Re: [1/3] xmllite: Use buffer offset instead of pointers
Nikolay Sivov nsi...@codeweavers.com writes: On 10/6/2013 19:06, Nikolay Sivov wrote: It's normal to grow destination buffer, in this case all stored pointers will be trashed. This patch uses offsets from start of a buffer instead. Hi, Alexandre. Patches list shows a build failure for this one, and I don't see any failures on testbot for it so assuming something it fails on your machine. So what's the exact failure you get? It's compiler warnings, you have several uninitialized or unused variables. Please review your changes carefully. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
Re: [1/3] xmllite: Use buffer offset instead of pointers
On 10/8/2013 10:56, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Nikolay Sivov nsi...@codeweavers.com writes: On 10/6/2013 19:06, Nikolay Sivov wrote: It's normal to grow destination buffer, in this case all stored pointers will be trashed. This patch uses offsets from start of a buffer instead. Hi, Alexandre. Patches list shows a build failure for this one, and I don't see any failures on testbot for it so assuming something it fails on your machine. So what's the exact failure you get? It's compiler warnings, you have several uninitialized or unused variables. Please review your changes carefully. Okay, will do. Strangely I see no warnings here, but that's probably a different gcc version.
Re: [1/3] xmllite: Use buffer offset instead of pointers
On 10/6/2013 19:06, Nikolay Sivov wrote: It's normal to grow destination buffer, in this case all stored pointers will be trashed. This patch uses offsets from start of a buffer instead. Hi, Alexandre. Patches list shows a build failure for this one, and I don't see any failures on testbot for it so assuming something it fails on your machine. So what's the exact failure you get?
