[Wireshark-dev] How is wireshark unpacking SMB Packets?
Hi all, smb is reading and unpacking packets sent/recived by a smb server. it unpacks NTLM hashes and shows the username, network name and stuff like that. i need to take a look at the source code of wireshark for this part. anybody to help me out with that? ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Luacov with Wireshark Lua dissector plugin
Hi, --- On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Peter Wu wrote: > It looks like "console.lua" is setting the "debug" function. Perhaps > those "helpers" should be removed or namespaced, as a workaround you can > just comment the debug function: > > -- function debug(x) ... end I tried the above, but, when Wireshark is started, it actually throws the error at: "~/.luarocks/share/lua/5.1/luacov/hook.lua:26:attempt to index global 'debug' (a function value)". In hook.lua, when the local variable "name" is assigned to the full path of the Lua plugin prefixed by "@", the coverage statistics get generated. Bascially, the following is used to retrieve the name: local name = debug.getinfo(level, "S").source -- returns "@dissector.lua" So, the following hard-coded assginment works: local name = "@dissector.lua" local prefixed_name = string.match(name, "^@(.*)") I am not sure why debug module or function is used to retrieve the path to the Wireshark Lua plugin. Will check with the Luacov author. Thanks for your reply. Appreciate it! SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.5.0, 2.6, and 3.0 release planning
Actually, I'd also much rather prefer to create one 2.6 and create 2.5 as a -rc. It would make developing that much easier. If we plan on release 2.5 as a regular release that I am fine with it. cheers Roland On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Gerald Combs > wrote: > >> I think we've fixed the major issues identified by Stig, Jim, and others >> so I'd like to release 2.5.0 on February 6. This would let us release 2.6.0 >> this spring, followed by 3.0.0 in the fall: >> >> >> March: Create master-2.6 after one or two 2.5.x releases. >> >> April: Release 2.6.0, probably after SharkFest Asia. >> >> August: Release 2.9.0. >> >> September 7, 2018: The 2.2 branch reaches EOL. >> >> September or October: Create master-3.0 after one or more 2.9.x releases. >> >> October or November: Release 3.0.0, either before or after SharkFest >> Europe. >> > Two major release this year ? > 2.6 will be a TLS release ? > > For avoid a lot of cherry-pick it is better for create master(-2.6 or > -3.0) only 2 or 3 week before 2.6 release ? > >> >> >> As discussed on this list and (IIRC) at SharkFest EU we can start >> removing legacy support in master after master-2.6 is branched. This >> includes, but is not limited to: >> >> - The GTK+ UI >> - Older versions of GLib >> - Qt 4.8 >> >> ___ >> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list >> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscr >> ibe > > > > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject= > unsubscribe > ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.5.0, 2.6, and 3.0 release planning
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > I think we've fixed the major issues identified by Stig, Jim, and others > so I'd like to release 2.5.0 on February 6. This would let us release 2.6.0 > this spring, followed by 3.0.0 in the fall: > > > March: Create master-2.6 after one or two 2.5.x releases. > > April: Release 2.6.0, probably after SharkFest Asia. > > August: Release 2.9.0. > > September 7, 2018: The 2.2 branch reaches EOL. > > September or October: Create master-3.0 after one or more 2.9.x releases. > > October or November: Release 3.0.0, either before or after SharkFest > Europe. > Two major release this year ? 2.6 will be a TLS release ? For avoid a lot of cherry-pick it is better for create master(-2.6 or -3.0) only 2 or 3 week before 2.6 release ? > > > As discussed on this list and (IIRC) at SharkFest EU we can start removing > legacy support in master after master-2.6 is branched. This includes, but > is not limited to: > > - The GTK+ UI > - Older versions of GLib > - Qt 4.8 > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject= > unsubscribe ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
