Re: Another major milestone
mfc.dll (bug 611 IIRC) *cough* :) On Jul 19, 2013 2:23 PM, "Rosanne DiMesio" wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:14:08 +0200 > Marcus Meissner wrote: > > > > > We noticed too late. ;) > > > > But thats software management life, you always have bugs left over > > when you release. More for 1.6.1 or 1.7.x :) > > > > So maybe now is the time to start thinking about bugs to target for 1.8. > There are longstanding bugs that are not regressions, but they do affect a > lot of apps. > > -- > Rosanne DiMesio > > >
Re: Another major milestone
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:14:08 +0200 Marcus Meissner wrote: > > We noticed too late. ;) > > But thats software management life, you always have bugs left over > when you release. More for 1.6.1 or 1.7.x :) > So maybe now is the time to start thinking about bugs to target for 1.8. There are longstanding bugs that are not regressions, but they do affect a lot of apps. -- Rosanne DiMesio
Re: Another major milestone
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Ken Sharp wrote: > > > On 19/07/13 15:00, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > >On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 > >Jeremy White wrote: > > > >>Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't > >>immediately get up and dance. > >> > >>In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. > >> > > > >What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a > >single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs > >for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but > >wonder why. > > > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611 was added two days ago. > *shrugs* We noticed too late. ;) But thats software management life, you always have bugs left over when you release. More for 1.6.1 or 1.7.x :) Ciao, Marcus
Re: Another major milestone
On 19/07/13 15:00, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 Jeremy White wrote: Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't immediately get up and dance. In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but wonder why. http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611 was added two days ago. *shrugs*
Re: Another major milestone
Marcus Meissner writes: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:00:30AM -0500, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 >> Jeremy White wrote: >> >> > Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't >> > immediately get up and dance. >> > >> > In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. >> > >> >> What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a >> single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs >> for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but >> wonder why. > > Either we are good :) > > Or we should have reminded and called for this kind of tagging and bug > squashing work. I think working from the regressions list is more productive (and we have made some good progress there). -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
Re: Another major milestone
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:00:30AM -0500, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 > Jeremy White wrote: > > > Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't > > immediately get up and dance. > > > > In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. > > > > What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a > single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs > for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but wonder > why. Either we are good :) Or we should have reminded and called for this kind of tagging and bug squashing work. Ciao, Marcus
Re: Another major milestone
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 Jeremy White wrote: > Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't > immediately get up and dance. > > In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. > What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but wonder why. -- Rosanne DiMesio
Re: Another major milestone
On 07/19/2013 01:40 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:55:42PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: >> Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't >> immediately get up and dance. >> >> In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. >> >> I think we have to consider that a major milestone in of itself. New, >> useful releases are just a matter of course for us now. >> >> Woohoo! Now I'm dancing . > > I keep hearing "Considering that it took you 15 years for 1.0 you are grinding > them out really fast now" ;) Soon he'll want us to do 6 or even 3 months time based releases! ;) bye michael
Re: Another major milestone
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:55:42PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't > immediately get up and dance. > > In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. > > I think we have to consider that a major milestone in of itself. New, > useful releases are just a matter of course for us now. > > Woohoo! Now I'm dancing . I keep hearing "Considering that it took you 15 years for 1.0 you are grinding them out really fast now" ;) Ciao, Marcus
Another major milestone
Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't immediately get up and dance. In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. I think we have to consider that a major milestone in of itself. New, useful releases are just a matter of course for us now. Woohoo! Now I'm dancing . Cheers, Jeremy
