Re: [WSG] MA in web development

2008-06-12 Thread Kevin Lennon

aboehmer wrote:

It could contain a pile of subjects, depending on how far you want to take it. 
Here just some ideas:

HTML/CSS
Multimedia (Video, Flash, Podcasts, etc)
Basics in Programming (PHP/VB, etc)
Usability
Accessibility
Search Engine Optimisation
Basics in Graphic Design (Photoshop, Illustrator, etc)
Introduction to Networks/Hosting environments

You could even chuck in some electives of Business subjects. Masters students 
would probably want to get their head around Project Management as well...?

Hope this helps.

Andreas.


-Original message-
From: Jason Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:30:36 +1000
To: wsg wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] MA in web development

  

Hello everyone,

Last night a proposal has been hinted at me to put together an MA course in
web development for a UK University. That's all I have been told so far.

I was wondering what people were feeling such a course ought to contain.

I have my views of course, but would not like to influence the feedback at
this point.

All suggestions are very much appreciated.

Regards,

Jason Grant
www.flexewebs.com/semantix


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




Andreas Boehmer
User Experience Consultant

Addictive Media
Phone: (03) 9386 8907
Mobile: 0411 097 038
http://www.addictivemedia.com.au
Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



  
I am currently enrolled in a Web Design and Interactive Media BS degree 
program. I have been teaching myself for almost 4 years at home 
intensively prior to going into this venture. I have to say that is 
offering this degree is teaching its students many things that are not 
compliant with the international standards in general.


The fact of the matter is that I believe that the entire school is in it 
for the money more thne teaching the students the right  and 
professional way to be a web designer and developer. As far as 
curriculum goes be sure they teach the standards or dont get involved at 
all.First off. Secondly I would suggest that you include a few server 
side programming languages like PHP and JSP. Be sure to also cover in 
depth DBMS as well.


Other universities such as the University of Scranton offer MS degrees 
in Software Engineering which you may get some ideas from as well.


http://academic.scranton.edu/department/gradsch/gsofteng.htm

Hope that helps. I know after reading that I have decided to quit my 
current college and go to the University of Scranton as I believe I will 
actually learn things there unlike at my current accredited college.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] AccessResearch // Page Check

2007-11-17 Thread Kevin Lennon

James Jeffery wrote:

- The first thing that struck me was the blatent missues of the em element.

- Missing title attribute from your anchor's

- No indication as to who or what your site is about. At least a logo or name.

- Why use XHTML? If you are not using anything XML related you should
be using HTML. HTML is not dead and just because you use XHTML it does
not mean your site is making good use of Web Standards. If this was do
they would not be working towards HTML5.

- Class and ID names are not semantic. id=left would make no sense
if you moved it to the right.

- Why do you have your text blocks all over the place? I think they
would look better if they were all left aligned and keep the
navigation to the right.

I like the idea, the font goes well with the simplisit design. Try
making the navigation stand out a bit more and give the page some
natural flow and order.

There is probably more issues but i only had a quick glance.

James

On Nov 17, 2007 4:03 PM, Rahul Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Hi,

http://rahulgonsalves.com/research/site/

I'm throwing together a quick site to try and fund my travel to an
accessibility conference. I haven't had too much time to check it, or
think it through, but I would appreciate a page check, and general
suggestions/comments. Also, I don't have access to Internet Explorer;
does it behave /reasonably well/ in that browser?

This is the first semi-fluid width site that I'm working on, so a
criticism of the methods that I have used will be very useful. I
would also appreciate a link to a good max-width emulator for the
various IE-editions that don't support it.

Many thanks,
  - Rahul.

Apologies to members of css-discuss, who will receive this email twice.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


The following statement  was from above I only partially agree with.
  


Why use XHTML? If you are not using anything XML related you should
be using HTML. HTML is not dead and just because you use XHTML it does
not mean your site is making good use of Web Standards. If this was do
they would not be working towards HTML5.


While there is no real reason to use XHTML if you are not using any XML 
related code . If you do a little research on HTML you would see that 
the W3C has only within the past  year or so announced they were even 
going to consider extending HTML beyond 4.01. Even so HTML 5 will not be 
a standard for several years based on the speed of the W3C in the past. 
XHTML is here now to stay and offers a far greater amount of 
expandability  in the future towards web applications then HTML can ever 
consider comparing to especially with all the WEB 2.0 hype out here.


That announcement was only after Microsoft blatantly stated the Internet 
Explorer Browser would never support the mime type of  application-xml 
and therefore would only interpret XHTML pages as a text/html. It was at 
that time also that the W3C appointed the head engineer to the committee 
to expand on HTML in the first place.


I may not post as often as some or even have the knowledge of many of 
the members on this list however, I believe if Microsoft would have 
stood behind XHTML with their browsers like Firefox and Safari did  HTML 
would certainly have been  a dying markup language.


It would be nice if the standards were all equally supported among the 
browsers but they are not. It would also be nice if there was a way to 
force web standards compliance  on every website on the web old or new 
but that will never happen.


The best society can hope for is if businesses get educated and require 
it of their web designers and programmers it may one day become an 
actual standard. I do not think that will happen in my lifetime 
personally but we can all dream I guess. As it stands now there seems to 
be too many people out there that think the standards are not nearly as 
important as if a website looks pretty to the eye.







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Kevin Lennon
n:Lennon;Kevin
org:Lake Area Webs
adr:;;227 Fire Tower Road;Milford;PA;18337;United States of America
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Web Design  Developer
tel;home:570-296-3865

Re: [WSG] Idiot's guide to JavaScript

2007-11-13 Thread Kevin Lennon

Rob Mason wrote:

Hi guys,

Am comfortable with HTML/CSS and accessibility in general, but 
struggle with JavaScript. I'm not a developer by trade, am a business 
type (sales and marketing) so most oft he stuff is well over my head. 
I am looking for a really basic, plain English guide to JavaScript. 
Either on or offline will do.


Any thoughts?

Thanks in advance

Rob

--
Rob Mason
t/a Sponge Project
www.spongeproject.co.uk http://www.spongeproject.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.31/1128 - Release Date: 11/13/2007 11:09 AM
  
You may want to check out the book called  Javascript for the world wide 
web  visual quickstart guide. 
http://www.amazon.com/JavaScript-World-Wide-Web-Negrino/dp/0321423348/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1194984888sr=8-1


That is not an affiliate link but amazon has it for $12.99 plus shipping 
there.





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Kevin Lennon
n:Lennon;Kevin
org:Lake Area Webs
adr:;;227 Fire Tower Road;Milford;PA;18337;United States of America
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Web Design  Developer
tel;home:570-296-3865
url:http://www.lakeareawebs.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] Javascript Code not working in IE6

2007-10-23 Thread Kevin Lennon

Alexander Uribe wrote:
   



In my javascript class at college, I have to find out why this piece 
of code does not run in IE6.

I can't seem to figure out why.
If anyone knows, that would be great

cheers,

Alex.

Code below

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN 
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;

html
head
titleExercise 4/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; 
style type=text/css
.borders {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 150px;
}

.li_borders {
background: yellow;
border: 1px solid blue;
color: red;
}
.li2_borders {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#ul2 {
xwidth: 150px;
}

#ul2 li {
border-color: silver;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px 1px 0px 1px;
display: inline;
font-weight:bold;
margin: 0;
padding: 0 4px;
}
/style
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = init;
function init()
{
var liArr = new Array();
var idx;
//--- process first UL block
var id = document.getElementById(ul1);
id.addEventListener(mouseover, ul1on, false);
id.addEventListener(mouseout, ul1off, false);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li_off, false);
}
//--- process second UL block
id = document.getElementById(ul2);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li2_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li2_off, false);
}
}
function ul1on() { document.getElementById(ul1).className=borders;}
function ul1off(){ document.getElementById(ul1).className=;}
function li_s()  { alert(this.innerHTML); } 
function li_on() { 
document.getElementById(this.id).className=li_borders;}

function li_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
function li2_on() { 
document.getElementById(this.id).className=li2_borders;}

function li2_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
/script
/head
body
pThis doesn't work in Internet Explorer 6. Why and whats the 
solution?/p

ul id=ul1
  li id=li11item 1/li
  li id=li12item 2/li
  li id=li13item 3 /li
/ul
ul id=ul2
  li id=li21item 1/li
  li id=li22item 2/li
  li id=li23item 3 /li
/ul
/body
/html



Join Lavalife for free. What are you waiting for? 
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D30288_t=764581033_r=email_taglines_Join_free_OCT07_m=EXT

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.8/1088 - Release Date: 10/23/2007 1:26 PM
  
Does it have anything to do with the fact that Line 22 #ul2 Property 
xwidth doesn't exist : 150px even if that is not actually JavaScript?



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Kevin Lennon
n:Lennon;Kevin
org:Lake Area Webs
adr:;;227 Fire Tower Road;Milford;PA;18337;United States of America
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Web Design  Developer
tel;home:570-296-3865
url:http://www.lakeareawebs.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] Web Standards In Colleges and Universities

2007-10-21 Thread Kevin Lennon

Stuart Foulstone wrote:

Hi,

You could possibly use how your college's own Website is coded to support
your case.

I don't know which college you're at, but look at how their Website is
coded  - I would be surprised if their still using the methods your tutor
is teaching.


  
I feel your frustration in the way our future experts are being taught 
our field. I agree that you should not allow your emotions to show when 
and if you are trying to convince the school to see it  via the 
international standards. If I recall from your beginning posting you 
mentioned something about the University of Birmingham  while their 
website home page has a few errors on it they did not use tables for 
positioning. Their CSS also validates. I would suggest that the only way 
you are going to get any school policies to change would be by 
requesting a meeting with the head of the appropriate department of the 
school. As far as your tutor goes I think you may find that they want 
you to build your pages with tables because of their lack of 
understanding of CSS or other technologies such as JavaScript.


The school itself may want to teach you to use tables for positioning 
simply because it is easier for them to break apart the different 
technologies. High Schools are teaching HTML at this point and they are 
teaching by the old ways prior CSS. I think you will also find that the 
school systems are still promoting deprecated tags such as the font tag  
they may even teach you to use the embed tag  as well even though it was 
never a part of HTML at all.





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Kevin Lennon
n:Lennon;Kevin
org:Lake Area Webs
adr:;;227 Fire Tower Road;Milford;PA;18337;United States of America
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Web Design  Developer
tel;home:570-296-3865
url:http://www.lakeareawebs.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] IE help

2007-08-23 Thread Kevin Lennon

Bob Schwartz wrote:

Some users have complained that when they go to this page

http://www.fifeweb.org/wp/lib/lib_current.html

and try to download the linked files with IE 7 they get a message 
stating something like Explorer is unable to download the requested 
file


My Windows (server 2000) testing computer has IE 6 on it and all works 
fine.


The links to the files are absolute, so my guess is these users either 
have some funny settings in thier IE 7, anti-virus programs, or some 
Norton firewall-like application.


However if someone could have a look in IE 7 I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Bob



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




I tried it in both IE7 and Firefox and it seems to work fine here.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Kevin Lennon
n:Lennon;Kevin
org:Lake Area Webs
adr:;;227 Fire Tower Road;Milford;PA;18337;United States of America
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Web Design  Developer
tel;home:570-296-3865
url:http://www.lakeareawebs.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] Usability Accessibility Over Design?

2007-08-15 Thread Kevin Lennon

James Jeffery wrote:

However, if
you want see an example where prestige is also crucial, but the designer
  has use compliant methods and passed 508 validation (at least) see:

 http://www.fosterandpartners

.com/Practice/Default.aspx



I dont mean to pick on this website, but from looking at the source i 
can already

see a few minor faults. Maybe there is a purpose, i dont know. But the
navigation links should be within a list. There is an empty div for 
the divider,

there are other methods to do the same thing.

Anyway taking this back on topic. Ive seen a number of great replies to
this message, its made me think a little more and before i write this 
article i best

get back to the drawing board with some hard facts.

And back to the point regarding laws, i cant see how they would create
and major limitations, a law to say that a website must be accessible and
follow the guidelines set wouldn't hold much back. Or some sort of 
convention
so that disabled users can quickly find there way to the accessible 
pages.


I will have a good hard think about this over the next day or so.

Thanks All.



On 8/15/07, *Designer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Frank Palinkas wrote:
  
 IMHO I would like to add one important factor to
this. Money.


I would like to throw a spanner in the works here. There are cases
where
a client is as interested in PRESTIGE  as he is in money. See, for
example:

http://www.habitat.co.uk/uk/main_uk.htm

as a case where prestige/image is crucial to the
business.  However, if
you want see an example where prestige is also crucial, but the
designer
  has use compliant methods and passed 508 validation (at least) see:


http://www.fosterandpartners.com/Practice/Default.aspx
http://www.fosterandpartners.com/Practice/Default.aspx

An excellent site!  It is interesting to note that, 12 months ago,
this
site was Flash, with a poor html version as second choice. This is no
longer necessary. Inspirational work!

My point is that the client shouldn't need to know anything about the
inner cogs and wheels. An experienced  designer emshould em be
able
to give the client whatever he wants and (although often difficult and
challenging) he can do this without sacrificing standards or
accessibility.

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk http://www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 
Interesting that  http://www.fosterandpartners.com/Practice/Default.aspx 
page passes the HTML validation but fails the CSS validation as provided 
by the W3C. The other pages on the site Also fail validation on HTML as 
well. I have yet to see a web page that is fully compliant with 
HTML,CSS,WAI that was appealing to the eyes let alone done with 
Macromedia Flash.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] Teaching CSS

2007-03-17 Thread Kevin Lennon
Best learning book I have ever seen or owned on CSS was CSS the Missing
Manual by David Sawyer McFarland published by Pogue Press / O'Reilly.  The
book is a great book for beginners especially as it walks you through many
of the real world problems. The thing is it does cover a lot of the Hacks
including the box model hack from IE5

 

Kevin J. Lennon

Lake Area Webs

http://www.lakeareawebs.com

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lee Powell
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:27 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Teaching CSS
Importance: High

 

Hi

 

I agree with all the comments made so far. The book(s) that helped me the
most get my head around CSS and it's applied techniques were:

 

Web Standards Solutions: Dan Cederholm

CSS Mastery, Advanced Web Standard Solutions: Andy Budd

Designing With Web Standards: Jeffrey Zeldman (new version just came off the
press)

 

Although the Zeldman book isn't a pure CSS guide it helps anyone understand
the fundamentals of why they work with CSS instead of old FONT tags.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Lee

 

 

On 17 Mar 2007, at 05:47, Cole Kuryakin wrote:





Hello All -

 

My background for the past 27 years has been in design. 6 years ago I
realized the (financial) necessity to begin learning web design. 3 years
after that came the next leap into HTML/PHP/CSS. So far, so good - well,
most of the time anyway.

 

I've always been a one-man-band, but now I'm finding myself much busier than
I can handle by myself so I've had to take on another designer who, while
quite good at his art, has never really been fully and satisfactorily
exposed to the fundamentals of CSS. So, I've got to teach him. And that's
the problem.

 

While my knowledge of CSS has gotten me through each project, and each sheet
validates, I still consider myself a learner as I've never had much time
to really, really, really understand the box model and other fundamentals
that, lord knows, I SHOULD understand completely by now. I've learned what I
know just via various internet sites and through the help and guidance of
wonderful groups like the WSG.

 

So, I'm at a crossroads. how can I teach something that I don't feel 100%
competent in? But the clock is ticking; clients are waiting, and my
freelance artist is calling asking humm, this is breaking. how should I fix
it? To which I respond . Ah, humm. let me get back to you on that - and a
new email flies out to the good folks in this great group for help.

 

With that lengthy pre-amble, I've got to ask - is there a GREAT book out
there that steps through the learning process of CSS right from the bare
bones that both I and my new artist can use? Not theoretical stuff, but
hand-on, simply-put, illustrative? There are a lot of books out there I
know, but I need a great one, that's very specific about explaining all the
fundamentals of the box model all the way up. I want to complexly stay away
from books that promote or talk about css hacks however (I've been using
conditional comments and IE specific sheets to deal with these problems with
100% success).

 

A number of SitePoint books on CSS seem pretty good -  based upon their
sample-chapters download - but before I spend US$40 on one, has anyone here
used them?

 

Besides a book, are there any on-line, step-by-step foundation to
penthouse curriculum course that anyone knows about and TRUSTS by
experience?

 

Thanks to all for weighing through this windy post; and advance appreciation
to all who care to comment.

 

Cole

 

 

 

 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***