On Wednesday 06 September 2006 21:45, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
As the Google SOC concluded. We need to evaluate whether our SOC
projects were successfull or not.
Some of them got through like Oleview, Trash implementation, riched20
improvisation.
I really dont know about the clamav integration, shell integration
(there were some patches regarding this I think), improve mswscock.dll
and ntlm using gensec.
I sure hope NTLM Signing Sealing went through. Not using GENSEC, admittedly,
but that's because of licensing issues. If anyone wants this bad enough to
keep updating a GPL-licensensed wine fork, I'm happy to pass on the patches
that implement that. Still, patches to get the same features working via
ntlm_auth are in the wine tree. This means that with your vanilla ntlm_auth
tool, you will be able to do NTLM signing in dummy mode. (This is by no means
secure or anything...)
Once Samba releases the next version that is not restricted to bugfixes only,
you will be able to do NTLMv1 signing and sealing. NTLMv1 sealing in dummy
mode fails for now, I'm currently talking to Eric Glass to get some clue as
to why that happens. (Eric is the one who maintains
http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html, if there's anybody outside
Microsoft who really knows NTLM, it's him.)
Wineconf is about to start, I think we need to re-think what might be
good additions and how should we proceed for 1.0 release.
Personally I think we need to get the LSA working. Windows does a lot of this
single sign-on stuff, and it'd be really nice to have in Wine. I hope to
talk about this with some of you people on Wineconf. This might be an area to
cooperate with the Samba people again, but let's first see what we need.
Please feel to comment on this.
This comment is a bit opinionated, but bear with me on that one. ;)
Kai
--
Kai Blin, kai Dot blin At gmail Dot com
WorldForge developerhttp://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin/
--
Will code for cotton.
pgpjQwBVGeoba.pgp
Description: PGP signature
