Re: [Xenomai] How to fix error "incompatible ABI revision levels on Ubuntu Linux 3.6.38 on ARM?
Hi Gilles and Xenomai-ers I have downloaded the Xenomai-2.6 the latest one, prepared the kernel and built the kernel. The kernel works as it can be loaded. Next, I have installed xenomai-runtime but I can install only the xenomai-run-time version numbered 2.5.5.2 - both Ubuntu Natty (11.04) and Precise (12.04) have the same 2.5.5.2 I wonder from where I can apt-get install the xenomai-runtime 2.6.0.x to match my kernel. I am trying to avoid xcompiling Xenomai. Pls advise. Thanks! On 6/23/12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/23/2012 01:25 PM, AKS wrote: >> Hi Gilles >> >> Thanks for the reply. Does that latest and greatest Xenomai 2.6 support >> ARM? > > Yes, ARM is supported and actively maintained. > > -- > Gilles. > ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
Re: [Xenomai] ARM, exception #0 ?
On 06/26/2012 03:23 PM, George Pontis wrote: > Running Xenomai 2.6.0 on an ARM at91sam9g45. I recently updated from Adeos > patch adeos-ipipe-3.0.13-arm-1.18-05 to adeos-ipipe-3.0.13-arm-1.18-09. Then > built a new kernel and gave it to the application developers for a test. > There were other changes in the root FS and a few tweaks in the kernel, but > none that looked (to me) like they would affect Xenomai. They report this > new error: > >> Xenomai: Switching ADC Task to secondary mode after exception #0 from >> user-space at 0x0fbc (pid 723) > > And then nothing about the app works any more. What does this mean ? It means there is a fault, when the PC is around 0x0fbc, that is in the tsc emulation kernel helper. Could you try reverting this commit ? http://git.xenomai.org/?p=ipipe-gch.git;a=commitdiff;h=b79850f3fbd541215d75c1352ad2a4f4d0e8583d;hp=610c6878b23c67daef286f947c59e60f7a204922 -- Gilles. ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
[Xenomai] ARM, exception #0 ?
Running Xenomai 2.6.0 on an ARM at91sam9g45. I recently updated from Adeos patch adeos-ipipe-3.0.13-arm-1.18-05 to adeos-ipipe-3.0.13-arm-1.18-09. Then built a new kernel and gave it to the application developers for a test. There were other changes in the root FS and a few tweaks in the kernel, but none that looked (to me) like they would affect Xenomai. They report this new error: > Xenomai: Switching ADC Task to secondary mode after exception #0 from > user-space at 0x0fbc (pid 723) And then nothing about the app works any more. What does this mean ? George ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
Re: [Xenomai] RT_TASK isn't needed for every program, is it?
On 06/26/2012 10:21 AM, Anisha Kaul wrote: > From what I've read here: > http://www.cs.ru.nl/lab/xenomai/exercises/ex01/Exercise-1.html > I could figure out that `RT_TASK` is a kind of real time "thread" concept. It is an id for a xenomai thread, very much like pthread_t. > > But in the cases where I don't need threads, can I simply write the > program in main() using Xenomai/RTnet API? Creating RT_TASK isn't > necessary for every program, is it? A xenomai thread is needed to access some of the xenomai services (most of them actually). By default, the main thread, when using xenomai native API is not a xenomai thread. If you want to turn the main thread into a xenomai native skin thread, you should use rt_task_shadow. xenomai sources distribution contains many examples of that. -- Gilles. ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
Re: [Xenomai] question: CONFIG_XENO_OPT_TIMING_SCHEDLAT
On 06/26/2012 01:41 PM, ali hagigat wrote: Is this kernel CONFIG_ variable indicates a minimum wait? No, expected latency. ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai -- Philippe. ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
[Xenomai] question: CONFIG_XENO_OPT_TIMING_SCHEDLAT
Is this kernel CONFIG_ variable indicates a minimum wait? ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
[Xenomai] RT_TASK isn't needed for every program, is it?
>From what I've read here: http://www.cs.ru.nl/lab/xenomai/exercises/ex01/Exercise-1.html I could figure out that `RT_TASK` is a kind of real time "thread" concept. But in the cases where I don't need threads, can I simply write the program in main() using Xenomai/RTnet API? Creating RT_TASK isn't necessary for every program, is it? -- Anisha Kaul ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
