Re: [WSG] Browser toolbars

2009-05-04 Thread Kane Tapping
Besides it being bad form, the only standard I know of that even mentions 
manipulating the browser chrome is the WCAG Samurai Errata for Web Content 
Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0.

Specifically
* Do not cause pop-ups or other windows to appear and do not change the 
current window without informing the user.


Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Information Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
k.tapp...@griffith.edu.au
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





From:
Frogspoon 
To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date:
05/05/2009 08:51 AM
Subject:
[WSG] Browser toolbars



Good morning all,

I have a quick question regarding browser toolbars and functionality. 
I have a client who is requesting a web application (online form) be 
built where they will lose some if not all browser navigation control 
and functionality, much like you would see on a Internet banking page. 
I'm against the idea personally but wanted to find out if there are 
any such standards out there that strongly encourage you keep these on 
your web page for usability and accessibility reasons. Finally, they 
wanted to the URL to be hidden as well, surely this is not recommended??

I'd appreciate any help on these questions,

Cheers

Frog


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-02 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi Mike,

>img a {}

Has anyone mentioned that this is incorrect? :-)

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Mike at Green-Beast.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/05/2008 08:14 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To

cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] Image links






Hi Dean,

> When you set up an anchor rule that has an 
> underline on hover meant for text, is there a 
> simple way to prevent the underline on image 

This should work for you:

img a {
  text-decoration : none;
}

Cheers.
Mike Cherim



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] How to make diagonal lines change color?

2008-04-10 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

If I HAD to do something like this, I would create a Gif image that had a 
transparency where you wanted the colour change.

Then use the GIF as a background image on a item and specify a background 
colour that changed on hover.

div#name {background: #f00 url(image-name.gif) repeat;}
div#name:hover {background-color #00f;}

This method would remove the issues with pre-caching a second image that 
you cant get around with using offsets because you want to tile the image.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Laert Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/04/2008 08:54 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
[WSG] How to make diagonal lines change color?






Hello everyone. 

Well there´s something I want to do but I have no idea if it´s possible to 
be done and how would I do this.

My website (www.laertjansen.com) has some two color diagonal lines as a 
bg.

What I want to do is: On the mouse over color X it becomes color Y 
   On the mouse over color Y it becomes color 
X

Is it possible to be done?

Thanks a lot for any help

-- 
Laert Jansen
www.laertjansen.com

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: [WSG] a target=” blank” not part of x html

2008-03-30 Thread Kane Tapping
>What I'm getting from the discussion to this point: 
>web *site* - new window bad; 
>web *app* - new window sometimes necessary
>target="_blank" - deprecated* and probably bad in any circumstance

Thats my position. the only difference being that if possible webapps 
should try to pop divs inside their current browser window/tab.

Target="" does still have a use, but its only for framesets in the older 
specs, and unless your managing legacy code, most designers on this list 
should be way past making frame based web sites/apps.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29/03/2008 12:58 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] a target=” blank” not part of xhtml







On Mar 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:

Perhaps if you've never seen or used one, it's hard
to conceptualize, but they exist.

Ouch...

However if the subject is still opening new windows vis a vis  the 
"target" attribute, it seems to me hard to conceptualize a web app that 
doesn't rely on both client- and server-side scripting.

And returning to the original question:

Why not.  I can't imagine it's better practice to replace it with 
javascript.

I'd think that in a web app it certainly is better practice to use 
javascript?

What I'm getting from the discussion to this point: 
web *site* - new window bad; 
web *app* - new window sometimes necessary
target="_blank" - deprecated* and probably bad in any circumstance

No doubt people will continue to hold different opinions as to how to deal 
with links to non-HTML documents. For myself I've decided the best course 
is to offer a direct link and leave it to the user to decide whether to 
open a new window/tab, and I think this is coming to be the majority and 
"standard" position. Those who hold a different view are free to do so, 
and act accordingly.

Andrew

*a little bee in my bonnet:
deprecated: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deprecated
depreciated: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/depreciated






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] a target= ” blank” not part of xhtml

2008-03-27 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

Just wanted to join the chorus and say that poping windows is behaviour 
and should not be a part of the HTML spec.

It really is akin to manipulating browser chrome and other designer land 
grabs (i.e. forgetting its the users broswer, not yours).

Somethings i have found is that the original issue can usually be 
addressed by using styling to indicate external or document links (and 
leaving it up to the user to handle that in their prefered way (personaly 
i like to middle click for a pop under tab)) or for legitimate needs 
(usually web apps) a JS (behaviour) solution is appropriate. Some of the 
best include lighbox style popups for 'wizard prompts' or help.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28/03/2008 02:00 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] a target=” blank” not part of xhtml







On Mar 27, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Michael Horowitz wrote:

I can't imagine its better practice to replace it with javascript.

No, "better practice" is to avoid foisting new windows on users 
altogether.

(IMHO - but I don't think I'm alone...)

Andrew






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Validating Flash

2008-03-26 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi Tim,

For XHTML 1.0 Strict I use:






Alternative content for users if plug-in fails to load.










Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Tim MacKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27/03/2008 03:37 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To

cc

Subject
[WSG] Validating Flash






Hi List,
 
My question is about embedding Flash on html pages (just certain elements 
– not talking about full flash sites). I always get errors from HTML Tidy 
and the validator about the object and embed tags, which wrecks my 
validated markup. What is the standards-compliant way to embed Flash 
elements so that my site validates and stops throwing errors?
 
Thanks,
Tim

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-02-27 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

>I think its also improper markup to have more than one stylesheet 

In no way should multiple  statements be construed as improper.

Multiple 'link-rel's" is the correct way to specify different media type's 
and is no more incorrect then having more then one  statement.

The move to modular code and the seperation of content/behavior/style is a 
good one for the industry.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Tim MacKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28/02/2008 04:17 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To

cc

Subject
RE: [WSG] multiple css style sheets






I think its also improper markup to have more than one stylesheet  
so @import might be a way to keep the code modular and still only have one 
style sheet link.
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Kane Tapping
Sent: Thursday, 28 February 2008 4:59 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets
 


Hi ,

I believe @import was originally used by designers to create styles 
Netscape Navigator 4 would not implement incorrectly.

Some other reasons why you might use this rather then multiple  
declarations, include: 
1.  You can declare the @import within a CSS file 

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-02-27 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

I believe @import was originally used by designers to create styles 
Netscape Navigator 4 would not implement incorrectly.

Some other reasons why you might use this rather then multiple  
declarations, include:

You can declare the @import within a CSS file 

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-02-27 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

>How do browsers determine the winner in a conflict... well, AFAIK, they 
take the first style that is most relevant to the element.

That would be the LAST style that is most relevant to the element. (unless 
!important is used to override the cascade.)

It also worth noting that multiple stylesheets are also commonly 
referenced within CSS using @import.


The main benefit of using multiple stylesheets is for modular code.


Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Steven Workman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28/02/2008 03:36 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets






Michael,

Multiple style sheets are quite common in large sites. Splitting your 
stylesheets into a "basics", "main" and "special cases" is good for 
keeping your code separate, also allowing multiple developers to work on 
different areas of a site's styles without interrupting each other. It's 
also becoming more common that any off the shelf javascript techniques 
come with their own stylesheets i.e. Cody Lindley's Thickbox.

How do browsers determine the winner in a conflict... well, AFAIK, they 
take the first style that is most relevant to the element.

Say you had Some text
If your first stylesheet said:
ul li { color:red;
}
and the second one said
.bob { color: blue;
}
It would render as blue.

However, if the first one said
ul li .bob { color:red;
}
and the second one remained the same
.bob { color: blue;
}
It would render as red

Steve Workman
PA Consulting Group
www.paconsulting.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.steel-software.com

On 27/02/2008, Michael Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
Just inherited a site and saw pages with multiple style sheets.  Is
there a reason for that and how does the browser determine what to use
if there is a conflict

--
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

[WSG] WCAG Samurai released.

2008-02-26 Thread Kane Tapping
Members of this list should be interested that the WCAG Samurai errata for 
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 has been released.
http://wcagsamurai.org/

For those not familiar with the Samurai errata, it is alternative to the 
FUBARed WCAG 2.0

For more information on what happened to WCAG 2.0, please read
http://alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for required field

2008-02-25 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi Matt,

I think

 Name  (required)
 

is the best way of representing required fields, It is what I implemented 
for Griffith University. (see it in action: 
http://www.griffith.edu.au/cgi-bin/feedbackform.cgi )

Thinking further on the subject, if I was to redo the Styling I would 
probably have used a  declaration instead of the .

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Matt Fellows" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26/02/2008 01:14 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for required 
field






> In some cases that's an excellent solution (what I've been using for a
> while) but unfortunately power users will dial down verbosity so much 
that
> they will quiet legends as well.
>
>  A blind power user I know told me * is best. He also told me nothing 
else is
>  needed, but he's a person and that part my be his opinion. For 
all-around
>  safety, one of these might be best:

Thanks Mike that's really interesting. I would argue, based on the
anecdotal evidence you've given, that the following legend is
superflous and prevents logical grouping.

>  
>  Required
>  Name (required) 
>  Email (required) 
>  

I am definitely leaning toward the following:


 Personal Details

 Name  (required)
 

 Email (required)
 

 Phone
 
 ...


Giving in to other's suggestions perhaps the 
could become  :)

The benefits here are:
* Easily scannable for the regular user
* Will be read out for screen readers
* Semantically intact
* Inputs can be grouped logically
* No need for annoying legends

Does this seem to be a combination of the general consensus?


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] Web Publishing Guidelines

2008-01-31 Thread Kane Tapping
The Griffith University Web Style Guide
http://www.griffith.edu.au/web-publishing/web-style-guide/

It covers range of Corporate branding, Information architecture, writing 
for the web, and web standards issues.

I think its good, but I may be biased :-)
Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Koen Willems" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/02/2008 05:30 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To

cc

Subject
RE: [WSG] Web Publishing Guidelines






I can recomment the Dutch Guidelines: 
http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/english/
 
Regards,
Koen Willems
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Namens Faul, Mark
Verzonden: donderdag 31 januari 2008 16:04
Aan: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Onderwerp: [WSG] Web Publishing Guidelines

Hi everyone, 
I'm currently working on a new set of web publishing standards or 
guidelines.  The New Zealand Government Web Standards and Recommendations 
[ http://webstandards.govt.nz/index.php/Home_page ] are a great 
inspiration, as well as the W3C standards of course.

Just wondering if others can refer me to good examples? 
Cheers!  Mark 
This e-mail originates from the City of Ottawa e-mail system. Any 
distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it 
contains by other than the intended recipient(s) is unauthorized. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the 
telephone number shown above or by return e-mail and delete 
this communication and any copy immediately. Thank you.

Le présent courriel a été expédié par le système de courriels de 
la Ville d'Ottawa. Toute distribution, utilisation ou 
reproduction du courriel ou des renseignements qui s'y trouvent 
par une personne autre que son destinataire prévu est interdite. 
Si vous avez reçu le message par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser par 
téléphone (au numéro précité) ou par courriel, puis supprimer 
sans délai la version originale de la communication ainsi que 
toutes ses copies. Je vous remercie de votre collaboration.

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


RE: [WSG] Standards friendly 'page tagging' web stats

2007-08-26 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi Paul,

>I'm heading down to Sydney in Sept for some training on it's use
>and how to best implement it.

Please tell me your not paying for that.

About Google Analytics
http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/topic.py?topic=10977

Installing the tracking code
http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/topic.py?topic=10976

How do I add tracking code to my website?
http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55488&topic=11126

> Just wanted to make sure I didn't break the site by implementing this.

You can implement the JS on a couple of test pages if you would like to 
test the result before including it in all your pages.
Kind Regards,
Kane



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/08/2007 03:07:35 PM:

> 
> Thanks for the responses and suggestions.
> 
> I haven't checked out Google Analytics yet, although it was on my list.
> In fact I'm heading down to Sydney in Sept for some training on it's use
> and how to best implement it.
> 
> Patrick, reports based on server log files are considerably limiting.
> For example, visitors are generally identified by IP and Session ID.
> This doesn't tell me if the person is a repeat customer, or how often
> they frequent the website, and also provides more accurate filtering of
> non-human user agents (as UAs don't tend to render the HTML or executive
> the JS).
> 
> The data collected is particularly useful for measuring the use of
> "back" and "forward" button usage, monitoring the effectiveness of
> campaigns, conversion rates, abandonment rates/locations, etc.
> 
> Just wanted to make sure I didn't break the site by implementing this.
> 
> 
> Paul Hempsall
> Web Developer
> 
> 
> Lake Macquarie City Council
> Phone: (02) 4921-0713
> Fax: (02) 4921-0566
> Web: http://www.lakemac.com.au
> 
> This information is intended for the addressee only. The use, 
> copying or distribution of this message or any information it 
> contains, by anyone other than the addressee is prohibited by the 
sender.
> 
> Any views expressed in this communication are those of the 
> individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them 
> to be the views of Council.
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] vCard File

2007-08-01 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

> Can someone please suggest a cool icon for vCard downloads? It must 
> be 2.0 of course :-)

hCard and hCalendar icons are available from Wolfgang Bartelme.

http://www.factorycity.net/projects/microformats-icons/
http://microformats.org/wiki/icons

I have recently been involved in a redevelopment of the Griffith 
University phonebook (not live yet), which has microformat intergration. 
(the previous upgrade 2 years ago added it)

You can see an example of a search result here: 
http://users.on.net/~frost/phonebook/
For extra credit have a look at the print version of the page.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/08/2007 01:30:09 PM:

> vCard's (.vcf files) will also open in a Mac OS X Address book.
> Not everyone will have a VCF compatible address book and hence an 
> attempt should be made to educate/explain their use.
> 
> You should mark up the displayed address information as an hCard: 
> http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard
> ... and then use the technorati vcard generator 
http://technorati.com/contact
> to scrape the page and produce your vcard for you
> 
> Can someone please suggest a cool icon for vCard downloads? It must 
> be 2.0 of course :-)
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: Joyce Evans 
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:51 PM
> Subject: [WSG] vCard File
> 
> I think there may have been a discussion regarding the vCard File 
> recently, and if there was, I didn’t study those emails because I 
> didn’t have to deal with it at the time.  Today, however, I got a 
> new project of re-creating a website with the current design.  On 
> this client’s contact page, there is a link to the .vcf file, which 
> when I click on it, the client’s contact information appears in the 
> Contacts section of my Outlook program.  I’ve never seen a link to a
> vCard File on a website until today.  Is it okay to have this link? 
> What happens if the visitor to the website does not use Outlook?  Thank 
you.
> 
> Joyce
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *** 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *** 

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] WCAG Samurai Errata

2007-06-08 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

> - no noscript?
> I still use it to add a submit button to dropdowns which are otherwise 
> javascript driven - I thought I was doing a good thing! (Wah! :( )
> Hmm.. its in the introduction, but not in the document. Thats not 
> right, surely?

I took this one to mean that you should be writing your form in a 
accessible and non-js way first then use JS to HIJAX (
http://ajaxian.com/archives/hijax-graceful-degration) that version to 
provide enhanced useability.This way you get a perfectly useable form 
without JS and enhanced usability when it is enabled.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/06/2007 04:19:08 PM:

> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:22:36 +1000, Kane Tapping wrote:
> > I have been reading with interest the WCAG Samurai Errata ( 
> > http://wcagsamurai.org/errata/intro.html ) and am suprised to have not 

> > found it discussed on WSG as of yet.
> 
> Thank you! I missed this announcement, somehow. What a refreshing read! 
> :)
> 
> Points
> 
> - no noscript?
> I still use it to add a submit button to dropdowns which are otherwise 
> javascript driven - I thought I was doing a good thing! (Wah! :( )
> Hmm.. its in the introduction, but not in the document. Thats not 
> right, surely?
> 
> - Guideline 10
> "Do not add non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces or 
> not) between adjacent links unless the semantics of the document 
> naturally would include such characters."
> Am I right in interpeting this as that we *don't* need to make sure 
> there are extra characters between links! Wow! Cool! :)
> 
> :reads more:
> 
> warmly,
> Lea
> -- 
> Lea de Groot
> Elysian Systems
> Brisbane, Australia
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

[WSG] WCAG Samurai Errata

2007-06-07 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi,

I have been reading with interest the WCAG Samurai Errata ( 
http://wcagsamurai.org/errata/intro.html ) and am suprised to have not 
found it discussed on WSG as of yet.

It raises many discussion points two of which mirror my own personal 
opinion...

Guideline 9.4: Do not attempt to create your own tab order. That is a job 
for a browser and adaptive technology.
Guideline 9.5: Don’t provide your own keyboard shortcuts. That is a job 
for a browser or adaptive technology.

I have always found these priority three guidelines to be counter 
productive because they often conflict with the built-in navigation 
controls from browsers and screen readers making the website harder to use 
by those you are trying to help by following the guidelines.

What is your opinion on the errata ? 

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-30 Thread Kane Tapping
I had a very similar issue with my feedback form.

Eventualy I split it into three fieldsets: your feedback, your details, 
and a privacy statement.

http://www.griffith.edu.au/cgi-bin/feedbackform.cgi
- Kane



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30/05/2007 11:16:11 PM:

> > It probably shouldn't be used for pairing as you describe, but rather 
a
> > group of inputs that all share some common-ground. In my case I use 
them 
> > to contain groups of required versus non-required inputs as well as 
the 
> > type of information sought (contact info, etc.).
> 
> Sorry to bring this up again but I've been thinking a bit more about 
this: 
> a fieldset should be used to group related form controls and each 
fieldset 
> should have a legend, but what if you have a form control that's not 
> really related to anything else? Do you put it in a fieldset by itself? 
> Then what do you do about the legend when in a lot of cases it'll simply 
 
> be duplicating what's in the label?
> 
> For instance, a form which has contact details and a message text area 
> might be split into one fieldset for the contact details and another for 
 
> the message (I know it could probably be argued that it could all go in 
> one fieldset but let's say for argument's sake that there's another 
> fieldset in between requesting the user to select from a series of 
> checkboxes that needs to go in its own fieldset). There's only really 
one 
> way to say "this is where your message goes" without being redundant, so 
 
> do you use a 2nd fieldset or go for a generic div to avoid the 
repetition 
> of legend/label?
> 
> -- 
> Tyssen Design
> www.tyssendesign.com.au
> Ph: (07) 3300 3303
> Mb: 0405 678 590
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Fw: [WSG] Content Management issue ?

2007-05-30 Thread Kane Tapping
Mail list guidelines

The mail list does not cover:

* Discussion of content management/web publishing system issues beyond 
those directly involved with Web Standards (there is a CMS list for that 
purpose, Log in and go to Edit your login details and mail list 
subscriptions and set your preferences to "Full CMS list" or "CMS list in 
digest mode")



----- Forwarded by Kane Tapping/Staff/Griffith on 31/05/2007 10:25 AM 
-

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/05/2007 10:09:30 AM:

> I've not had that much experience with DW/Contribute, but I know they've 
 
> both got pretty ordinary CSS support which means in a lot of cases you 
> have to create separate Design Time Stylesheets just to get your layout 
to 
> look presentable in Contribute.
> 
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 09:50:33 +1000, Marcin Szczepanski 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Rather than muck around with CMS systems for content sites, we get our
> > clients to use Adobe Contribute:
> >
> > http://www.adobe.com/products/contribute/
> >
> > Essentially provides them a WYSIWYG interface to edit pages on their
> > site, preview them, etc.  Works with Dreamweaver templates for 
editable
> > regions, repeating regions, etc - but these are just special 
"comments"
> > in the HTML, so you could add them without Dreamweaver.
> >
> > With the right combination of editable regions etc you can even have
> > non-technical users editing dynamic sites, as you just don't give them
> > access to edit the parts that generate code.
> >
> > It's not free, but you're going to save time compared to setting up a
> > server-side CMS and moving the site into it, etc.   Also supports
> > posting to blogs and things like that.
> >
> > Might not be the best solution for a 10,000+ page Intranet that needs
> > complex workflow etc, but most sites aren't that sort of size.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marcin Szczepanski
> > Senior Web Developer
> > webqem pty ltd
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Kevin Ross
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2007 2:16 AM
> > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> > Subject: [WSG] Content Management issue ?
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > I have a question which has surfaced due to an upcoming requirement.
> >
> > I have built a web site for a client who now wants to be able to
> > manage the site on her own.  She is computer literate, but not a web
> > designer, by any means.  I am new to the idea of Content Management
> > systems and am really trying to wrap my brain around what they really
> > do and how to set one up.  I guess I am wondering how other designers
> > handle this type of issue?  How do you setup clients to manage their
> > own site so they are not having to take a detailed course in Web
> > Design.  I hope my concern is understood, as I have been thinking
> > about this issue for a while and have investigated certain software...
> > Joomla, Wordpress...
> >
> > Can anyone lend a hand?  Thanks very much...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin.
> >
> >
> > ***
> > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ***
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ***
> > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ***
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tyssen Design
> www.tyssendesign.com.au
> Ph: (07) 3300 3303
> Mb: 0405 678 590
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em

2007-05-25 Thread Kane Tapping
Setting the font-size like that is to create a more even base-line size 
across multiple browsers.
http://www.thenoodleincident.com/tutorials/box_lesson/font/browser.html

It is not the determining factor on end-user font size. (unless of course 
you never declare the em size for your markup)
 - that is depended on the value of the em declarations used for markup 
and the em declarations used on any container objects.

If you want to complain that 9-11pt text is too small? fine, but you are 
disagreeing with one possible end result, not the body: font-size % 
declaration.

>arbitrarily assuming that there's something wrong with the user's choice 
of default ...
I guess we also shouldnt be second guessing our users choice of font, 
weight, spacing, color ... positioning ?
And one day all users will view the webpages using their own custom user 
stylesheets... Until that day expect designers to be actively styling 
their pages as they see fit.

The point i was trying to make is that you can design your site while also 
allowing scaleability, user preference to impact the design and to also 
ensure your content is usable across a variety of mediums.
- Kane




Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/05/2007 05:15 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em






On 2007/05/25 15:31 (GMT+1000) Kane Tapping apparently typed:

> Setting the body to font size to 65% - 70% is a good start.

Actually it's a bad start, arbitrarily assuming that there's something 
wrong
with the user's choice of default, and reducing it by some arbitrary 
amount,
even though you don't have a clue what it was to start with. Browser 
default
sizes are purposely adjustable so that their users can tailor web page 
text
sizes to suit their own personal needs.
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/bigdefaults.html

It's also an excellent definition of disrespect for your site's visitors.
-- 
"The path of the righteous is like the first gleam of dawn, shining
ever brighter till the full light of day."   Proverbs 4:18 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em

2007-05-24 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

Yeah, your never going to get an exact match through the browsers using 
ems, you kind of have to let go of pixel perfect design and aim your 
design as a flexible interpretation of your css. This approach will also 
mean your design will cope with users setting larger (or smaller) text 
sizes in their browser (or you could add this feature into your site 
yourself).

When you start using ems you cannot give and exact height or width for 
your text (it will change across browsers), but you can ensure that there 
is a constant ratio between your elements on all browsers. ie your 's 
are ALWAYS 2x the size of your 's.

Another thing that may crop up is that Firefox has absolute s***house 
rounding when calculating em sizes, so you will need to keep a careful eye 
on any borders that are declared on objects sized with ems. quite often it 
will round the border size to 0, and not display a border :-(

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Sagnik Dey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/05/2007 04:02 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em






Thnx for the suggestion..but i need to define the font size in the body 
itself

I've defined 75% which works well in IE6..but it appears smaller in 
IE6....

-Sagnik


On 5/25/07, Kane Tapping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi ,

Setting the body to font size to 65% - 70% is a good start. this averages 
out the differences between the browsers, 

body {font-size: 70%;}

>From then on set your font sizes in ems. 

h1 {font-size: 1.8em;} 

And keep in mind that changes to the em size will cascade through 
container objects. 
Kind Regards,
Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630 




"Sagnik Dey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
25/05/2007 03:18 PM 

Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org



To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
cc

Subject
[WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em








Hi Guys,

 I'm developing a website that have some standards defined. The font size 
specified is 9pt. But due to accessibility standards I wanted to  convert 
that in % or em. Can anybody tell what do i need to use to view the same 
size in different browsers? 


-- 
:: Sagnik :: 
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm 
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 



-- 
:: Sagnik :: 
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em

2007-05-24 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

Setting the body to font size to 65% - 70% is a good start. this averages 
out the differences between the browsers,

body {  font-size: 70%;}

>From then on set your font sizes in ems.

h1 {font-size: 1.8em;}

And keep in mind that changes to the em size will cascade through 
container objects.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Sagnik Dey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/05/2007 03:18 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
[WSG] Converting font size from pt to % or em






Hi Guys,

  I'm developing a website that have some standards defined. The font size 
specified is 9pt. But due to accessibility standards I wanted to  convert 
that in % or em. Can anybody tell what do i need to use to view the same 
size in different browsers? 


-- 
:: Sagnik :: 
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Map of Australia Image Map

2007-05-24 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

Use css to change the offset of the background image, this technique can 
be combined with a text replacement (negative text indent in thie case) to 
provide accessible labels. 

A simple example can be seen in the navigation on this page: 
http://www.harmonynaturaltherapies.com/

which all comes from this html with no JS


Home
Acupuncture
Massage
Pamper
About


the magic comes from the css.
Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





"Felisimina Jom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/05/2007 11:44 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To

cc

Subject
[WSG] Map of Australia Image Map






Hi Everyone
 
We are trying to put together a map of Australia where the states appear 
on hover and are clickable.
 
As I understand it, the hover state can't be used in  so I wonder if 
there is a way to display the States on hover without using javascript?
 
Has anybody seen or created way of displaying States on hover using CSS 
only?
 
Thanks in advance for your advice.
 
 
Felisimina
 
 

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-24 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

>although I think that placing the label text before the field instead of 
above makes it even more accessible for the avarage visitor, especcially 
if the form tends to be long

All the research I have read claims labels being above the field results 
in the greatest useability.
http://www.lukew.com/resources/articles/WebForms_LukeW.pdf

I have had good success using the standard  and  tags to 
mark up my forms, the only drawback to this method is the increased 
vertical height, but again useability research has shown that if your page 
has the content/function your users are after scrolliong is not a issue. 
(and you should be cutting your forms down to the bare minimum anyway.)

A short example: http://www.griffith.edu.au/cgi-bin/feedbackform.cgi

Something else worth mentioning, i did have some issues with syling an 
array of radio or checkboxes, i.e you have a question, plus you have to 
label that particular input (with a prefilled answer), but this was neatly 
solved with a nested fieldset.

example: 
http://www.griffith.edu.au/web-publishing/content-modules/radio-buttons.html
example: 
http://www.griffith.edu.au/web-publishing/content-modules/checkboxes.html
Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 3735 7630





Sander Aarts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/05/2007 10:22 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout






Hello Mike,

Mike at Green-Beast.com schreef: 
If one tries hard enough, it seems anything can be considered a list of 
sorts.
 
That might be true, but I hope you will agree that it's easier to consider 
a form being a list than a whole page.

A form is a list of controls and their related inputs, but we wouldn't use 
a 
list to organize form controls, so we'd use fieldsets/legends, labels and 
inputs. Using the Q&A scenario which you might use to try and justify the 
use of a DL to organize a form, let's swap out the elements with their 
appropriate ones (which need to be used anyway).

DL = Fieldset
??  = Legend
DT = Label (the "Q")
DD = Input (the "A")
 
I didn't say I use s instead of s. I use them too if needed, 
although I'm not a big fan of  (from a layout point of view this 
must be the most annoying element).
Btw, in some cases the  is not the 'Q' but the 'A', as with 
checkboxes and radio buttons. And I think that originally s were 
meant to replace the  'Q'- in these cases. 

It seems to me the form has everything we need to properly organize it. 
Once 
it's made we can add then a few styles and layout rules with CSS to make 
it 
look good.
But in most cases not as good as the designer whose designs I'll have to 
translate into templates wants it. Sometimes you just have not enough 
hooks for CSS or you'll have to add extra elements in order to make clear 
snippets that can be reused within the system of the site. And even though 
we would all like to create websites that use no more than the necessary 
semantic elements, I'm sure you're familiar with this problem if you work 
with designs that are not yours or for customers that want don't want an 
archaic form layout.
And if you do need another element then I'd say a  comes very close to 
the semantic structure of a form because of this Q&A thing.

See a real (somewhat styled) example:  http://green-beast.com/gbcf/ (Demo 
Form)

Using this is satifies all of the needs of users and spec requirements. No 

definition list necessary or needed.
 
Your demo form is a wonderful example of a web standards compliant and 
accessible form (although I think that placing the label text before the 
field instead of above makes it even more accessible for the avarage 
visitor, especcially if the form tends to be long), but it also has this 
basic layout. Which is fine, but not always what is requested.

 

I certainly wasn't trying to make a case 
for using a list, any list, for a form.
 
I know and you are forgiven ;-)

Cheers.
Sander


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-22 Thread Kane Tapping
Okay, so what CAN you use for forms?





 (and text area, select etc)

and where neccessary the occasional 

The rest is the magic of CSS


Example:
html: http://www.griffith.edu.au/cgi-bin/feedbackform.cgi
styles: http://www.griffith.edu.au/schema/corporate/common/css/glass.css

- Kane





Breton Slivka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23/05/2007 08:14 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout






So when is this great festival of telling people what they can't do 
going to end? I'd like to know what you CAN do for forms? this is not 
a made up problem. Forms are difficult to style.

-Breton



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-21 Thread Kane Tapping
My view:

Use HTML for content
Use CSS for presentation
Use tables only for tabular data 

WCAG 1.0 has the following guidelines applicable to this question.

3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.
5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers.
5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when 
linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an 
alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version).
5.4 If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for 
the purpose of visual formatting.
5.5 Provide summaries for tables.
10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and 
form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, 
ensure that the label is properly positioned.
10.3 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render 
side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative (on the 
current page or some other) for all tables that lay out text in parallel, 
word-wrapped columns.
10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, 
place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas.
12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls.


 - Kane






"Benedict Wyss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22/05/2007 02:15 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
[WSG] dl v table for form layout






Hi all,

I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention our 
site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts.

I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise 
informed. 

I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is not 
that good to look at with everything butting up against each other. His 
other suggestion was to add  's to move things about. 

I like to use the definition list with Labels.

Now I know the dl I am using is not being used exactly as it was 
originally used (good point), but I say it is 100 times better than 
tables.

Can I get a WSG response on the best format to layout a form. 

Cheers,

Ben

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] 100% height

2007-05-13 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

http://www.fotografics.it/test/

Displays full height in IE7 on XP.

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 373 57630





"Jean-Jacques Halans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14/05/2007 01:02 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
Re: [WSG] 100% height






Looks good in IE6, Opera 9.20, and Firefox 2.0.0.3,
all WinXP pro.

On 5/12/07, Bob Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A version with the footer inside the div is up, plus it seems that by
> adding important! to height: auto; in the original version it is now
> working in Safari and Firefox.
> I would appreciate feedback from a test in IE 6 and (especially) 7
>
> http://www.fotografics.it/test/
>
>
> > Bob Schwartz wrote:
> >> I have been at it all day and no luck.
> >>
> >> Anyone who would like to help can see some test pages at:
> >>
> >> http://www.fotografics.it/test/
> >>
> >> The problem is explained on the pages.
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> > try placing your footer inside the wrapper.
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>


-- 
Halans Jean-Jacques


> http://www.halans.be
> http://del.icio.us/halans
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/halans/
> http://halans.vox.com/



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] IE 7 body length problem

2007-05-08 Thread Kane Tapping
Hi ,

I found my IE7 will show the bug on its first load, but any refresh 
afterwards will load with the body/colour covering the entire window. 
(covering the window with another window will also remove the whitespace.)

A quick check with the IE7 developer toolbar shows the  stretching 
only as far as the content.

If would suggest setting a background colour for the .

btw the toolbar declares  hasLayout = -1

Kind Regards,

Kane Tapping
Web Standards Developer
Web and Content Management Services
Griffith University. 4111. Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 (0)7 373 57630




On 5/9/07, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On my site, http://christianmontoya.net/
> > the body does not extend past the content in IE 7 on initial page
> > load, so the background doesn't reach the bottom of the screen. I know
> > there's a simple fix for this, but I can't remember it... can someone
> > help me out? Thanks in advance.
>
> Hi Christian,
> I don't see this behavior in ie7 WinXP Pro
> But I think you should be able to fix what you describe by giving layout 
to
> some element in there.
> Did you try: body {zoom:1}

Couldn't see this issue on my IE7 too (are you using a beta?). Thierry
is right, the element needs to be given layout.

http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html

enjoy...
Karl


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***