Re: [WSG] IE7 Confirmed

2005-02-16 Thread David R
Also note that it will only be made available for XP. Everyone else will 
have to stay on IE6 or earlier.

Carl.
Windows XP now accounts for 60% of all Internet users now?
I'll probably just put a notice up, telling people to download Firefox 
or Opera if they're on Pre-Windows XP or IE7.0 if they're on Windows XP.

However, watch out if a large % of your site visitors are corporate or 
academic (K-12), many schools and companies don't update their WWW 
software unless its like 6 months overdue. I'm sure we all have 
experiences with schools and the like still running Flash 5.

--
-David R
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] IE7 Confirmed

2005-02-15 Thread David R
...Straight from Scoble's blog:
http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/02/15.html#a9441
This should prove interesting
--
-David R
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] IE7 Confirmed

2005-02-15 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:03:01 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Straight from Scoble's blog:
http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/02/15.html#a9441
This should prove interesting
No... he used word compatibility,
which means that all bugs must remain untouched.
They're just going to implement new infobar alert:
You're trying to open a web page.
 Web pages can be harmful to your computer.
 Click here to start Unwanted Toolbars Removal Wizard
;)
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] IE7 Confirmed

2005-02-15 Thread Andrew Krespanis
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:21:58 -, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No... he used word compatibility,
 which means that all bugs must remain untouched.

Here's a quote from the press release:
Internet Explorer 7.0, designed to add new levels of security to
Windows XP SP2 while maintaining the level of extensibility and
compatibility that customers have come to expect.

Sounds like the bugs are staying -- maintain compatibility is
synonomous with leave the bugs alone in MS terms :(


Andrew.

http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] IE7 Confirmed

2005-02-15 Thread David R
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:21:58 -, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

No... he used word compatibility,
which means that all bugs must remain untouched.

Here's a quote from the press release:
Internet Explorer 7.0, designed to add new levels of security to
Windows XP SP2 while maintaining the level of extensibility and
compatibility that customers have come to expect.
Sounds like the bugs are staying -- maintain compatibility is
synonomous with leave the bugs alone in MS terms :(
Possibly. But what about DocType overriding?
They can correct CSS2.1 handling for strict and XHTML doctypes whilst 
maintaining non-compliant sites who continue to use the HTML4.01 (and 
prev) DTDs.

Of course, adding support for the application/xhtml+xml MIME-type 
wouldn't do any harm.

--
-David R
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**