Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-20 Thread Bruce
Your right Bill, wasn't thinking straight, another senior moment.

73 DE VK2RT Bruce
Sent from my SAMSUNG Galaxy S7 edge on the Telstra Mobile Network
 Original message From: Bill Somerville  
Date: 20/7/17  8:20 pm  (GMT+10:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the
  audio slider 
On 20/07/2017 02:50, Bruce wrote:
> It would be more convienent if that slider actually did adjust the 
> audio level.

Hi Bruce,

how would you propose that a slider adjust the audio level?

73
Bill
G4WJS.


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-20 Thread Bill Somerville

On 20/07/2017 02:50, Bruce wrote:
It would be more convienent if that slider actually did adjust the 
audio level.


Hi Bruce,

how would you propose that a slider adjust the audio level?

73
Bill
G4WJS.


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Bruce
Why, if there are level settings for both graphical displays on the graphical 
display dialog would a level setting on the main WSJT-X dialog be necessary? It 
would be more convienent if that slider actually did adjust the audio level.

73 DE VK2RT Bruce
Sent from my SAMSUNG Galaxy S7 edge on the Telstra Mobile Network
 Original message From: Gary McDuffie  Date: 
20/7/17  7:37 am  (GMT+10:00) To: Black Michael , WSJT 
software development  Subject: Re: 
[wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the
  audio slider 

> On Jul 19, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hmmm...some feedback from those that still want it on the main screen would 
> be nice.

On the menu for me, Mike.

Gary - AG0N
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Gary McDuffie

> On Jul 19, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hmmm...some feedback from those that still want it on the main screen would 
> be nice.

On the menu for me, Mike.

Gary - AG0N
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Joe Taylor

Enough, already, about the audio level slider!!

Those who read the manual knew what it was for.

It confused many others, and it was responsible for a large number of 
emails to two reflectors and direct to me.


Its function was mildly useful, but redundant.

It will soon be history.

-- Joe, K1JT

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
There is no free space created by removing the slider.  The CAT widget is still 
there.  Though maybe we could do a color code on the freq display to show if 
it's working (e.g. red text if it's not since red background means OOB right 
now).
Seems like a lot of angst for a control that doesn't do much and will be used 
by a relatively small crowd.
But before moving any further need to cross the hurdle with Joe and Bill about 
whether to keep it at all.
There seems to be a resistance to "options" but I'm a big fan of giving 
operators easy-to-use controls for the way they operate and several have 
expressed a desire for easy graph level control from the main window.
Qt's layout facility is a PITAI wish it was just drag'n'drop.  I don't work 
with it enough so have to muddle through how to even move a widget...break 
layout...move...recreate layout...but layout doesn't work anymorearrghhh...
de Mike W9MDB

  From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net>
 To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio 
slider
   
 
 
 On 20/07/2017 6:30 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
  
 I agree the placement is misleading...but there really isn't a better place to 
put it without some judicious rearranging. Would need to figure out what to do 
with the CAT indicator for example. Or maybe sticking it under the Date/Time 
might work. Just not a lot of room to work with. 
  de Mike W9MDB 
 
 What about relocating it horizontally right (to the left of the TX messages 
Tab control). The DX Call and associated controls could relocate to the left 
filling the now free space left by the slider, and the free space they create 
to their right could be taken up by the slider.
 
 de Laurie VK3AMA
     
 --
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


   --
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread David Tiller
Michael,

It doesn't have to remain a gigantic slider - it could be a simple dB spinbox 
like the other controls on the graph window. That would actually free up space 
on the main window where all the real fun happens.
--
David Tiller
Sr. Architect/Lead Consultant | CapTech
(804) 304-0638 | 
dtil...@captechconsulting.com<mailto:dtil...@captechconsulting.com>



On Jul 19, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> 
wrote:

I agree the placement is misleading...but there really isn't a better place to 
put it without some judicious rearranging.
Would need to figure out what to do with the CAT indicator for example.
Or maybe sticking it under the Date/Time might work.
Just not a lot of room to work with.

de Mike W9MDB




From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net<mailto:vk3a...@vkdxer.net>>
To: WSJT software development 
mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:22 PM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

Having the slider immediately adjacent to the level indicator,
regardless of its true function, implies to an uneducated user (hasn't
read the manual or understood group postings) that the two are
associated. It is how most GUIs are presented.

A problem I see all too often, is some users experiencing difficulties
or think there is a defect with their software will post their
questions/findings to non-related Internet forums, QRZ and eHam are the
big ones, looking for answers and support. They don't post to the
correct support group/forum. I see this often with WSJT-X, JTAlert and
JTDX. The usual result is an incorrect or incomplete answer from a user
based on their experience or the perception of how the software works,
often wrong. It is not uncommon to see a long running thread of
exchanges between users exchanging (and reinforcing) the misinformation.
Unless someone comes along and corrects the record, this misinformation
tends to be propagated through Internet searches and word-of-mouth.

None of us like our software being incorrectly maligned due to
misinformation.

IMHO, leaving the slider adjacent to the level meter will lead to an
ongoing public perception among some users that the software is broken.
Especially after a General Release (look at the numerous threads posted
since the 1.8.0-rc1 was posted, people don't read or research old
messages). New users encountering these uncorrected public defect
reports via an Internet search will likely perceive there is a problem
with the software.

That's my 2cents.

de Laurie VK3AMA



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org<http://Slashdot.org>! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org<http://Slashdot.org>! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA



On 20/07/2017 6:30 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
I agree the placement is misleading...but there really isn't a better 
place to put it without some judicious rearranging.

Would need to figure out what to do with the CAT indicator for example.
Or maybe sticking it under the Date/Time might work.
Just not a lot of room to work with.

de Mike W9MDB


What about relocating it horizontally right (to the left of the TX 
messages Tab control). The DX Call and associated controls could 
relocate to the left filling the now free space left by the slider, and 
the free space they create to their right could be taken up by the slider.


de Laurie VK3AMA

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Hmmm...some feedback from those that still want it on the main screen would be 
nice.
de Mike W9MDB

  From: David Tiller 
 To: Black Michael ; WSJT software development 
 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio 
slider
   
Michael,
It doesn't have to remain a gigantic slider - it could be a simple dB spinbox 
like the other controls on the graph window. That would actually free up space 
on the main window where all the real fun happens.
--David TillerSr. Architect/Lead Consultant | CapTech(804) 304-0638 | 
dtil...@captechconsulting.com


On Jul 19, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
 wrote:

I agree the placement is misleading...but there really isn't a better place to 
put it without some judicious rearranging.Would need to figure out what to do 
with the CAT indicator for example.Or maybe sticking it under the Date/Time 
might work.Just not a lot of room to work with.
de Mike W9MDB


From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net>
To: WSJT software development 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:22 PM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

Having the slider immediately adjacent to the level indicator,
regardless of its true function, implies to an uneducated user (hasn't
read the manual or understood group postings) that the two are
associated. It is how most GUIs are presented.

A problem I see all too often, is some users experiencing difficulties
or think there is a defect with their software will post their
questions/findings to non-related Internet forums, QRZ and eHam are the
big ones, looking for answers and support. They don't post to the
correct support group/forum. I see this often with WSJT-X, JTAlert and
JTDX. The usual result is an incorrect or incomplete answer from a user
based on their experience or the perception of how the software works,
often wrong. It is not uncommon to see a long running thread of
exchanges between users exchanging (and reinforcing) the misinformation.
Unless someone comes along and corrects the record, this misinformation
tends to be propagated through Internet searches and word-of-mouth.

None of us like our software being incorrectly maligned due to 
misinformation.

IMHO, leaving the slider adjacent to the level meter will lead to an
ongoing public perception among some users that the software is broken.
Especially after a General Release (look at the numerous threads posted
since the 1.8.0-rc1 was posted, people don't read or research old
messages). New users encountering these uncorrected public defect
reports via an Internet search will likely perceive there is a problem
with the software.

That's my 2cents.

de Laurie VK3AMA



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel




   --
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
I agree the placement is misleading...but there really isn't a better place to 
put it without some judicious rearranging.Would need to figure out what to do 
with the CAT indicator for example.Or maybe sticking it under the Date/Time 
might work.Just not a lot of room to work with.
de Mike W9MDB


  From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net>
 To: WSJT software development  
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:22 PM
 Subject: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio 
slider
   
Having the slider immediately adjacent to the level indicator, 
regardless of its true function, implies to an uneducated user (hasn't 
read the manual or understood group postings) that the two are 
associated. It is how most GUIs are presented.

A problem I see all too often, is some users experiencing difficulties 
or think there is a defect with their software will post their 
questions/findings to non-related Internet forums, QRZ and eHam are the 
big ones, looking for answers and support. They don't post to the 
correct support group/forum. I see this often with WSJT-X, JTAlert and 
JTDX. The usual result is an incorrect or incomplete answer from a user 
based on their experience or the perception of how the software works, 
often wrong. It is not uncommon to see a long running thread of 
exchanges between users exchanging (and reinforcing) the misinformation. 
Unless someone comes along and corrects the record, this misinformation 
tends to be propagated through Internet searches and word-of-mouth.

None of us like our software being incorrectly maligned due to 
misinformation.

IMHO, leaving the slider adjacent to the level meter will lead to an 
ongoing public perception among some users that the software is broken. 
Especially after a General Release (look at the numerous threads posted 
since the 1.8.0-rc1 was posted, people don't read or research old 
messages). New users encountering these uncorrected public defect 
reports via an Internet search will likely perceive there is a problem 
with the software.

That's my 2cents.

de Laurie VK3AMA



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


   --
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


[wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider

2017-07-19 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA
Having the slider immediately adjacent to the level indicator, 
regardless of its true function, implies to an uneducated user (hasn't 
read the manual or understood group postings) that the two are 
associated. It is how most GUIs are presented.


A problem I see all too often, is some users experiencing difficulties 
or think there is a defect with their software will post their 
questions/findings to non-related Internet forums, QRZ and eHam are the 
big ones, looking for answers and support. They don't post to the 
correct support group/forum. I see this often with WSJT-X, JTAlert and 
JTDX. The usual result is an incorrect or incomplete answer from a user 
based on their experience or the perception of how the software works, 
often wrong. It is not uncommon to see a long running thread of 
exchanges between users exchanging (and reinforcing) the misinformation. 
Unless someone comes along and corrects the record, this misinformation 
tends to be propagated through Internet searches and word-of-mouth.


None of us like our software being incorrectly maligned due to 
misinformation.


IMHO, leaving the slider adjacent to the level meter will lead to an 
ongoing public perception among some users that the software is broken. 
Especially after a General Release (look at the numerous threads posted 
since the 1.8.0-rc1 was posted, people don't read or research old 
messages). New users encountering these uncorrected public defect 
reports via an Internet search will likely perceive there is a problem 
with the software.


That's my 2cents.

de Laurie VK3AMA



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel