Re: [Wireshark-dev] What Wireshark base version to use for customization
On 12/15/14, 8:39 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On 12/10/14 12:17, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa wrote: >> Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone. >> >> I already pushed some of my changes (already accepted) to the >> repository, and I will keep doing that in the future. >> >> I have a last question (technical one this time). Do you build Wireshark >> for Solaris (9 and 10)? I am facing issues doing it and I want to know >> if it is supposed to work and the problems are on my side. >> >> Anyone here has done that before manually? Any recommendation on where >> to get the missing packages? > > When I last built for Solaris I was using the packages from opencsw.org > . They make it easy with a command to install, for example, Gtk > together with all its dependencies. The Solaris buildbot[1] uses OpenCSW packages as well. If you run into trouble you might look at some of the build steps. For example, the following `configure` command is currently used for compiling with gcc: ./configure LDFLAGS=-R/opt/csw/lib CFLAGS=-DG_CONST_RETURN=const --with-gtk2 --disable-warnings-as-errors --with-pcap=/opt/csw --with-gnutls=yes --with-gcrypt=yes --with-libgcrypt-prefix=/opt/csw --with-libsmi=/opt/csw --with-zlib=/opt/csw --with-geoip=/opt/csw --with-krb5=/opt/csw --with-c-ares=/opt/csw --with-qt [1]http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris%2010%20SPARC ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] What Wireshark base version to use for customization
On 12/10/14 12:17, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa wrote: Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone. I already pushed some of my changes (already accepted) to the repository, and I will keep doing that in the future. I have a last question (technical one this time). Do you build Wireshark for Solaris (9 and 10)? I am facing issues doing it and I want to know if it is supposed to work and the problems are on my side. Anyone here has done that before manually? Any recommendation on where to get the missing packages? When I last built for Solaris I was using the packages from opencsw.org . They make it easy with a command to install, for example, Gtk together with all its dependencies. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master f412c9a: Use ENC_BIG_ENDIAN when fetching FT_U?INT8 fields ...
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:23:47AM +0100, Michal Labedzki wrote: > Personally I prefer ENC_NA for single-byte. Me too. How about changing proto_tree_add_item() so that the endian field is optional? Single byte: proto_tree_add_item(tree, proto_test, tvb, 0, 1); Multi-byte: proto_tree_add_item(tree, proto_test, tvb, 1, 2, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN); ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master f412c9a: Use ENC_BIG_ENDIAN when fetching FT_U?INT8 fields ...
On 15 December 2014 at 07:52, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > > Yes, Petri-dish/pre-commit is guard but need all people use it... > > +1 -- Graham Bloice ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
