayed as the Wiki logo for that page only. Ideally, we then 'tart up' this page a little and have the new scotwiki.org domain point to it. With help from Peter Weiss, I've a QRcode which includes a Saltire and points to scotwiki.org. If we're to make use of this, then I believe one of the key functions of the page should be to encourage people to create accounts to upload images, and to perhaps join WMUK. Scotland is, largely, in need of a drive to recruit contributors who venture outside when the daystar is visible; or, tap into the wide international visitor base, get them improving the quantity and quality of images, then expand coverage across multiple languages. I'll be discussing this further with Fae on Friday and Saturday, but my gut instinct is to start with images. The number of people I see - apparently on holiday - and lugging round £4K+ of camera equipment in Edinburgh is almost-frightening. Bringing such people into the WMF fold just seems sensible. rather than a photo they share with friends and family for 20-30 views per month, they can end up with thousands of views and encourage others to build and translate content around quality images. Brian McNeil. -- http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil - Accredited Reporter. Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [cultural-partners] Info: Edinburgh wikimeet on Saturday 1st October
In the meantime, we could do with some comments or advice on our teeshirt design. These will be used at our Wikimeet and we will probably arrange a print run next week, so there is time for an alternative design to be considered if anyone wants to have a crack at it. See Brian's current proposed version at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_in_Scotland-4.5%22.png Is there an SVG version of that available to allow interested editors to submit tweaks under a separate filename / generally have a play? -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A proposal... MediaWiki Hackathon
Per previous, I am still interested in this, though I would probably attend for a day (no overnight), but we'll see. No point getting a large place though, if it's still such a short list. Even a packed 20-seater would be better than an empty 80-seater, I guess. But on the upside, it can still be a success even with low numbers of attendees and I'm looking forward to it :) -- Harry p.s. sumanah is Sumana Harihareswara, the Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:53 AM, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote: I've put it in the meta meetup template http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AMeetup_listaction=historysubmitdiff=2845220oldid=2843061 But I suggest not doing any geonotices until you have booked at a venue and put it on the meetup page. WSC On 26 August 2011 10:41, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote: I don't know if Brighton has a Linux User Group? But they might be interested (and also may have suggestions for venues and other helpful stuff). The only really important thing in a venue is the WiFi ;) As to advertising; post on the Bot Owners Noticeboard. Tom On 26 August 2011 10:22, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote: Crumbs, I'm not having the best of luck with organising a date for this :| I see the wiki was only just updated for both of these … Sorry about that - the dates have been at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings for a while, but I only realised that they weren't on the events page this morning. Speaking of board meetings, I wonder if my membership application has made it in yet.. I can't spot it on the online system - did you apply online or by post? It doesn't look like we're going to fill much of the hall/area I've looked into booking, let alone the breakout room (if anyone wants a breakout room for up to 20 people, let me know!) lol.. could be interesting ^.^ I'm sure you'll fill it in the end - it'll just take a little work to get people's attentions. ;-) Another thought - it would probably be worth contacting university computer science departments to see if they have anyone interested in coming along and learning how to contribute to mediawiki. Similarly other UK tech groups. Mike ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Question: When and how often should WM-UK give grants for digitization projects?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote: snip Further, experience at Wikisource suggests that proofreading is the bottleneck, rather than scanning. /snip Other items in this interesting discussion notwithstanding, does anyone know the WikiSource position on paying for proofreading? en.wp is against paid editing, but almost entirely on bias grounds, and there's no room for bias here: either a proofreading is right or it's wrong. One might reasonably worry about the impact on the community of having an amount of work paid for, but, on the flipside this is donkey work and I daresay the going rates would be very low (I base this on having flicked through prices on AMmazon's Mechanical Turk project). -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Charity outreach favour
Hey Chris. I'm happy to help if I can? Regards, Harry (user:Jarry1250) On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote: If you don't find any luck here, OTRS are good at this kind of thing. On 12 August 2011 17:39, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, A charity I know is trying to update its wikipedia entry to deal with what they see as a case of WP:UNDUE, and finding they are getting snapped at on-wiki. I was wondering if someone might be prepared to help them find appropriate ways of improving the article. I would offer myself if the charity concerned wasn't my employer ;-) If you can help, please drop me a line. Chris ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] two-letter UK domains: any use?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:16 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote: It's not even as if wp is that closely associated with Wikipedia. Online you have worldpress. Within the UK you have two police forces and that widening participation program. Isn't that a good thing? Get some resale value? Maybe WMUK could retain ownership and lease them out - i.e. total control to ensure they aren't misused, maybe even a profit. Okay, that's all hypothetical, but my point was that competition isn't necessarily a bad thing. Grab a few, I say. -- Harry (User:Jarry1250) ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Other Events - hackathon
This is something I'd like to attend. I run bots, have a Toolserver account and have submitted patches to the main MediaWiki codebase. Only problem for me may be the timing (I have exams). But that can be sorted later. Regards, Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Lewis Cawte lewisca...@googlemail.comwrote: I know of 1 developer in the UK, who is currently in Berlin, and I'd hope to have commit by then. One thing I have noticed, is that a lot of the developers there, are WMF staff/contractors from all over the place that have flown in, so it'd be interesting to see what the deal is with that... (I know Tim Starling, the release manager has probably flown in from Australia). It'd also be chance for British Wikimedians to talk to the developers, share some opinions face to face, and for people to do talks on general WM-UK stuff if they wanted to... -- Lewis Cawte On 14/05/11 11:41, Mike Peel wrote: A hackathon in the uk would be great. My main worry with it would be having enough developers turn up at it, though. There are a lot of German mediawiki developers, which means that the events in Berlin are always successful, but there are a lot fewer devs in the uk. So I suspect the main focus of at least the first hackathon would be introducing people to the code - which then needs a cadre of current developers to lead, teach and assist as they make their first commits. I'd love to hear thoughts from others about this - particularly from any devs on this list. Thanks, Mike On 14 May 2011, at 11:31, Lewis Cawte lewisca...@googlemail.com wrote: Hm, I think we should throw a hackathon, I've been watching the talks at the one in Berlin so far, and its quite interesting. I'd show up and would help with some things (not a member of WM-UK though), but its an idea, anyway... -- Lewis Cawte On 27/04/11 18:04, steve virgin wrote: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Events Hi Lewis Answer is 'yes' The next year's events are starting to be discussed now and input is warmly welcome. Attached link is a place to keep an eye on as it will show events as they begin to happen. Do get involved if you can, it would be great to meet up with you at one. Best Steve -Original Message- From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Lewis Cawte Sent: 27 April 2011 17:47 To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Other Events Hi, I'm not a member of Wikimedia UK (because I can never find the money when I think about joining), but I've noticed a lot of the events are university things or museum stuff, I was wondering, are there any other types of events, for example, I know the Dutch/German chapters run or host the occasional Hack-a-Thon or meetups at other coding related events. Do we do anything other than the GLAM or whatever it is? -- Lewis Cawte 14 year old Wikimedia, LAMP server owner and follower of MediaWiki development. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Other Events - hackathon
(resending this due to mailing list subscription quirks) This is something I'd like to attend. I run bots, have a Toolserver account and have submitted patches to the main MediaWiki codebase. Only problem for me may be the timing (I have exams). But that can be sorted later. Regards, Harry (User:Jarry1250) On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Lewis Cawte lewisca...@googlemail.comwrote: I know of 1 developer in the UK, who is currently in Berlin, and I'd hope to have commit by then. One thing I have noticed, is that a lot of the developers there, are WMF staff/contractors from all over the place that have flown in, so it'd be interesting to see what the deal is with that... (I know Tim Starling, the release manager has probably flown in from Australia). It'd also be chance for British Wikimedians to talk to the developers, share some opinions face to face, and for people to do talks on general WM-UK stuff if they wanted to... -- Lewis Cawte On 14/05/11 11:41, Mike Peel wrote: A hackathon in the uk would be great. My main worry with it would be having enough developers turn up at it, though. There are a lot of German mediawiki developers, which means that the events in Berlin are always successful, but there are a lot fewer devs in the uk. So I suspect the main focus of at least the first hackathon would be introducing people to the code - which then needs a cadre of current developers to lead, teach and assist as they make their first commits. I'd love to hear thoughts from others about this - particularly from any devs on this list. Thanks, Mike On 14 May 2011, at 11:31, Lewis Cawte lewisca...@googlemail.com wrote: Hm, I think we should throw a hackathon, I've been watching the talks at the one in Berlin so far, and its quite interesting. I'd show up and would help with some things (not a member of WM-UK though), but its an idea, anyway... -- Lewis Cawte On 27/04/11 18:04, steve virgin wrote: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Events Hi Lewis Answer is 'yes' The next year's events are starting to be discussed now and input is warmly welcome. Attached link is a place to keep an eye on as it will show events as they begin to happen. Do get involved if you can, it would be great to meet up with you at one. Best Steve -Original Message- From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Lewis Cawte Sent: 27 April 2011 17:47 To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Other Events Hi, I'm not a member of Wikimedia UK (because I can never find the money when I think about joining), but I've noticed a lot of the events are university things or museum stuff, I was wondering, are there any other types of events, for example, I know the Dutch/German chapters run or host the occasional Hack-a-Thon or meetups at other coding related events. Do we do anything other than the GLAM or whatever it is? -- Lewis Cawte 14 year old Wikimedia, LAMP server owner and follower of MediaWiki development. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org