[wsjt-devel] More on disabling TX when not answered

2017-07-27 Thread Rich - K1HTV 
Using R7965, I noticed that if I answer a station's CQ and my TX frequency is 
more than 10 Hz away from his frequency, if he comes back to another station, 
my "Enable Tx"  is NOT turned off. The result is that I continue to call as the 
station that called CQ as he is working another station. I must manually stop 
my transmissions. 


I can see that if I am more than 50 Hz away, I probably am not causing any 
problems to the CQer. However, if my frequency is within +/- 50 Hz of the 
CQer's frequency I could be causing enough QRM to prevent him from decoding the 
station he is trying to work.


Wouldn't it be better that if the CQer responds to another station, that my TX 
be disabled only if my TX frequency was LESS than +/- 50 Hz from the CQer?


73,

Rich - K1HTV--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Band indicator on separating lines

2017-07-27 Thread Rich - K1HTV 
Using R7965, I have Settings/General/Display "Blank line between decoding 
periods" checked. When the band is changed using the band pull down menu, my K3 
changes bands properly and the proper meter band is properly displayed on the 
right side of each line of dashes in the "Band Activity" column. 


However, when the band is changed on the K3 via the radio's  'Band" up/down 
buttons, the name of the band being decoded does not appear on the far right 
side of the separating dashed lines until FOUR 15 second sequencing periods go 
by. 


Is this normal? 


73,

Rich - K1HTV

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Thumbs up

2017-07-27 Thread Dan Malcolm 
 

I saw this mentioned on the forum, and now see it in action with r7958.
When answering a CQ and the CQ'ing station replies to another station,
WSJT-X disables "Enable Tx" taking me out of the loop.  I like it.  Reduces
QRM.  Big thumbs up to the developers.

 

73

 

Dan Malcolm = K4SHQ

 

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Disabling "Enable TX" only works with "TX1"

2017-07-27 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
Shortcut keys are under Help/Keyboard Shortcuts and F3
de MIke W9MDB

  From: Rich - K1HTV 
 To: g4...@classdesign.com; WSJT  
 Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 2:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Disabling "Enable TX" only works with "TX1"
   
  
Bill,   OK, so the key to starting with the TX2 message is to double click on 
the round bullet to the left of TX1 until the message text is greyed out. Then 
when I click on the CQing station's call, the TX1 message is skipped and the 
TX2 message is transmitted...got it. 
By doing this, now when a station called does NOT come back to my call, even if 
I use the TX2 message, the red "Enable Tx" button goes grey and my further 
calls to that station are stopped.
Thanks.
BTW, I've been reading the WSJT - Revision 7960: guide at:
/branches/wsjtx/doc/user_guide/en
But I haven't yet found where all of the various shortcut keys are defined.
73,Rich - K1HTV
= = =
Hi Rich,

how are you selecting Tx2 to reply to a CQ call? If you are doing so by 
clicking the buttons next to it then WSJT-X will assume you know what 
you are doing and are already in a QSO. To use Tx2 to reply to CQ or QRZ 
calls you can double-click either of the buttons next to the Tx1 message 
to disable it, it will be greyed out to show that and Tx2 will be 
automatically used to reply to make initial calls to stations when you 
double click a decode.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

 --
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


   --
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Disabling "Enable TX" only works with "TX1"

2017-07-27 Thread Rich - K1HTV 
 

Bill,

   OK, so the key to starting with the TX2 message is to double click on the 
round bullet to the left of TX1 until the message text is greyed out. Then when 
I click on the CQing station's call, the TX1 message is skipped and the TX2 
message is transmitted...got it.


By doing this, now when a station called does NOT come back to my call, even if 
I use the TX2 message, the red "Enable Tx" button goes grey and my further 
calls to that station are stopped.


Thanks.


BTW, I've been reading the WSJT - Revision 7960: guide at:


/branches/wsjtx/doc/user_guide/en

But I haven't yet found where all of the various shortcut keys are defined.


73,

Rich - K1HTV


= = =


Hi Rich,

how are you selecting Tx2 to reply to a CQ call? If you are doing so by
clicking the buttons next to it then WSJT-X will assume you know what
you are doing and are already in a QSO. To use Tx2 to reply to CQ or QRZ
calls you can double-click either of the buttons next to the Tx1 message
to disable it, it will be greyed out to show that and Tx2 will be
automatically used to reply to make initial calls to stations when you
double click a decode.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread Gary McDuffie 

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 2:53 AM, st...@vk6ir.com wrote:
> 
> When I give RR73 to the other station, their auto sequence goes wrong and I 
> get given a signal report again.

It’s likely that the other station is running older software that doesn’t know 
what to do with the RR73 when they get it.

You have to wait for the general population to all get the later versions of 
software before things can work the way you want.

Gary - AG0N
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] r7959 - Lookup function possible problem

2017-07-27 Thread Bill Somerville 

On 27/07/2017 13:57, K5GZR - Rick wrote:


Lookup of DX Grid works as designed if I double click on a line in 
Band Activity…. Finds the call in CALL3.TXT and displays the 6 digit 
grid.  It also works as expected if the call is not in CALL3.TXT…It 
displays the 4 digit grid from the message in the DX Grid box.


However, if I type a call in the DX Call box and click Lookup – it 
appears that the lookup is not operating as it used to.  DX Grid, Az 
and path length are not being updated with the information from 
CALL3.TXT.  Whatever values are in there from a previous call are left 
there, unchanged.


If I clear out the DX Grid box and then click on Lookup, the 
information from CALL3.TXT is displayed as expected.



Hi Rick,

it is hard to see how this can be improved. WSJT-X does not know if the 
data in the grid box is entered from a QSO or left over from a prior 
lookup or QSO. The rule being applied is that if the first 4-digits of 
the displayed grid match the first 4-digits of the grid in CALL3.TXT or 
the grid entry is empty then the grid can be extended to 6-digits 
automatically.


I would not want to overwrite data that came from your QSO partner on 
air with a potentially different location from CALL3.TXT.


I suggest you clear the DX grid field manually or clear both DX Call and 
DX grid between QSOs using the F4 keyboard shortcut (there is a settings 
option to do that automatically on logging).


Although more complicated, perhaps a CTRL+click on "Lookup" could be 
used to clear and then lookup the grid for the current DX Call. In that 
case I would revert the new behaviour for normal lookups from r7959.


73
Bill
G4WJS.

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] r7959 - Lookup function possible problem

2017-07-27 Thread K5GZR - Rick 
Windows 10

R7959

 

Lookup of DX Grid works as designed if I double click on a line in Band
Activity.. Finds the call in CALL3.TXT and displays the 6 digit grid.  It
also works as expected if the call is not in CALL3.TXT.It displays the 4
digit grid from the message in the DX Grid box.

However, if I type a call in the DX Call box and click Lookup - it appears
that the lookup is not operating as it used to.  DX Grid, Az and path length
are not being updated with the information from CALL3.TXT.  Whatever values
are in there from a previous call are left there, unchanged.

If I clear out the DX Grid box and then click on Lookup, the information
from CALL3.TXT is displayed as expected.

 

Thanks,

Rick - K5GZR

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] DecodedText color patch

2017-07-27 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
This patch adds the DecodedText color setting to the Settings/Color tab so you 
can set the background color. of decoded messages.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ll0fb0wvjpi8sg/color.patch?dl=1

de Mike W9MDB--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread dgb 

VK6IR and I both running same version, r7959 and the RR73 worked fine

73 Dwight NS9I


On 7/27/2017 4:06 AM, Erik - wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

My observations in r7959, but it is a (super) work in progress so it 
will change:


RR73 is ignored as you found, Dwight. Perhaps both sides have to be 
using versions that have it implemented?


In selecting RR73 for TX4 in Panel 1, my TX5 (CQ DX EI4KF) gets 
over-written by ab1cde EI4KF 73.


In Panel 2, which I use, double-clicking the TX4 equivalent (RRR) 
doesn’t change it to RR73.


Erik EI4KF.

*From:*dgb [mailto:n...@bayland.net]
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 08:52
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you? When I tried it on 
r7956 everybody just kept coming back to me with a repeat of the 
signal report ... it wasn't decoding correctly at the other end. 
Trying r7959 now.


73 Dwight NS9I

On 7/27/2017 3:35 AM, Wolfgang wrote:

Hello Steve,

double click on 'TX4' will relieve you from your attack! ;-)

73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW


Thursday, July 27, 2017, 9:24:39 AM, you wrote:

*> I must be having a stupid attack !!

> I have just complied the above version, and from other posts I
have read, I
> think it should have a RR73 option.

> I cannot find anywhere to choose this option! Am I missing
something?

> Steve
> VK6IR


*--
Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge
communication!
Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen Kommunikation!



--

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most

engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot




___

wsjt-devel mailing list

wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net


https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread dgb 

Yes same here on r7959 - T U 73 Dwight NS9I


On 7/27/2017 4:01 AM, Wolfgang wrote:

Hello Dwight,

r7959 - same here.

But Bill mentioned in a message that they working on it.

73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW


Thursday, July 27, 2017, 10:52:05 AM, you wrote:


Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you? When I tried
it on r7956 everybody just kept coming back to me with a
repeat of the signal report ... it wasn't decoding correctly
at the other end. Trying r7959 now.
73 Dwight NS9I


--
Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge communication!
Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen Kommunikation!


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel




--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread Erik - 
My observations in r7959, but it is a (super) work in progress so it will 
change:

RR73 is ignored as you found, Dwight. Perhaps both sides have to be using 
versions that have it implemented?

In selecting RR73 for TX4 in Panel 1, my TX5 (CQ DX EI4KF) gets over-written by 
ab1cde EI4KF 73.

In Panel 2, which I use, double-clicking the TX4 equivalent (RRR) doesn't 
change it to RR73.


Erik EI4KF.

From: dgb [mailto:n...@bayland.net]
Sent: 27 July 2017 08:52
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959


Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you? When I tried it on r7956 
everybody just kept coming back to me with a repeat of the signal report ... it 
wasn't decoding correctly at the other end. Trying r7959 now.

73 Dwight NS9I

On 7/27/2017 3:35 AM, Wolfgang wrote:
Hello Steve,

double click on 'TX4' will relieve you from your attack! ;-)

73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW


Thursday, July 27, 2017, 9:24:39 AM, you wrote:

> I must be having a stupid attack !!

> I have just complied the above version, and from other posts I have read, I
> think it should have a RR73 option.

> I cannot find anywhere to choose this option! Am I missing something?

> Steve
> VK6IR


--
Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge communication!
Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen Kommunikation!



--

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most

engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot




___

wsjt-devel mailing list

wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread Wolfgang 
Hello Dwight,

r7959 - same here.

But Bill mentioned in a message that they working on it.

73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW


Thursday, July 27, 2017, 10:52:05 AM, you wrote:

> Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you? When I tried
> it on r7956 everybody just kept coming back to me with a
> repeat of the signal report ... it wasn't decoding correctly
> at the other end. Trying r7959 now.

> 73 Dwight NS9I


--
Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge communication!
Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen Kommunikation!


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread Wolfgang 
Title: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959


Hello Steve,

double click on 'TX4' will relieve you from your attack! ;-)

73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW


Thursday, July 27, 2017, 9:24:39 AM, you wrote:

> I must be having a stupid attack !!

> I have just complied the above version, and from other posts I have read, I
> think it should have a RR73 option.

> I cannot find anywhere to choose this option! Am I missing something?

> Steve
> VK6IR 


--
Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge communication!
Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen Kommunikation!


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959

2017-07-27 Thread steve 

I must be having a stupid attack !!

I have just complied the above version, and from other posts I have read, I 
think it should have a RR73 option.


I cannot find anywhere to choose this option! Am I missing something?

Steve
VK6IR 



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel