On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ed Beroset wrote:
Based on the current discussion about the use of the format field for
proto_tree_add_item(), I have once again revised the patch file for Bug 5531
( https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5531 ). It has gotten
a lot of votes and was originally submitted over nine months ago. Is there
something else I should do to help get this in the main build?
See comments in the bug.
Is there either a public specification for C12.12 or, at least, an explanation
of the part of the protocol responsible for all the ugly stuff in
canonify_unencrypted_header()?
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
