Re: Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv

2010-09-19 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, James McKenzie wrote:
 Please take time to read through the remainder of the posts here, even
 though you've been here for a while.  It is NOT possible to build Wine
 without some sort of X on the build computer right now. 

Yep, I know.  Which is why I wondered that configure did not bail out
on my (the system in question was after an upgrade, and apparently
something had gone wrong there.  Which is why I asked here. ;-)

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
 It's definitely supposed to fail in configure. That's handled by the
 standard autoconf built-in check for X. Please try to figure out why it
 doesn't catch that case.

I spent an hour or so back then, and again an hour today and could not
get this to reproduce.  Presumably it's some weird combination of things
that I had addressed and then failed to go back to.

So, the only outcome of this is the little formatting patch I just
submitted: 

http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-September/093427.html

Sorry,
Gerald




Re: Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv

2010-02-14 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com writes:

 How to fix this?

 Should dlls/winex11.drv just not be built in such a case?  Should 
 configure error out?  (We do have --without-x, too, though.)  Anything 
 else?

 Currently we do pass configure and then run into a compile failure
 later on.

It's definitely supposed to fail in configure. That's handled by the
standard autoconf built-in check for X. Please try to figure out why it
doesn't catch that case.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org




Re: Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv

2010-02-14 Thread James McKenzie
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
 Trying to build Wine on a new tester which initially had too few packages 
 installed I ran into the following.
   
Gerald:

Please take time to read through the remainder of the posts here, even
though you've been here for a while.  It is NOT possible to build Wine
without some sort of X on the build computer right now.  It would be
great if --without-x did work throughly.  Are you willing to fix this?

James McKenzie