[XeTeX] \include File
Hello,
I want to keep all the \label{x.x.x} things in one TeX file and want to load
and run but do not want it to print to the PDF file.
Once I load the file then I can use \nameref to call a particular item.
Thanks for your help
Anant
\documentclass[fleqn,12pt,a4paper]{article} % normal
\usepackage{fontspec,xltxtra,xunicode}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{hyperref}
%\usepackage{fontenc}
%\usepackage{microtype}
%\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage{cmll}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{pifont}
\usepackage{amstext, amsmath}
%\setmainfont[Script=Devanagari]{Sanskrit2003}
\begin{document}
\section{Enter you equation here 8.1.1} \label{8.1.1}
\section{Enter new equation Here 6.1.85} \label{8.1.2}
$ \mbox{Roots}\xrightarrow{\mbox {\scriptsize{\nameref{8.1.1
\mbox{Intermediate form} \xrightarrow{\mbox {\scriptsize{\nameref{8.1.2
\mbox{Final word} $ \\
\end{document}
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Arrows with Text
Hello Ross,
thanks for your prompt reply
\text{} \mbox{}
these two did the trick, now I have a question can I change the thickness of
line that gets created using \xrightarrow{}
if I can't then thats ok
-Anant
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au wrote:
Hello Anant,
Sent from my iPad
On 21/11/2010, at 3:40 AM, A u akupadhyay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to create a text on top of a arrow as shown in this example
http://www.stack.nl/%7Ejwk/latex/examples/node6.html
http://www.stack.nl/~jwk/latex/examples/node6.htmlhttp://www.stack.nl/%7Ejwk/latex/examples/node6.html
However I want to use Unicode (i.e Sanskrit, Hindi text) or Sanskrit2003
font.
Did you try it?
Put your labels inside an \hbox , \mbox , or \text and it should just work.
Another approach would be to use Xy-pic, via \usepackage{xy} .
Then you can draw arrows in any direction and place text labels above,
below or along the arrow. The possibilities are endless. (Actually, I'm not
sure how well some of the more advanced features will work with XeTeX. That
would be good to explore.)
I would appreciate your help
regards
Anant
Hope this helps,
Ross
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenated, transliterated Sanskrit.
Im glad to here that there is finaly some implementation of roman transliteration in the sanskrit hyphenation pattern. Keep up the good work! While I was checking hyphen-sa.tex, I wondered two things (which are irrelevant to Dominik's problem): 1) I saw that that all diacritics used for IAST appear in the pattern, while some of them (for example ṛ and ṝ) are marked as non standart transliteration. That is OK, insofar as IAST is not a standart in the official sense. But IAST is most commonly used and the standart transliteration of vocalic r in IAST is ṛ, not r̥. The latter belongs to the international standart transliteration of Indic scripts, defined as ISO 15919. So if ISO 15919 has to be taken into concern for the Sanskrit hyphenation pattern, it should be done so completly. Which means, that for example ṁ should also be added, and ṃ marked as non standart transliteration, and so on. But I don't know how far one can go here. While IAST is meant exclusivly for Sanskrit-transliteration (I know that it's used for Pali also, but in a slightly different way), ISO 15919 contains far more diacritics, than are needed for the transliteration of Sanskrit. It's rather meant as a transliteration of many or most Indian languages. Should it be duplicated then in every hyphenation pattern of every language in question? 2) That might be a stupid question, but aren't hyphennation patterns for most Abugida-scripts more or less the same? That means the hyphennation is rather script dependend, than language dependend. Lots of hyphennation patterns have to be duplicated, if they are ordered by language. While one could have a hyphen-indic.tex instead. Have a nice weekend! Manuel 2010/11/21 Dominik Wujastyk wujas...@gmail.com: That's extremely helpful! Thank you, Arthur. I've upped the first argument of hyphenmins to 2, which helps a lot for romanisation, but may make the Nagari breaks more difficult. I suppose it's not reasonable to assume that hyphenation parameters will be the same across different scripts. Best, Dominik On 20 November 2010 22:12, Arthur Reutenauer arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote: I'm really not sure what I'm getting as a result. It looks as if it's roman script being hyphenated as if it were Devanagari. The initial a- of several words, like arhasi, gets separated (a-rhasi), which might just about look okay in Nagari, but not in romanisation. Am I actually getting the right thing You're indeed getting what the patterns say. From what I read in hyph-sa.tex, the patterns allow breaks after any vowel (but not inside diphthongs), and forbids them before final consonants or consonant clusters; and that's about it. It's certainly a debatable choice, but it does seem like the patterns really aim at mimicking the way (say) Sanskrit written using Devanagari is hyphenated. You would have to take this up with Yves. Why do I have to pretend that this is Devanagari (\devanagarifont)? This is by design in polyglossia (see gloss-sanskrit.ldf). You would have to take this up with François. (And I'm the one responsible for integrating hyph-sa.tex into hyph-utf8. Why does it seem like there is a French mafia around Sanskrit support in XeTeX? ;-) Arthur -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
[XeTeX] Problems with ArabXeTex
Dear list members, For the critical edition of an Arabic manuscript I'm using ArabXeTex. I encountered several problems with this package: 1. I would like to use the nonvoc option, but the 'mansuub'-endings aN schould appear with the two fathas. How can I do this? 2. Another problem seems to be the hamza-writing after an alif at the end of the word. Here, there schould appear only two fathas without the supplementary alif in fullvoc-mode, in nonvoc-mode only the hamza. Did anyone experience problems with the contextual analysis of hamza already? 3. I'm using the Scheherazade-Font. Is it possible to set some words in boldface? How can I do this? 4. The critical edition should begin with a front page. For this, I would like to use another font. How can I change Arabic fonts in one document? Does anyone know a free thuluth-Font for Mac? 5. Would it be possible to begin the Arabic text at the end of the document (thus, using the normal direction of Arabic books) and simultaneously the German text at the beginning? I'm sorry for all these questions. Thank's a lot in advance for your help! Best wishes, Christopher Braun ___ Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: https://produkte.web.de/go/demail02 -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Error with Delicious font
On 2010-11-19 22:09, Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 17.11.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Pander: XeLaTeX has a problem with Delicious font Just as Herb I can't reproduce your problem. Maybe I was doing things incorrectly, since I first installed the the traditional font variants and added then the heavy and small caps variants, the only thing I don't like is that xdvipdfmx reports so many missing MAP file fragments. Mac OS X 10.5.8, PPC hardware, 32 bit. Maybe it's an Ubuntu thing. Most probably it is a bug in XeLaTeX on Ubuntu, since XeLaTeX on Mac OSX is fine working also LuaLaTeX in working. BTW, otfinfo, part of TeX Live, reports the font names as: Delicious-Variant. -- Greetings Pete You can learn many things from children. How much patience you have, for instance. – Franklin P. Jones -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Problems with ArabXeTex
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:45:12AM -0500, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote: Christopher Braun wrote: 3. I'm using the Scheherazade-Font. Is it possible to set some words in boldface? How can I do this? For this, maybe you could look at fontspec's FakeBold option. I can't vouch for the desirability, but here's an example: You don't need fontspec for this. It's internat XeTeX' feature that can be used just with plain XeTeX. P.T. -- Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Problems with ArabXeTex
Christopher Braun wrote:
3. I'm using the Scheherazade-Font. Is it possible to set some words in
boldface? How can I do this?
For this, maybe you could look at fontspec's FakeBold option. I can't
vouch for the desirability, but here's an example:
%%% This for the preamble ...
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setdefaultlanguage{german} % or whatever
\setotherlanguage{arabic}
\newfontfamily\arabicfont[Script=Arabic,Scale=1.4]{Scheherazade}
%%% This for the document %%%
\textarabic{السلم عليك يا مريم}
\textarabic{\fontspec[FakeBold=4,Script=Arabic,Scale=1.4]{Scheherazade}السلم
عليك يا مريم}
I used FakeBold=4 since, at least to me, anything less is hardly
noticeable in Arabic script.
5. Would it be possible to begin the Arabic text at the end of the document
(thus, using the normal direction of Arabic books) and simultaneously the German
text at the beginning?
I've not done anything like this myself, but you could complete both
docs separately, then join them using the pdfpages package (within the
world of TeX) or pdftk, pdflab, etc. for other resources.
HTH.
--
United in adoration of Jesus,
fr. michael gilmary, mma
Most Holy Trinity Monastery
67 Dugway Road
Petersham, MA 01366-9725
www.MaroniteMonks.org
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenated, transliterated Sanskrit.
Le 21 nov. 2010 à 10:12, Yves Codet a écrit :
Dominik, I think you can write \sanskritfont, can’t you?
I just tried this:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setdefaultlanguage{sanskrit}
\newfontfamily\sanskritfont{Charis SIL}
\textwidth=0.5cm
\begin{document}
\noindent
manum ekāgram āsīnam abhigamya maharṣayaḥ |
\end{document}
It worked by me, with Polyglossia v1.2.0a.
Best wishes,
Yves
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
[XeTeX] Problems with ArabXeTex
Dear list members,For the critical edition of an Arabic manuscript I'm using ArabXeTex. I encountered several problems with this package:1. I would like to use the nonvoc option, but the 'mansuub'-endings aN schould appear with the two fathas. How can I do this?2. Another problem seems to be the hamza-writing after an alif at the end of the word. Here, there schould appear only two fathas without the supplementary alif in fullvoc-mode, in nonvoc-mode only the hamza. Did anyone experience problems with the contextual analysis of hamza already?3. I'm using the Scheherazade-Font. Is it possible to set some words in boldface? How can I do this? 4. The critical edition should begin with a front page. For this, I would like to use another font. How can I change Arabic fonts in one document? Does anyone know a free thuluth-Font for Mac?5. Would it be possible to begin the Arabic text at the end of the document (thus, using the normal direction of Arabic books) and simultaneously the German text at the beginning?I'm sorry for all these questions. Thank's a lot in advance for your help!Best wishes,Christopher BraunNeu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: https://produkte.web.de/go/demail02 -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenated, transliterated Sanskrit.
Hello. Le 20 nov. 2010 à 22:12, Arthur Reutenauer a écrit : I'm really not sure what I'm getting as a result. It looks as if it's roman script being hyphenated as if it were Devanagari. The initial a- of several words, like arhasi, gets separated (a-rhasi), which might just about look okay in Nagari, but not in romanisation. Am I actually getting the right thing You're indeed getting what the patterns say. From what I read in hyph-sa.tex, the patterns allow breaks after any vowel (but not inside diphthongs), and forbids them before final consonants or consonant clusters; and that's about it. It's certainly a debatable choice, but it does seem like the patterns really aim at mimicking the way (say) Sanskrit written using Devanagari is hyphenated. You would have to take this up with Yves. Debatable, I'm not sure :) Gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum. Personally I don't mind breaks such as a-rhasi. I know many prefer ar-hasi, but there are some books where you would find a-rhasi. On page 189 of Gray's edition of Vāsavadattā (Delhi, 1962), for instance, I can see: ...nirmu-kta..., ...ku-ṭṭimam. So, for a start, I did exactly what Arthur described, I chose the easy way. But I can add rules allowing a break after the first consonant of a consonant cluster. If there are rules such as: a1 ... r3h you should get ar-hasi rather than a-rhasi without having to modify hyphenmins. Why do I have to pretend that this is Devanagari (\devanagarifont)? This is by design in polyglossia (see gloss-sanskrit.ldf). You would have to take this up with François. (And I'm the one responsible for integrating hyph-sa.tex into hyph-utf8. Why does it seem like there is a French mafia around Sanskrit support in XeTeX? ;-) :) Dominik, I think you can write \sanskritfont, can’t you? Best wishes, Yves -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenated, transliterated Sanskrit.
That's extremely helpful! Thank you, Arthur. I've upped the first argument of hyphenmins to 2, which helps a lot for romanisation, but may make the Nagari breaks more difficult. I suppose it's not reasonable to assume that hyphenation parameters will be the same across different scripts. Best, Dominik On 20 November 2010 22:12, Arthur Reutenauer arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote: I'm really not sure what I'm getting as a result. It looks as if it's roman script being hyphenated as if it were Devanagari. The initial a- of several words, like arhasi, gets separated (a-rhasi), which might just about look okay in Nagari, but not in romanisation. Am I actually getting the right thing You're indeed getting what the patterns say. From what I read in hyph-sa.tex, the patterns allow breaks after any vowel (but not inside diphthongs), and forbids them before final consonants or consonant clusters; and that's about it. It's certainly a debatable choice, but it does seem like the patterns really aim at mimicking the way (say) Sanskrit written using Devanagari is hyphenated. You would have to take this up with Yves. Why do I have to pretend that this is Devanagari (\devanagarifont)? This is by design in polyglossia (see gloss-sanskrit.ldf). You would have to take this up with François. (And I'm the one responsible for integrating hyph-sa.tex into hyph-utf8. Why does it seem like there is a French mafia around Sanskrit support in XeTeX? ;-) Arthur -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
