Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again
My impression is that nobody is going to care about it as long as it doesn't break anything. I would say that the best way to proceed would be to set up a date for an initial migration test with a small wikisource by sending them a notification in advance, and then repeat the procedure with the rest. Cheers, Micru On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote: About this RFC https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Standardize_ProofreadPage_namespaces_across_Wikisources, John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index namespaces, respectively. Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What are your wikis' general opinions about this? ___ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l -- Etiamsi omnes, ego non ___ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again
2014-10-20 2:51 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org: About this RFC https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Standardize_ProofreadPage_namespaces_across_Wikisources, John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index namespaces, respectively. Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What are your wikis' general opinions about this? Not sure but I think that this change is important for technichal people and in the same time, it's probably a small detail for the wikisorcerors. Isn't it ? If it is, we should go ahead. What about the other namespaces ? (like I asked in March) Cdlt, ~nicolas ___ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again
Yes, it's a small detail for Wikisourcerors but not for tech people because it requires to update a lot of rows in the database. So, I think that the concertation should be done more with system administrators than with Wikisourcerors. As 250/252 are the default ids for Page/Index namespaces and are dedicated to ProofreadPage they should be used. About the other namespaces, they are not managed specifically by an extension so the context is not exactly the same. I believe that this point should be raised only after the changes for Page/Index are done. Thomas Le 20 oct. 2014 à 09:07, Nicolas VIGNERON vigneron.nico...@gmail.com a écrit : 2014-10-20 2:51 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org: About this RFC, John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index namespaces, respectively. Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What are your wikis' general opinions about this? Not sure but I think that this change is important for technichal people and in the same time, it's probably a small detail for the wikisorcerors. Isn't it ? If it is, we should go ahead. What about the other namespaces ? (like I asked in March) Cdlt, ~nicolas ___ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l ___ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
