Thanks very much for all the replies here. I'll get back to the others
who have commented. In the meantime, its fair to say that we're very
aware of the issues around wcag2, mainly those concerning usability. I
think the W3C themselves are open that using it requires quite a bit of
dev knowledge. At the moment, we're considering its adoption, but if we
did go with it, it would be after the candidate review process has
finished, so we can see what the implications of that are.
On the usability aspect - if we did adopt, it'd be with our own
'translation' docs (FAQs etc) for developers. We'd point to the W3C's
quick reference, which is quite a useful doc, but we recognise that govt
teams would need some pretty clear explanation of what the changes are
and how to use the W3C's stuff. We'd also be doing a lot of hands-on
training etc.
In assessing wcag2 we've used the existing wcag1-to-wcag2 comparison
docs and added our own column mapping existing NZ standards ... there's
been quite a bit of work (and animated working group discussion) round
that. Then there's the questions of conformance levels etc ...
We don't have a decision yet but will keep you posted. Any decision
will also go to outside review here in NZ.
If anyone has any specific questions, best use the email below.
Thanks again for your replies.
--
Anthony Hawkins
Analyst, Government Technology Services
State Services Commission
DDI: +64 4 495 6718
Fax: +64 4 495 6669
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssc.govt.nz http://www.ssc.govt.nz/ | www.e.govt.nz
http://www.e.govt.nz/ | newzealand.govt.nz
http://newzealand.govt.nz/
New Zealand's State Services Commission: Leading the state sector to
world class performance
...
Caution: If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and then delete this message along with any
attachments. Please treat the contents of this message as private and
confidential.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Susie Gardner-Brown
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 12:38 p.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] WCAG2 in govt
I don't work in government as such, rather a big university. We (my
group within the Uni, which is one that supports teaching and learning,
makes websites etc) are going with WCAG2 - well, the first two levels
anyway.
We've been developing a wiki with suggestions for different groups of
users within our group and then the wider university community (graphic
designers, web developers, programmers, instructional designers,
lecturers, admin staff etc). And basing it on WCAG2 ... Of course we
can't force anyone to take any of this up, but we are aiming to do so
ourselves insofar as the recommendations relate to the expected users of
the University.
- susie
On 30/09/08 12:15 AM, Nick Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know WCAG2 is being considered in Western Australia. There is
a debate to wait for it to reach W3C Recommendation status and spend our
resources working on other issues now.
***
List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
