Re: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO
> There would be no challenge for you as an OPERATOR! There’s no real challenge in double clicking callsigns. > Robot FT8 is not Ham Radio Arguably, from the operator’s perspective, experimentation in software is more in the spirit of ham radio than double clicking callsigns. Just my view. On 14 Jun 2018, 06:03 +0100, Michael Aust , wrote: > Pat, > > I agree > > Robot FT8 is not Ham Radio > > I rather see real operators at each end and there using skill in chasing DX > rather than making a Robot > FT8 station > > The thrill of working of 6meter DX real to real operator mode is the way to > go at least for me ( West Coast USA to Africa/Europe ) > > We do not need to change the FT8 frequencies into a 24Hour Beacon Service > with hundred’s of Robot FT8 stations > > 73 Mike > > > On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:39 PM, patrick hamel wrote: > > > > If you have the skills you could develop the software you describe, but > > then what good would it do when your "robot" has worked everyone in the > > world? > > There were CW robots years ago but nobody worked them. > > There would be no challenge for you as an OPERATOR! > > How big would your QSL printing and mailing bill be? > > Would the mailman ever deliver or just tell you to come get your ^%$#@! out > > of the building or the river? > > There is a saying "Because we can does not mean we should". > > If you have the code written, re-purpose it as an "On The Beach" (movie) > > doomsday beacon. > > 73, > > Pat W5THT > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michele via wsjt-devel" > > To: "WSJT software development" > > Cc: "Michele" > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 4:05:15 PM > > Subject: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO > > > > Hello, > > I'm an OM from Italy. > > Can I develop a software that allows make QSO automatically? > > > > 73 > > > > -- > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > ___ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > -- > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > ___ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO
Hi all Already been done by sv5dkl his station has worked in excess of 13,500 stations since last July he has posted a howto on youtube. I cannot see the point in a robot station or understand how people cannot click for themselves and feel the need for autoseq on which makes the whole operation only 2 clicks away from a robot station anyway. I have completely stopped playing with FT8 and now pick off the few jt65/jt9 stations that are about. Regards G7OED Richard -Original Message- From: DM2CYN Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 7:14 AM To: Michele via wsjt-devel Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO Michele, interesting topic! Go on and let us know your results! Vy 73 Leo Am 13.06.2018 um 23:05 schrieb Michele via wsjt-devel: Hello, I'm an OM from Italy. Can I develop a software that allows make QSO automatically? 73 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO
I must say that I'm getting awfully tired of the bashing of a fine operating mode that requires a lot more operator sophistication than those who have never used it assume. I'm a pretty good CW op (starting in 1955), but I also concentrate on station building, understanding propagation, and the other aspects that contribute to a successful QSO. Ragchewing bores me to tears. There are good reasons for the degree of automation that WSJT-X provides for modes with short turnaround times. But a successful QSO includes knowing where to point the antenna, when to be working what distant QTH, knowing when propagation can make it possible, picking an operating frequency within the waterfall. My computer didn't make the QSO -- me, my radio, and my antennas made the QSO! I mostly use WSJT modes for QSOs I can't make another way -- mostly 6M and 160M, mostly E-skip, meteor scatter, and some tropo. About two months ago, I managed a QSO with 5A1AL in Libya running barefoot with a compromise antenna; my neighbor W6GJB and I had been chasing him for three years. Libya is TOUGH from the west coast of the US. I think we worked him on 17M or 20M. I chase grids on 6M (only), and have found both JT65 and FT8 a huge help. There are thousands of SSB ops living in rare grids who never learned CW, but they can run FT8 and give me a QSO with 20 dB better noise immunity than SSB! And there's another HUGE issue -- most of us are surrounded by homes, each of which, including our own, are filled with noise sources that cover all but the strongest signals. K1JT's modes have given hams with these limitations a chance to do ham radio. I'm a genuine old fart, first licensed in 1955. I try to learn something new every day, and in the spirit of ham radio, try to share what I've learned with others. I suggest that the bashers adopt these objectives. 73, Jim K9YC On 6/14/2018 12:53 AM, Tom M0LTE wrote: > There would be no challenge for you as an OPERATOR! There’s no real challenge in double clicking callsigns. > Robot FT8 is not Ham Radio Arguably, from the operator’s perspective, experimentation in software is more in the spirit of ham radio than double clicking callsigns. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO
Seems to me that the original post was that of an internet troll. Probably best to move on. 73 Conrad PA5Y On 2018-06-14 09:55, Jim Brown wrote: I must say that I'm getting awfully tired of the bashing of a fine operating mode that requires a lot more operator sophistication than those who have never used it assume. I'm a pretty good CW op (starting in 1955), but I also concentrate on station building, understanding propagation, and the other aspects that contribute to a successful QSO. Ragchewing bores me to tears. There are good reasons for the degree of automation that WSJT-X provides for modes with short turnaround times. But a successful QSO includes knowing where to point the antenna, when to be working what distant QTH, knowing when propagation can make it possible, picking an operating frequency within the waterfall. My computer didn't make the QSO -- me, my radio, and my antennas made the QSO! I mostly use WSJT modes for QSOs I can't make another way -- mostly 6M and 160M, mostly E-skip, meteor scatter, and some tropo. About two months ago, I managed a QSO with 5A1AL in Libya running barefoot with a compromise antenna; my neighbor W6GJB and I had been chasing him for three years. Libya is TOUGH from the west coast of the US. I think we worked him on 17M or 20M. I chase grids on 6M (only), and have found both JT65 and FT8 a huge help. There are thousands of SSB ops living in rare grids who never learned CW, but they can run FT8 and give me a QSO with 20 dB better noise immunity than SSB! And there's another HUGE issue -- most of us are surrounded by homes, each of which, including our own, are filled with noise sources that cover all but the strongest signals. K1JT's modes have given hams with these limitations a chance to do ham radio. I'm a genuine old fart, first licensed in 1955. I try to learn something new every day, and in the spirit of ham radio, try to share what I've learned with others. I suggest that the bashers adopt these objectives. 73, Jim K9YC On 6/14/2018 12:53 AM, Tom M0LTE wrote: > There would be no challenge for you as an OPERATOR! There’s no real challenge in double clicking callsigns. > Robot FT8 is not Ham Radio Arguably, from the operator’s perspective, experimentation in software is more in the spirit of ham radio than double clicking callsigns. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Field Day mod
Joe (and the group), Jim Wilson, AC8NT, suggested a Field Day mod was bandied about several months ago. Jim says he knows you and worked on some code for you. Jim is the president of our local club (PCARS). Can you suggest an article/doc/link/etc for the mod? Or, a different forum? 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Three extra bits are available
Joe, I would hope that the enhanced 75-bit message structure will allow for the Tx3 and Tx4 messages to contain all of the 0-9 and A-Z characters. This would allow FT8 to be used in a number of other operating events & contests such as State QSO parties and Field Day exercises. Can we assume that WSJT-X would NOT include the capability of inserting an incrementing contest number? If that is the case, there needs to be a way for an operator who has a station answering his CQ, to quickly insert of the contest exchange in the Tx3 message. It would be helpful if WSJT-X could insert a fixed string variable such as 3A MDC for Field day, a 2 character State abbreviation, or a 3 or 4 character county abbreviation. This should be followed by a space, with the cursor placed after the space. This would allow for the user to quickly type in any additional data, such as a contest number, after it. The station answering a CQ would have a little more time to insert any additional contest data, such as a contest number, after the fixed format part of the contest exchange in standard Tx4 message. If things are too tight, the space could be eliminated. If the above capability could be added, FT8 could be incorporated in many worldwide contest events. 73, Rich - K1HTV = = = On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Joe Taylormailto:j...@princeton.edu >wrote: > Hi Palle (and other VHF+ contest enthusiasts in IARU Regioin 1), > > Thanks for the suggestions you posted to wsjt-devel concerning VHF+ > contest exchanges in EU. > > I have been sketching out some possible enhanced 75-bit message > structures for FT8 mode aimed (among other things) at supporting your Region > 1 contests. > > I would appreciate your comments on the following model contest QSO > structure based roughly on common HF contest practices: > > 1. CQ G4ABC IO91 > 2.G4ABC PA9XYZ JO22 > 3. PA9XYZ 590003 IO91NP > 4.G4ABC R 570007 JO22DB > 5. PA9XYZ G4ABC RR73 > > The 4-character locators in messages 1 and 2 are redundant (and anyway > optional). But they cost nothing to include, and they do provide some useful > initial information. > > The first two digits of the exchanges in messages 3 and 4 are an "RS" > signal report. Because of the strong forward error correction in FT8, the > first digit will always be "5". The second digit would be the FT8 S/N > reading mapped onto a S1 to S9 scale, using 6 dB per S unit. Something like > S1=-24, S2=-18, ... S9=+24 dB. > > Is this an acceptable format for your Region 1 contest exchanges? Do you > think FT8 might be a popular mode for some use in EU VHF+ contests? > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Automatization QSO
It's already been done many different ways. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 6/14/2018 1:14 AM, DM2CYN wrote: Michele, interesting topic! Go on and let us know your results! Vy 73 Leo Am 13.06.2018 um 23:05 schrieb Michele via wsjt-devel: Hello, I'm an OM from Italy. Can I develop a software that allows make QSO automatically? 73 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Use of FT8 in a VHF rover - observations
Hi Ria, Thanks for reporting on your experience using FT8 as a Rover during the VHF QSO Party. We will be working on better solutions for the "/R" and contest-mode issues. -- 73, Joe, K1JT On 6/13/2018 11:35 PM, rjai...@gmail.com wrote: This weekend I was part of rover team K2EZ/R. Andrea basically let me run 6 meters and she handled 2 meters and up. I found that in general, if I used the callsign K2EZ/R it worked fairly well except when more than one caller responds. In that case I had to manually sequence and put the other station’s call in, and generate a reply message for them. Rover rules require us to use /R or /ROVER. 2 meters didn’t have a frequency defined in the software but 144.174 seemed to be popular. So it worked out fairly well. 73 Ria, N2RJ -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Field Day mod
Joe (and the group), Jim Wilson, AC8NT, suggested a Field Day mod was bandied about several months ago. Jim says he knows you and worked on some code for you. Jim is the president of our local club (PCARS). Can you suggest an article/doc/link/etc for the mod? Or, a different forum? 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day mod
Hi Gene, On 6/14/2018 9:54 AM, Gene Marsh wrote: Joe (and the group), Jim Wilson, AC8NT, suggested a Field Day mod was bandied about several months ago. Jim says he knows you and worked on some code for you. Jim is the president of our local club (PCARS). Can you suggest an article/doc/link/etc for the mod? Or, a different forum? 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op There's not much I can add to what has been emphasized a number of times here and on other WSJT user forums. The structured JT-style messages in modes supported by WSJT-X are designed for making minimal QSOs exchanging signal reports, locators, and not much else. You can send FD message exchanges as free text (max 13 characters), but not with auto-sequencing capabilities and other operational conveniences. Not really recommended. More useful message formats and procedures for contests, etc., might be built into a future version of WSJT-X. No good for this year's Field Day, however. -- Joe, K1JT -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Field Day and Other Message Mod's
It seems to me that changing the operation of the “tab 1” message list might go a long way towards accommodating the non-standard messaging wanted for Field Day and other situations - and probably enhance current functionality. I would suggest: 1) Allow a “free form” field to be inserted in the Tx messages. The field could be delineated by brackets (which would not transmitted), for instance, and could be placed anywhere within the message. 2) Relabel the “next” selection targets to “do” targets and re-function so that selected messages are those that are transmitted (top to bottom sequence as now), while un-seleceted ones are skipped. The associated “tx message #” fields would adjust to show the appropriate sequence number with un-selected showing “skipped”. 3) A size (or available character space) indicator should be shown somewhere with the message so that one could see whether message changes do not exceed tx capability without having to count. This could be a number to indicate remaining/available character space or just an entry limit (you can not enter anything more after the limit). Actually, suggestion 3 would be good regardless of whether any other changes were made. Al Pawlowski, K6AVP Los Osos, CA USA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?
On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the extended outage, reorganization is complete. 73 Bill G4WJS. Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses wsjtx-superbuild and it does not find the script: svn: E17: URL 'svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx-superbuild' doesn't exist Any ideas? 73 Barry G4MKT (Maintainer for Mageia) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?
On 14/06/2018 21:38, Barry Jackson wrote: On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the extended outage, reorganization is complete. 73 Bill G4WJS. Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses wsjtx-superbuild and it does not find the script: svn: E17: URL 'svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx-superbuild' doesn't exist Any ideas? 73 Barry G4MKT (Maintainer for Mageia) Hi Barry, we are moving to git, part of that involved reorganizing the svn repo. Each project now has a top level directory in the repo with a trunk and optionally a branches and tags directory alongside. So the wsjtx-superbuild location has moved to svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild/trunk if you have it checked out then you can relocate it by simply typing: svn switch ^/wsjtx-superbuild/trunk from within the workspace. 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:05 PM Barry Jackson wrote: > On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: > > > the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the > > extended outage, reorganization is complete. > > > > Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses > wsjtx-superbuild and it does not find the script: > > svn: E17: URL > 'svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx-superbuild' doesn't > exist > > Any ideas? > I frequently have off-and-on issues with SF SVN It's usually transient. 73, Richard KF5OIM -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Subprocess Error: Subprocess failed with exit code 2
Same as always. Please let me know how I can assist. Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\WSJT-X -t C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X At line 81 of file C:\Users\bill\src\wsjt-svn\lib\decoder.f90 (unit = 19) Fortran runtime error: Cannot open file 'C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X/houndcallers.txt': No such file or directory -- Steve Sacco NN4X Narcoossee, FL EL98jh -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day Mod
You are invited to our Facebook group - FT8 for Field Day https://www.facebook.com/groups/163063787693492/ We have 2 work-around solutions for doing FT8 on Field Day. One is a very clever one that uses N1MM plus a script. Our final test before FD is this Saturday at 1800z for 30 minutes on 14090 KHz. Tim N6GP | | Virus-free. www.avast.com | -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Subprocess Error: Subprocess failed with exit code 2
Maybe your antivirus is getting in the way?Can you put an exclusion on the directory? de Mike W9MDBH On Thursday, June 14, 2018, 4:54:13 PM CDT, Steve Sacco NN4X wrote: Same as always. Please let me know how I can assist. Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\WSJT-X -t C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X At line 81 of file C:\Users\bill\src\wsjt-svn\lib\decoder.f90 (unit = 19) Fortran runtime error: Cannot open file 'C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X/houndcallers.txt': No such file or directory -- Steve Sacco NN4X Narcoossee, FL EL98jh -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Using the WSJT-X Superbuild CMake script (was: Re: SVN repository failure?)
On 14/06/2018 22:25, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Barry, we are moving to git, part of that involved reorganizing the svn repo. Each project now has a top level directory in the repo with a trunk and optionally a branches and tags directory alongside. So the wsjtx-superbuild location has moved to svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild/trunk if you have it checked out then you can relocate it by simply typing: svn switch ^/wsjtx-superbuild/trunk from within the workspace. Hi Barry and other users of the wsjtx-superbuild CMake project, I have updated wsjtx-superbuild script to use the new WSJT-X git repository on SourceForge. The updated wsjtx-superbuild project is also hosted in a git repository in the WSJT SourceForge project. The project is here: https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild/ci/master/tree/ and you can make a read-only clone using git as follows: git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild The CMake script itself has been somewhat simplified, it still takes a single configuration argument of WSJTX_TAG but the value is now simply the WSJT-X tag name. If this argument is omitted then the stable branch will be built, the stable branch is the nearest equivalent of the old svn development trunk. Building a source tarball from other branches is not currently supported. So for example to make a source tarball of WSJT-X v1.9.1, e.g. for use on a distribution build server, you might do the following: mkdir ~/wsjtx-superbuild cd ~/wsjtx-superbuild git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild src mkdir build cd build cmake -D WSJTX_TAG=wsjtx-1.9.1 ../src cmake --build . --target source From then on the generated tarball and the instructions printed by the above CMake build should be followed. 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
