Rein Klazes wrote:
test case for bug #18102
---
dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c | 131 +++-
1 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c b/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c
index 4f602c2..5cf3fcd 100644
--- a/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c
+++ b/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c
@@ -220,6 +220,130 @@ static void scrollbar_test_track(void)
ok( IsWindow( hScroll), Scrollbar has gone!\n);
}
+/* some tests designed to show that Horizontal and Vertical
+ * window scroll bar info are not created independently */
+static void scrollbar_test_default( DWORD style)
+{
+INT min, max, ret;
+HWND hwnd;
+SCROLLINFO si = { sizeof( SCROLLINFO), SIF_TRACKPOS };
+
+hwnd = CreateWindowExA( 0, static, , WS_POPUP | style,
+0, 0, 10, 10, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
+assert( hwnd != 0);
+
+ret = GetScrollRange( hwnd, SB_VERT, min, max);
+ok( ret ||
+broken( !ret) /* Win 98/ME */
+, GetScrollRange failed.\n);
No comments on the patch as I don't know enough of this stuff. The comma
at the start of a new line looks strange though (couple of these in the
patch).
+scrollbar_test_default( 0);
+if( 0) { /* enable this when the todo's in scrollbar_test_default are fixed */
+scrollbar_test_default( WS_HSCROLL);
+scrollbar_test_default( WS_VSCROLL);
+scrollbar_test_default( WS_HSCROLL | WS_VSCROLL);
+}
Does Wine crash on these?
--
Cheers,
Paul.