Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:29:18PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> ChangeLog: * Generate valid HTML 4.01 Strict.
>* Underline vis_note class links, too.

Cool stuff Feri. Anyone knows what happened to the tests?
The last one at http://test.winehq.org/data/ is 2004-12-28.
Also, the last tests build at SF is winetest-200409111000
which is a bit outdated :)

What gives?

-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:29:18 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> ChangeLog: * Generate valid HTML 4.01 Strict.
>* Underline vis_note class links, too.

Groovy! Is there a todo list of what needs to be done for winetest
anywhere? Going to http://test.winehq.com/ still yields an error, you have
to know the magic URL and then navigate the builds manually. It'd be nice
to get some pretty HTML frontend to that going: a task for somebody who is
keen but doesn't want to hack Wine itself maybe?

Could you elaborate your plan for winetest Feri?

thanks -mike




Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2005 18:14 schrieb Dimitrie O. Paun:
> Cool stuff Feri. Anyone knows what happened to the tests?
> The last one at http://test.winehq.org/data/ is 2004-12-28.
> Also, the last tests build at SF is winetest-200409111000
> which is a bit outdated :)
>
Well, since 2004-12-28 we got test for msi.dll and two new GUIDs not supported 
by current(?) mingw. The attached patch fixes mingw for me. Hope i got the 
GUIDs right.

As far i know the test are build at / uploaded to
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/
by Paul Millar.

Bye Stefan




--- w32api/lib/uuid.c.sav	2005-01-06 23:21:03.0 +0100
+++ w32api/lib/uuid.c	2005-01-06 23:23:00.0 +0100
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_AllClasses,0x330,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
 DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_CColorPropPage,0xbe35201,0x8f91,0x11ce,0x9d,0xe3,0,0xaa,0,0x4b,0xb8,0x51);
 DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_CFontPropPage, 0x0be35200,0x8f91,0x11ce,0x9d,0xe3,0x00,0xaa,0x00,0x4b,0xb8,0x51);
+DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_CMultiLanguage, 0x275c23e2, 0x3747, 0x11d0, 0x9f,0xea,0x00,0xaa,0x00,0x3f,0x86,0x46);
 DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_CPicturePropPage,0xbe35202,0x8f91,0x11ce,0x9d,0xe3,0,0xaa,0,0x4b,0xb8,0x51);
 DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_ConvertVBX,0xfb8f0822,0x164,0x101b,0x84,0xed,0x8,0,0x2b,0x2e,0xc7,0x13);
 DEFINE_GUID(CLSID_CurrentUserClasses,0x332,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
@@ -187,6 +188,7 @@
 DEFINE_GUID(IID_ILockBytes,0xa,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
 DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMalloc,0x2,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
 DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMallocSpy,0x1d,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
+DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMAPIPropData,0x2031A,0,0,0xC0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
 DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMarshal,0x3,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
 DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMessageFilter,0x16,0,0,0xc0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
--- /dev/null	2003-09-23 19:59:22.0 +0200
+++ w32api/lib/msi.def	2005-01-06 23:18:33.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+LIBRARY MSI.DLL
+EXPORTS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Ferenc Wagner
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:29:18PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> ChangeLog: * Generate valid HTML 4.01 Strict.
>>* Underline vis_note class links, too.
>
> Cool stuff Feri. Anyone knows what happened to the tests?
> The last one at http://test.winehq.org/data/ is 2004-12-28.
> Also, the last tests build at SF is winetest-200409111000
> which is a bit outdated :)

Yes, looks like Kevin had to give up on cross building the
binaries a couple of months ago; it was he who updated the
SF downloads page.  Paul Millar, however, kept up with the
load until the new GUIDs broke MinGW again.  We already
talked about the issue and Hans Leidekker also confirmed the
MinGW problem, but hasn't got around to provide a patch yet.
If Paul can use Stefan's patch, then new builds can be
expected real soon, I guess.
-- 
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:29:18 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> ChangeLog: * Generate valid HTML 4.01 Strict.
>>* Underline vis_note class links, too.
>
> Groovy! Is there a todo list of what needs to be done for
> winetest anywhere?

I've got one myself, but keep it secret, of course.  Still I
can tell the only item of real interest is adding a Tag
input field to the binary, which was brought forward by the
apparent need of interactive and visible runs.

> Going to http://test.winehq.com/ still yields an error,
> you have to know the magic URL and then navigate the
> builds manually.

Ok, perhaps I can give out the classified URL:
 http://test.winehq.org/data/
Yes, you have to navigate manually (the links on the top
don't work), but I've got Jeremy Newmann's word on knocking
something up by yesterday.  That something includes making
those links work at least.

> It'd be nice to get some pretty HTML frontend to that
> going: a task for somebody who is keen but doesn't want to
> hack Wine itself maybe?

Yes, unless Jer has actually done it.  Turning it into a
template would also be possible, but I'm not too keen on it
as that would steal real screen estate.  But would be a nice
touch, for sure.

> Could you elaborate your plan for winetest Feri?

What makes you think I've got one?  It should be *you* who
speak up and tell what information/presentation is need for
the best and easiest use.
-- 
Yours,
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:26:18 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> What makes you think I've got one?  It should be *you* who
> speak up and tell what information/presentation is need for
> the best and easiest use.

I basically did: some UI for test.winehq.com to let you easily navigate
the available builds. Also clicking on the info/name links gives a 404
right now in many cases, so ... just making it feel more like a full
website and some extra polish really :)




Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:26:18 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> What makes you think I've got one?  It should be *you*
>> who speak up and tell what information/presentation is
>> need for the best and easiest use.
>
> I basically did: some UI for test.winehq.com to let you
> easily navigate the available builds.

In the works (Jer?)  What kind of navigation would you
prefer?  Is forward/backward and a directory list (like
flashy PHP frontend) enough?  Do you want such buttons
scattered on the page?  A directory button, perhaps?  Web
design is surely not my strength...

> Also clicking on the info/name links gives a 404 right now
> in many cases, so ...

Yes, that's the effect of putting new skin on an old body:
old submissions simply don't have that information available
separately.  Tests submitted and processed after the commit
(not more than two so far, I think) don't have this problem.
I didn't want to complicate the code with conditionaly
emitting the links; those tests are old and of limited
interest only.  Hope we'll get new binaries soon.

> just making it feel more like a full website and some
> extra polish really :)

D'oh, aesthetics... ;)
-- 
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Kevin Koltzau
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 04:12 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Yes, looks like Kevin had to give up on cross building the
> binaries a couple of months ago; it was he who updated the
> SF downloads page.

I actually gave up keeping the sourceforge upload working, I am however
still building winetest. Sourceforge made some changes to their site that
broke sfutils. I had thought about hosting the builds on wine.sourceforge.net,
which I mentioned on the list some time ago with no response.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Is there a todo list of what needs to be done for winetest anywhere? 

This is what I had in mind:
   
  * We need a page under http://www.winehq.org/site/status (in the 
right-hand box) which should contain:
-- an explanation for the entire winetest business
-- ditto for winrash (http://winrash.sf.net)
-- pointers to where they can download them (tests & winrash)
-- how they can help by actually running them (winrash is preferred)
-- instructions on how to install winrash
-- a legend for the test pages
-- links to the last 10 most recent results

  * Also, http://test.winehq.org/ should contain:
-- a short description of the results
-- a link to the http://www.winehq.org/site/status, for full details
-- the above mentioned legend for the results
-- a summary with links to all test results (for bonus points,
   display them in calendar form).

-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 06:58:19PM -0500, Kevin Koltzau wrote:
> I actually gave up keeping the sourceforge upload working, I am however
> still building winetest. Sourceforge made some changes to their site that
> broke sfutils. I had thought about hosting the builds on wine.sourceforge.net,
> which I mentioned on the list some time ago with no response.

Hmm, that would be cool. For reasons I can not understand, I can not
access Paul's site at www.astro.gla.ac.uk, so having them available
somewhere else would be very good for me.

-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Paul Millar
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 20:09, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2005 18:14 schrieb Dimitrie O. Paun:
> > Anyone knows what happened to the tests?
> 
> [...] The attached patch fixes mingw for me. Hope i got the GUIDs
> right. 
>
> As far i know the test are build at / uploaded to
> http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/
> by Paul Millar.

Yes.

I've taken your patch, Stefan, and integrated it with the collection 
of patches I'm currently using.  Unfortunately, just including the 
file interferred with some of the patches that were already included 
(oops!).

I'm rebuilding the mingw tool-chain as I type, so should have things 
ready first thing in the morning.  I'll test it, and if it works, put 
it into production.

Cheers,

Paul.


pgpBSGXUimwjF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Paul Millar
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 21:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> If Paul can use Stefan's patch, then new builds can be
> expected real soon, I guess.

Should be up tomorrow, all things being equal (and a following 
wind ;^)

Paul.


pgpcyHA6UAyeh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Paul Millar
On Thursday 13 January 2005 00:41, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Hmm, that would be cool. For reasons I can not understand, I can
> not access Paul's site at www.astro.gla.ac.uk, so having them
> available somewhere else would be very good for me.

Yes, this problem again?  I've never heard of problems from anyone 
else.

Currently, the DB backend that supplies the (stagnant) information for 
WRT is down, but the page degrades gracefully enough.  The rest of 
the content is static, so should be visable to anyone.

Could you do a bit more investigation, like "host 
www.astro.gla.ac.uk"?

Ta,

Paul.


pgprjnwUFC0K1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Ferenc Wagner
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> For reasons I can not understand, I can not access Paul's
> site at www.astro.gla.ac.uk

Can't you even ping the server?  If not, what does
traceroute say?  If yes, your IP number must be blacklisted
at Glasgow... ;)
-- 
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 20:09, Stefan Leichter wrote:
>
>> Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2005 18:14 schrieb Dimitrie O. Paun:
>>
>>> Anyone knows what happened to the tests?
>> 
>> [...] The attached patch fixes mingw for me. Hope i got the GUIDs
>> right. 
>
> Should be up tomorrow, all things being equal (and a following 
> wind ;^)

Good work, guys!
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:11:35AM +, Paul Millar wrote:
> Could you do a bit more investigation, like "host 
> www.astro.gla.ac.uk"?

Here you go:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ host www.astro.gla.ac.uk
www.astro.gla.ac.uk is an alias for terra.astro.gla.ac.uk.
terra.astro.gla.ac.uk has address 130.209.45.194

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ traceroute www.astro.gla.ac.uk
traceroute to terra.astro.gla.ac.uk (130.209.45.194), 30 hops max, 38 byte 
packets
 1  lattica.com (192.168.3.1)  0.519 ms  0.404 ms  0.331 ms
 2  * * *
 3  gw03-vlan201.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.90.161)  18.194 ms  
6.477 ms  35.257 ms
 4  gw01-vlan962.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.93.69)  8.538 ms  
8.966 ms  25.388 ms
 5  gw02.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.80.130)  14.756 ms  8.939 ms  
52.187 ms
 6  * * *
 7  p13-0.core02.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.213)  25.295 ms  22.545 ms  
23.932 ms
 8  p15-0.core01.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.242)  22.971 ms  24.112 ms  
24.849 ms
 9  4.68.127.129 (4.68.127.129)  69.403 ms  36.608 ms  66.020 ms
10  so-2-1-0.bbr2.Chicago1.Level3.net (209.244.8.13)  57.766 ms  78.712 ms  
37.232 ms
11  so-2-0-0.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net (209.247.10.130)  35.877 ms  69.783 ms 
 39.840 ms
12  as-0-0.bbr1.London2.Level3.net (4.68.128.101)  111.231 ms  164.851 ms  
180.228 ms
13  ge-3-0-0.gar1.London2.Level3.net (4.68.124.62)  102.045 ms  105.203 ms  
103.338 ms
14  195.50.116.202 (195.50.116.202)  136.914 ms  144.620 ms  125.928 ms
15  po2-0.lond-scr4.ja.net (146.97.35.221)  114.603 ms  136.163 ms  101.644 ms
16  po1-0.read-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.26)  101.265 ms  112.260 ms  124.663 ms
17  po3-0.warr-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.54)  105.411 ms  106.434 ms  113.055 ms
18  po2-0.glas-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.58)  158.310 ms  119.836 ms  151.558 ms
19  po0-0.glasgow-bar.ja.net (146.97.35.54)  110.029 ms  110.312 ms  110.151 ms
20  146.97.40.106 (146.97.40.106)  152.059 ms  123.885 ms  111.152 ms
21  130.209.2.117 (130.209.2.117)  129.663 ms  160.970 ms  133.687 ms
22  130.209.2.2 (130.209.2.2)  112.559 ms  110.315 ms  123.665 ms
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:24:21AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Can't you even ping the server?  If not, what does
> traceroute say?  If yes, your IP number must be blacklisted
> at Glasgow... ;)

No, I can't ping either:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ping www.astro.gla.ac.uk
PING terra.astro.gla.ac.uk (130.209.45.194) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- terra.astro.gla.ac.uk ping statistics ---
24 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 22998ms


-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-12 Thread Brian Vincent
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:11:35 +, Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2005 00:41, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > Hmm, that would be cool. For reasons I can not understand, I can
> > not access Paul's site at www.astro.gla.ac.uk, so having them
> > available somewhere else would be very good for me.
> 
> Yes, this problem again?  I've never heard of problems from anyone
> else.

For what it's worth, I have no problem accessing
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/

-Brian



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-13 Thread Paul Millar
Dimi,

Both these results are what I get from remote hosts that can access 
the web pages, so unfortunately don't shed any light on the issue.

As a shot in the dark, have you got either ECN set, or a non-zero 
default window-scaling?  Which kernel are you running?

cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale

Cheers,

Paul.

On Thursday 13 January 2005 01:57, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:11:35AM +, Paul Millar wrote:
> > Could you do a bit more investigation, like "host
> > www.astro.gla.ac.uk"?
>
> Here you go:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ host www.astro.gla.ac.uk
> www.astro.gla.ac.uk is an alias for terra.astro.gla.ac.uk.
> terra.astro.gla.ac.uk has address 130.209.45.194
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ traceroute www.astro.gla.ac.uk
> traceroute to terra.astro.gla.ac.uk (130.209.45.194), 30 hops max,
> 38 byte packets 1  lattica.com (192.168.3.1)  0.519 ms  0.404 ms 
> 0.331 ms 2  * * *
>  3  gw03-vlan201.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.90.161) 
> 18.194 ms  6.477 ms  35.257 ms 4 
> gw01-vlan962.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.93.69)  8.538
> ms  8.966 ms  25.388 ms 5  gw02.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com
> (66.185.80.130)  14.756 ms  8.939 ms  52.187 ms 6  * * *
>  7  p13-0.core02.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.213)  25.295 ms 
> 22.545 ms  23.932 ms 8  p15-0.core01.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com
> (154.54.2.242)  22.971 ms  24.112 ms  24.849 ms 9  4.68.127.129
> (4.68.127.129)  69.403 ms  36.608 ms  66.020 ms 10 
> so-2-1-0.bbr2.Chicago1.Level3.net (209.244.8.13)  57.766 ms  78.712
> ms  37.232 ms 11  so-2-0-0.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net
> (209.247.10.130)  35.877 ms  69.783 ms  39.840 ms 12 
> as-0-0.bbr1.London2.Level3.net (4.68.128.101)  111.231 ms  164.851
> ms  180.228 ms 13  ge-3-0-0.gar1.London2.Level3.net (4.68.124.62) 
> 102.045 ms  105.203 ms  103.338 ms 14  195.50.116.202
> (195.50.116.202)  136.914 ms  144.620 ms  125.928 ms 15 
> po2-0.lond-scr4.ja.net (146.97.35.221)  114.603 ms  136.163 ms 
> 101.644 ms 16  po1-0.read-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.26)  101.265 ms 
> 112.260 ms  124.663 ms 17  po3-0.warr-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.54) 
> 105.411 ms  106.434 ms  113.055 ms 18  po2-0.glas-scr.ja.net
> (146.97.33.58)  158.310 ms  119.836 ms  151.558 ms 19 
> po0-0.glasgow-bar.ja.net (146.97.35.54)  110.029 ms  110.312 ms 
> 110.151 ms 20  146.97.40.106 (146.97.40.106)  152.059 ms  123.885
> ms  111.152 ms 21  130.209.2.117 (130.209.2.117)  129.663 ms 
> 160.970 ms  133.687 ms 22  130.209.2.2 (130.209.2.2)  112.559 ms 
> 110.315 ms  123.665 ms 23  * * *
> 24  * * *
> 25  * * *
> 26  * * *
> 27  * * *
> 28  * * *
> 29  * * *
> 30  * * *


pgp4SOPuPcj11.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-13 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 22:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote:

> SF downloads page.  Paul Millar, however, kept up with the
> load until the new GUIDs broke MinGW again.  We already
> talked about the issue and Hans Leidekker also confirmed the
> MinGW problem, but hasn't got around to provide a patch yet.
> If Paul can use Stefan's patch, then new builds can be
> expected real soon, I guess.

I've put a couple of new RPMs on my page:

   http://mirzam.it.vu.nl/mingw/

>From the changelog:

 - update mingw-runtime to 3.6
 - update w32api to 3.2
 - add mscms import library.
 - add msi import library.
 - add a uuid needed by MAPI tests
 - rebuild on Fedora Core 3

These allow me to cross build all tests in current cvs.

 -Hans




Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-13 Thread Paul Millar
On Thursday 13 January 2005 13:40, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 22:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > If Paul can use Stefan's patch, then new builds can be
> > expected real soon, I guess.
>
> I've put a couple of new RPMs on my page:
>http://mirzam.it.vu.nl/mingw/

OK, I've checked Hans' patches against Stefan's and found differences!  
I'm not a Windows person, so do these matter?

In uuid.c, only the one difference:
  From Stefan
+DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMAPIPropData,0x2031A,0,0,0xC0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
  From Hans
+DEFINE_OLEGUID(IID_IMAPIPropData,0x2031A,0,0);



In the msi.def, quite a few differences, picking one at random
  From Stefan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  From Hans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @8

I don't really want to spend lots of time merging patches, so could 
one set be defined as "correct", and I'll use them.

Cheers,

Paul.

Cheers,

Paul.


pgpvWJ0hZaXi7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-13 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Thursday 13 January 2005 15:23, Paul Millar wrote:

> In uuid.c, only the one difference:
>   From Stefan
> +DEFINE_GUID(IID_IMAPIPropData,0x2031A,0,0,0xC0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0x46);
>   From Hans
> +DEFINE_OLEGUID(IID_IMAPIPropData,0x2031A,0,0);

Both are correct (the DEFINE_OLEGUID resolves to the former).

> In the msi.def, quite a few differences, picking one at random
>   From Stefan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   From Hans
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] @8

Again, both are OK.

 -Hans



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-14 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> As a shot in the dark, have you got either ECN set, or a non-zero 
> default window-scaling?  Which kernel are you running?
>
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn

This gives 1 for me (and I can access your pages).

> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale

This is 0.

One more thing to try is tcptraceroute:

$ /usr/sbin/tcptraceroute www.astro.gla.ac.uk 80
Selected device eth0, address 157.181.170.74, port 41886 for outgoing packets
Tracing the path to www.astro.gla.ac.uk (130.209.45.194) on TCP port 80, 30 
hops max
[...]
15  po3-0.warr-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.54)  45.120 ms  44.988 ms  45.036 ms
16  po2-0.glas-scr.ja.net (146.97.33.58)  49.367 ms  49.226 ms  49.186 ms
17  po0-0.glasgow-bar.ja.net (146.97.35.54)  49.115 ms  49.114 ms  49.057 ms
18  146.97.40.106 (146.97.40.106)  49.504 ms  50.188 ms  49.472 ms
19  130.209.2.117 (130.209.2.117)  49.783 ms  50.823 ms  49.629 ms
20  130.209.2.2 (130.209.2.2)  49.744 ms  49.599 ms  49.957 ms
21  terra.astro.gla.ac.uk (130.209.45.194) [open]  49.644 ms * *

The interesting part may be filtered, but it was able to
contact terra at port 80.
-- 
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-14 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Paul Millar wrote:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 00:41, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
 

Hmm, that would be cool. For reasons I can not understand, I can
not access Paul's site at www.astro.gla.ac.uk, so having them
available somewhere else would be very good for me.
   

Yes, this problem again?  I've never heard of problems from anyone 
else.
 

It happens to me sometimes too.
regards,
Jakob



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-14 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
What makes you think I've got one?  It should be *you* who
speak up and tell what information/presentation is need for
the best and easiest use.
 

I can't believe I didn't think of this before, but the test results
really should be sorted differently.
I would prefer to have all failed tests at the top, so one could
see easily which ones need to be fixed.
It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email
whenever a test failed.
regards,
Jakob



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-14 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2005 14:40 schrieb Hans Leidekker:
>
> I've put a couple of new RPMs on my page:
>
>http://mirzam.it.vu.nl/mingw/
>
> From the changelog:
>
>  - update mingw-runtime to 3.6
>  - update w32api to 3.2
>  - add mscms import library.
>  - add msi import library.
>  - add a uuid needed by MAPI tests
>  - rebuild on Fedora Core 3
>
> These allow me to cross build all tests in current cvs.
>
Hello Hans,

i had a build problem with the new rpms. The gcc rpm registers itself as 
mingw-gcc-3.4.2-10hl, but the mingw rpm (runtime, w32api) requires 
mingw-gcc-core for its build. Therefore i have changed gcc's spec file like 
this:

diff -uw SPECS/mingw-gcc.spec.sav SPECS/mingw-gcc.spec
--- SPECS/mingw-gcc.spec.sav  2005-01-14 20:05:50.0 +0100
+++ SPECS/mingw-gcc.spec  2005-01-14 20:06:09.0 +0100
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 %define debug_package %{nil}

 Summary:   GCC, GNU Compiler Collection (C/C++ compiler) for MinGW/Wine.
-Name:  mingw-%{appname}
+Name:  mingw-%{appname}-core
 Version:   %{mainver}
 Release:   10hl
 Copyright: GPL

I will send you the SuSE 9.0 rpms on Monday from work. 11MB will take very 
long over my analog line.

Bye Stefan



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-15 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Friday 14 January 2005 21:31, Stefan Leichter wrote:

> i had a build problem with the new rpms. The gcc rpm registers itself as
> mingw-gcc-3.4.2-10hl, but the mingw rpm (runtime, w32api) requires
> mingw-gcc-core for its build.

Fixed now, thanks.

 -Hans



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-17 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> What makes you think I've got one?  It should be *you*
>> who speak up and tell what information/presentation is
>> need for the best and easiest use.
>
> I would prefer to have all failed tests at the top, so one
> could see easily which ones need to be fixed.

Not being an addition but a change, I'd like to hear others'
opinion on this matter.  My personal feeling is that losing
alphabetical ordering on test names isn't worth it, as color
monitors are fairly common nowadays.  So vote for the change!

> It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email
> whenever a test failed.

Finding out the author of a test isn't easy, it requires
some digging into CVS.  On the other hand, I'd choose an
opt-in method instead.  But it's a separate project anyway,
the present machinery has pretty much nothing to facilitate
this.  The summary.txt files are easy to parse and available
by HTTP, so one could use them to get the figures.
-- 
Feri.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:30:53AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > I would prefer to have all failed tests at the top, so one
> > could see easily which ones need to be fixed.
> 
> Not being an addition but a change, I'd like to hear others'
> opinion on this matter. 

I agree, it's not worth losing alphabetical ordering.

> > It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email
> > whenever a test failed.
> 
> Finding out the author of a test isn't easy, it requires
> some digging into CVS.

And we can't just do it, we need opt-ins, etc. Not worth
it IMO.

-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-17 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email
whenever a test failed.
 

Finding out the author of a test isn't easy, it requires
some digging into CVS.
   

And we can't just do it, we need opt-ins, etc. Not worth
it IMO.
 

But if I were to implement an opt-in scheme, you would be ok with it?
regards,
Jakob



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> But if I were to implement an opt-in scheme, you would be ok with it?

I wouldn't be opposed to it, but I'd advice against expanding so
much effort for such little benefit. We have so much to do, it's
not like we're looking for stuff to kill time :)

-- 
Dimi.



Re: WineHQ:winetest: produce valid HTML

2005-01-17 Thread Paul Millar
On Monday 17 January 2005 11:30, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would prefer to have all failed tests at the top, so one
> > could see easily which ones need to be fixed.
>
> Not being an addition but a change, I'd like to hear others'
> opinion on this matter.  My personal feeling is that losing
> alphabetical ordering on test names isn't worth it, as color
> monitors are fairly common nowadays.  So vote for the change!

I'd vote for tests staying in the same relative position from run to 
run (be that alphabetical or whatever).

> > It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email
> > whenever a test failed.
>
> Finding out the author of a test isn't easy, it requires
> some digging into CVS.  On the other hand, I'd choose an
> opt-in method instead.  But it's a separate project anyway,
> the present machinery has pretty much nothing to facilitate
> this.  The summary.txt files are easy to parse and available
> by HTTP, so one could use them to get the figures.

One possibility is to send an email to the wine-devel list when 
something breaks (but only the one!).

There were mixed reactions to this, for WRT, so I filtered all the 
emails and double-checked before forwarding them.

Paul.


pgpzevwbAydWR.pgp
Description: PGP signature