That's probably more a topic for Wiki-research-l than for Wikitech-l
(in particular since they seem to have published formulas rather than
code). BTW, we briefly reviewed this preprint in the Wikimedia
Research Newsletter back when the first version came out:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter/2012/June#Central_users_produce_higher_quality
Also, there is quite a few other research out there about
automatically assessing article quality - last year, there was even a
small competition for such algorithms:
http://www.webis.de/research/events/pan-12
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I haven't read the paper itself, but just in case someone has a moment and
is interested:
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/520946/can-automated-editorial-tools-help-wikipedias-declining-volunteer-workforce/
--
Juliusz
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
