RE: [WSG] Sorry about the old posts
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Peter Firminger wrote: > > The source of the old post is, > > Tim [deleted] My sincerest apology to Tim. A very bad choice of words on my part, I did not mean to convey the impression that Tim was directly responsible, only that he was being used as a possible source for spam. Another incident where my mind thinks of something and the fingers forget to type it. Sorry Tim. -- Regards, Rob Unsworth Ipswich, Australia - * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
RE: [WSG] Sorry about the old posts
> The source of the old post is, > Tim [deleted] > Yeah that was Tim's message that was resent. He is definitely not the problem. > Check the header of the post previous to the repeat of Russ's post. Yep, it's Russ' address > > I wouldn't rule out the possibility that this is the work of > a spammer > looking for a way to access the list. You may be right. Received: from i2kc04-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([217.32.164.183]) by i2kc04-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); The 217... Address is in the UK but a trace is not going right through. BT have been notified. If I hear nothing from anyone that may be causing it in the next 24 hours I'll have to block the BT smtp server smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]. If you recognise any of the servers mentioned please talk to me directly asap. Thanks for trying to help Rob but better to do this off list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than point the finger publicly. Regards, Peter * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
Re: [WSG] Sorry about the old posts
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Peter Firminger wrote: > They seem to be emanating from a bt.com smtp server. > > Any ideas BT members? > > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151] by mail.webboy.net with > SMTP; >Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:34:52 +1100 The source of the old post is, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Check the header of the post previous to the repeat of Russ's post. I wouldn't rule out the possibility that this is the work of a spammer looking for a way to access the list. -- Regards, Rob Unsworth Ipswich, Australia * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
[WSG] Sorry about the old posts
They seem to be emanating from a bt.com smtp server. Any ideas BT members? Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151] by mail.webboy.net with SMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:34:52 +1100 Peter * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
